WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION LARGE SCALE TESTING TO PROTECT SAN FRANSCISO WATER SUPPLY Tom O’Rourke Thomas R. Briggs Professor of Engineering Cornell University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Putting USGS Research to Use: User Perspectives on Research Evolution, Accomplishments, and Challenges USGS Earthquake Hazards Program (EHP) Lloyd S. Cluff.
Advertisements

JP Singh and Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., P.E. Gary Norris, Ph.D., P.E. March 2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM S-SHAFT FOR LATERALLY LOADED.
NEES-Pile: Experimental and Computational Study of Pile Foundations Subjected to Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading COMPARISON BETWEEN CENTRIFUGE.
Investigation of Consolidation Promoting Effect by Field and Model Test for Vacuum Consolidation Method Nagasaki University H.Mihara Y.Tanabasi Y.Jiang.
Liquefaction, Kobe Earthquake Matt Greaves, Tom Baker.
RETAINING EARTH STRUCTURE Session 11 – 16
ENGR 166 – Foundations in Engineering Structural Engineering Module Dynamics of Structures.
Inuksuk - Nunavut, Canada
Negative Skin Friction
Materials and Joining March 2005 R&D Forum David Horsley TransCanada Pipelines Limited.
Seismic Improvement Program Presented to: The Northern California Earthquake Hazards Workshop February 12, 2014.
TransCanada Corporation (TSX/NYSE: TRP)
The Marmaray Tunnel Project Bosphorus Strait, Turkey
Instrument Space Requirements Rob Connatser Chief Instrument Project Engineer November 2014.
EBMUD: A Decade of Seismic Mitigation Progress – More Work to Do By Bill Cain, S.E. Project Manager Seismic Mitigation Planning Member, ABAG Lifeline Infrastructure.
Panel Discussion: PBEE Practice and Needs Paul Somerville, URS Joe Maffei, R&C Ron Hamburger, SGH Lloyd Cluff, PG&E Tom Shantz, Caltrans Jim Malley, Degenkolb.
Supplemental Review and Exercises
Seismic Performance Assessment of Flat Plate Floor Systems John W. Wallace, Ph.D., P.E. Thomas Hyun-Koo Kang, Ph.D. Student Department of Civil and Environmental.
Earthquake Resistant Features in Buildings Dr. K. S. Nanjunda Rao.
SOIL, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
UseIT Tutorial # 3 Earthquakes in the Southern California Fault System Tom Jordan June 16, 2011.
Earthquakes and Earth’s Interior
TOPIC 2: TYPES OF FOUNDATION
Australian Geomechanics Society Mini-symposium Sydney October 2005 Soil Loads on Cut and Cover Tunnels Under High Fills Doug Jenkins Interactive Design.
Introduction Motivations: There are hundreds of miles of retaining wall systems that exist in western United States Their routine design for static applications.
Dam Failure Dams are generally an expensive structure that directly affect the economy of the area through power generation, flood control and water supply.
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Southern California: A Natural Laboratory for Earthquake Science SCEC annual meeting, 2000.
Section 2 Review 1. Seismic waves carry the energy of an EQ away from the focus. Some of those waves reach the surface and become surface waves. 2… P-waves-compress.
Foundations for offshore wind towers
1 Natural Disasters Earthquakes & Their Damages. 2 San Francisco M = 7.8; 3,000 killed.
1 NEES-Pile: Experimental and Computational Study of Pile Foundations Subjected to Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading Topic for Wrap-up Discussion.
TOPICS COVERED Building Configuration Response of Concrete Buildings
Deformation of Rocks How Rocks Deform Brittle-Ductile Behavior
IMPLEMENTATION OF SCEC RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ONGOING PROJECTS SCEC PROPOSAL TO NSF SCEC 2004 RFP.
LIQUEFACTION FAILURE OF FOUNDATION - STRUCTURE COLLAPSE.
California Earthquakes Through an historical perspective.
Weian Liu 3. Research Interest Soil Structure Interaction Seismic Analysis and Design of Bridge Structures Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics.
JPARC- Decay Volume M.Sakuda (KEK) 11 November Decay Volume Requirements Design 2. Construction Status 3. Summary and schedule In collaboration.
Bay Area Earthquakes – Utility & Lifeline Issues Bay Area Earthquakes – Utility & Lifeline Issues JEANNE PERKINS Consultant, ABAG Earthquake and Hazards.
10/2010 IWLC2010 Global Design Effort 1 Brief Overview of Interaction Region Conventional Facilities in RDR Times Presenter Tom Lackowski.
1 Homes take DUSEL NSF Preliminary Baseline Review - April 13-15, 2010 Bob Altes Engineer- ISE Water Shield Engineering Figure Courtesy PDG and LBNL Homestake.
Ashley L., TiAni T., Joe O., Kyle V.. California North American & Pacific Plates Major cities: Richmond, Berkeley, Oakland, San Leanardo, Hayward and.
Location and map of region Tectonic activities Mechanism of earthquake Damage Risks.
LONG TERM GEODETIC MONITORING OF THE DEFORMATION OF A LIQUID STORAGE TANK FOUNDED ON PILES P. Savvaidis Laboratory of Geodesy Dept. of Civil Engineering.
University at Buffalo EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH INSTITUTE Student Chapter CHAPTER INTRODUCTION The UB-EERI is an active student chapter with 20 members.
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 Platform Moved on Hillman Rollers, Deformations John W. Amann ILC – Mechanical Engineering 9/12/07 IREng07.
1 Case Study: Pacific Gas & Electric Company San Francisco Lifelines Council Edwards Salas Senior Vice President, Engineering and Operations, PG&E February,
DESIGN FLEXIBLE AND RIGID PAVEMENTS Ms Ikmalzatul Abdullah.
1 Quake Summit 2010 October 9, 2010 Centrifuge Testing and Parallel Numerical Simulations of Lateral Pressures Measured Against a Rigid Caisson PI: Scott.
Chilled Water Plant Overview From Project Concept To Operation July 26, 2007.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS. TAIWAN PART I: EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.
NEESR PROJECT NEESR-SG EVALUATION OF GROUND RUPTURE EFFECTS ON CRITICAL LIFELINES CORNELL RENSSELAER SCIENCENTER.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 13
Recent CSMIP/Caltrans Downhole Array Data and their Application in Site Specific Analysis H. Haddadi 1, V. Graizer 1, A. Shakal 1, P. Hipley 2 1 – California.
National University Rail Center Innovative Fully Precast Retaining Wall System For Highways and Railroads Maen Farhat, Momenur Rahman, Mustapha Ibrahim.
Asset Degradation Modelling at Townsville Water
Plate movement Earthquake = sudden release of energy in the Earth’s crust that creates seismic waves. They are measured by the Richter Scale,
HOMOGENEOUS HYDROGEN DEFLAGRATIONS IN SMALL SCALE ENCLOSURE
BRIDGES MOST IMPORTANT GEOTECHNICAL EFFECT- LIQUEFACTION
Earthquakes A sudden and violent shaking of the ground as a result of movements within the earth's crust or volcanic action.
Experimental study of shaft resistance of energy pile
Pinole-Hercules Water Pollution Control Plant Upgrade Project
4th Annual Construction Law Summit
Project Purpose & Description
Effect of Earthquake on Fire Protection Systems
Progress on the development of a low-cost fast-timing microchannel plate photodetector Junqi Xie1, Karen Byrum1, Marcel Demarteau1, Joseph Gregar1, Edward.
Graduation Project Bracing system for deep excavation.
Number of treatments ____________________________________________
Name: _____________________ Date:_____________ Block: ____
Presentation transcript:

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION LARGE SCALE TESTING TO PROTECT SAN FRANSCISO WATER SUPPLY Tom O’Rourke Thomas R. Briggs Professor of Engineering Cornell University

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION SAN FRANCISO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PLAN 86 Projects86 Projects $4.6 Billion$4.6 Billion New Calaveras DamNew Calaveras Dam Retrofit 2 Water Treatment PlantsRetrofit 2 Water Treatment Plants 450 km Pipelines450 km Pipelines 3 Tunnels3 Tunnels

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION BDPLs 3 & 4 at Hayward Fault Owner/Operator: San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC)Owner/Operator: San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) Designer: URS, Inc.Designer: URS, Inc. Test Facility: Cornell Large-Scale Lifelines Testing Facility, George E. Brown Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering SimulationTest Facility: Cornell Large-Scale Lifelines Testing Facility, George E. Brown Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION BAY DIVISION PIPELINES BDPLs 3 & 4 70% Bay Area Water San Francisco Public Utilities Commission BDPLs 1 & 2 BDPLs 3 & 4

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION BDPLs 3 & 4 at Hayward Fault 2-m-diameter Pipeline Crossing Hayward Fault at ~47 Degrees2-m-diameter Pipeline Crossing Hayward Fault at ~47 Degrees 2 m Lateral Fault Offset2 m Lateral Fault Offset Compressive Deformation and Lateral Offset of Pipeline from Fault MovementCompressive Deformation and Lateral Offset of Pipeline from Fault Movement 24-m-wide Right-of-way with Other Pipelines24-m-wide Right-of-way with Other Pipelines

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION Protective Vault 91.5 m long Protective Vault 91.5 m long Segments: 6.1 x 6.1 x 6.1 m Joints: 45 degrees

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION Before Fault Movement After Fault Movement Segments: 6.1m x 6.1m x 6.1 m x 6.1 m Joints: 150 & & 300mm

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION OF VAULT Secant Walls for Cut-and Cover SupportSecant Walls for Cut-and Cover Support Lower Strength Secondary Wall ElementsLower Strength Secondary Wall Elements Secant WallsVault with Pipeline Backfill

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION PURPOSE OF TESTS Validate Design ApproachValidate Design Approach Assess Relative Movement of SegmentsAssess Relative Movement of Segments Understand Interaction Between Vault & Secant Pile WallsUnderstand Interaction Between Vault & Secant Pile Walls Evaluate Joint Effects on Vault PerformanceEvaluate Joint Effects on Vault Performance Assess Effects of EPS Fill Between Secant Wall and VaultAssess Effects of EPS Fill Between Secant Wall and Vault

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION 3-D VIEW OF TEST SET UP

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION CORNELL TESTS 1/10 th Scale1/10 th Scale Test Basin:Test Basin: –13 m Long –3.2 m Wide –2.1 m Deep

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION CONCRETE TEST SEGMENTS 1 m = 3.28 ft mm = 1 in.

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION

SCALING RELATIONSHIPS Joint Rotation Joint Stiffness

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION INSTRUMENTATION 6 Degrees of Freedom at Each Segment6 Degrees of Freedom at Each Segment Accurate to 0.25 mmAccurate to 0.25 mm LVDT/DCDT, Temposonic Sensors, LasersLVDT/DCDT, Temposonic Sensors, Lasers ~ 120 Measurements per Displacement Episode~ 120 Measurements per Displacement Episode Tactile Force SensorsTactile Force Sensors High Resolution Video CamerasHigh Resolution Video Cameras

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION Tactile Force Pressure Sensors 50 X 40 cm plan dimensions

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION Test No. Test Date Fault Location Number of Segments Cover Plate Configuration Segment Gap Prototype Scale Fill between Secant Wall and Segments 1A Feb. 12, 2009 Centered on Segment 13 Cover plates at base and two sides of each joint 150 mmSoil 1B Mar. 31, 2009 Centered on Joint12 Cover plates at two sides of each joint. 150 mmSoil 1C Apr. 23, 2009 Centered on Segment 13 Cover plates at two sides of each joint 150 mmEPS 1D May 13, 2009 Centered on Joint12 Cover plates at two sides of each joint. 150 mmEPS 1E May 28, ft North of Center Segment 13 No cover plates 300 mmEPS

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION FACTORS AFFECTING VAULT DEFORMATION Location of Vault Joint Relative to FaultLocation of Vault Joint Relative to Fault Joint Rotational StiffnessJoint Rotational Stiffness Nature of Backfill Between Vault and Secant Pile WallNature of Backfill Between Vault and Secant Pile Wall

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION FAULT LOCATION VS VAULT JOINT Fault Centered on JointFault Centered on Joint – Vault Deformation Closest to Fault – Greatest Joint Rotation Fault Centered on VaultFault Centered on Vault – Vault Deformation Farthest from Fault – Smallest Joint Rotation

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION

Pretest Block Layout South   North N4 N3N2N1S1 S2 S3 S4 50 deg EPS particles with soil cover C

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION 1 m offset South   North 50 deg

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION 2 m offset South   North 50 deg

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION 3 m offset South   North 50 deg

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION 5 m offset South   North 50 deg

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION Pretest Block Layout South   North N4 N3N2N1S1 S2 S3 S4 50 deg EPS particles with soil cover C

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION 1 m offset South   North 50 deg

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION 2 m offset South   North 50 deg

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION

LATERAL PRESSURES With Soil BackfillWith Soil Backfill – 10-15% Max Passive Pressure at 2m of prototype fault offset

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION LATERAL PRESSURES With EPSWith EPS – < 1% Max Passive Pressure at 2m of prototype fault offset

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION HEAVE AT FAULT Small to Moderate Heave Affected by Joint StiffnessSmall to Moderate Heave Affected by Joint Stiffness Flexible Joint Stiff Joint

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION ROTATION OF JOINT AT FAULT Flexible Joint Stiff Joint

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION VAULT COMPRESSION Compressive Shortening 4-5 Segments from FaultCompressive Shortening 4-5 Segments from Fault Joint Closure Contact 3-4 Segments from FaultJoint Closure Contact 3-4 Segments from Fault Joint Contact Never Observed at Ends of VaultJoint Contact Never Observed at Ends of Vault

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION NEES TESTING FOR SFPUC Continuous Design, Fabrication, and Testing over 9 Months to Support ActualContinuous Design, Fabrication, and Testing over 9 Months to Support Actual Successful Confirmation of Design ConceptSuccessful Confirmation of Design Concept Important Insights Regarding BehaviorImportant Insights Regarding Behavior

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE AND REHABILITATION OF CRITICAL LIFELINES Substantial Industry InvolvementSubstantial Industry Involvement Insituform Technologies, Inc.Insituform Technologies, Inc. LADWP, SFPUC, EBMUDLADWP, SFPUC, EBMUD Center for Advanced Microelectronics Mnfg.Center for Advanced Microelectronics Mnfg. Dual Shake Tables Flexible Electronics Split Box

WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION COLLABORATION WITH INDUSTRY Chevron PhillipsChevron Phillips Consolidated EdisonConsolidated Edison Corning, Inc.Corning, Inc. Exxon MobilExxon Mobil Insituform TechnologiesInsituform Technologies Gas Technology InstituteGas Technology Institute Los Angeles Department of Water and PowerLos Angeles Department of Water and Power Northeast Gas Assoc.Northeast Gas Assoc. San Francisco Public UtilitySan Francisco Public Utility TekscanTekscan Tokyo Gas, LtdTokyo Gas, Ltd ULC RoboticsULC Robotics