High Accuracy Helicopter Lidar & Mapping Jeffrey B. Stroub, CP,RLS,PPS,SP Vice President Business Development September 9, 2014 Jeff Stroub CP, RLS, PPS,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reality Check: Processing LiDAR Data A story of data, more data and some more data.
Advertisements

Lidar Data Applications for Natural Resource Management
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
Open Source Tools for Treatment of Lidar Derived Terrain Models By Marty Earwood GEOG 596A - Capstone Project Penn State University Graduate Student September.
ASPRS Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data Dr. David Maune (Dewberry) Dr. Qassim Abdullah (Woolpert) Hans Karl.
A Comparison of Digital Elevation Models to Accurately Predict Stream Channels Spencer Trowbridge Papillion Creek Watershed.
Terrain for the Lower Colorado River Flood Damage Evaluation Project Erin Atkinson, Halff Associates, Inc. Rick Diaz, Lower Colorado River Authority Symposium.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | ArcGIS 3D Analyst - Lidar Applications Clayton Crawford.
Applied Geographics, Inc./Tennessee Regional Forums/Enhanced Elevation/August 2011Slide 1 Tennessee Business Planning Technical Overview on Enhanced Elevation.
+ 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) NGAC Meeting September 5, 2013 The National Map.
Zachary Fancher Last updated 12/15/2012. Background Regulatory Division responsible for making jurisdictional determinations on “Waters of the U.S”, as.
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Background The USGS is working with the U.S. Army at Fort Bragg to develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3). The.
Digital Elevation Models GLY 560: GIS and Remote Sensing for Earth Scientists Class Home Page:
Terrain Datasets: How good are they? Celso Ferreira¹, Francisco Olivera¹, Dean Djokic² ¹Texas A & M University ² Environmental Systems Research Institute.
Celso Ferreira¹, Francisco Olivera², Dean Djokic³ ¹ PH.D. Student, Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University ( ² Associate.
Floodplain Mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS Eric Tate Francisco Olivera David Maidment
Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote.
From Topographic Maps to Digital Elevation Models Daniel Sheehan IS&T Academic Computing Anne Graham MIT Libraries.
1. LiDAR Mapping Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) mapping provided for the United States International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC) – established.
An Introduction to Lidar Mark E. Meade, PE, PLS, CP Photo Science, Inc.
Acquisition and Processing of LiDAR Data
Issues and Answers in Quality Control of LIDAR DEMs for North Carolina DFIRMs Gary W. Thompson, RLS North Carolina Geodetic Survey David F. Maune, Ph.D.,
Esri International User Conference | San Diego, CA Technical Workshops | Lidar Solutions in ArcGIS Clayton Crawford July 2011.
Obtaining LiDAR Data, Contracting Considerations Kenny Legleiter Project Manager Merrick & Company.
Processing Terrain Data in the River Proximity Arc Hydro River Workshop December 1, 2010 Erin Atkinson, PE, CFM, GISP Halff Associates, Inc.
UNDERSTANDING LIDAR LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING LIDAR is a remote sensing technique that can measure the distance to objects on and above the ground surface.
David Knipe Engineering Section Manager Automated Zone A Floodplain Mapping.
APPLICATION OF LIDAR IN FLOODPLAIN MAPPING Imane MRINI GIS in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Source. Optech,Inc.
3001 LiDAR Services VGIN Presentation – December 2007.
Digital Terrain Models by M. Varshosaz
Minnesota Elevation Mapping Project Metro Area Collect 1/13/2011 Tim Loesch Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Automated H&H and Advanced Terrain Processing
Hydro-enhancement of LiDAR Data to Support Floodplain Modeling 2011 ASFPM Annual Conference Louisville, Kentucky May 18, 2011 Mark W. Ellard, PE, CFM Associate,
Accuracy and Maps Mike Ritchie, PE, PLS, PSM, CP President and CEO Photo Science.
Lidar and GIS Applications and Examples
by David M. Beekman and Vito A. Cimino
2012 KYTC Transportation-GIS Conference Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Office Building 200 Mero St., Frankfort, KY Thursday March 29, 2012 Pavement.
National Research Council Mapping Science Committee Floodplain Mapping – Sensitivity and Errors Scott K. Edelman, PE Watershed Concepts and Karen Schuckman,
SOLAR NYC Sean C. Ahearn CARSI Hunter College – CUNY NGAC Meeting, September 23, 2010 CARSI, preliminary LIDAR data.
Understanding LIDAR Technology Brian Mayfield, CP, GISP, GLS Timothy A. Blak, GS, PLS, CFM.
Coordination of Indiana GIS through dissemination of data and data products, education and outreach, adoption of standards, and building partnerships IGIC.
LiDAR Contour Options Randy Mayden, VP Business Development
Airborne Lidar Calibration Approaches Defining calibration techniques and assessing the results JAMIE YOUNG LIDAR SOLUTIONS SPECIALIST.
LIDAR Technology Everett Hinkley USDA Forest Service Geospatial Management Office Prepared for Congressman Allan Mollahan's Office.
Uses of Geospatial Soils & Surface Measurement Data in DWR Delta Levee Program Joel Dudas
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Lidar Interoperability: The Need for Common Guidelines and Practices ASPRS Annual Conference Thursday.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Marie C. Peppler USGS FIM Program Liaison Flood Inundation Mapping Program Project needs overview.
March 2003HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Other Features of HEC-RAS- part 2 Cross Section Interpolation Multiple Plans Supporting Pictures.
NC Flood Plain LIDAR Use at NCDOT August 4, 2004 NC LIDAR Workgroup NCSU North Carolina Department of Transportation.
USGS Water Resources Discipline Charleston, WV District office Katherine Paybins GIS data and projects.
© 2006, The Sanborn Map Company, Inc. Privileged and confidential information. Distribution or copying prohibited unless approved in writing. 1 CAPCOG.
SWFWMD LiDAR Specifications – 18 April 2008 LiDAR Specifications at the SWFWMD Ekaterina Fitos & Al Karlin.
Flood Inundation Mapping Program
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
E-Education Institute Lidar Technology and Applications Proposal for an elective course to be offered by the Dutton e-Education Institute MGIS Capstone.
Management and Use of LiDAR-Derived Information Elizabeth Cook USDA-NRCS Columbia, MO.
LIDAR Flood mapping for Brownsville and Matamoros Gueudet Pierre GIS in Water Resources University of Texas Austin Fall 2002.
Contour Mapping from LiDAR Presented by: Dave Bullington Surdex Corporation St. Louis, MO
LiDAR – What is it and How is it Used? Presented by John Erickson Project Manager Ayres Associates February 13, 2003 Presented by John Erickson Project.
-National Lidar Initiative- the NDEP Perspective National Lidar Initiative Meeting February 2007 – Reston, VA Presented by Bryon Ellingson Executive Secretary,
Integrated spatial data LIDAR Mapping for Coastal Monitoring Dr Alison Matthews Geomatics Manager Environment Agency Geomatics Group.
Coordination of Indiana GIS through dissemination of data and data products, education and outreach, adoption of standards, and building partnerships Current.
Best Practices for Managing and Serving Lidar and Elevation Data Cody Benkelman.
Ontario’s Current LiDAR Acquisition Initiative
Understanding LIDAR Technology
Terrain modelling: the basics
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
Washington Geological Survey
Elevation Workgroup Update
Automated Zone A Floodplain Mapping
Presentation transcript:

High Accuracy Helicopter Lidar & Mapping Jeffrey B. Stroub, CP,RLS,PPS,SP Vice President Business Development September 9, 2014 Jeff Stroub CP, RLS, PPS, SP Vice-President Business Development September 16, 2014 Understanding USGS LiDAR Base Specification Version 1.0

USGS LiDAR Base Specification Version 1.0

Goal USGS Base Specification Consistency – all USGS funded LiDAR Collections USGS Interest is only LiDAR Derived Elevation Models USGS Scope specific to their mission – Hydro-Flattened surface – Hydro Enforced optional surface A carefully planned project may support other uses – USGS Version 1.1 in concept stage

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey H. Karl Heidemann, GISP Physical Scientist U.S. Geological Survey/EROS

5/25 Background In response to ARRA funding for USGS LiDAR collection, development of a common minimum specification was begun in early 2009; the USGS NGP Lidar Base Specification, Version 1.0 was published in the summer 2012:. Time marches on … – NEEA Study on national LiDAR value published – The 3DEP established – ASPRS Accuracy Standards developed – Technical advances in the industry The now 5 year-old v1.0 Specification requires revision

6/25

7/25 ASPRS Accuracy Standard Alignment Alignment to ASPRS Accuracy Assessment Methodology – NVA on point cloud assessed in single-return areas – VVA must be met (excluding delineated Low Confidence areas) – CVA is no longer reported Use of ASPRS recommended check point quantities

8/25 Lidar Specification Changes  QL2 is the minimum QL for 3DEP lidar collections.  2 points/m 2  10 cm RMSE Z  LAS Version 1.4 is required.  OGC Well Known Text Georeference information required  LAS Point Record Format 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 are required.  Proper use of Withheld and Overlap flags required.  Metadata for LiDAR files.  LiDAR metadata tags suggested in v1.0 are required in v1.1.

LiDAR Specification Changes  2GB limit on swath file size has been removed.  Flightline Overlap requirement has been removed.  Scan Angle guideline has been removed.  Classification: Two added required classifications  Bridges (17)  High Noise (18)  Classification Accuracy for : QL2, QL1, and QL0  Test areas are now 1 square km, not 1 km square

LiDAR Accuracy Accuracy is dependent on: Flying height Sensor parameters –Rep Rate –Scan Angle –Scan frequency System accuracy Terrain Vegetation Baseline distance –Location of base station to Aircraft

Plan based on –Workable blocks of data –Delivery tiles –Baseline requirements –Flightline distance limitations –Control locations –Accuracy –Application –Topography LiDAR Project Planning

Processing Steps 1.GPS Processing 2.QC GPS 3.IMU Processing 4.QC IMU 5.Calibration 6.Check Calibration 7.LAS point Cloud Output 8.Verify coverage 9.Classification 1.Sub sample for Macros 2.Breakline generation 10.QC Manual Editing 11.QC process 12.Generation products 13.Check Deliverables

Full Return Surface Model

LiDAR Classified.LAS File

Classification

Manual Editing

USGS Product Hydrologically – Flattened (Hydro-Flattened) – USGS Standard Product Processing of LiDAR derived surface (DEM or TIN) so mapped water surfaces are flat from bank to bank, and rivers demonstrate a gradient change. Breaklines are used to establish elevations for water surfaces consistent with surrounding topography, and produce aesthetically acceptable water surfaces in final DEM or TIN. Hydro flattening is driven solely by USGS cartographic mapping needs.

Breaklines Breakline specifications vary by project and point densities Hydrologically-Conditioned (Hydro-Conditioned) –Processing of a DEM or TIN so that the flow of water is continuous across the entire terrain surface whether flow in channel or not (evaluation basin / large areas) Hydrologically –Enforced (Hydro-Enforced) –Process of mapping water bodies so that lakes and reservoirs are at level surface and so that streams flow downhill……(typically used for hydrologic and hydraulic modeling) – optional product

Bare-Earth Surface without Breaklines

Bare-Earth Surface with Breaklines

Breaklines If a DEM is required for a project and the breaklines fail acceptance, the DEM will fail acceptance. LiDAR industry has come along way in breakline development Breakline generation depends on source material – formerly Photogrammetry now LiDAR derived

Breaklines USGS Spec. 100 Feet River 2 Acre

Breaklines

A Cross Section is viewed to see if the red XBAR line is set at the lowest elevation. The red XBAR line elevation can be changed if not correct.

Breaklines After placing the red XBAR lines and setting their elevation so they monotonic you are ready to drape water breaklines

Breaklines This is a 5000’ x 5000’ Tile This is a full tile with the water bodies and river collected. The red XBARs have been placed and the elevations have been set.

Breaklines The Final check to make sure the river breaklines are monotonic is to run contours. A surface is created with the river breaklines only. Contours are developed for That surface and contours are created crossing only the river breaklines.

Bare-Earth Surface

Bare-Earth with Breaklines – Hydro Flattened Surface

Bare-Earth Surface - Hydro Flattened

Bare-Earth with Contours processed through a Hydro Flattened Surface

Hydro Flattened - Bare-Earth Surface

Hydro Flattened Surface with Flood Stage Introduced

Bare-Earth with Breaklines – Hydro Enforced Surface

Bare-Earth Surface Hydro Enforced

Bare-Earth with Contours processed through a Hydro Enforced Surface

Hydro Enforced Bare-Earth Surface

Hydro Enforced Surface with Flood Stage Introduced

Accuracy Field surveying required to establish: FVA – Fundamental Vertical accuracy SVA – Supplemental Vertical Accuracy CVA – Consolidated Vertical Accuracy RMSE Fundamental Vertical Accuracy (FVA) using check points in open terrain. FVA = * RMSE(z) = Sqrt[(Σ(Zdata(i). Zcheck(i)) 2 )/n]

Accuracy

Standard USGS Deliverables Hydro-flattening per USGS water surface requirements No single line drain breaklines – optional Metadata – extraneous Raw point cloud in.LAS – file size fixed at 2gb Classified Point cloud – USGS standard Bare-Earth Surface (Raster DEM) per classification scheme Breaklines per USGS specification - ESRI feature class No contour processing

Project Reporting Designed to USGS and other agency requirements

Questions and Answers Thank You