FOURTH SADC DIGITAL BROADCASTING MIGRATION FORUM, 27-30 AUGUST 2012 MANAGING DTT HARMFUL INTERFERENCE ENGR. EDWARD I. AMANA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nairobi, Kenya, 26 – 27July 2010 Role of ITU-T & ITU-R Ahmed ZEDDAM Ahmed ZEDDAM, ITU-T SG5 Chair France Telecom Orange ITU-T Workshop on Delivering Good.
Advertisements

Conversion of Analogue Assignments into Digital Allotments Conversion of Analogue Assignments into Digital Allotments The Channel Potential Method Dr.
Fundamental Considerations for the Deployment of DTT Transmission Facilities in South Africa F.Lindeque Pr. Tech Group Executive : Network Services Sentech.
Regional Information Meeting and Workshop related to the RRC-06 for the administrations of the Arab countries Damascus, Syria August 2005 Planning.
RRC 04/05 ITU Information meeting September Computer methods for planning Ken Hunt Rapporteur for Chapter 10.
Regional Information Meeting and Workshop related to the RRC-06 for the administrations of the African countries Dakar, Senegal, April 2005 Planning.
Switchover from Analogue to Digital Terrestrial Television Broadcasting in Central and Eastern Europe Case study of Serbia Péter Vári Belgrade, 28th April.
The need to harmonize spectrum for mobile
TRANSITION TO THE DIGITAL TERRESTRIAL TELEVISION BROADCASTING IN TURKEY 05 NOVEMBER 2012, BUDAPEST Information and Communication Technologies Authority.
1. 2 Prepared by : Eng.Yasir Mohammed Bashar Interference calculations.
Key Technical Provisions of the White Paper and Protections Afforded to ITFS Licensees. National ITFS Association Annual Conference February 16 th – 19.
STATE OF READINESS ON DIGITAL MIGRATION Independent Communications Authority of South Africa September
Study on Digital Switchover Plan in SATRC Countries 2 nd SATRC Spectrum WG Meeting March, 2014 Tehran, I.R.Iran Rumana Haque Bangladesh Telecommunication.
1.  The Australian Radio Communications Industry Association represents some 300 commercial entities including approximately 1500 industry professionals.
Transition to Digital Broadcasting and Digital Dividend 6-7 October 2011, Belgrade, Serbia Sub-Regional Workshop on Transition to Digital Broadcasting.
1 Compatibility of Digital Broadcasting and Mobile Services Regional Seminar on Digital TV Broadcasting Algiers, 4-5 December 2007 Presented by Jan Doeven.
Frequency Planning and Reuse Engr. Mehran Mamonai.
© 2009 Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved.1 Computer Networks and Internets, 5e Chapter 14 Wireless Networking Technologies.
Wireless Network Taxonomy Wireless communication includes a wide range of network types and sizes. Government regulations that make specific ranges of.
ACMA Spectrum Strategies 2 March 2006 Optus Networks Perspective Wireless Spectrum Strategies 2006 Peter FERRIS General Manager, Technology and Planning.
Copyright : Hi Tech Criminal Justice, Raymond E. Foster Police Technology Police Technology Chapter Three Police Technology Wireless Communications.
Advanced Topics in Next- Generation Wireless Networks Qian Zhang Department of Computer Science HKUST Wireless Radio.
Wireless & Mobile Networking: Cellular Concept
Regulating Broadcasting Overview of the technical specifications that make up the U. S. broadcast spectrum.
Regional Regulatory Seminar on Transition to Digital Terrestrial Television Broadcasting and Digital Dividend for Europe, Budapest, Hungary, 5-7 November.
For the Public Safety Community
Doc: CRpNL-10/0012d0 Summary of White Space ruling in the USA Vic Hayes, TUDelft 06-Oct-10Submission by Vic Hayes, TUDelft1.
NBTC/ITU Workshop on Cross-Border Frequency Coordination June , 2015 Bangkok, Thailand.
Terrestrial Microwave TK2133 A Lee Hau Sem A Lai Horng Meau.
Radio Interference Calculations
Making South Africa a Global Leader in Harnessing ICTs for Socio-economic Development BROADCASTING DIGITAL MIGRATION Portfolio Committee 19 February 2008.
CHANGING TECHNOLOGIES: Implications for viewers & listeners Philip Laven VLV Autumn Conference November 2014.
Wireless Broadband Service in Rural America Rural TeleCon ‘06 October 24, 2006 Paul D’Ari Spectrum Competition and Policy Division Federal Communications.
The $20 Billion Question: Can Satellite and Terrestrial Wireless Co-Exist in C-band? David Hartshorn Secretary General Global VSAT Forum.
Committed to Connecting the World International Telecommunication Union May 2011 Kim Kikwon Project Manager/BDT, ITU Digital Broadcasting Switchover ITU-AIBD-ABU.
The $20 Billion Question: Can Satellite and Terrestrial Wireless Co-Exist in C-band? David Hartshorn Secretary General GVF.
Planning of digital terrestrial broadcasting. Results of the Regional Radiocommunication Conference RRC-06 Evghenii Sestacov Deputy Director General of.
PROSPECTS FOR DIGITAL TV Philip Laven Chairman, DVB Project Vice-Chairman, FOBTV NATEXPO, Moscow 6 November 2012.
WORKSHOP OVERVIEW ENGR. YOMI BOLARINWA fnse, mieee, msbe Broadcast Engineer 1.
Meteorological Spectrum Issues- Outcome of the 2003 World Radiocommunication Conference Presented By: David Franc National Weather Service December 2,
SENTECH’S PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS ON ITS PROGRESS REPORT ON DTT PROJECT Date: 1 June 2010.
MASNET GroupXiuzhen ChengFeb 8, 2006 Terms and Concepts Behind Wireless Communications.
Transition to Digital Broadcasting and Digital Dividend 6-7 October 2011, Belgrade, Serbia 1 Sub-Regional Workshop on Transition to Digital Broadcasting.
They are not the same Dennis Ward ATCB. The FCC has a requirement that Applications for certification through the TCB program must contain test reports.
Agence Nationale des Fréquences Sharing of spectrum in the UHF band Jean-Jacques GUITOT ANFR Sub-Regional Workshop on Transition to Digital Broadcasting.
WIDEBAND CODE DIVISION MULTIPLE ACCESS & THE CAPACITY IN CODE DIVISION MULTIPLE ACCESS Presented by Maheshwarnath Behary Assisted by Vishwanee Raghoonundun.
RALI FX3 Microwave Fixed Services Frequency Coordination Glenn Odlum Senior Engineer Spectrum Engineering Section
Cognitive Radio: Next Generation Communication System
1 International Bureau 2008 Annual Report January 15, 2009.
Stakeholders Forum on Quality of Service and Consumer Experience Nairobi Kenya QoE/QoS for Broadcasting Services 23 – 25 th November 2015.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Communications by Engineering and Technology Unit By: Wojtek Skowronski Date: 8 October 2004.
©Ofcom Spectrum reform in the UK: The development of Spectrum Usage Rights Professor William Webb 2006.
Technician License Course Chapter 7 Lesson Module 16: Licensing Regulations: Bands and Privileges.
Wireless Communications Outline Introduction History System Overview Signals and Propagation Noise and Fading Modulation Multiple Access Design of Cellular.
RADIO FREQUENCY SPECTRUM POLICY NOVEMBER Making South Africa a Global Leader in Harnessing ICTs for Socio-economic Development 2 WHAT IS SPECTRUM?
Comparative Telecommunications Law Prof. Karl Manheim Spring, : Introduction to Radio Spectrum.
Coexistence Studies in IEEE Meeting #3 San Francisco, July 2003 Reza Arefi IEEE C /72.
Technician License Course Chapter 7 Lesson Module 16: Licensing Regulations: Bands and Privileges.
Unit 4 Cellular Telephony
The Cellular Concept and Its Implementations. The Cellular Concept The cellular concept was developed and introduced by the Bell Laboratories in the early.
Use of Spectrum Bands Above 24 GHz For Mobile Radio Services ‘5G’…
Design and implementation of monitoring systems Jan Verduijn Chairman ITU-R WP1C on Spectrum Monitoring ITU-D expert.
MONITORING OF USE RADIO FREQUENCY SPECTRUM AND METHODS OF MEASUREMENT.
4G Wireless Systems A Seminar on Presented By: Sainik Kumar Mahata
Radio Spectrum Policy in Europe
Radio Frequency Interference
Regional Seminar on Digital TV Broadcasting
Digital Sound broadcasting ITU Regulation
Preliminary GSC positions on WRC-19 agenda items 1.13 IMT
Cellular Telephone Networks
Presentation transcript:

FOURTH SADC DIGITAL BROADCASTING MIGRATION FORUM, AUGUST 2012 MANAGING DTT HARMFUL INTERFERENCE ENGR. EDWARD I. AMANA

ABSTRACT: This paper takes a look at the issues of Harmful Interference in Digital Terrestrial Television – DTT and how to manage them. QUESTIONS: 1.What is Harmful Interference? 2.What are the Sources of Harmful Interference in DTT? 3. How do we manage them?

INTRODUCTION: When we transmit a signal, either from a Television Studio or from an outside event like from the sporting fields, we expect a faithful reproduction of such signals on the television receivers tuned to such an event. Ideally, the received signals should be without distortions and without intrusion or interference from any other source. This might have been achievable if we have only one transmitter using the available spectrum. Unfortunately, in the real world this is not so To say there is an excess demand on the useable spectrum by various services with different characteristics is an understatement.

On daily basis new technologies are evolving that is putting new demands on the already scarce spectrum. In the Broadcast Arena, we are currently dealing with the issues of Transition from Analogue to Digital Broadcasting, which is already putting a lot of strain on the available Broadcast Spectrum because, during the transition period we have to contend with transmitting both Analogue and Digital Broadcasting ( Double Illumination or Simulcasting ) During this period, the integrity of the Analogue Signal has to be maintained while the Digital Broadcasting is being introduced. To compound matters, different standards and formats of Digital Broadcasting have evolved and are still evolving:

 Standard Definition Television – SDTV.  High Definition Television – HDTV.  Ultra High Definition Television – UHDTV.  3-Dimentional Television – 3-DTV. And in the Digital Transmission Arena we have different transmission format like:  DVB-T  DVB-T2  DVB-H / H2  ATSC / ATSC MOBILE  CMMB.  MEDIAFLO  DMB-T/H.  ISDB-T / ISDB – International The development in the Telecommunications Industry is even more rapid:

from:  GSM  WiMax  WiFi  IMT. All these new technologies forces changes in the use of available spectrum and places a lot of burden on the Regulator

HARMFUL INTERFERENCE : The fundamental characteristic of Radio Waves is that:  Every transmitter has an impact on every receiver.  Signals cannot be stopped.  They can only be attenuated either by:  Frequency or  Distance Any radio system must therefore take cognizance of the level of the unwanted or interfering signals it either generates or receives.

HARMFUL INTERFERENCE: HARMFUL INTERFERENCE CAN THEREFORE BE SIMPLY DEFINED AS ANY EXTERNAL SIGNAL THAT RENDERS THE RECEIVERS REPRODUCTION OF IT’S WANTED SIGNAL INTOLERABLE.

SOURCES OF HARMFUL INTERFERENCE To properly understand the sources of interference it is necessary to take a cursory look at how the spectrum is managed: In most countries we have what is often referred to as Command & Control Regulation: The National Regulator controls access to spectrum by:  Dividing the Spectrum into Bands, taking into cognizance International Agreements such as the allocations in the ITU-R Radio Regulations  Allocating bands to services  Broadcasting  Mobile  Fixed etc.  Determine if there should be Guard Bands and if so, how wide.  Decide the approach for licensing each band.

SOURCES OF HARMFUL INTERFERENCE  Issuing Licenses to each spectrum user to meet their demand for the radio spectrum with well spelt out licensing conditions. There are 3 common approaches to licensing and each has it’s implication on harmful Interference: 1.SITE LICENSING: Here different operators are licensed to use the same band but are constrained geographically so that the same band can be used many times. Under the Command & Control Model these will be managed by the Regulator, who would plan the deployment and parameters of each site. 2.Block Licensing: Here a block of Spectrum with a given Geographic & Frequency extent is delegated to an operator that can deploy at will the equipment that meet the license conditions

SOURCES OF HARMFUL INTERFERENCE 3. LICENSE EXEMPT: These are unlicensed spectrum that operate on general operating rules such as very low power e.g. 2.4 GHz. Used for Bluetooth, WiFi etc.

ALLOCATION OF BANDS TO SERVICES & OPERATORS

INTERFERENCE IN A DTT NETWORK: Irrespective of what ever Transmission Standard adopted by a Nation, Depending on the landmass of the country a network of several transmitters have to be deployed for effective National Coverage. Every transmitter within the Network is allocated a Bandwidth to ensure successful transmission. As we said earlier: Every transmitter has an impact on every receiver. Every transmitter has the following potential for causing interference:

 Unwanted emissions consist of:  Out-of-band emissions: immediately outside the necessary bandwidth and resulting from the modulation process  Spurious emissions: outside the necessary bandwidth, including: harmonic emissions, parasitic emissions, intermodulation products and frequency conversion products.

Unfortunately, Receivers cannot effectively Screen Out Signals in Adjacent Channels to the wanted Signal. Therefore overlapping of signals from transmitters operating on adjacent channels can cause Harmful Interference to a Receiver within the Region of Overlap. The Diagram below shows in a very simple manner, the interference environment:

TYPES OF INTERFERENCE

MANAGING INTERFERENCE Managing Harmful Interference in DTT starts from the Regulator. The Command & Control Regulation is most effective in containing interference – although most operators will prefer a Liberalized Spectrum Environment. Fortunately the Transition from Analogue to Digital Broadcasting has resulted in an advocacy for a Common Signal Carrier. The Regulator must therefore be involved in the National Coverage Network Planning, taking into cognizance all the potentials for interference in giving out the equipment specifications. These will include:  Transmitters  Receivers and  Set Top Boxes.

MANAGING INTERFERENCE Each Transmitter Site must be Licensed with a clear specification of:  Antenna Height Above Sea Level  Effective Radiated Power  Polarization and  Radiation Pattern – ( Omni-Directional / Directional or Cardioid ) Cross Boarder Interference is a much more serious issue. Very often a lot of countries like to deploy powerful transmitters at the boarders to their neighbouring country. There is therefore a need for coordination between neighbors to avoid Harmful Interference.

MANAGING INTERFERENCE Before the Roll-out of the DTT Network, the Regulator must ensure compliance to Specifications by carrying out an Acceptance Test / Type Approval of Transmitters / Receivers. The Regulator must also carry out Field Strength Measurements to ascertain the Coverage Area of each Transmitter and note areas of overlapping signals from two different transmitting stations and ascertain the possibility of Interference.

MANAGING INTERFERENCE SITE SHARING:  Encouraged for:  Economic and  Environmental reasons To avoid Interference at these Sites, there must be adequate Frequency Separation between the various Services that are sharing the Site.

CONCLUSION  WE have defined Harmful Interference  Identified the main Sources of Interference and  Proffered some solutions to Managing Harmful Interference However, the job of the Regulator does not stop with the final copmmissioning of the Broadcasting Network. The Regulator has to constantly monitor the transmission for compliance.

THANK YOU ALL