Introduction to Neurobiology Lecture 13: Classical conditioning 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 31 Cerebellum Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Click to edit Master title style. Click to edit Master subtitle style.
Indiana University’s Remote Classroom Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Non-science majors learn about.
Click to edit Master subtitle style Retirement Plan Participation Analysis For Plan Sponsor Use Only July 2011.
Click to edit Master subtitle style CHROMOSOMES. Click to edit the outline text format Second Outline Level  Third Outline Level Fourth Outline Level.
Click to edit the outline text format  Second Outline Level Third Outline Level  Fourth Outline Level Fifth Outline Level Sixth Outline Level Seventh.
Dinaric region costume, Vrlika area, Croatia.. Click to edit the outline text format  Second Outline Level Third Outline Level  Fourth Outline Level.
Review Climate Change. Weather vs Climate Seasons.
Dealing with Disregulation of the Brain Neurofeedback 1.
Simple learning: Habituation and classical and operant conditioning.
Facebook Group: The group is called: Psych281 Spring08 Available only to University of Alberta network Sorry to be rude but… Please don’t add me as a friend.
Type Title Here for Tic-Tac-Toe Type names of students in group here.
Lectures 5&6: Pavlovian Conditioning (Basic Concepts & Generality)
Classical Conditioning. A. Definitions 1.Classical conditioning: learning that takes place when originally neutral stimulus comes to produce a conditioned.
Neuroscience & Behavior Program Robert J. Polewan & John W. Moore* University of Massachusetts Amherst COMPOUND CONDITIONING UNDER TEMPORAL UNCERTAINTY.
Inhibitory Pavlovian Conditioning Stimuli can become conditioned to signal the absence of a US— such learning is called Inhibitory Conditioning CS+ = excitatory.
Classical Conditioning. Associative Learning Nonassociative HabituationSensitization A single type of stimulus The relationship between two stimuli Classical.
Classical Conditioning. Learning: What does it mean to learn? Learning is the single largest area of Psychology second only to clinical psychology.
PSY 402 Theories of Learning
Jacques Wadiche, PhD Assistant Professor Neurobiology Department 1/25/08 Cerebellum.
Classical Conditioning: The Elements of Associative Learning
PSY402 Theories of Learning Wednesday January 15, 2003.
PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 3 – Nuts and Bolts of Conditioning (Mechanisms of Classical Conditioning)
Inhibitory Cerebello-Olivary Projections and Blocking Effect in Classical Conditioning J J Kim, D J Krupa, R F Thompson Science, vol. 279, (1998)
Behaviour.
Learning Ms. Simon Do Now: Define Learning. Definition Learning is a relatively permanent change in an organism’s behavior due to experience.
How do we learn?  What are the manners by which you learn as a student?
The Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis Is Critically Involved in Enhancing Associative Learning After Stressfull Experience By Debra Bangasser, Jessica.
Psychology of Learning EXP4404 Chapter 3: Pavlovian (Classical) Conditioning Dr. Steve.
Classical conditioning Forging connections between formerly unrelated events.
Version 0.1 (c) CELEST Associative Learning.
Experimental Evidence  Rats drink little saccharin water at first but increase over time.  Loud tones (110 db) produce different responses depending.
Factors Influencing Conditioning  CS and US Intensity, and Attention to the CS  Temporal relationship  Predictiveness  Preparedness  Redundancy 1.
Acquisition curve of Eyeblink CR
Learning Part I Learning Classical Conditioning
Basic Learning Processes Robert C. Kennedy, PhD University of Central Florida
Introduction to Neurobiology Lecture 13: Classical conditioning 1 Inhibitory Cerebello-Olivary Projections and Blocking Effect in Classical Conditioning.
PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 3 – Nuts and Bolts of Conditioning (Mechanisms of Classical Conditioning)
ATTRIBUTES OF LEARNING AND CLASSICAL CONDITIONING.
LEARNING: PRINCIPLES & APPLICATIONS CLASSICAL CONDITIONING.
Headline sample style Intro sample style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level o Fifth level.
Click to Add Title Click to Add Subtitle.
US location switch alone
Click to Add Title Click to Add Subtitle.
Reevaluating the Role of LTD in Cerebellar Motor Learning
Click to edit Master text styles
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Inferior Olivary TMEM16B Mediates Cerebellar Motor Learning
Click to Add Title Click to Add Subtitle.
Click to Add Title Click to Add Subtitle.
Author names here Author association names here
Click to edit Master text styles
Student #7 starts with Locker 7 and changes every seventh door
Click to edit Master text styles
Slide Title Edit Master text styles Second level Third level
ОПШТЕСТВО ТЕМА: МЕСТОТО ВО КОЕ ЖИВЕАМ Скопје
Author names here Author associations here
Aryeh Hai Taub, Rita Perets, Eilat Kahana, Rony Paz  Neuron 
Author names here Author associations here
PSY 402 Theories of Learning
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Reevaluating the Role of LTD in Cerebellar Motor Learning
Click to edit Master text styles
Lorem ipsum dolores Lorem ipsum dolores.
Stephan D. Brenowitz, Wade G. Regehr  Neuron 
Author names here Author associations here
Click to edit Master text styles
Apparatus and equipment configuration used for trace eyeblink conditioning in head-fixed mice (A), analysis of high-speed video (B), and example behavioral.
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 1996)
Classical Conditioning
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Neurobiology Lecture 13: Classical conditioning 1

Associative Learning Nonassociative HabituationSensitization A single type of stimulus The relationship between two stimuli or reward. Classical conditioning Operant conditioning Extinction Blocking

Definitions  An Unconditioned stimulus (US) is a stimulus which “naturally” elicits an (unconditioned) response (UR). For example: An airpuff to the eye is an unconditioned stimulus which elicits an eyeblink (nictitating membrane response).  A conditioned stimulus (CS) is a “neutral” stimulus (e.g. a tone), which, by being associated with the US, leads after learning to a conditioned response (CR).

Basic paradigm  Before learning,US UR CS nothing  Training:CS+US UR CS increasing CR(=UR)  Post-training:CS CR (=UR).  Temporal relationship: 1) Simultaneous 2) Delayed (partial overlap in time) 3) Trace (separated in time. Usually 200ms-2s.

The nictitating membrane response

Circuitry for conditioning nictitating membrane response

The suppression of CF during learning of eye blink. Naive animal Trained animal

US only CS-US With PTX GABA is involved in the suppression of CF.

Click to edit the outline text format Second Outline Level  Third Outline Level Fourth Outline Level  Fifth Outline Level  Sixth Outline Level  Seventh Outline Level  Eighth Outline Level  Ninth Outline LevelClick to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third level  Fourth level » Fifth level Extinction protocol with: no infusion ACSF PTX GABA is involved in the extinction of CR.

Click to edit the outline text format Second Outline Level  Third Outline Level Fourth Outline Level  Fifth Outline Level  Sixth Outline Level  Seventh Outline Level  Eighth Outline Level  Ninth Outline LevelClick to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third level  Fourth level » Fifth level  The response of trained animal to tone + puff  test sessions with: ACSF NBQX (AMPA receptor antagonist) AMPA receptors are involved in the extinction of CR.

Blocking: CS “A” is tone; CS “B” is light; US is air puff. The eyeblink response to air puff is the UR The Eyeblink response to A or B is the CR B+U S CRCR B A+B+ US CRCR A/ B A+ US A+B+ US CRCR A CRCR B // CRCR A A+ US Blocking of conditioned eyelid responses

Phase I, animals received seven daily sessions of tone-airpuff conditioning; Phase II, animals underwent five sessions of tone-light-airpuff compound conditioning. Either picrotoxin (PTX) or (ACSF) was infused directly into the inferior olive. Controls experienced only the second phase of the blocking procedure. Afterward, all animals were presented with light-airpuff pairings to assess whether conditioning to the light had accrued during compound conditioning (phase II).  Both control and PTX animals exhibited significant learning to the light CS compared with the ACSF animals - blocking did not occur in the PTX group. PTX had no effect on the performance of CRs and URs during the compound conditioning, indicating that PTX selectively affected blocking. ACSF PTX CONTROL Phase 1 phase 2 phase 3 Blocking GABA is involved in blocking of conditioned eyelid responses

Circuitry for conditioning nictitating membrane response

Wild-type: Conditioned responses (%)- 80 Average peak amplitude Average peak velocity mm/s LTD-deficient mice: Conditioned responses (%)- 30 Average peak amplitude Average peak velocity mm/s

Click to edit the outline text format Second Outline Level  Third Outline Level Fourth Outline Level  Fifth Outline Level  Sixth Outline Level  Seventh Outline Level  Eighth Outline Level  Ninth Outline LevelClick to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third level  Fourth level » Fifth level Average CS-alone responses of a wild-type animal and a L7-PKCi mutant  At T-4 (but not at T-2) the wt shows well-timed responses around the US onset time.  The response peak of the mutant doesn’t change. At T-4 (but not at T-2) there are changes between wt and the mutant. Blue- wild type Red- mutants

Click to edit the outline text format Second Outline Level  Third Outline Level Fourth Outline Level  Fifth Outline Level  Sixth Outline Level  Seventh Outline Level  Eighth Outline Level  Ninth Outline LevelClick to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third level  Fourth level » Fifth level Average CS-alone responses when the ISI is extended to 500 ms  If the timing is LTD- dependent, the amplitude and velocity in the L7-PKCi mutant should not be influenced by the length of the ISI. indeed, the mutants ’ peak amplitude and peak velocity weren ’ t changed. In contrast, those wt values were changed. Blue- wild type Red- mutants

Red - pre-lesion Blue – post-lesion Green - post-sham lesion Mutants wt (After T-4) Conditioned responses still occur after lesions of the cerebellum in both mutants and wt, but the amplitudes were significantly reduced.

Click to edit the outline text format Second Outline Level  Third Outline Level Fourth Outline Level  Fifth Outline Level  Sixth Outline Level  Seventh Outline Level  Eighth Outline Level  Ninth Outline LevelClick to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third level  Fourth level » Fifth level Blocking neuronal activity in cerebellar output  Superior cerebellar peduncle blocked using perfusion of TTX  Expression of eyeblink conditioning blocked, but not acquisition Krupa and Thompson, PNAS 1995

The cerebellar-olivary system LTD LTP 1.2Hz<>Rate

 phase 1 : seven daily sessions of tone-airpuff conditioning.  phase 2 : five sessions of tone-light-airpuff compound conditioning while either PTX or ACSF was infused.  phase 3 : all animals were presented with light-airpuff pairing tests.  controls experienced only the second phase of the blocking procedure. Blocking of conditioned eyelid responses

olivepons PFCF PC’s LTD DCN CR Blocking: US inhibition USCS PTX: blocks inhibition prevents blocking prevents extinction Extinction: without US or with NBQX

The daily training consisted of 10 blocks of 10 trials. The trials were separated by a random intervals (20 to 40 ms). Response of wild-type (wt) after 2 days and after 4 days. CR- conditioned response UR- unconditioned response