NPRR 206 DAM Credit Requirements Reduction: E Values and Percentiles Luminant Proposal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MCWG Update to WMS 12/07/ Exposure / Collateral Update Nodal Total Potential Exposure reported by ERCOT as of 11/30/11 now exceeds the Zonal Estimated.
Advertisements

CRR Shortfall – Revenue Equalization Part 2 (Continuation from 2/21/08 TPTF discussion) Bill Barnes TPTF 3/5/2008.
DSWG Update to WMS May 17, DSWG Goals Update.
Seasonal Adjustment Factor Discussion Technical Advisory Committee
Seasonal Adjustment Factor Mark Ruane Credit Work Group ERCOT Public July 23, 2014.
MCWG Update to WMS Loretta Martin LCRA, Chair Josephine Wan AE, Vice Chair 03/05/
1 CRR Credit Policy Task Force Update TPTF July 21, 2008.
December 2, 2011 QMWG Summary of Potential Issues with NPRR385 Price Floor ERCOT.
Market Trials - Friday call Credit and Treasury Weekly Update September 3, 2010.
September 2012 Proposed CRR Auction Credit Changes: Summary of Draft NPRR.
WMS Subgroup – CRR Credit 3.Review of CRR margining methodology for PTP Obligations in Nodal Protocols 4.Potential credit margin alternatives Cheryl Yager.
1 NPRR 484/554 – Revisions to Congestion Revenue Rights Credit Calculations and Payments Market Call ERCOT Public July 31, 2013.
Training NPRR 206 and “e” Factors August 10, 2010 NPRR 206 and "e" Factors.
Market Credit Working Group update to the Wholesale Market Subcommittee 06/03/
MCWG Update to WMS 5/11/ Exposure / Collateral Update Nodal Total Potential Exposure reported by ERCOT as of 4/30/11 remains less than Zonal Estimated.
Nodal Program Update and SEWG Update COPS 1/11/2011 Jim Galvin.
MCWG Update to WMS 6/15/ Exposure / Collateral Update Nodal Total Potential Exposure reported by ERCOT as of 4/30/11 remains less than Zonal Estimated.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department October 11, 2006.
September 2012 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
Matt Tozer ERCOT Manager, Settlements & Billing 9/4/2013 ERCOT Update Management of the Balancing Account CMWG.
TAC Meeting Update. Board Update and TAC Voting Item Kenan Ogelman, Vice Chair of TAC gave the Board Update. It included recommendation that TAC.
CRR Shortfall – Revenue Equalization Part 3 (Continuation from 3/5/08 TPTF discussion) Bill Barnes/Sharon Wang TPTF 3/21/2008.
MCWG Update to WMS 08/14/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update -July 31 st Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review NPRRs All operational except – NPRR 552 – Additional.
October 20, 2010 WMS Credit Update. 2 Topics Nodal exposure – how much collateral CRR/TCR auctions – December 2010 Preliminary Credit Cutover Timeline.
Transmission Congestion Rights – Credit Perspective April 17, 2014.
1 DAM Credit parameters review The “Procedures for Setting Nodal Day Ahead Market (DAM) Credit Requirements Parameters” is a document that is required.
Nodal Credit DAM Non-Business Day Treatment of Available Credit Limit (ACL)
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
January 7, 2011 Review Nodal Exposure / Collateral as of end of December, 2010 Cheryl Yager.
MCWG Update to WMS 11/13/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update - October 30 th Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review September 25 Meeting Minutes - Approved.
The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal ERCOT model under four scenarios: 1.(Base Case) “Normal” summer.
Market Credit Working Group update to the Wholesale Market Subcommittee 09/02/
DAM Performance Issues with CRR Offers Steve Reedy Market Design Manager NATF 31 August 2010.
ERCOT Market Credit Working Group Presentation to the Finance and Audit Committee Payment Short Pay/Default and Uplift for Congestion Revenue rights (CRRs)
Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Oct 20, 2010.
1 Nodal Credit Update at WMS June 16, 2010.
ERCOT CWG/MCWG April 24, 2013 DAM Credit Parameters.
Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Nov 18, 2009.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 03, :30 PM.
November 27, 2012 NPRR322, Real-Time PTP Option Modeling Implementation Overview.
Total Potential Exposure (TPE) Overview Credit Work Group May 28, 2008 Cheryl Yager.
1 Exposure Stress Testing CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public June 12, 2014.
MCWG Update to WMS 2/9/2010. Agenda Items Exposure / Collateral Status Update 1/26 MCWG/CWG Joint Meeting – Potential NPRR to enable expiring CRRs to.
DAM Collateral Requirements Carrie Bivens Manager, Day-Ahead Market Dec 16,
1 Credit Parameters Review TAC July 2, Protocol Section , “Credit Requirement for DAM Bids and Offers” specifies: Credit Requirement for.
DAM Performance Issues with CRR Offers Steve Reedy Market Design Manager TAC 2 September 2010.
DAM and Nodal Collateral Requirements Concerns and Solutions December 7, 2009.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department September 28, 2006.
WMS – Nodal Credit Integration Start Up May 19,
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
NPRR639 Discussion CWG/MCWG August 20, Current MCE Calculation MCE ignores net purchases of bilateral energy. See red portion of MCE formula below.
CRR Default and the Nodal Market Wholesale Market Subcommittee February 20, 2008.
Money Transfer Due to Real-Time Irresolvable Constraint Resmi Surendran ERCOT.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris May 5, 2011.
Revisions to Credit Exposure Calculations by using Electricity Futures Prices Suresh Pabbisetty, FRM, ERP, CQF, CSQA. Lead Technical Analyst, Credit May.
Day Ahead Market QSE’s Credit Requirements Concerns and Solutions August 14, 2008.
Credit Exposure Analysis using ICE Prices Suresh Pabbisetty, FRM, ERP, CQF, CSQA. Lead Technical Analyst, Credit April 11, 2016.
MCWG Update to WMS 3/9/2010. Exposure / Collateral Update Nodal Total Potential Exposure reported by ERCOT as of 1/31/11 remains less than Zonal Estimated.
Credit Exposure Analysis using ICE Prices Suresh Pabbisetty, FRM, ERP, CQF, CSQA. Lead Technical Analyst, Credit April 20, 2016.
CRR Deration and NPRR821 WMS 09/06/2017.
Credit Reports Vanessa Spells COPS Meeting ERCOT Public
Nodal Program Update to Cops
DALE MCWG / CWG 3/10/2010.
LCRA Comments regarding NPRR 821
NPRRs 815NPRR Revise the Limitation of Load Resources Providing Responsive Reserve (RRS) Service.  This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) revises.
Future Credit Exposure (FCE)
John Dumas Director, Wholesale Market Operations
Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

NPRR 206 DAM Credit Requirements Reduction: E Values and Percentiles Luminant Proposal

Goal – Encourage DAM Participation – Right size collateral requirements – Recognize offsetting risk – Reflect basis risk between offsetting bids and offers – Enable hedged entities to bid in a manner that ensures price risk is managed and unnecessary real time short positions are not a result of a bidding strategy that is constrained by unnecessary and burdensome working capital obligations NPRR 206 Goal and Luminant’s Current Proposal

BIDS (6)(a) 1 st 60 DaysAfter 60 Days Variable and Purpose (LUME)DescriptionLCRALUMEERCOTLCRALUMEERCOT DReflects a ceiling price that constrains collateral obligations for a bid when “E1” < 1 Percentile of DAM hourly SPP over last 30 days or 95 E1Enables a hedged entity (offsetting bids & offers) to bid as a price taker to ensure bids are cleared when offers clear (Avoid Real Time Short Risk). a) Variable from 0 to 1 b) Daily value c) If Bid Price > “D” then add exposure = E1% multiplied by the difference between the Bid Price and “D” Based on Load & Resource Imbalance, and Mismatch, with floor = 0.2? and multiplier = 2.0 x e1 Based on Load & Resource Imbalance, and Mismatch, with floor = 0.2 and multiplier = 1.2 x e1 a) 1 st 14 days e1=1, e2=0, & e3=1 b) after the 1 st 14 days set factors with “after 60 days” solution w/ multiplier = 1.2 x e1 and 0.2 floor 95%ile of ($Bids - $TPO - $EOO) / ($Bids) [cleared totals; i.e., P*Q] See next page for details: Based on cleared bids, offers, PTPs, and CRRs settled Use LCRA solution Set at least bi-weekly and reported / monitored daily 3 Bid Exposure = Conditional Cap Exposure Implementation + E1 Adjustment Bid Exposure = Bid Quantity x [ Min [ Bid Price, “D” ] + E1 x Max [ 0, Bid Price – “D” ]]

E1 = 50 th Percentile of the E1 observations calculated for each day over the last 30 days (Descending Sort) For each day’s E1 determination: E1 Observation = IF (a) the product of Bid Quantity Cleared and Cleared Price ≤ 0 THEN (b) E1 = 1 ELSE (c) E1 = Max [ 0 or [ Bid Risk – Offer Offsets – CRR Offsets + PTP Risk ] / Bid Risk] 4 Bid RiskDAM Energy Bids Cleared Q Cleared-Bids x P DAM-Cleared Offer Offsets Three-Part and DAM Energy Only Offers Cleared Q Cleared-3part x P DAM-Cleared + Q Cleared-EO x P DAM-Cleared CRR Offsets CRR Cleared Q CRR-Options x Max(0, P Sink DAM-Cleared – P Source DAM- Cleared ) + Q CRR-Obligations x (P Sink DAM-Cleared – P Source DAM-Cleared ) PTP Offsets PTP Cleared Q PTP x (P Sink DAM-Cleared – P Source DAM-Cleared ) BIDS - Luminant’s “E1” Definition Variable Definitions

1 st 60 DaysAfter 60 Days Variable and Purpose (LUME)DescriptionLCRALUMEERCOTLCRALUMEERCOT ADetermines if an Energy Only offer qualifies for offsetting bid exposure Percentile of past 30 day DAM hourly SPP BDetermines the magnitude for which an offer will offset bid exposure Percentile of past 30 day DAM hourly SPP E2Enables a hedged entity (offsetting bids & offers) to reduce bid exposure by “B” a) “Gives credit” to extent E2 > 0 (when $EOO < A) b) Value 0 to 1 c) Set min bi-weekly d) Reported daily 01-E100 See next page: Based on cleared bids, offers, PTPs, and CRRs settled 1 - Max [ 0 or ($EOO + $TPO-$Bid) / ($EOO + $TPO)] E3Enables exposure to be calculated on DAM EOO Quantity for which no offsetting bid exist a) requires credit to extent E2 > 0 (when $EOO > A) b) Value 0 to 1 c) Set min bi-weekly d) Reported daily 1111 [($EOO + $TPO-$Bid) / ($EOO + $TPO)] 5 ENERGY ONLY OFFERS (“EOO”) (6)(b) EOO Exposure = Energy Only Collateral Reductions + Energy Only Collateral Requirements EOO Exposure = [Q EOO:P≤ath x E2 x -SPP bth ] + Max [ 0, [SPP RT -SPP DA ] 95th ] x E3 x Q EOO

E2 = 50 th Percentile of the E2 observations calculated for each day over the last 30 days (Descending Sort) For each day’s E2 determination: E2 = 1 less Max [ 0 or ( Offer Risk – Bid Offsets – PTP Offsets + CRR Risk ) / Offer Risk ] 6 E3 to be in effect = 50 th Percentile of the E3 calculated for each day over the last 30 days (Descending Sort) For each day’s E3 determination: E3 = ( Offer Risk – Bid Offsets – PTP Offsets + CRR Risk ) / Offer Risk Offer RiskThree-Part and DAM Energy Only Offers Cleared Q Cleared-3part x P DAM-Cleared + Q Cleared-EO x P DAM-Cleared Bid OffsetsDAM Energy Bids ClearedQ Cleared-Bids x P DAM-Cleared CRR Offsets CRR ClearedQ CRR-Options x Max(0, P Sink DAM-Cleared – P Source DAM-Cleared ) + Q CRR-Obligations x (P Sink DAM-Cleared – P Source DAM-Cleared ) PTP Offsets PTP ClearedQ PTP x (P Sink DAM-Cleared – P Source DAM-Cleared ) ENERGY ONLY OFFERS – LT Luminant E2 and E3 Variable Definitions

1 st 60 DaysAfter 60 Days Variable and Purpose (LUME)DescriptionLCRALUMEERCOTLCRALUMEERCOT YDetermines if a 3 Part offer qualifies for offsetting bid exposure %ile of past 30 day DASPP below which EOOs qualify to “receive credit” 2550Up to Up to 50 ZDetermines the magnitude for which a 3 Part offer will offset bid exposure %ile of past 30 day DASPP used to calculate “received credit” to – to 75 7 THREE PART OFFERS (6)(c) Three Part Offer Exposure = A Qualifying 3Part Collateral Reduction Three Part Offer Exposure = [Q 3P:P≤yth x - SPP zth ]

1 st 60 DaysAfter 60 Days Variable and Purpose (LUME)DescriptionLCRALUMEERCOTLCRALUMEERCOT UDetermines the additional collateral obligation in excess of the notional value of the bid for potential out of the money exposure on PTP cleared bids Percentile of past 30 day RTSPP diff (source-sink) added to bid price*qty TDetermines the collateral obligation to offset the estimated notional value of Ancillary Services Percentile of past 30 day MCPC for that hour for that A.S. (times qty to calculate exposure) PTP Obligations & Ancillary Services (6)(d-e) PTP Exposure = Q Bid x [Max [ 0, P Bid ] + Max [ 0, [ RT-SPP Source –RT-SPP Sink ] ”u”th percentile ] ] Ancillary Services Not Self Arranged = MCPC ”t”th percentile x Q AS not self-arranged

LUME Summary Initial 60 Day Logic – Be Ultra-Conservative – Introduce a Minimum E1 value – Increase calculated E1 by 20% by multiplying 1.2 times E1 observations – Recognize offsetting risk at reduced levels E3 = 1 E2 = 1 – E1 Lower A,B,Y,Z (Contingent Offer Offsets) Increase D (Contingent Maximum Bid Posting Obligation) Post 60 Day Logic – Be Conservative – Utilize Data Available to ERCOT in variable calculations – E1: Allows Hedged Counterparties to bid in a manner that ensures RT short obligations are minimized by offsetting offers clearing without bids clearing – E2, A, Y: Recognize offsetting risk – B, Z, D: Reflect basis risk between bids and offers – Inclusion of CRRs and PTPs in E1, E2, E3 calculations recognizes basis risk and encourages basis risk management – E3: Posting obligation for Energy Only Offers – Develop a process (implementable by go-live) that is dependant on a counterparty’s historical activity to calculate exposure that adequately collateralizes risk, and provides ERCOT the discretion to recalculate when historical activity doesn’t align to current risk – Continue to develop a netting solution for the nodal parking deck