J. E. Williams, ACCRI, 22-02-11 The Impact of ACARE reductions in Future Aircraft NOx Emissions on the Composition and Oxidizing Capacity of the Troposphere.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fires, Atmospheric Composition and Earth System Feedbacks Oliver Wild Centre for Atmospheric Science Cambridge JULES Science Meeting, Exeter, June.
Advertisements

NO x Source Composition Climate Earth System Lightning, Chemistry and the Impacts on Climate Oliver Wild Department of Environmental Science Lancaster.
Ozone in the Troposphere: Air Quality, Chemical Weather and Climate Oliver Wild Centre for Atmospheric Science, Cambridge Dept. of Environmental Science,
Air Pollution and Climate
QUANTIFY Activity 3:Large chemistry modeling Status report, month 30 (Athens, 21 september) 3.1 Model evaluation and current impact Evaluation of.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Effect of increasing Asian Emissions and meteorological variability on the composition of the UT/LS J. E. Williams 1, P. F. J. van Velthoven 1, T. J. Schuck.
Michael Gauss, UiODe Bilt, 8-9 November 2005Quantify A3 workshop WP Future chemical composition changes from different modes of transport Set-up.
QUESTIONS 1.Is hexane more or less reactive with OH than propane? 2.Is pentene or isoprene more reactive with OH?
Hydrogen Scenario Impacts on Global Climate and Air Pollution Martin G. Schultz Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Bundesstr. 53, Hamburg, Germany.
Interannual variations in global OH radicals over the period in GEOS-Chem, and preliminary comparisons to other models I. Bey 1, S. Koumoutsaris.
THE ATMOSPHERE: OXIDIZING MEDIUM IN GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Workshop USEPA/OAQPS.
This Week—Tropospheric Chemistry READING: Chapter 11 of text Tropospheric Chemistry Data Set Analysis.
STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY. TOPICS FOR TODAY 1.Review of stratospheric chemistry 2.Recent trends in stratospheric ozone and forcing 3.How will stratospheric.
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY: FROM AIR POLLUTION TO GLOBAL CHANGE AND BACK Daniel J. Jacob.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Simple Chemical modeling of ozone sensitivity
Sensitivity of Methane Lifetime to Sulfate Geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) Giovanni Pitari V. Aquila,
Trace Gas Measurements in India S. Lal Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India Indo-US Workshop Chennai July 12-16, 2006.
TROPOSPHERIC OZONE AND OXIDANT CHEMISTRY Troposphere Stratosphere: 90% of total The many faces of atmospheric ozone: In stratosphere: UV shield In middle/upper.
IPCC WG1 AR5: Key Findings Relevant to Future Air Quality Fiona M. O’Connor, Atmospheric Composition & Climate Team, Met Office Hadley Centre.
Effect of NO x emission controls on the long-range transport of ozone air pollution and human mortality J. Jason West, Vaishali Naik, Larry W. Horowitz,
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY APPLICATIONS WORKSHOP January 2004, ESTEC Albert P H Goede Objective of the Workshop User Consultation on present and future.
The effect of pyro-convective fires on the global troposphere: comparison of TOMCAT modelled fields with observations from ICARTT Sarah Monks Outline:
Source vs. Sink Contributions to Atmospheric Methane Trends:
4/20/2006Ga Tech - EAS Air Chemistry Group Presentation 1 A Hydrogen Economy’s Potential Environmental Impacts Chun Zhao Evan Cobb.
The links to global problems Presentation at the 25 th anniversary special event of the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution “Past successes.
Recent Trend of Stratospheric Water Vapor and Its Impacts Steve Rieck, Ning Shen, Gill-Ran Jeong EAS 6410 Team Project Apr
1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)
QUESTIONS 1. How does the thinning of the stratospheric ozone layer affect the source of OH in the troposphere? 2. Chemical production of ozone in the.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Global Modelling of UTLS Ozone David Stevenson + many others Institute of Atmospheric and.
A modelling study on trends and variability of the tropospheric chemical composition over the last 40 years S.Rast(1), M.G.Schultz(2) (1) Max Planck Institute.
10-11 October 2006HYMN kick-off TM3/4/5 Modeling at KNMI HYMN Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the.
HYMN Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the biosphere GOCE-CT Status of TM model Michiel.
1 UIUC ATMOS 397G Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change Lecture 14: Methane and CO Don Wuebbles Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Illinois,
Overlaps of AQ and climate policy – global modelling perspectives David Stevenson Institute of Atmospheric and Environmental Science School of GeoSciences.
REGIONAL/GLOBAL INTERACTIONS IN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY Greenhouse gases Halocarbons Ozone Aerosols Acids Nutrients Toxics SOURCE CONTINENT REGIONAL ISSUES:
Climatic implications of changes in O 3 Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies How well.
04/12/011 The contribution of Earth degassing to the atmospheric sulfur budget By Hans-F. Graf, Baerbel Langmann, Johann Feichter From Chemical Geology.
David Stevenson 1, Colin Johnson 2, Ellie Highwood 3, Bill Collins 2, & Dick Derwent 2 1 School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh 2 The Met Office.
AN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMIST’S VIEW OF THE WORLD FiresLand biosphere Human activity Lightning Ocean physics chemistry biology.
WORKSHOP ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND AIR QUALITY : part I: Intercontinental transport and climatic effects of pollutants OBJECTIVE: Define a near-term (-2003)
The Double Dividend of Methane Control Arlene M. Fiore IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria January 28, 2003 ANIMALS 90 LANDFILLS 50 GAS 60 COAL 40 RICE 85 TERMITES.
2020 vision: Modelling the near future tropospheric composition David Stevenson Institute of Atmospheric and Environmental Science School of GeoSciences.
Why care about methane Daniel J. Jacob. Global present-day budget of atmospheric methane Wetlands: 160 Fires: 20 Livestock: 110 Rice: 40 Oil/Gas: 70 Coal:
OsloCTM2  3D global chemical transport model  Standard tropospheric chemistry/stratospheric chemistry or both. Gas phase chemistry + essential heteorogenous.
HYMN: Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the biosphere GOCE-CT TM4 model evaluations
TROPOSPHERIC OZONE AS A CLIMATE GAS AND AIR POLLUTANT: THE CASE FOR CONTROLLING METHANE Daniel J. Jacob with Loretta J. Mickley, Arlene M. Fiore, Yaping.
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
IPCC / Special Report on Aviation & Global Atmosphere 10 Apr 01 Joyce Penner Professor of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences University.
Atmospheric modelling of the Laki eruption
A. R. Ravishankara, John S. Daniel, Robert W. Portmann (2009)
Impact of Solar and Sulfate Geoengineering on Surface Ozone
Distribution and Trends: Impacts on Climate and Ozone Air Quality
Methane Global Warming Potential (GWP)
The Double Dividend of Methane Control
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Chemistry-Climate Modelling: Impacts of climate change on tropospheric chemical composition David Stevenson Institute of Atmospheric and Environmental.
Global atmospheric changes and future impacts on regional air quality
Intercontinental Transport, Hemispheric Pollution,
Linking Ozone Pollution and Climate Change:
OZONE PRODUCTION IN TROPOSPHERE
Global Change Welcome Meeting, Edinburgh, October 15th 2010
IPCC / Special Report on Aviation & Global Atmosphere 10 Apr 01 Joyce Penner Professor of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences University.
David Stevenson University of Edinburgh
Effects of global change on U.S. ozone air quality
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review
Presentation transcript:

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, The Impact of ACARE reductions in Future Aircraft NOx Emissions on the Composition and Oxidizing Capacity of the Troposphere in 2050 J. E. Williams, . Hodnebrog, P. F. J. van Velthoven and the QUANTIFY modeling team

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, EU-QUANTIFY (FP6) Quantifying the Climate Impact of Global and European Transport Systems Emission datasets used in this study available on the site Activity 3: Large-scale Chemistry Effects Related Publications: P. Hoor, et al., The impact of traffic emissions on atmospheric ozone and OH: results from QUANTIFY, Atms. Chem. Phys., 9, , (Preliminary Emission Estimates) G. Myhre et al., Radiative forcing due to changes in ozone and methane caused by the transport sector, Atms. Environ., 45, , O. Hodnebrog et al., Future Impact of non-land based traffic emissions on atmospheric ozone and OH – an optimistic scenario and a possible mitigation strategy, in preparation.

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, Quantify Transport Emission Estimates for NO x B1 Scenario (optimistic) : Abatement and mitigation procedures are effective Fraction of NOx from air decreases for ACARE Scenario Warming potential per NOx from AIR highest due to release in the UTLS (Fuglestvedt et al., 2008) ACARE : Advisory Council for Aeronautical Research in Europe

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, B1 and B1 ACARE Aircraft Emission Estimates TgN yr TgN yr TgN yr TgN yr -1

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, Variability in the Latitudinal Distribution of B1 Aircraft NOx emissions Gg N yr -1 Growth in air NOx in Tropics between 2000 – 2050; Peak in NH at 2025 Relative partitioning towards Tropics increases in the Future

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, QUANTIFY Model Ensemble Model (Institute)Hor. ResLevelsChemical Species (Trans./Total.) Reactions TM4 (KNMI, NL)3° x 2°34 (0.1)26/42 (Trop)68 p-TOMCAT (UCAM- DCHEM, UK) 2° x 2°31 (10)35/51 (Trop)112 OsloCTM2 (UiO, Norway) T4260 (0.1)76/98 (Trop/Strat)163 LMDz-INCA (LSCE, Fr)3.75° x 2.5°19 (3)66/96 (Trop)291 UCI CTM (UCI, US)T4237 (2)28/38 (Trop/LINOZ)90 MOCAGE (Meteo-France, Fr) 2° x 2°47 (5)89/30 (Trop/Strat) ECMWF OD meteorology for 2003 used throughout. 5 CTMs and 1CCM. Background CH4 increased according to projections. Experimental Methodology: 5% perturbation in Emissions from each transport sector Scaled to ~100% (Grewe et al, GMD, 2010)

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, NH Perturbations in O 3 : Ensemble model mean B1ACARE scenario only emission scenario with lower O3 than 2000 in ensemble mean Non-linearites cause 2025 to be < 2050

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, Global tropospheric O 3 budget (TM4) Tg O 3 yr B12050 B1 ACARE Total NO x Emissions (Tg N yr-1) Chemical Production (+4.1%) (+3.4%) Chemical Destruction (+3.5%) (+2.9%) Dry Deposition (+16.5%)696.2 (+4.1%) Strat-Trop exchange (+1.4%)526.4 (-0.3%) Trop. Burden/Lifetime302 (22.2)329 (23.4)328 (23.4) Although Total NOx emissions  ~8% in B1 net chemical O 3 prod.  0.6% (0.5% w/ ACARE) Increases in Air traffic in Tropics compensate for Global NOx reduction

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, NH Perturbations in UTLS OH : Ensemble Mean Average between hPa

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, Influence on Surface Air Quality: 2003 vs 2050 B1 BO3 :  25 Tg (+5.4%) ; BCO :  42 Tg (-7.5%) ; BCH4 :  1425Tg (+37.6%) NO + CH3O2  NO2  O3 Background [O3] increases by ~5-10% in Pristine areas Decreases over populated regions from Industrial and Traffic Mitigation

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, Impact of Air traffic emissions on air quality: 2050 B1 Aircraft Emissions fully removed : Impact on surface O3 Increases surface O3 in NH by ~1-5%

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, Impact of ACARE emissions on air quality: 2050 B1 ACARE emissions  surface [O3] by ~0.5-2% in NH as a result of ACARE NOx reductions Mitigates increases in background [O3] due to CH4  (enhanced NOx recycling)

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, Impact of ACARE emissions on Oxidising Capacity: B B1 ACARE τ( CH 4 ) yrs τ( CO ) months OH + CH 4 (+ O 2 ) > CH 3 O 2 + H 2 O ~16% OH + CO > HO 2 + H 2 O + CO 2 ~ 40% There is a feedback in that reducing aircraft NOx increases the atmospheric lifetime of methane thus increasing the RF component Effect could be mitigated with increasing Relative Humidity due to rising Temperatures

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, Radiative Forcing from ΔO 3, ΔCH 4 and CH 4 -induced ΔO 3 RF (mW m -2 ) ΔO3ΔO3 Δ CH 4 CH 4 -induced Δ O 3 Total 2050 B (9.0)-17.8 (4.0)-6.5 (1.5)1.9 (6.4) 2050 B1 ACARE 18.9 (6.8)-14.3 (3.4)-5.2 (1.2)-0.6 (4.6)

J. E. Williams, ACCRI, Conclusions Future aircraft emissions peak in 2025 for NH and 2050 for the Tropics in B1 Scenario. There is a seasonal dependency in the magnitude of effects, where strong photolytic activity amplifies differences. Aircraft emissions contribute ~1-5% towards surface O 3 in 2050 for the B1 Emission Scenario. Introducing ACARE Technology has the potential to reduce surface O 3 ~1-2%. Introducing ACARE Technology changes the RF potential from slightly +ve to slightly –ve, although the std. dev. in the model ensemble is large.