European Involvement in T2K Neuchatel June 21, 2004 Dave Wark Imperial College /RAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Advertisements

J-PARC PAC ‘07 Imperial College/RAL Dave Wark Status of the T2K Experiment Dave Wark Imperial/RAL J-PARC PAC KEK July 6, 2007.
The JPARC Neutrino Project – a European Perspective Dave Wark University of Sussex/RAL DESY October 6, 2003.
ISS, 23 September 2005E. Gschwendtner, CERN1 Beam Instrumentation at CNGS 1. Introduction 2. Layout 3. Beam Instrumentation 4. Summary.
T2K – Canada Accelerator & Detector Status D. Karlen University of Victoria & TRIUMF ACOT meeting, May 12, 2007.
Alain Blondel CHIPP Neutrino meeting NEUCHATEL June 2004.
25/10/2007M. Dracos1 EURO The European Design Study for a high intensity neutrino oscillation facility (Rob Edgecock, Mats Lindroos, Marcos Dracos)
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
Status of T2K Target 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Power Target Workshop 6-7 th November 2008 Mike Fitton RAL.
K.T. McDonald June 18, 2009 DUSEL FNAL 1 Strategies for Liquid Argon Detectors at DUSEL Kirk T. McDonald Princeton University (June 18, 2009)
May 17-19, 2000 Catalina Island, CA Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting 1 Target Support Facility for a Solid Target Neutrino Production.
The JPARC Neutrino Target
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
JHF2K neutrino beam line A. K. Ichikawa KEK 2002/7/2 Overview Primary Proton beamline Target Decay Volume Strategy to change peak energy.
Vacuum windows at JPARC Contents Introduction Vacuum windows at hadron beam line Helium gas cooling Vacuum windows at neutrino beam line primitive discussion.
Target system for hadron & neutrino beam lines at J-PARC Contents Introduction of J-PARC Target and Target system for hadron beam line Target system for.
J-PARC upgrade T. Nakadaira (KEK / J-PARC). Outline J-PARC overview & on-going program Motivation of future experiment in J-PARC Overview of future experiment.
Next generation of ν beams Challenges Ahead I. Efthymiopoulos - CERN LAGUNA Workshp Aussois, France, September 8,2010 what it takes to design and construct.
 A GEANT4-based simulation was performed of the production target, solenoid, selection channel, and spectrometer.  The acceptance was found to be 8.3x10.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
1 Further Demands on beam Intense, Intense, Intense, ….Intense, Intense, Intense, …. –Very far detector, extremely small cross section, search small osci.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Targetry Concept for a Neutrino Factory Muon Meeting BNL January 26, 2004.
JPARC- Decay Volume M.Sakuda (KEK) 11 November Decay Volume Requirements Design 2. Construction Status 3. Summary and schedule In collaboration.
Q&A on T2K construction of beam line near detectors budget collaboration (contribution from each) T2KK.
Future upgrade of the neutrino beam-line for multi-MW beam 5 th Hyper-Kamiokande open Vancouver July Yuichi Oyama (KEK) (for T2K neutrino.
11 Status of Neutrino Beamline Construction T.Kobayashi IPNS, KEK Jan.8, 2008 J-PARC PAC.
Current Status and Possible Items around ‘neutrino beam’ Horn Target Remote maintenance tools Decay volume window and collimator muon monitor Many items.
1 Status of Neutrino Beamline Construction K. Nishikawa IPNS, KEK 2006 . 12 . 4.
Beam MC activity A.K.Ichikawa for beam group For more details,
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
Overview of the KEK Neutrino Beam Facility and its Operation Summary after September 2000 FNAL) K.H. Tanaka for the KEK-PS Beam Channel Group.
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
NuFact02, July 2002, London Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U.Tokyo For the K2K collab. and JHF-Kamioka WG.
The CNGS Target Station By L.Bruno, S.Péraire, P.Sala SL/BT Targets & Dumps Section.
7 November 2003 Status of CNGS NBI presented by K. Elsener 1 Status of CNGS Konrad Elsener CERN – Accelerators+Beams Division.
COMET. μ-e conversion search from muonic aluminium J-PARC pulsed proton beam to produce pulsed muon beam Forbidden in the Standard Model  clue to the.
Detector possibilities: scintillator based detectors EUCARD 1 st Annual Meeting, RAL, 13 April 2010 Paul Soler.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
NuMI NBI2003 November 7-11, 2003 NuMI Target Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 NuMI Target Status, Testing, Support Module At NBI’02: Beam test results of Medium.
GRAN SASSO’S HADRON STOP Temperature’s behaviour under specified beam conditions Barbara Calcagno.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
WP2 progress on safety E. Baussan EUROnu CB Meeting Monday 10th & Tuesday 11th June 2011 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
T2K Remote Handling T. Sekiguchi (KEK) on behalf of Tada (KEK) 2012/11/10.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
T2K IFOP 11/7 Imperial College/RAL Dave Wark Status of the 280m Detectors and Current Issues Dave Wark Imperial/RAL J-PARC IFOP Videocon Nov. 16, 2007.
Magnet R&D for Large Volume Magnetization A.V. Zlobin Fermilab Fifth IDS-NF Plenary Meeting 8-10 April 2010 at Fermilab.
MARS15 Studies of Impact of LBNF Target/Horn Optimization on the Hadron Absorber 6 th High Power Targetry Workshop Merton College, Oxford April 12, 2016.
High Power Target Experience with T2K Chris Densham T2K Beamline Collaboration including RAL / KEK / Kyoto.
HB2008 – WG F: 27 Aug. S. Childress – Diagnostics_2MW 1 NuMI Beam Diagnostics and Control Steps to 2 MW S. Childress Fermilab.
T2K Target status PASI Meeting Fermilab 11 th November Chris Densham STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory On behalf of the T2K beam collaboration.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months Vaia Papadimitriou Beamline Technical Board Meeting.
CARESG, 11Apr2006V. Palladino Report on BENE Activities Beams for European Neutrino Experiments (BENE) subtitle: A Network aiming at a consensual road.
K2K and JHF-nu muon monitor Jun Kameda (KEK) 1. K2K muon monitor 2. JHF-ν muon monitor 3. Summary International workshop on Neutrino Beam Instrumentation,
Irradiated T2K Ti alloy materials test plans
Heating and radiological
News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months
K2K and JHF-nu muon monitor
M. Calviani, A. Ferrari (EN/STI), P. Sala (INFN)
Conventional Neutrino Beams Day 2
Beam Tests of Ionization Chambers for the NuMI Neutrino Beam Monitoring System MINOS.
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
Beam dump for J-Parc neutrino facility
Presentation transcript:

European Involvement in T2K Neuchatel June 21, 2004 Dave Wark Imperial College /RAL

…to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark Italy  Padova, Naples, Roma France  Saclay, IN2P3 Spain  Valencia, Barcelona Switzerland  University of Geneva, ETH United Kingdom  Imperial College, QMW, Warwick, RAL, Liverpool, Sheffield ~25 physicists currently, more being sought Mailing list, regular meetings at CERN Many have joined K2K European Groups Ready to Join T2K

decay pipe Near detector Target Station  -pit 280m 130m Neutrino Beam Facility Overview Technical Design&Development (Status) Report Primary proton beam line  Normal conducting magnets  Superconducting magnets  Proton beam monitors  Vacuum system  Collimators/beam plug Target station  Target  Horn  Remote handling system Decay pipe Beam dump Muon monitors …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: Beam  Design of the beam dump …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

…to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark Simulations now being performed at RAL, proposing to do the engineering design

Proposed European Contributions: Beam  Design of the beam dump  Target expertise …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

J/gK degree Z R Temperature rise of the target due to the radiation w/ 1 pulse cal. w/ MARS 30mm  graphite target : energy deposit is ~60kJ/spill Thermal stress analysis (incl. shock wave) and cooling system design is now on-going. maximum~ 180J/g Target system

23m Iron shield Helium vessel Machine room Service pit Storage for radioactive material 12m 33m Iron shield Concrete blocks 40 ton crane Target & 1st horn2nd horn3rd horn Final focus Decay volume Concrete structure Ground level Baffle 22m Extremely high radiation environment Neutrino target station Aluminum wall filled with He RALCERN(?)PSI(?)

Proposed European Contributions: Beam  Design of the beam dump  Target expertise  Proton beam final focus monitoring …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Where shall we install the monitors FF TS -Beam Arc PS I,C,P C,P I,C,P C,P P P P C, P C, P C, P I,C,P I,P TGT Beam Monitor I : Intensity (CT) C: Center position (LPM) P: Profile (SSEC/RGBPM) BLM will be placed along the beam line.

Detector electrons ・ Residual gas is ionized by proton beam ・ Produced electrons are collected by Straight Electric Field. ・ Collected electrons are detected by MCP (Micro Channel Plate) or EMT (Electron Multiplier Tube) equipped with the multi-anodes. ・ Non Destructive ・ Cover the wide range of proton intensity MCP Electric Field Profile Monitor : (2)RGBPM Estimated signal of readout ~ [electrons/ch] (J-PARC: 1e^-7 Torr) J-PARC Fast beam  High intensity Magnetic Field is necessary (B>0.03T for a few mm resolution)

Proposed European Contributions: Beam  Design of the beam dump  Target expertise  Proton beam final focus monitoring  Muon monitors/muon monitor electronics …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: Beam  Design of the beam dump  Target expertise  Proton beam final focus monitoring  Muon monitors/muon monitor electronics  Beam windows …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: Beam  Design of the beam dump  Target expertise  Proton beam final focus monitoring  Muon monitors/muon monitor electronics  Beam windows  Quench detectors …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: Beam  Design of the beam dump  Target expertise  Proton beam final focus monitoring  Muon monitors/muon monitor electronics  Beam windows  Quench detectors 280m detector …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

20m  36m 33 22 SK direction 16m 5m FGD MRD Neutron shield ~14m SK Grid  profile beam 1m Conceptual design of the near neutrino detector Off-axis (~2 o ) On-axis (0 o ) Beam direction and stability The detector design is only just started. 3m  and e fluxes and spectra interaction study Kaon contributions (CC-QE, non-QE and  0 ) (w/ Magnet?)

Proposed European Contributions: Beam  Design of the beam dump  Target expertise  Proton beam final focus monitoring  Muon monitors/muon monitor electronics  Beam windows  Quench detectors 280m detector …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: Beam  Design of the beam dump  Target expertise  Proton beam final focus monitoring  Muon monitors/muon monitor electronics  Beam windows  Quench detectors 280m detector  Major European contribution – magnetize the 280m …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

…to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark UA1/NOMAD Magnet Advantages greatly reduces expensive MRD improved measurement of p  Charge id on (most) tracks Accepted as default design

Proposed European Contributions: Beam  Design of the beam dump  Target expertise  Proton beam final focus monitoring  Muon monitors/muon monitor electronics  Beam windows  Quench detectors 280m detector  Major European contribution – magnetize the 280m …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: Beam  Design of the beam dump  Target expertise  Proton beam final focus monitoring  Muon monitors/muon monitor electronics  Beam windows  Quench detectors 280m detector  Major European contribution – magnetize the 280m  Fine-grained tracking to take advantage of the magnetic field …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: Beam  Design of the beam dump  Target expertise  Proton beam final focus monitoring  Muon monitors/muon monitor electronics  Beam windows  Quench detectors 280m detector  Major European contribution – magnetize the 280m  Fine-grained tracking to take advantage of the magnetic field  EM calorimeter? …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: Beam  Design of the beam dump  Target expertise  Proton beam final focus monitoring  Muon monitors/muon monitor electronics  Beam windows  Quench detectors 280m detector  Major European contribution – magnetize the 280m  Fine-grained tracking to take advantage of the magnetic field  EM calorimeter?  Electronics? …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: Beam  Design of the beam dump  Target expertise  Proton beam final focus monitoring  Muon monitors/muon monitor electronics  Beam windows  Quench detectors 280m detector  Major European contribution – magnetize the 280m  Fine-grained tracking to take advantage of the magnetic field  EM calorimeter?  Electronics?  DAQ? …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: 2 km detector  Would provide the ultimate sensitivity. …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Convincing demonstration of e appearance will require detailed understanding of backgrounds …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark Which will in turn require a detailed understanding of the near/far comparison

…to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: 2 km detector  Would provide the ultimate limit to systematics. …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: 2 km detector  Would provide the ultimate limit to systematics.  Are participating in simulation and conceptual design …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: 2 km detector  Would provide the ultimate limit to systematics.  Are participating in simulation and conceptual design  Would contribute some substantial element, like the FGD …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: 2 km detector  Would provide the ultimate limit to systematics.  Are participating in simulation and conceptual design  Would contribute some substantial element, like the FGD  Perhaps use a medium-sized LAr calorimeter? …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: 2 km detector  Would provide the ultimate limit to systematics.  Are participating in simulation and conceptual design  Would contribute some substantial element, like the FGD  Perhaps use a medium-sized LAr calorimeter? Hadron Production data …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: 2 km detector  Would provide the ultimate limit to systematics.  Are participating in simulation and conceptual design  Would contribute some substantial element, like the FGD  Perhaps use a medium-sized LAr calorimeter? Hadron Production data  HARP …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: 2 km detector  Would provide the ultimate limit to systematics.  Are participating in simulation and conceptual design  Would contribute some substantial element, like the FGD  Perhaps use a medium-sized LAr calorimeter? Hadron Production data  HARP  HERO/NA49/some other experiment …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: 2 km detector  Would provide the ultimate limit to systematics.  Are participating in simulation and conceptual design  Would contribute some substantial element, like the FGD  Perhaps use a medium-sized LAr calorimeter? Hadron Production data  HARP  HERO/NA49/some other experiment Software/Analysis …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: 2 km detector  Would provide the ultimate limit to systematics.  Are participating in simulation and conceptual design  Would contribute some substantial element, like the FGD  Perhaps use a medium-sized LAr calorimeter? Hadron Production data  HARP  HERO/NA49/some other experiment Software/Analysis  Contribute state-of-the-art software techniques …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

Proposed European Contributions: 2 km detector  Would provide the ultimate limit to systematics.  Are participating in simulation and conceptual design  Would contribute some substantial element, like the FGD  Perhaps use a medium-sized LAr calorimeter? Hadron Production data  HARP  HERO/NA49/some other experiment Software/Analysis  Contribute state-of-the-art software techniques  Fully participate in analysis and verification of any results …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

FAQ (or rather FHO). There is nothing for Europe to contribute to T2K  I hope I have shown otherwise. The Japanese can do it all.  No they can’t. It is too far.  It is no farther than SLAC.  Japanese groups routinely work at CERN and RAL. What is in it for us?  The opportunity to play a central part in the key experiment on  13.  The opportunity to grow the European experimental community  Fantastic experience in water Čerenkov detectors.  Fantastic experience in doing near/far comparisons.  Involvement in the next premier facility.  Continue the unification of the world’s physics community. …to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark

…to T2K European input… Imperial College/RAL Neuchatel Meeting June 21 ’04 Dave Wark