Surface-based Group Analysis in FreeSurfer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Brain Development in ADHD The NIMH Study. Processing Steps in Pictures MRIClassificationExtraction of Surfaces Cortical Thickness Blurred Thickness Map.
Advertisements

Seed-based functional connectivity analysis
Statistical Signal Processing for fMRI
Integrating FreeSurfer and FSL FEAT
IS&T Scientific Visualization Tutorial – Spring 2010 Robert Putnam Plotting packages overview.
Surface-based Analysis: Intersubject Registration and Smoothing
Integrating FreeSurfer and FSL FEAT
FreeSurfer Applications. What is it used for? Tools wielded: – Cortical thickness – Surface-based group analysis – Subcortical structure measurements.
From Localization to Connectivity and... Lei Sheu 1/11/2011.
Matlab Toolbox for Inter-Subject Correlation Analysis Overview.
FMRI in small animals Focus on documentation Joseph B. Mandeville Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Charlestown, MA, USA Mass. General.
Introduction to FreeSurfer surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Surface-based Group Analysis in FreeSurfer
Our group recently reported that cerebral cortical development, specifically within aspects of vmPFC, is related to anxious/depressed problems in typically.
Correction for multiple comparisons in FreeSurfer
Morphometry BIRN: Imaging Calibration Analysis Tools Data Sharing.
Controlling Computer Using Speech Recognition (CCSR) Creative Masters Group Supervisor : Dr: Mounira Taileb.
Integrating QDEC with Slicer3 Click to add subtitle.
Introduction to connectivity: Psychophysiological Interactions Roland Benoit MfD 2007/8.
MINC meeting 2003 Pipelines: analyzing structural MR data Jason Lerch.
Function-Structure Integration in FreeSurfer surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/docs/ftp/pub/docs/freesurfer.func.pdf.
Tutorial 4 Single subject analysis. Tutorial 4 – topics Computing t values Contrasts Multiple comparisons Deconvolution analysis Trigger average analysis.
A Comparative Evaluation of Cortical Thickness Measurement Techniques P.A. Bromiley, M.L.J. Scott, and N.A. Thacker Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering.
Volume Preprocessing Segmentation Tessellation Inflation Manual EditingRe-inflationFix topology Final Surface Volume/Surface Postprocessing Cutting & Flattening.
Multimodal Integration surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Statistical Analysis An Introduction to MRI Physics and Analysis Michael Jay Schillaci, PhD Monday, April 7 th, 2007.
UCI Progress MBIRN AHM. Progress Tool Development –FIPS and HID: Modifications to store derived data, including morphometric measures from Freesurfer.
I can run this simple BAT file to copy files: (this was tried with and without the pause command)
Working with FreeSurfer ROIs surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Freesurfer-based brain image analysis Csaba Anderlik UiB Csaba Anderlik UiB.
Intro to FreeSurfer Jargon voxel surface volume vertex surface-based recon cortical, subcortical parcellation/segmentation registration, morph, deform,
Accuracy, Reliability, and Validity of Freesurfer Measurements David H. Salat
Surface-based Group Analysis in FreeSurfer
Multimodal Integration: DTI/fMRI Integration, Surface Analysis
Surface-based Group Analysis in FreeSurfer
Group Averaging of fMRI Data
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Surface-based Analysis: Inter-subject Registration and Smoothing
fMRI and neural encoding models: Voxel receptive fields (continued)
Voxel-based Morphometric Analysis
Correction for multiple comparisons in FreeSurfer
Function-Structure Integration in FreeSurfer
Alice Invernizzi Tutorial: matplotlib Alice Invernizzi
Surface-based Analysis: Intersubject Registration and Smoothing
Introduction to Permutation for Neuroimaging HST
Seed-based Resting State fMRI Analysis in FreeSurfer
Surface-based Exploratory Group Analysis in FreeSurfer
Surface-based Analysis: Intersubject Registration and Smoothing
20 Years of FreeSurfer PETsurfer: MRI-PET Integration using FreeSurfer Nov 17, 2017 Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts.
Moo K. Chung1,3, Kim M. Dalton3, Richard J. Davidson2,3
Multimodal Integration: fMRI Surface and ROI Analysis
FMRI Analysis with the FreeSurfer Functional Analysis Stream (FS-FAST) Preprocessing, First Level Analysis, and Group Analysis.
Multimodal Integration
Correction for multiple comparisons in FreeSurfer
Enhanced Security Testing- Do Automate Debuggers
Voxel-based Morphometric Analysis
CPHT-Ecole polytechnique
Correction for multiple comparisons in FreeSurfer
Seed-based Resting State fMRI Analysis in FreeSurfer
Voxel-based Morphometric Analysis
Brain MRI scans for the patient.
A group-analysis tool for Freesurfer
FMRI Analysis with the FreeSurfer Functional Analysis Stream (FS-FAST) Preprocessing, First Level Analysis, and Group Analysis.
Voxel-based Morphometric Analysis
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Will Penny Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging,
Figure 7-1: Non-Pipelined Instruction Execution vs. 2-stage Pipeline
Cortical representation of place of articulation features, generalized across manner of articulation, pooling all trails from two tasks. Cortical representation.
Surface-based Group Analysis in FreeSurfer
Presentation transcript:

Surface-based Group Analysis in FreeSurfer

Outline Processing Stages Command-line Stream Assemble Data Design/Contrast (GLM Theory) Analyze Visualize Interactive/Automated GUI (QDEC) Correction for multiple comparisons

Aging Exploratory Analysis In which areas does thickness Change with age? Cortical Thickness vs Aging Salat et al, 2004, Cerebral Cortex

Aging Thickness Study N=40 (all in fsaverage space) p<.01 Negative Age Correlation p<.01 Positive Age Correlation

Surface-based Measures Morphometric (e.g., thickness) Functional PET MEG/EEG Diffusion (?) sampled just under the surface

Processing Stages Specify Subjects and Surface measures Assemble Data: Resample into Common Space Smooth Concatenate into one file Model and Contrasts (GLM) Fit Model (Estimate) Correct for multiple comparisons Visualize

The General Linear Model (GLM)

GLM Theory Is Thickness correlated with Age? Dependent Variable, Measurement x1 x2 y2 y1 Subject 1 Subject 2 Of course, you would need more then two subjects … HRF Amplitude IQ, Height, Weight Age Independent Variable

System of Linear Equations Linear Model Intercept: b (=Offset) Slope: m Thickness Age x1 x2 y2 y1 System of Linear Equations y1 = 1*b + x1*m y2 = 1*b + x2*m y1 y2 1 x1 1 x2 b m = * Matrix Formulation X = Design Matrix b = Regression Coefficients = Parameter estimates = “betas” = beta.mgh (mri_glmfit output) b m b= Y = X*b

Hypotheses and Contrasts Is Thickness correlated with Age? Does m = 0? Null Hypothesis: H0: m=0 y1 y2 1 x1 1 x2 b m = * m= [0 1] * b m Intercept: b Slope: m Thickness Age x1 x2 y2 y1 b m b= g = C*b = 0 ? C=[0 1]: Contrast Matrix mri_glmfit output: gamma.mgh

More than Two Data Points Thickness Intercept: b y1 y2 y3 y4 1 x1 1 x2 1 x3 1 x4 b m = * n1 n2 n3 n4 + Slope: m Age Y = X*b+n y1 = 1*b + x1*m + n1 y2 = 1*b + x2*m + n2 y3 = 1*b + x3*m + n3 y4 = 1*b + x4*m + n4 Model Error Noise Residuals eres.mgh No matter how many data points you have, there is still only one slope and one intercept.

t-Test and p-values g = C*b Y = X*b+n p-value/significance value between 0 and 1 closer to 0 means more significant FreeSurfer stores p-values as –log10(p): 0.1=10-1sig=1, 0.01=10-2sig=2 sig.mgh files Signed by sign of g p-value is for an unsigned test

Two Groups Do groups differ in Intercept? Do groups differ in Slope? Is average slope different from 0? … Intercept: b1 Slope: m1 Thickness Age Intercept: b2 Slope: m2

Two Groups Y = X*b+n = +n * y11 = 1*b1 + 0*b2 + x11*m1 + 0*m2 + n11 Intercept: b1 Slope: m1 Thickness Age Intercept: b2 Slope: m2 y11 y12 y21 y22 1 0 x11 0 1 0 x12 0 0 1 0 x21 0 1 0 x22 b1 b2 m1 m2 = * +n Y = X*b+n y11 = 1*b1 + 0*b2 + x11*m1 + 0*m2 + n11 y12 = 1*b1 + 0*b2 + x12*m1 + 0*m2 + n12 y21 = 0*b1 + 1*b2 + 0*m1 + x21*m2 + n21 y22 = 0*b1 + 1*b2 + 0*m1 + x22*m2 + n22

Two Groups Y = X*b+n b= Do groups differ in Intercept? Does b1=b2? C = [+1 -1 0 0], g = C*b Y = X*b+n b1 b2 m1 m2 b= Do groups differ in Slope? Does m1=m2? Does m1-m2=0? C = [0 0 +1 -1], g = C*b Intercept: b1 Slope: m1 Thickness Age Intercept: b2 Slope: m2 Is average slope different than 0? Does (m1+m2)/2 = 0? C = [0 0 0.5 0.5], g = C*b

Surface-based Group Analysis in FreeSurfer Create your own design and contrast matrices Create an FSGD File FreeSurfer creates design matrix You still have to specify contrasts QDEC Limited to 2 discrete variables, 2 levels max Limited to 2 continuous variables

Command-line Processing Stages Assemble Data (mris_preproc) Resample into Common Space Smooth Concatenate into one file Model and Contrasts (GLM) (FSGD) Fit Model (Estimate) (mri_glmfit) Correct for multiple comparisons Visualize (tksurfer) } recon-all -qcache Run after all editing is done.

Specifying Subjects $SUBJECTS_DIR fred jenny margaret … bert Subject ID $SUBJECTS_DIR fred jenny margaret … bert Set SUBJECTS_DIR, issue a command (mksubjdirs) to create directory structure. Convert (using mri_convert) data to COR format and store in mri/RRR, run recon-all. Typically, we acquire 3 high-quality T1 volumes to use as input to reconstruction (128-slice sagital, 1 mm in-plane resolution). SUBJECTS_DIR environment variable

FreeSurfer Directory Tree bert bem stats morph mri rgb scripts surf tiff label orig T1 brain wm aseg Subject ID lh.aparc_annot rh.aparc_annot lh.white rh.white lh.thickness rh.thickness lh.sphere.reg rh.sphere.reg Set SUBJECTS_DIR, issue a command (mksubjdirs) to create directory structure. Convert (using mri_convert) data to COR format and store in mri/RRR, run recon-all. Typically, we acquire 3 high-quality T1 volumes to use as input to reconstruction (128-slice sagital, 1 mm in-plane resolution). SUBJECTS_DIR environment variable

Example: Thickness Study $SUBJECTS_DIR/bert/surf/lh.thickness $SUBJECTS_DIR/fred/surf/lh.thickness $SUBJECTS_DIR/jenny/surf/lh.thickness $SUBJECTS_DIR/margaret/surf/lh.thickness …

FreeSurfer Group Descriptor (FSGD) File Simple text file List of all subjects in the study Accompanying demographics Automatic design matrix creation You must still specify the contrast matrices Integrated with tksurfer Note: Can specify design matrix explicitly with --design

FSGD Format GroupDescriptorFile 1 Class = Group Class Male Class Female Variables Age Weight IQ Input bert Male 10 100 1000 Input fred Male 15 150 1500 Input jenny Female 20 200 2000 Input margaret Female 25 250 2500 One Discrete Factor (Gender) with Two Levels (M&F) Three Continuous Variables: Age, Weight, IQ Class = Group Note: Can specify design matrix explicitly with --design

} } FSGDF  X (Automatic) X = C = [-1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 1 0 10 0 100 0 1000 0 1 0 15 0 150 0 1500 0 0 1 0 20 0 200 0 2000 0 1 0 25 0 250 0 2500 X = Male Group Female Group Female Age Male Age Weight Age IQ C = [-1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] } Tests for the difference in intercept/offset between groups } C = [ 0 0 -1 1 0 0 0 0 ] Tests for the difference in age slope between groups DODS – Different Offset, Different Slope

Another FSGD Example Two Discrete Factors One Continuous Variable: Age Gender: Two Levels (M&F) Handedness: Two Levels (L&R) One Continuous Variable: Age GroupDescriptorFile 1 Class MaleRight Class MaleLeft Class FemaleRight Class FemaleLeft Variables Age Input bert MaleLeft 10 Input fred MaleRight 15 Input jenny FemaleRight 20 Input margaret FemaleLeft 25 Class = Group

Interaction Contrast g = D1 -D2=0 g = (b3-b1)- (b4-b2) = -b1+b2+ b3-b4 Two Discrete Factors (no continuous, for now) Gender: Two Levels (M&F) Handedness: Two Levels (L&R) Four Regressors (Offsets) MR (b1), ML (b2), FR (b3), FL (b4) M F R L b1 b4 b3 b2 D1 D2 GroupDescriptorFile 1 Class MaleRight Class MaleLeft Class FemaleRight Class FemaleLeft Input bert MaleLeft Input fred MaleRight Input jenny FemaleLeft Input margaret FemaleRight g = D1 -D2=0 g = (b3-b1)- (b4-b2) = -b1+b2+ b3-b4 C = [-1 +1 +1 -1] ?

Factors, Levels, Groups Usually each Group/Class: Has its own Intercept Has its own Slope (for each continuous variable) NRegressors = NClasses * (NVariables+1)

Factors, Levels, Groups, Classes Continuous Variables/Factors: Age, IQ, Volume, etc. Discrete Variables/Factors: Gender, Handedness, Diagnosis Levels of Discrete Variables: Handedness: Left and Right Gender: Male and Female Diagnosis: Normal, MCI, AD Group or Class: Specification of All Discrete Factors Left-handed Male MCI Right-handed Female Normal

Assemble Data: mris_preproc mris_preproc --help --fsgd FSGDFile : Specify subjects thru FSGD File --hemi lh : Process left hemisphere --meas thickness : subjectid/surf/hemi.thickness --target fsaverage : common space is subject fsaverage --o lh.thickness.mgh : output “volume-encoded surface file” Lots of other options! Output: lh.thickness.mgh – file with stacked thickness maps for all subjects  Input to Smoother or GLM

Surface Smoothing mri_surf2surf --help Loads stacked lh.thickness.mgh 2D surface-based smoothing Specify FWHM (eg, fwhm = 10 mm) Saves stacked lh.thickness.sm10.mgh Can be slow (~10-60min) recon-all –qcache (computes for each subject, run after you are finished editing subject)

mri_glmfit Reads in FSGD File and constructs X Reads in your contrasts (C1, C2, etc.) Loads data (lh.thickness.sm10.mgh) Fits GLM (ie, computes b) Computes contrasts (g=C*b) t or F ratios, significances Significance -log10(p) (.01  2, .001  3)

mri_glmfit mri_glmfit --y lh.thickness.sm10.mgh --fsgd gender_age.txt --C age.mtx –C gender.mtx --surf fsaverage lh --cortex --glmdir lh.gender_age.glmdir mri_glmfit --help

mri_glmfit mri_glmfit --y lh.thickness.sm10.mgh --fsgd gender_age.txt --C age.mtx –C gender.mtx --surf fsaverage lh --cortex --glmdir lh.gender_age.glmdir Input file (output from smoothing). Stack of subjects, one frame per subject.

mri_glmfit mri_glmfit --y lh.thickness.sm10.mgh --fsgd gender_age.txt --C age.mtx –C gender.mtx --surf fsaverage lh --cortex --glmdir lh.gender_age.glmdir FreeSurfer Group Descriptor File (FSGD) Group membership Covariates

mri_glmfit mri_glmfit --y lh.thickness.sm10.mgh --fsgd gender_age.txt --C age.mtx –C gender.mtx --surf fsaverage lh --cortex --glmdir lh.gender_age.glmdir Contrast Matrices Simple text/ASCII files Test hypotheses

mri_glmfit mri_glmfit --y lh.thickness.sm10.mgh --fsgd gender_age.txt --C age.mtx –C gender.mtx --surf fsaverage lh --cortex --glmdir lh.gender_age.glmdir Perform analysis on left hemisphere of fsaverage subject Masks by fsaverage cortex.label Computes FWHM in 2D

mri_glmfit Output directory: lh.gender_age.glmdir/ beta.mgh – parameter estimates rvar.mgh – residual error variance etc … age/ sig.mgh – -log10(p), uncorrected gamma.mgh, F.mgh gender/ mri_glmfit --y lh.thickness.sm10.mgh --fsgd gender_age.txt --C age.mtx –C gender.mtx --surf fsaverage lh --cortex --glmdir lh.gender_age.glmdir

Visualization with tksurfer Saturation: -log10(p), Eg, 5=.00001 Threshold: -log10(p), Eg, 2=.01 False Dicovery Rate Eg, .01 View->Configure->Overlay File->LoadOverlay

Visualization with tksurfer File-> Load Group Descriptor File …

Tutorial Command-line Stream Create an FSGD File for a thickness study Age and Gender Run mris_preproc mri_surf2surf mri_glmfit