PM—Propositional Model A Computational Psycholinguistic Model of Language Comprehension Based on a Relational Analysis of Written English Jerry T. Ball,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Computational language: week 10 Lexical Knowledge Representation concluded Syntax-based computational language Sentence structure: syntax Context free.
Advertisements

Toward a Large-Scale Model of Language Comprehension in ACT-R 6 July 2007 Jerry Ball 1, Andrea Heiberg 2, and Ronnie Silber 3 Air Force Research Laboratory.
Semantics (Representing Meaning)
Lexical Functional Grammar History: –Joan Bresnan (linguist, MIT and Stanford) –Ron Kaplan (computational psycholinguist, Xerox PARC) –Around 1978.
Language Use and Understanding BCS 261 LIN 241 PSY 261 CLASS 12: BRANIGAN ET AL.: PRIMING.
Syntax-Semantics Mapping Rajat Kumar Mohanty CFILT.
Projecting Grammatical Features in Nominals: 23 March 2010 Jerry T. Ball Senior Research Psychologist 711 th HPW / RHAC Air Force Research Laboratory DISTRIBUTION.
Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 2 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 4.
Constructions at Work The Nature of Generalization in Language
Basic Expressions July 2007 Jerry Ball 1, Andrea Heiberg 2 Air Force Research Laboratory 1 L3 Communications 2.
Sentence Memory: A Constructive Versus Interpretive Approach Bransford, J.D., Barclay, J.R., & Franks, J.J.
MORPHOLOGY - morphemes are the building blocks that make up words.
Is the Head of a Noun Phrase Necessarily a Noun? 25 July 2003 Jerry Ball
Language (and Decomposition). Linguistics provides… a highly articulated “computational” (generative) theory of the mental representations of language.
LING NLP 1 Introduction to Computational Linguistics Martha Palmer April 19, 2006.
Leksička semantika i pragmatika 1. predavanje. Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics.
Leksička semantika i pragmatika 2. predavanje. Semantics -predicate arguments break(AGENT, INSTRUMENT, PATIENT) AGENT PATIENT INSTRUMENT John broke the.
Linguistic Theory Lecture 8 Meaning and Grammar. A brief history In classical and traditional grammar not much distinction was made between grammar and.
Module 14 Thought & Language. INTRODUCTION Definitions –Cognitive approach method of studying how we process, store, and use information and how this.
Modeling Long-Distance Dependencies in Double R July 2008 Jerry Ball Human Effectiveness Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory.
Cognitive Linguistics Croft & Cruse 10 An overview of construction grammars (part 2, through end)
1/27 Semantics Going beyond syntax. 2/27 Semantics Relationship between surface form and meaning What is meaning? Lexical semantics Syntax and semantics.
1 Introduction to Computational Linguistics Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Spring 2006-Lecture 4.
Topic: Theoretical Bases for Cognitive Method Objectives Trainees will be able to give reasons for the design and procedures of the Cognitive Method.
1 Introduction to Computational Linguistics Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Fall 2005-Lecture 2.
Learning about Literacy: A 30-Year Journey By P. David Pearson & Diane Stephens Presented by Pat Edwards & Hakim Shahid Edu. 707 Dr J. McEneaney.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics A brief history. Psycholinguistics : A brief history Pre-psycholinguistics: The ancient Greeks: Noticed.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics
Semantics and Lexicology Generativist semantics. From structuralist semantics Semantic features, components.
Understanding a Sentence
TRANSFORMATIONAL GRAMMAR An introduction. LINGUISTICS Linguistics Traditional Before 1930 Structural 40s -50s Transformational ((Chomsky 1957.
Lecture 1 Introduction: Linguistic Theory and Theories
Assessment of Semantics
1 The Interaction Between Verbs And Constructions Lucas Champollion Oct 18 th, 2004 Goldberg, Adele E. (1995): Constructions. Ch. 2.
1 What does “meaning” mean? Linguistics lecture #3 November 2, 2006.
Dr. Monira Al-Mohizea MORPHOLOGY & SYNTAX WEEK 12.
Introduction to Linguistics Ms. Suha Jawabreh Lecture 18.
Construction Driven Language Processing May 2007 Jerry T. Ball Senior Research Psychologist Air Force Research Laboratory Mesa, AZ.
An Intelligent Analyzer and Understander of English Yorick Wilks 1975, ACM.
1 Relationship between Cognitive Psychology and Other Disciplines Eysenck, Michael W. and Mark T. Kean Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook,
Introduction to Embodied Construction Grammar March 4, 2003 Ben Bergen
CPE 480 Natural Language Processing Lecture 4: Syntax Adapted from Owen Rambow’s slides for CSc Fall 2006.
Lecture 1 Lec. Maha Alwasidi. Branches of Linguistics There are two main branches: Theoretical linguistics and applied linguistics Theoretical linguistics.
Deep structure (semantic) Structure of language Surface structure (grammatical, lexical, phonological) Semantic units have all meaning components such.
Topic 3: predicates Introduction to Semantics. Definition Any word which can function as the predicator of a sentence. Predicators The parts which are.
Natural Language Processing Chapter 1 : Introduction.
Done by: Amir Tazhinov, For ENG 100a Class American University in Bulgaria, 2014.
LING 6520: Comparative Topics in Linguistics (from a computational perspective) Martha Palmer Jan 15,
Leonid Iomdin Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences
SYNTAX.
Lexical Semantics Fall Lexicon Collection of Words Collection of Words Mental store of information about words and morphemes Mental store of information.
SUBJECT VERB OBJECT. Subject The subject is one of the main two parts of a sentence. According to traditional grammar, a sentence consists of two parts:
September 26, : Grammars and Lexicons Lori Levin.
Syntax By WJQ. Syntax : Syntax is the study of the rules governing the way words are combined to form sentences in a language, or simply, the study of.
MENTAL GRAMMAR Language and mind. First half of 20 th cent. – What the main goal of linguistics should be? Behaviorism – Bloomfield: goal of linguistics.
Grammar The “4 – Level” Analysis. The 4 - Levels Jack ate a delicious sandwich. Level 1 – parts of speech Level 2 – parts of a sentence Level 3 – phrases.
Lec. 10.  In this section we explain which constituents of a sentence are minimally required, and why. We first provide an informal discussion and then.
Grammar Grammar analysis.
Cognitive Language Processing for Rosie
CS 4700: Foundations of Artificial Intelligence
Semantics (Representing Meaning)
CS 4700: Foundations of Artificial Intelligence
Formalizations of Commonsense Psychology
Representation of Actions as an Interlingua
Introduction to Linguistics
BBI 3212 ENGLISH SYNTAX AND MORPHOLOGY
Introduction to Computational Linguistics
Valence, Transitivity, Voice
Structure of a Lexicon Debasri Chakrabarti 13-May-19.
Presentation transcript:

PM—Propositional Model A Computational Psycholinguistic Model of Language Comprehension Based on a Relational Analysis of Written English Jerry T. Ball, PhD

PM Overview Introduction Historical & Theoretical Basis The Representation of Propositional Descriptions The Representation of Object Descriptions The Processing of Propositional and Object Descriptions Summary

Mental Box Real World Linguistic Expression Object, State Or Event Repn of Ling Expression Repn of Related Ling Expressions sense Repn of Prototype Repn of Exemplar Repn of Instance sense reference Linguistic Nonlinguistic sense

|obj is hitting the books| |obj hit the nail on the head| |I hit obj| |I hit the term| |he is hitting obj| |obj likes to hit obj| |subj hit obj| |subj verb obj| |subj predicate| |sentence| |obj hit obj| |obj pred obj| |hitter hit hittee| |agent hit patient| |agent pred patient| |proposition|

Linguistic Influences Cognitive Linguistics (Langacker; Lakoff) Semantics & Cognition (Jackendoff) Traditional Grammar (Jespersen; Quirk et. al) Case Grammar (Fillmore) Valency Grammar (Somers) Functional Grammar (Dik) TG & GB Theory (Chomsky)

Psychological Influences ACT-R (Anderson) Construction-Integration Model (Kintsch) Miller & Johnson-Laird Mental Models (Johnson-Laird) Clark & Clark; Clark & Haviland CAPS (Just & Carpenter)

Artificial Intelligence Influences Preference Semantics (Wilks) Conceptual Dependency Theory (Schank) Conceptual Structures (Sowa) SHRDLU (Winograd)

Propositional Descriptions Predicate Predicate Modifier Predicate Specifier Object Argument Description Propositional Argument Description Propositional Modifier

Propositional Forms Pred(Obj) Pred(Obj,Obj) Pred(Obj,Obj,Obj) Pred(Prop head ) Pred(Obj,Prop) Pred(Prop head,Obj) Pred(Obj,Obj,Prop)

Propositional Form Samples [went(he)] [kissed(he,me)] [gave(he,me,it)] [unfortunately([went(he)] head )] [believes(he,[like(you,me)])] [by([kissed(he,me)] head,it] [told(he,me,[like(you,him)])]

Predicate Modification Pred{Pred head }(obj) Pred{Pred head }(Obj, +Obj)

Predicate Modification Samples [am{sad}(I)] [over{went}(he,it)]

Conjunctions Pred conj (Prop head,Prop head ) Pred conj (Prop head,Prop head,…) Pred conj {Pred head,Pred head } Pred conj {Pred head,Pred head,…} Pred conj {Pred-Mod head,Pred-Mod head } Pred conj {Pred-Mod head,Pred-Mod head,…} Pred conj {Pred-Spec head,Pred-Spec head } Pred conj {Pred-Spec head,Pred-Spec head,…}

Conjunction Examples [and([like(I,you)],[like(you,me)])] [and{hit,kicked}(he,it)] [and{quickly,quietly}{went}(he)] [and{is,was}{sad}(he)]

Object Descriptions Term Function Function Modifier Function Specifier Object Description

Object Forms Func  Term Func-Mod{Func head }  Func Func-Spec  Obj Func(Obj head )  Obj Func(Obj head,Obj)  Obj

Object Form Examples head > > very{old head } func (the head ) (all(the head )) (in(the head,the )

Conjunctions Func conj Func conj (Obj head,Obj head ) Func conj (Obj head,Obj head,…) Func conj {Func head,Func head } Func conj {Func head,Func head,…} Func conj {Func-Mod head,Func-Mod head } Func conj {Func-Mod head,Func-Mod head,…} Func conj {Func-Spec head,Func-Spec head,…}

Conjunction Examples (the >) (and(the head,the head )) (the head >) (and{this,that} head )

Processing Read Text from Left to Right Identify Word Activate Schemas for Word Select Activated Schema Integrate Activated Schema with Previously Activated Schemas Read Next Word

Processing Processor Learns Effective Processing Strategies Limited Backtracking (Jump back to beginning) Relational Lexical Items Set Up Expectations that Drive Processing Mechanism (Lexically Driven) No Separate Syntactic Analysis No Top-Down Processing No Overall Grammar No Crucial Grammatical Unit Like Sentence

Processing the  the obj boy  the obj +  (the ) likes  likes(O1,O2) prop likes(O1,O2) prop + (the )  likes(the,O2) prop the  the obj girl  the obj +  (the ) likes(the,O2) prop + (the )  [likes(the,the )]

Processing an Object Desc the  the obj black  black term robed  term black term + robed term  black{F1} func + robed term black{F1} func + robed term  black{robed} term judge  black{robed} term +  > the obj + >  (the >)

Processing a Prop Desc he  (he) is  is{PR1} a  a obj man  a obj +  (a ) is{PR1} + (a )  is{(a ) pred }(O1) prop is{(a ) pred }(O1) prop + (he)  is{(a ) pred }(he)

Processing a Prop Desc he  (he) stopped  stopped?? stopped + walking  stopped{PR1} + walking(O1) walking(O1) + slowly  walking(O1) + slowly{PR2} pred walking(O1) prop + slowly{PR2} pred  slowly{walking}(O1) prop stopped{PR1} + slowly{walking}(O1) prop  stopped{slowly{walking}}(O1) prop (he) + stopped{slowly{walking}}(O1) prop  [stopped{slowly{walking}}(he)]