62 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN- 2014-9 Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 26 August 2009 Beijing, China.
Advertisements

60 Draft Policy ARIN Remove Web Hosting Policy.
Draft Policy Clarifying Requirements for IPv4 Transfers.
Improving 8.4 Anti-Flip Language. Problem Statement Current policy prevents an organization that receives BLOCK A in the previous 12 months from.
1 Draft Policy Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy Original Authors: Chris Grundeman, Martin Hannigan, Jason Schiller AC Shepherds: Bill Darte,
Recommended Draft Policy Section 8.4 Inter-RIR Transfer of ASNs.
Advisory Council Shepherds: Scott Leibrand & Stacy Hughes Remove Single Aggregate requirement from Specified Transfer.
60 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Anti-hijack Policy.
ARIN Clarifying Requirements for IPv4 Transfers Dan Alexander- Primary Shepherd David Farmer- Secondary Shepherd.
Customer Confidentiality Draft Policy Origin (Proposal 95)9 June 2009 Draft Policy (successfully petitioned) 2 February 2010 Aaron Wendel has.
Policy Implementation and Experience Report Leslie Nobile.
Protecting Number Resources Draft Policy Advisory Council Shepherds: Marc Crandall Scott Leibrand.
Policy Experience Report Richard Jimmerson. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
ARIN Update Aaron Hughes ARIN Board of Trustees Focus Increased focus on customer service – Based on feedback and survey Continued IPv4 to IPv6.
Draft Policy ARIN Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements.
ARIN Update Aaron Hughes ARIN Board of Trustees Focus IPv4 Depletion & IPv6 Adoption Working through ARIN’s IPv4 Countdown Plan – At final stage.
1 Madison, Wisconsin 9 September14. 2 ARIN’s Policy Development Process Current Number Resource Policy Discussions and How to Participate John Springer.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Out of Region Use.
Policy Experience Report Leslie Nobile. The PDP Cycle Need Discuss Consensus Implement Evaluate
Draft Policy Revising Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size.
Simplified M&A transfer policy Draft Policy
ARIN Update Aaron Hughes ARIN Board of Trustees Focus Increased focus on customer service – Based on feedback and survey Continued IPv4 to IPv6.
ARIN Section 4.10 Austerity Policy Update.
PROP Leif Sawyer. Draft Policy ARIN Eliminating Needs-based Evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 Netblocks Author:
ARIN Modify section 8.2 to better reflect how ARIN handles reorganizations.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Remove Operational Reverse DNS Text.
Draft Policy Transfers & Multi-National Networks Kevin Blumberg.
Advisory Council Shepherds: Marc Crandall & Scott Leibrand Combined M&A and Specified Transfers.
1 ARIN’s Policy Development Process Current Number Resource Policy Discussions and How to Participate Dan Alexander ARIN Advisory Council.
Policy Implementation & Experience Report Leslie Nobile.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Remove Web Hosting Policy.
Draft Policy IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement.
Draft Policy Allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space to Out-of-region Requestors 59.
Draft Policy Protecting Number Resources 1.History including origin & shepherds 2.Summary 3.Status at other RIRs 4.Staff/legal assessment 5.PPML.
Draft Policy IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement.
1 Orlando, FL February 24, ARIN’s Policy Development Process Current Number Resource Policy Discussions and How to Participate Heather Schiller.
Waiting List For Unmet IPv4 Requests Draft Policy
ARIN Allow Inter-RIR ASN Transfers. Problem Statement We already allow transfer of ASNs within the ARIN region. Recently APNIC implemented a policy.
Draft Policy Return to 12 Month Supply and Reset Trigger to /8 in Free Pool.
Draft Policy Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy 1.History including origin & shepherds 2.Summary 3.Status at other RIRs 4.Staff/legal assessment.
Draft Policy ARIN Modify 8.4 (Inter-RIR Transfers to Specified Recipients) Authors: David Huberman and Tina Morris AC Shepherds: Cathy Aronson and.
Rework of IPv6 Assignment Criteria Draft Policy
Draft Policy Aligning 8.2 and 8.3 Transfer Policy.
Draft Policy IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement.
ARIN Anti-hijack Policy. Context Proposal prompted by presentation at NANOG 60 “Understanding IPv6 Internet Background Radiation” With an LOA.
Draft Policy ARIN Modify 8.4 (Inter-RIR Transfers to Specified Recipients) Presented by Chris Tacit.
Allocation of IPv4 Blocks to Regional Internet Registries (Global Proposal) Draft Policy
Draft Policy Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers.
Recommended Draft Policy RIR Principles 59.
60 Draft Policy ARIN Improving 8.4 Anti-Flip Language.
60 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Reduce All Minimum Allocation/Assignment Units to /24.
ARIN Leif Sawyer. Draft Policy ARIN Eliminating Needs-based Evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 Netblocks Author:
60 Draft Policy ARIN NRPM 4 (IPv4) Policy Cleanup.
Draft Policy ARIN Christian Tacit. Problem statement Organizations that obtain a 24 month supply of IP addresses via the transfer market and then.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN
59 Draft Policy Allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space to Out-of-region Requestors.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN David Farmer
2011-4: Reserved Pool for Critical Infrastructure
Draft Policy ARIN Amy Potter
Required Resource Reviews
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Post-IPv4-Free-Pool-Depletion Transfer Policy Staff Introduction.
IPv6 Subsequent Allocation
Draft Policy ARIN Cathy Aronson
Draft Policy Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Change timeframes for IPv4 requests to 24 months Tina Morris.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Eliminate HD-Ratio from NRPM
Recommended Draft Policy Section 8
Permitted Uses of space reserved under NRPM 4.10
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Modify 8
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Transfers for new entrants
Presentation transcript:

62 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements

History 1.Origin: ARIN-prop-199 from January AC Shepherds: Heather Schiller, Scott Leibrand 3.Presented at the PPC at NANOG 60 4.AC accepted as a Draft Policy in March 5.Presented at ARIN 33 6.Revised in May 7.Presented at the PPC at NANOG 61 8.AC advanced this to Recommended Draft Policy in July 9.Text Online & in Discussion Guide

3 Staff Understanding – This proposal would revise NRPM 8.2 “Mergers and Acquisitions” by removing aggregation and reclamation of resources as methods to restore compliance with current policy.

4 Staff Comments 1.Removing the aggregation terminology from the policy is appropriate given the retirement of the aggregation policy language elsewhere in the NRPM. 2.Removing the reclamation terminology from the policy may encourage more people to complete 8.2 transfers because the reclamation aspect is no longer part of the policy. 3.The problem statement does not specify which version and date of the RSA. This is a reconciliation issue between policy and RSA and therefore staff interprets this proposal as pertaining to current RSA version 11.0 ( ) [section 6].

5 Legal Assessment – This proposal does not appear to pose any material legal issues.

6 Presentation by the AC

Draft Policy ARIN Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements

Problem Statement 8.2 transfer policy has utilization requirements at the time of the review of the transfer request. The RSA section 6 expressly forbids ARIN from de-registering blocks (in whole or in part) due to under-utilization or no-justification during transfer requests. This is a direct conflict. ARIN Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements8

What this solves 1.WHOIS Accuracy - Some M&A resource transfers never complete once ARIN starts asking about utilization. Organizations who may not have full historical documentation may be concerned ARIN will force return of resources, so WHOIS never gets updated to reflect the fact the recipient is using the IPs. 2.NRPM 8.2 Conflict with RSA - The RSA prohibits ARIN from forcibly taking away space when the signer is in compliance with the other terms and conditions of the contract. 3.Removes defunct reference to “aggregating” space, which was in the just-removed sections 4.6 and 4.7. ARIN Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements9

Proposed Solution There was support on PPML and at the PPM to remove the words ‘aggregate’ and ‘reclaim’. Based on that feedback the proposed change to 8.2 reads: "In the event that number resources of the combined organizations are no longer justified under ARIN policy at the time ARIN becomes aware of the transaction, through a transfer request or otherwise, ARIN will work with the resource holder(s) to return, aggregate, or transfer, or reclaim resources as needed to restore compliance via the processes outlined in current ARIN policy." 10ARIN Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements

What Stays Unchanged Mergers and Acquisitions ARIN will consider requests for the transfer of number resources in the case of mergers, acquisitions, and reorganizations under the following conditions: ● The new entity must provide evidence that they have acquired assets that use the resources to be transferred from the current registrant. ARIN will maintain an up-to-date list of acceptable types of documentation. ● The current registrant must not be involved in any dispute as to the status of the resources to be transferred. ● The new entity must sign an RSA covering all resources to be transferred. ● The resources to be transferred will be subject to ARIN policies. ● The minimum transfer size is the smaller of the original allocation size or the applicable minimum allocation size in current policy. 11ARIN Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements

History Presented and discussed at PPM in April and PPC in June. No PPML comments on this proposal since April. ARIN Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements12

Discussion ● Do you support this recommended draft policy as written? ● If you are opposed, what concerns do you have? Do you have any other suggestions for how to handle this? 13ARIN Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements