GOCI: Early In-Orbit Performances

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AITA 9, MERTIS Team – MERTIS Calibration, Oct 2007 Folie 1 Development of a calibration concept for the MErcury Thermal Infrared Spectrometer Thomas Saeuberlich,
Advertisements

Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the GOCI Jae Hyun Ahn* Joo-Hyung Ryu* Young Jae Park* Yu-Hwan Ahn* Im Sang Oh** Korea Ocean Research & Development.
Summary of Terra and Aqua MODIS Long-term Performance Jack Xiong 1, Brian Wenny 2, Sri Madhaven 2, Amit Angal 3, William Barnes 4, and Vincent Salomonson.
1 st post launch SCIAMACHY calibration & Verification Meeting L1b Astrium Friedrichshafen – Germany 24 July 2002 First Level 1b Spectral Calibration analysis.
CHRIS (Compact High Resolution Imaging Spectrometer) sira group sira electro-optics Dr Mike Cutter EO & Technology Business Manager.
VIIRS Reflective Solar On-orbit Calibration and Performance Jack Xiong and Jim Butler Code 618.0, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD CLARREO SDT Meeting, NASA.
Brown Bag Lunch Lecture ABI Calibration
Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Methodology to compare GERB- CERES filtered radiances.
Remote sensing in meteorology
CIRSGSFC April 2004 dej-1 CIRS Instrument Overview CIRS Team Meeting Observatoire de Paris - Meudon April 26 – CIRS Instrument Group presented.
Spectroscopy of Stratospheric Molecular O3
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission Victor Gardner University of Maryland 2007 AIAA Region 1 Mid-Atlantic Student Conference National Institute.
SeaDAS Training ~ NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 1 Introduction to ocean color satellite calibration NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Goddard Space.
Rachel Klima (on behalf of the MASCS team) JHU/APL MASCS/VIRS Data Users’ Workshop LPSC 2014, The Woodlands, TX March 17,2014 MASCS Instrument & VIRS Calibration.
1 KARI Proprietary Material COMS-1 Program, Introduction to COMS Development Plan COMS Program Office Korea Aerospace Research Institute.
The Field Camera Unit Project definition, organization, planning S. Scuderi INAF – Catania.
Presentation EddiCam consortium, FF, Madrid 13/06/2002 Eddington programmatic status Fully approved by SPC as part of ESA’s science program as project.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geometric Assessment of Remote Sensed Data Oct Presented By: Michael Choate, SAIC U.S.
1 Pixel and Image Characteristics Prof. Arnon Karnieli The Remote Sensing Laboratory Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research Ben-Gurion University.
October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 1 MEIDEX – Crew Tutorial Calibration of IMC-201 Adam D. Devir, MEIDEX Payload Manager.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
1 st post launch SCIAMACHY calibration & Verification Meeting L1b Astrium Friedrichshafen – Germany 24 July 2002 First level 1b Sun mean reference (SMR)
1 An Observatory for Ocean, Climate and Environment SAC-D/Aquarius HSC - Radiometric Calibration H Raimondo M Marenchino 7th SAC-D Aquarius Science Meeting.
0 IOCCG 2003 Yongseung Kim Remote Sensing Department Korea Aerospace Research Institute High Resolution Visible and IR Sensors (HiRVIS) on Geostationary.
Overview of the “Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB)” Experience. Nicolas Clerbaux Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMIB) In collaboration.
1 Leonardo Pinheiro da Silva Corot-Brazil Workshop – October 31, 2004 Corot Instrument Characterization based on in-flight collected data Leonardo Pinheiro.
Implementation and Processing outline Processing Framework of VIIRS instrument monitoring System Processing Framework of VIIRS EV data Monitoring SD/SDSM.
RMIB involvement in the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) and Climate Monitoring SAF projects Nicolas Clerbaux Remote sensing from Space Division.
Recent Solar Irradiance Data From SBUV/2 and OMI Matthew DeLand and Sergey Marchenko Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) SOLID WP-2 Workshop.
Basic Satellite Communication (3) Components of Communications Satellite Dr. Joseph N. Pelton.
Use of the Moon as a calibration reference for NPP VIIRS Frederick S. Patt, Robert E. Eplee, Robert A. Barnes, Gerhard Meister(*) and James J. Butler NASA.
KMA Proprietary Material 4 th GOES-R Users’ Conference 1 Introduction to Communication, Ocean & Meteorological Satellite Hee-Hoon Lee Korea Meteorological.
GIST, Boulder, 31/03/2004 RMIB GERB Processing: overview and status S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
The Field Camera Unit Results from technical meeting S. Scuderi INAF – Catania.
Electro-optical systems Sensor Resolution
2015 GSICS Annual Meeting, Deli India March 16~20, 2015 Xiuqing Hu National Satellite Meteorological Center, CMA Yupeng Wang, Wei Fang Changchun Institute.
Digital Light Sources First introduced in 2001.
Pre-launch Characteristics and Calibration
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
TEMPO Instrument Update
Calibrating the METEOSAT SEVIRI solar channels using lunar observations Sébastien Wagner (1) Bartolomeo Viticchie (1), Tom Stone (2), Tim Hewison(1), Gary.
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
MODIS and VIIRS Reflective Solar Bands Calibration Methodologies and
TEMPO Instrument Update
VIRTIS Operations at Lutetia
GOES-16 ABI Lunar Data Preparation to GIRO
An Overview of MODIS Reflective Solar Bands Calibration and Performance Jack Xiong NASA / GSFC GRWG Web Meeting on Reference Instruments and Their Traceability.
Sébastien Wagner (1) Tom Stone (2), Gary Fowler (1), Tim Hewison (1)
Calibration and Performance MODIS Characterization Support Team (MCST)
MODIS Lunar Calibration Data Preparation and Results for GIRO Testing
Instrument Characterization: Status
Deep Convective Cloud BRDF characterization using PARASOL
Using the Moon for Sensor Calibration Inter- comparisons
Instrument Considerations
Changchun Institute of Optics Fine Mechanics and Physics
S-NPP Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Lunar Calibration using GSICS Implementation of the ROLO model (GIRO) for Reflective Solar Bands.
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
TanSat/CAPI Calibration and validation
Presentation Overview
JEM-SMILES Instrumental Capabilities
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
Lunar calibration of COMS visible channel using GIRO
Remote sensing in meteorology
2011 International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
MERIS Level 1b processing Ludovic Bourg
Presentation transcript:

GOCI: Early In-Orbit Performances 2011 IGARSS TH3.T05 GOCI: Early In-Orbit Performances July 28, 2011 Vancouver, CANADA Han-Dol KIM*, Gm-Sil Kang*, Joo-Hyung Ryu** Pierre Coste†, Philippe Meyer † *Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI) **Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute (KORDI) †EADS Astrium

Agenda Introduction of COMS Introduction of GOCI Current Status of COMS and GOCI GOCI In-Orbit Performances Conclusion

Introduction of COMS (1) COMS: Communication, Ocean and Meteorological Satellite Geostationary satellite Mass at Launch: 2460 kg Orbital Location: 128.2oE Design Life time: 10 years Operational Life: 7.7 years Launch: June 26, 2910, 21:41 (UTC) Launcher: Ariane 5 ECA COMS Missions A meteo mission (MI)* An ocean imager mission (GOCI)** An experimental Ka band telecommunication mission * MI: Meteorological Imager ** GOCI: Geostationary Ocean Color Imager

Introduction of COMS (2) The main characteristics of COMS - Operational lifetime: 7.7 years - Design lifetime: 10 years - Orbital position: 128.2°E - Launch mass: 2460 Kg - Payload mass: 316 Kg - Payload power: 1077 W - Power generation: 2396 W by GaAs cells solar array - Pointing performance: * better than +/- 0.05°absolute pointing error in roll and pitch for MI/GOCI * better than 0,11°(half cone) error for Ka band RF beam pointing * pointing stability; 10µrad (N/S and E/W) peak to peak over 8s period 55µrad (N/S and E/W) peak to peak over 120s period

Introduction of GOCI (1) Overview world’s 1st geostationary ocean color imager, jointly developed by EADS Astrium and KARI 8 channels/spectral bands (6-Visible and 2-NIR) provides multi-spectral data regarding coastal ocean environment for marine science research and application purpose spectral band selection is ensured by a 9-position filter wheel: 8 positions correspond to the 8 wavebands (the ninth one for detector dark current measurement) Spectral band selection is ensured by a 9-position filter wheel: 8 positions correspond to the 8 wavebands, and the ninth one is used for detector dark current measurement by providing a full occultation view.

Introduction of GOCI (2) Performance requirement specification Items Technical requirements Ground Sample Distance (GSD)  500m  500m at the center of the target area Target area 2500km  2500km centered on (36N , 130E) Spectral coverage 412 nm ~ 865 nm (8 channels) Bandwidth 10 nm ~ 40 nm SNR 750 ~ 1200 System MTF 0.3 on all bands (after ground processing) Dynamic range NEdR ~ Maximum cloud radiance Radiometric calibration accuracy 4 % Digitization 12 bit Spectral band selection is ensured by a 9-position filter wheel: 8 positions correspond to the 8 wavebands, and the ninth one is used for detector dark current measurement by providing a full occultation view.

Introduction of GOCI (3) Key Design Features (i) (Z+ Earth) Five Key Elements: Three mechanisms (SCM, FWM, POM), Telescope Assembly and FPA. Functional chain, in the order of: SCM, POM, Telescope Assembly, FWM, FPA Calibration mechanism: SD & Diffuser Aging Monitoring Device (DAMD), a smaller aperture diffuser using identical material to SD (QVD), to be used infrequently and suffer virtually no degradation due to contaminant buildup and polymerization from solar exposure, which allows maintaining the calibration accuracy. GOCI Main Unit (w/o MLI protection)

Introduction of GOCI (4) Key Design Features (ii) Spectral band selection is ensured by a 9-position filter wheel: 8 positions correspond to the 8 wavebands, and the ninth one is used for detector dark current measurement by providing a full occultation view. GOCI Main Unit (w/o MLI protection) during integration phase

Introduction of GOCI (5) Key Design Features (iii) - FPA (Focal Plane Assembly) GOCI Detector & FEE (Front End Electronics) 2-D array, COMS detector: 1415(EW)x1432(NS) pixels 2 sub-arrays: 1415 x 715 pixels 2 lead-out channels for each sub-array Low noise amplification of 4 lead-out channel signals of the detector by FEE Spectral band selection is ensured by a 9-position filter wheel: 8 positions correspond to the 8 wavebands, and the ninth one is used for detector dark current measurement by providing a full occultation view. GOCI CMOS Detector

Introduction of GOCI (5) Key Design Features (vi) - Telescope Assembly: * Three Mirror Anastigmat (TMA) design, providing good MTF performance over the field of view on focal plane array, with all mirrors made of SiC to lower weights and minimize thermal effects Spectral band selection is ensured by a 9-position filter wheel: 8 positions correspond to the 8 wavebands, and the ninth one is used for detector dark current measurement by providing a full occultation view.

Introduction of GOCI (5) Key Design Features (v) - FWM (Filter Wheel Mechanism) * 1-D rotation, Filter Wheel * 8 spectral filters * 1 Dark plate for offset measurement - POM (Pointing Mechanism) * An High accuracy pointing assembly, used to select slot positions Spectral band selection is ensured by a 9-position filter wheel: 8 positions correspond to the 8 wavebands, and the ninth one is used for detector dark current measurement by providing a full occultation view.

Introduction of GOCI (6) Key Design Features (vi) - SCM (Shutter & Calibration Mechanism) Shutter wheel (1-D rotation) * For the earth view when opening and for closing instrument cavity when it is inactive * SD (Solar Diffuser): for the sun view. effectively insensitive to radiation degradation over mission life time (made of Quasi Volumic Diffuser (QVD)). * DAMD (Diffuser Aging Monitoring Device): for the sun view. a smaller aperture diffuser using identical material to SD, to be used infrequently and suffer virtually no degradation, which allows maintaining the calibration accuracy. Spectral band selection is ensured by a 9-position filter wheel: 8 positions correspond to the 8 wavebands, and the ninth one is used for detector dark current measurement by providing a full occultation view.

Current Status of COMS & GOCI (1) COMS launch and mission timeline

Current Status of COMS and GOCI (2) COMS lOT Summary (July 2010~ Feb 2011) Bus IOT - All functional checks are completed and Bus is in good health. - Performance checks are completed and subsystems are showing excellent performances. Payload IOT - All functional checks are completed and all three payloads are in good health. - Radiometric performance checks and radiometric calibration have been completed. - Geometric calibration has been completed with the focus on INR tuning.

Current Status of COMS and GOCI (3) GOCI Status Summary Normal Operation for the service to the end user has set forth at the completion of IOT (FAR), from April 2011. Current GOCI Status - GOCI is in good health with all functions in good check. - Radiometric calibration is exhibiting good trace of performance, calibration and stability. - Geometric correction is exhibiting good landmark matching and excellent INR performance metric.

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (1) Functional chain architecture of Data Processing

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (2) Radiometric Performances (1) Radiance Response GOCI radiometric model has been validated through ground test S: Output (Digital count), L: Incident Radiance G: Linear gain, b: Nonlinear gain, Tint: integration time O: Dark current offset parameter, F: Fixed offset parameter 2D mapping parameter O 2D mapping parameter F In orbit offset parameter  Ground offset parameter

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (3) Radiometric Performances (2) Radiance Response (ii) GOCI radiometric model has been validated through ground test Digital count image of Sun diffused by SD Ground Measured Radiometric Response In-orbit radiometric responsivity G & b , PRNU (Pixel Response Non-Uniformity)  On-ground measured values

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (4) Radiometric Performances (3) Radiometric calibration and stability (i) GOCI radiometric calibration using Sun light through Solar diffuser  Covering whole imaging chain (telescope and video chain) for Earth observation (SD is located in front of pointing mirror)  Covering full pupil  Monitoring of Solar diffuser aging using secondary solar diffuser In orbit calibration method using two images has been verified through IOT duration. SD image for long integration time SD image for short integration time Gain matrix

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (5) Radiometric Performances (4) Radiometric calibration and stability (ii) Gain matrix calculation Linear gain Non-linear gain where Es : solar irradiance, : sun images : measurement parameter for sun imaging SD: diffusion factor of SD, SD: solar incident angle, TSD: integration time Using two measurement points SA, SB (two images) : image with long integration time & image with short integration time Using solar irradiance ES calculated from the solar spectrum model (Thuillier 2004) provided by GOCI user group Using diffusion model SD of SD characterized on-ground Using solar incident angle SD calculated from Ephemeris data and telemetry 20

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (6) Radiometric Performances (5) Radiometric calibration and stability (iii) Radiance image calculation using in-orbit gain matrix where : raw data after offset correction : Gain parameters calculated through in-orbit solar calibration 08/09/2010, 00:15:00 UTC L0 image (raw digital image, slot 7, B8) L1A image (radiance image, slot 7, B8)

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (7) Radiometric Performances (6) Radiometric calibration and stability (iv) Evolution of mean gain over 5 months: about 2% degradation (Stabilization after 3 months)

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (8) Radiometric Performances (7) SNR SNR has been assessed indirectly by using in orbit gain matrix. IOT SNR measurement > Specification Nominal side Redundant side

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (9) MTF MTF has been assessed by KEF image for Band 7 and Ban 8. IOT MTF measurement > Specification Example of E/W MTF measurement (KEF)

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (10) Geometric Performances (1) GSD GSD at FOV center has been assessed. IOT GSD measurement: OK

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (11) Geometric Performances (2) Geometric Correction: INR - A new, noble approach to INR system design - Not directly dependent on system and/or payload models and hence can avoid any indispensible modeling and/or prediction error in the process - Acquisition of sufficient number of landmarks in good quality is key to this design - Excellent landmark matching algorithm and the fine-tuning of newly established landmark database with ample landmark sites render such acquisition of sufficient number of good landmarks

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (12) Geometric Performances (3) GOCI INR performances (i) - Accuracy performances on landmarks have been checked on KORDI GOCI operational platform (1FEB2011 to 7FEB2011) - GOCI INR performances have been re-checked after the final adjustment (15FEB2011 to 21FEB2011)

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (13) Geometric Performances (4) GOCI INR performances (ii) Mean Standard Deviation Performance (mrad) EW NS Navigation 0.05 0.46 0.56 0.52 1.72 2.03 24.1 28.4 Band-to-Band Reg. -0.01 0.00 0.30 0.25 0.92 0.74 12.9 10.4

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (14) Geometric Performances (5) GOCI INR performances (iii): Example of shoreline matching (B7)

GOCI In-Orbit Performances (14) Geometric Performances (6) GOCI INR performances (vi): Example of shoreline matching (B7)

GOCI Sample Images (1)

GOCI Sample Images (2)

GOCI Sample Images (3)

GOCI Sample Images (4)

Conclusion The newly developed GOCI is demonstrating quite decent performances in orbit, both in radiometric and geometric aspects. It is anticipated that such GOCI image data will bring a new dimension to the geostationary remote sensing and in the related scientific research fields. More in-depth review, thorough analysis and active iteration are desired to define the requirement specification for the next generation GOCI (‘GOCI-2’). It is hoped that GOCI will further be expanded in terms of its design, development, operation and applications, into the next generation of geostationary remote sensing satellites.