The Legal Edge: Solving Today’s Construction Problems Texas Housing Conference July 28-30, 2014 Hilton Hotel Austin, TX.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A GIA is a contract between a surety company and a contractor (or subcontractor)/principal. A GIA is a standard, typical document in the construction.
Advertisements

Insurance Provisions Acquisition of
THE ROLE OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS WITHIN AN ORGANIZATION By Aaron Hardiman, MBA, ARM.
CONTRACTS: To Sign Or Not To Sign. What is a Contract? >A contract is an agreement between two or more parties which creates an obligation to do, or not.
© 2012 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC CONTRACT ESSENTIALS Diane M. Tokarsky Chair, Construction Law 100 Pine Street, PO Box 1166 Harrisburg, PA
1 CONTRACT RISK MANAGEMENT: Strategies and Tactics J. Scott Hommer, III Venable LLP 8010 Towers Crescent Drive, Suite 300 Vienna, Virginia (703)
1. Among the most important advisors to a construction firm are: –Professional surety bond producer –Knowledgeable construction/surety attorney –Construction-oriented.
A LITIGATOR’S ADVICE ON LITIGATION AVOIDANCE Alan N. Greenspan Jackson Walker LLP © 2004 by Alan N. Greenspan. All rights reserved.
Waiver of Liability. Purpose The main intent of the Waiver of Liability statement is to highlight the very small yet real risk that volunteer activities.
Pension Fund Trustees Liability Ncedi Mbongwe. Introduction to Camargue Underwriting Managers Established in 2001 Underwriters: Mutual and Federal and.
CARLIN LAW GROUP, APC (619) Know Your Indemnity Obligation Know Your Risk Know Your Insurance Company by KEVIN R. CARLIN, ESQ.
©2008 Perkins Coie LLP Game Industry Roundtable Privacy Developments for the Game Industry Thomas C. Bell September 24, 2008.
1 INDEMNITY AND CONTRACT CLAUSES JANUARY 18, 2013 CFMA – Sacramento Chapter J. Scott Alexander Ken Schumaker Murphy Austin Adams Schoenfeld LLP 304 “S”
An Overview of the Changing Indemnity Laws and Effective Use of Scaffold Use Agreements to Protect Against Liability.
Dem Texas Society of Professional Engineers TSPE Conference & 78 th Annual Meeting June 26, 2014 Indemnification: Hold Harmless in Defense Presented By:
Contractual Liability For Schools… Making Smart Choices and Finding the Negotiator Within Presented by Jessica K. Walls, Esq. Isaac, Brant, Ledman & Teetor.
Contract Negotiation Thomas E. Walsh, Ph.D. Director, Sponsored Research & Compliance, University of Florida Research Administration Training Series November.
Service Sector Contracting Malcolm Mackay, Partner, Litigation, Brodies LLP Eve Brazier, Contracts Specialist, Oil & Gas, Brodies LLP.
CONTRACTS: Before You Sign a University Contract...
Design Lease Contracting for Services IT/Security Medical IGA Special Events Providing Services.
Law I Chapter 18.
“In the vast area of legal jurisprudence, there are undoubtedly many instances where being the first, or only, jurisdiction to grant rights to persons.
Burnslev.com © 2013 Burns & Levinson LLP Allocating and Mitigating Contractual Risk ACC – NE Corporate Counsel Institute June 12, 2013 Alan M. Block, John.
The Islamic University of Gaza Engineering Faculty
9-1 General Requirements - Enforceable Contract 1.Offer and acceptance 2.Consideration 3.Legal object 4.Competent parties 5.Legal form.
Duty to Defend Often linked with Indemnification Duty to defend kicks in when event occurs Who controls defense 0.
The Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 (Vic) made simple Western Suburbs Law Association Tuesday 4 June 2013 Michael Heaton.
Construction Contracts What You Need to Know March 19, 2015.
Middleware Promises Warranties that Don’t Indemnities that Won’t Stephen Rubin, Esquire
Contract Review.  1. The final step in the vendor contracting process should be getting the vendor’s standard written contract and signing the contract.
Hüseyin Arslan, LLM Legal Counsel ERGO Turkey. Hüseyin Arslan, LLM. “Insurance Arbitration [Turkish Practice]”  Insurance litigation in Turkey has long.
The Legal Edge: Solving Today’s Construction Problems Texas Housing Conference July 28-30, 2014 Hilton Hotel Austin, TX.
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW RELATING TO ‘CONSEQUENTIAL LOSS’ Anthony Jucha 30 March 2010.
Local Government Forum, 15 September 2010 Tender Negotiations, Indemnity and Exclusion of Liability Kathryn Walker Senior Associate (08)
1 CONTRACT LANGUAGE CONVENTION 2004 Concerns of Precast Manufacturers Presented by: HAGEN LAMBERT & TRAVIS FOX.
The Constitution and Dispute Resolution OBE 118, Section10, Fall, 2004 Professor McKinsey Recommended Chapter Three review problems beginning on page 136.
1 Indemnifications from Joint Powers Agencies and their Members before the Joint Powers Agency Subcommittee of the Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Presented by David P. Schack, Partner June 29, 2006 Insurance Coverage For Multi- State Investigations: Can You Get Your Insurer to Pay for.
Contract Bond Forms What to Look For and What Might be Missing Presented by Steve Nelson EVP & General Counsel SureTec Insurance Company 1.
Sheri Swain, Director of Enterprise Risk Management Maricopa County Community College District Christine Nobles, Insurance Manager Maricopa County.
Indian Partnership Act 1932 Definition Sec 4 – “Partnership is the relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of business carried.
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 12Slide 1 Settlements - In General A settlement is an agreement by both parties to resolve the dispute through compromise.
Highway to Hell or Strawberry Fields Forever Identifying and Dealing with Avoidable Project Risk.
Why Bond Forms Matter… A Practical Guide to Better Bonding Presenters: Joanne S. Brooks, Esq., Vice President and Counsel, The Surety and Fidelity Association.
TERMINATION IN COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS PRESENTED BY : PICHARN SUKPARANGSEE at the Conference on “Negotiating, Drafting & Managing Commercial Contracts 2016”
27-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
P.R.I.M.E. Finance Panel of Recognized International Market Experts in Finance The role of experts in complex financial cases: DIFC Court case study (Al.
When Common Law Isn’t So Common Drafting Enforceable Agreements in Other Jurisdictions Speakers: Sara A. Biro, Former Senior European Counsel, Fitch Ratings.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
The Legal Edge: Solving Today’s Construction Problems Texas Housing Conference July 28-30, 2014 Hilton Hotel Austin, TX.
© Hendrick, Phillips, Salzman & Flatt, P.C. – March 8, 2016 What Roofing Contractors Should Look Out For and Include in Contracts and Warranties March.
HOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTEREST IN A SALE CONTRACT Focus on what you “get” when you sign!
TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Chapter 18. TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Under criminal law, wrongs committed are called crimes. Under civil law, wrongs committed are called.
(Private) Auto Subrogation in Canada. Private Auto Insurance Provinces: – Alberta, Ontario, P.E.I., New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland Territories.
Presented by: Tommy Mays, Legal Counsel Baptist Health Medical Center Health Contracting 101.
Christopher M. McNeill Indemnification—Real Life Stories from the Trenches.
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
INDEMNITY The University of Texas System Office of General Counsel Dana Hollingsworth, Attorney.
Four Ways Suppliers Limit Their Risk Contractually
Indemnification.
Contracts A contract is an agreement between two or more parties which creates an obligation to do or not to do a particular thing. The document containing.
What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Understanding Selected Key Provisions of Construction Contracts © Copyright 2017 NASBP.
Indemnification 101 February 24, 2017
Troublesome Contract Clauses College of Liberal Arts
Lecture 28 Intellectual Property(Cont’d)
DEALINGS WITH CONTRACTS AND INDEMNIFICATIONS
What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Understanding General Agreements of Indemnity © Copyright 2017 NASBP.
Presented by: Richard F. King, CPA, CCIFP Schlouch incorporated
Speaker: Sarah Chambers, Esq. Claims Counsel| Professional Liability
Find the Problems with the Provisions May 11, 2016 Presented By:
Presentation transcript:

The Legal Edge: Solving Today’s Construction Problems Texas Housing Conference July 28-30, 2014 Hilton Hotel Austin, TX

Presenters Moderator Bobby Bowling, Tropicana Homes Panel Members Vijay D'Cruz, Locke Lord Joe Davis, Husch Blackwell Chris Ryman, Coats | Rose

Presented to: The Texas Affiliation of Affordable Housing Providers Five Key Construction Contract Clauses (among others) Chris E. Ryman Coats, Rose, Yale, Ryman, & Lee, P.C.

“LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND WAIVER OF CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES: IN NO EVENT SHALL THE CONTRACTOR’S LIABILITY TO THE SUBCONTRACTOR EXCEED THE FAIR VALUE OF THE SUBCONTRACTOR’S SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS SUBCONTRACT … CONTRACTOR AND ITS AFFILIATES SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY TO SUBCONTRACTOR FOR SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES … For purposes of this Subcontract, the term “Consequential Damages” shall mean special, indirect, incidental, or consequential losses or damages, including but not limited to the loss of profits or revenues, the loss or restricted use of property rights, the incurring of financing costs, or any other loss or damage not constituting direct damages deemed by law to be within the contemplation of the parties to this Subcontract at the time it becomes effective.” (abbreviated version) 1. Limitation of Liability/ Consequential Damages Waiver

Key points: –Texas court might enforce if conspicuous & specific/ right language used –Sometimes a “save the company” clause: may severely limit liability/ protect against more remote (“consequential”) money damages 1. Limitation of Liability/ Consequential Damages Waiver

“The Contractor shall receive no financial compensation for delay or hindrance of the Work. In no event shall the Owner be liable to the Contactor or any Subcontractor or Supplier, any other person or any surety for or any employee or agent of any of them, for any damages arising out of or associated with any delay or hindrance to the Work, regardless of the source of the delay or hindrance, including events of Force Majeure, AND EVEN IF SUCH DELAY OR HINDRANCE RESULTS FROM, ARISES OUT OF OR IS DUE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, TO THE NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF CONTRACT OR OTHER FAULT OF THE OWNER. The Contractor's sole remedy in any such case shall be an extension of time.” 2. “No-damages-for-delay” clause

Key points: –GC might only be entitled to time extension; critical in delay cases –Note: enforced by Houston court but currently on appeal to Texas Supreme Court 2. “No-damages-for-delay” clause

“THE SUBCONTRACTOR AGREES TO WAIVE THE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY FOR ANY DISPUTE ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THE PROJECT, THE SUBCONTRACT WORK, THE SUBCONTRACT, OR THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The parties shall first, as an express condition precedent, attempt to resolve such disputes by negotiations between their senior executives, … and, if no resolution is then achieved, submission of the dispute to non-binding mediation as soon as possible and within thirty (30) days after the parties mutually agree upon a mediator. … If the parties cannot resolve the dispute by mediation, the Contractor, at its sole discretion, may elect to litigate the dispute in a court of competent jurisdiction or have the matter decided in arbitration...such appointed arbitrator to be a licensed Texas attorney with at least ten (10) years of construction contract dispute experience… The arbitration award shall be rendered in writing, must include an award of all or substantially all attorney’s fees and costs to the prevailing party…The Subcontractor agrees no such controversy or dispute – including but not limited to mediation or arbitration proceedings – shall interfere with the continuation and progress of the Subcontract Work….” (abbreviated version) 3. Dispute Resolution

Key points: –Jury waiver (key for GCs; not as much for owners) –Meeting between officers/ mediation, trying to avoid attorney’s fees –GC’s right to choose arbitration or resolution in court –Arbitrator is qualified & must award attorney’s fees –Sub must continue working despite dispute 3. Dispute Resolution

“The Contractor’s contract with the Owner, the plans and specifications, the bid documents (all of which are expressly incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein) and this Subcontract, shall be interpreted to be consistent with one another, and any irreconcilable conflict between the two, or any patent or latent ambiguity, shall be interpreted to require that which is most beneficial to the Contractor.” 4. “Flow down” clause/ consistency

Key points: –GC’s obligations to owner “flow down” to sub –Consistency between documents/ favorable to GC 4. “Flow down” clause/ consistency

A.EXCEPT WITH RESPECT TO CLAIMS RELATING TO BODILY INJURY OR DEATH OF AN EMPLOYEE AS DEFINED IN SUBPARAGRAPH 8.3 B. BELOW, SUBCONTRACTOR AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, AND HOLD HARMLESS CONTRACTOR, ALONG WITH ITS PARENTS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATED COMPANIES AND PARTNERS AND THEIR OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, MANAGERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES, AND ANY PARTIES REQUIRED TO BE INDEMNIFIED BY CONTRACTOR UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS (COLLECTIVELY THE “INDEMNIFIED PARTIES” OR INDIVIDUALLY AN “INDEMNIFIED PARTY”) FROM ALL CLAIMS, SUITS, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES – INCLUDING ATTORNEY’S FEES AND EXPENSES OF LITIGATION – INVOLVING ECONOMIC LOSS, PERSONAL INJURY, PROPERTY DAMAGE OR WRONGFUL DEATH (“CLAIMS) THAT ACTUALLY OR ALLEGEDLY ARISE OUT OF OR ARE CONNECTED WITH SUBCONTRACTOR’S WORK OR ITS PRESENCE OR THE PRESENCE ANY OF SUBCONTRACTOR’S SUBCONTRACTORS ON THE PROJECT. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, THIS INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS PROVISION SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE EXTENT THAT IT REQUIRES SUBCONTRACTOR TO INDEMNIFY AN INDEMNIFIED PARTY AGAINST A CLAIM CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENCE OR FAULT, THE BREACH OR VIOLATION OF A STATUTE, ORDINANCE, GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION, STANDARD, OR RULE, OR THE BREACH OF CONTRACT OF THE INDEMNIFIED PARTY, ITS AGENT OR EMPLOYEE, OR ANY THIRD PARTY UNDER THE CONTROL OR SUPERVISION OF THE INDEMNIFIED PARTY, OTHER THAN SUBCONTRACTOR OR ITS AGENT, EMPLOYEE OR SUBCONTRACTOR OF ANY TIER. 5. Indemnification

B. INDEMNITY FOR EMPLOYEE CLAIMS: SUBCONTRACTOR AGREES TO AND SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS (COLLECTIVELY “INDEMNIFY”) CONTRACTOR AND OWNER, AND ANY OTHER PARTIES REQUIRED TO BE INDEMNIFIED BY CONTRACTOR UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THEIR REPRESENTATIVES, PARTNERS, MEMBERS, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, INVITEES OR LICENSEES (COLLECTIVELY THE “INDEMNIFIED PARTIES” OR INDIVIDUALLY AN “INDEMNIFIED PARTY”) FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, LOSSES, DAMAGES, DEMANDS, INJURIES, JUDGEMENTS, CAUSES OF ACTION, SUITS, AND LIABILITY OF EVERY KIND, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS AND ATTORNEY’S FEES (COLLECTIVELY “CLAIMS”), FOR BODILY INJURY OR DEATH OF ANY EMPLOYEE OF SUBCONTRACTOR, ITS AGENTS, OR ITS SUBCONTRACTORS OF ANY TIER (COLLECTIVELY “EMPLOYEE” FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS SECTION), ACTUALLY OR ALLEGEDLY OCCASIONED BY, CONTRIBUTED TO OR ARISING OUT OF, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, THE SUBCONTRACT WORK, THE PERFORMANCE OF THE SUBCONTRACT WORK OR THIS SUBCONTRACT, OR PRESENCE AT THE PROJECT SITE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CLAIMS DUE TO NEGLIGENCE, GROSS NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF WARRANTY, BREACH OF CONTRACT, VIOLATION OF ANY STATUTE, RULE OR REGULATION OR OTHER ACT OR OMISSION BY SUBCONTRACTOR, ITS EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OF SUBCONTRACTOR OF ANY TIER, OR THEIR RESPECTIVE AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES, OR ANY OTHER PARTY FOR WHOSE ACTS SUBCONTRACTOR IS LIABLE. SUBCONTRACTOR’S OBLIGATION TO INDEMNIFY SHALL APPLY EVEN IF SUCH CLAIMS ARE ACTUALLY OR ALLEGEDLY CAUSED IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY THE ACTS, OMISSIONS, OR NEGLIGENCE OF AN INDEMNIFIED PARTY, EVEN IF SUCH NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER ACTS OR OMISSIONS ARE ACTIVE OR PASSIVE, DIRECT OR INDIRECT, SOLE, JOINT OR CONCURRENT. THIS INDEMNITY AGREEMENT IS INTENDED TO INDEMNIFY THE AFOREMENTIONED INDEMNIFIED PARTIES FROM THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR OWN NEGLIGENCE, AS PROVIDED ABOVE. 5. Indemnification

Key points: -Enforceable only if: 1.Conspicuous 2.Properly worded (claims specified: “express negligence rule”) -Cannot indemnify a party from its own negligence unless it is an employee injury claim 5. Indemnification

“Payment by the Owner to the General Contractor shall be an express condition precedent to any obligation by the General Contractor to pay the Subcontractor for the Subcontractor’s Work. The Subcontractor therefore expressly acknowledges and assumes the risk of non-payment from the Owner to the General Contractor.” 6. Pay-if-paid (“contingent payment”) clauses

Key points: –SEVERELY restricted by 2007 Legislation (except certain residential & road/ civil/ utility construction, design services) –Enforceable only if properly worded (makes clear payment by upstream party is express condition precedent/ risk is understood); A “pay-when-paid” clause will not suffice (e.g., “Contractor will pay Subcontractor within 7 days of receiving payment from Owner” ≠ pay-if-paid clause) 6. Pay-if-paid (“contingent payment”) clauses

Chris E Ryman Coats | Rose 3 E. Greenway Plaza Suite 2000 Houston, Texas (713)