1 st post launch SCIAMACHY calibration & Verification Meeting L1b Astrium Friedrichshafen – Germany 24 July 2002 First Level 1b Spectral Calibration analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ERS - ENVISAT SYMPOSIUM Gothenburg October, 2000 GOMOS GOMOS Calibration and Processor Verification Instrument Principle Calibration Instrument and.
Advertisements

SCIAMACHY Calibration Review, ESTEC, 11 September 2002 Tilstra, De Graaf, Stammes First verification of SCIAMACHY’s polarisation measurements Gijs Tilstra,
Validation of SCIA’s reflectance and polarisation (Acarreta, de Graaf, Tilstra, Stammes, Krijger ) Envisat Validation Workshop, Frascati, 9-13 December.
Page1 SCIAMACHY Calibration Review – ESTEC – Sept 2002 SCIAMACHY Tangent Height Verification H.Bovensmann University of Bremen Institute of Remote.
Overview Review of the Goddard method Update on instrument/detector evolution (a purely phenomenological approach) Characterization of the soft proton.
AITA 9, MERTIS Team – MERTIS Calibration, Oct 2007 Folie 1 Development of a calibration concept for the MErcury Thermal Infrared Spectrometer Thomas Saeuberlich,
OMI ST meeting June 2008 Calibration & 0-1b data processing Marcel Dobber (KNMI)
GOME-2 polarisation data and products L.G. Tilstra (1,2), I. Aben (1), P. Stammes (2) (1) SRON; (2) KNMI GSAG #42, EUMETSAT,
Time & Frequency Products R. Peřestý, J. Kraus, SWRM 4 th Data Quality Workshop 2-5 December 2014 GFZ Potsdam Recent results on ACC Data Processing 1 SWARM.
CALIBRATION WRINKLES Project OBJECTIVE: Test techniques for improving echelle-mode wavelength  scales of STIS, solar-system’s premier high-res UV.
WP 3: Absorbing Aerosol Index (AAI) WP 10: Level-1 validation L.G. Tilstra 1, I. Aben 2, and P. Stammes 1 1 Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.
Presentation on OMPS Nadir Mapper Wavelength Shift Adjustment for Earth-view Measurements.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA COS Science Calibration & Instrument Status TIPS 20 Nov 2003 Last COS TIPS Aug 2003.
GlobColour CDR Meeting ESRIN July 2006 Merging Algorithm Sensitivity Analysis ACRI-ST/UoP.
Cluster Angewandte Fernerkundung DLR Oberpfaffenhofen Figure 2 shows all sun mean reference spectra of GOME from July 1995 to June 2006.
1 st post launch SCIAMACHY calibration & Verification Meeting L1b Astrium Friedrichshafen – Germany 24 July 2002 First Level 1b General Product Quality.
Disk-Integrated Polarization of the Moon in the Ultraviolet from SOLSTICE M. Snow, G. Holsclaw, W. McClintock, T. Woods University of Colorado/LASP
Just how good is a L1 spectrum? An overview of SCIAMACHY calibration quality Ralph Snel, SSAG Calibration Subgroup and SQWG SADDU meeting June 16/17, 2008.
Echelle spectra reduction with IRAF*
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
KNMI, The Netherlands * SCIAMACHY validation workshop, Bremen, 6 Dec ‘04 Large scale validation of SCIAMACHY nadir reflectance Gijs van.
The Physics of Atmospheric Gas Measurements The 2009 Noble Lectures University of Toronto Kelly Chance Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
The Physics of Atmospheric Gas Measurements 2. Atmospheric physics as applied to data analysis algorithms Kelly Chance Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
NOAA Research and Operations Marine Optical Buoy Design Review July 18-19, 2006 Plan for calibration and maintenance of AHAB Uncertainty Budget: Laboratory.
A Preliminary Cycle 1 Calibration Plan for the JWST Science Instruments James Muzerolle.
In-orbit calibration (TOTAL channel) V space -V IBB Raw Earth V (counts) Raw IBB V (counts) =
0. To first order, the instrument is working very well ! 1.Evolution of the IR detector with time 2.Stability of the L channel 3.Saturation 4.Linearity.
Plans for interim data release J E Russell (Imperial)
Solar observation modes: Commissioning and operational C. Vocks and G. Mann 1. Spectrometer and imaging modes 2. Commissioning proposals 3. Operational.
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
Page 1 Validation Workshop, , IfE Bremen, G. Lichtenberg:Calibration status National Institute for Space Research SCIAMACHY Calibration status November.
MAESTRO Sun Scan Analysis Florian Nichitiu May 14, 2004.
BPA M&V Protocols Overview of BPA M&V Protocols and Relationship to RTF Guidelines for Savings and Standard Savings Estimation Protocols.
CE 401 Climate Change Science and Engineering solar input, mean energy budget, orbital variations, radiative forcing January 2012.
Correlation between visual impression and instrumental colour determination for LEDs János Schanda Professor Emeritus of the University of Pannonia, Hungary.
1 st post launch SCIAMACHY calibration & Verification Meeting L1b Astrium Friedrichshafen – Germany 24 July 2002 First level 1b Sun mean reference (SMR)
Validation workshop, Frascati, 13 December 2002Page 1 SCIAMACHY products quality and recommendations Based on presentations and discussions during this.
Diffraction gratings let us measure wavelengths by separating the diffraction maxima associated with different wavelengths. In order to distinguish two.
Michael Unrau, Institut für Kernphysik Analyse von Bolometersignalen der EDELWEISS Dark Matter Suche EDELWEISS dark matter searchFull InterDigitized detector.
Software Engineering Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Osaka University July 21, 2008WODA.
INSTRUMENT STATUS AND PERFORMANCE Guido Levrini. Page 2 ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 December 2002 ASAR F Instrument operability issues.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA SMOV4 Requirements Review Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Scott D. Friedman STScI 30 July 2003.
OMI ST meeting June 2006 Calibration & 0-1b data processing Marcel Dobber (KNMI)
Analysis of Nonlinearity Correction for CrIS SDR April 25, 2012 Chunming Wang NGAS Comparisons Between V32 and V33 Engineering Packets.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: Study Overview R.Siddans.
Practical session on calibrators Euro Summer School Active Galactic Nuclei at the highest angular resolution: theory and observations Torun, Poland 27.
Corot:Ubatuba Nov The Ground Segment: Data Processing. Software development in laboratories. Brazilian contribution. Michel Auvergne Réza Samadi.
The Critical Importance of Data Reduction Calibrations In the Interpretability of S-type Asteroid Spectra Michael J. Gaffey Space Studies Department University.
1 st post launch SCIAMACHY calibration & Verification Meeting L1b Astrium Friedrichshafen – Germany 24 July 2002 First level 1b Leakage current analysis.
Institut für Umweltphysik/Fernerkundung Physik/Elektrotechnik Fachbereich 1 Status of SQWG activities H. Bovensmann, G. Lichtenberg, R. Snel, C. Lerot,
OMI ST meeting June 2006 Calibration working group.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Number of expected scans and percentage of processed scans for all four instruments.
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
Iodine Monoxide (IO) Nadir Scientific Data Product
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
TEMPO Instrument Update
The ROLO Lunar Calibration System Description and Current Status
Calibration Status for the GOME Instrument
Diffraction Grating Resolving Power
Aqua MODIS Reflective Solar Bands (RSB)
Using SCIAMACHY to calibrate GEO imagers
the Lyman-alpha Radiometer onboard PROBA-2
Instrument Characterization: Status
Proposal for LAT Year 1 Data Release Plan
GSICS/CEOS web meeting on Reference Solar Spectrum
UVIS Calibration Update
Preliminary SCIAMACHY Lunar observations as intercalibration source
S3B OLCI Lunar Observations
Tractography Algorithm: Toolbox:
HXMT in IHEP progresses since last joint calibration meeting
Presentation transcript:

1 st post launch SCIAMACHY calibration & Verification Meeting L1b Astrium Friedrichshafen – Germany 24 July 2002 First Level 1b Spectral Calibration analysis

2 Level 1b Spectral Calibration analysis: content The Spectral Calibration philosophy The Iecf Spectral Calibration Algorithm Related Verification Tasks: orbit behaviour Analysis specifics First results Other Spectral Calibration Verification Tasks Recommendations

3 The Spectral Calibration Philosophy Objective : to assign a wavelength to each individual SCIA detector pixel during the flight. Method : the relation between pixel index and wavelength is described by a 4 th order polynomial: To derive a set of calibration coefficients two calibration sources, the SLS and the sun, are analysed. Stability : due to ageing of the instrument, the wavelength parameters needs to be updated on a regular basis. Iecf, Instrument Engineering and Calibration Facility, guarantees long term stability of scientific measurements.

4 The Iecf Spectral Calibration Algorithm Task : to determine coefficients of the 4 th order polynomial for each channel as function of the orbital regions. Input: Level 1b Newly Calculated Spectral ADS Method : for each polynomial coefficient, given by the Spectral ADS as a function of orbital phase, a harmonic fit has to be performed in order to parameterise the orbital dependence. The coefficients values are then computed for a set of 12 fixed orbital phases:

5 Related verification Task: orbit behaviour L : Number of orbital regions for spectral calibration L : Orbit region dependency Due to the instrument’s thermal environment along the orbit, the spectral calibration can be expected to show orbital dependency. Therefore SLS measurements shall be executed along the entire orbit to investigate whether the number of measurements and the number of orbital regions are sufficient and the orbit phase boundaries are chosen properly.

6 Analysis specifics and overview Level 1b product: SCI_NL__0PNPDK _182502_ _00056_01613_0129.N1 Orbits: 1613 States: 10 SLS States (predefined State_ID 59 ), on 87 total States Channel 1 : variation long the orbit is close or less to 1/100 of a pixel Channel 2 : not analysed due to erroneous key-data set used by the Level 0 to 1b processor Channels 3, 4, 5 and 6 : variation long the orbit is close or less to 1/100 of a pixel Channel 7 and 8 : not analysed for no in-flight dark current correction of the the raw lamp spectrum

First Results: Orbit dependency for Channel 1 The algorithm performs correctly the harmonic fit of the coefficients. … but is this the best approach to the Spectral Calibration?

First Results: Orbit dependency for Channel 3 The algorithm performs correctly the harmonic fit of the coefficients. … but is this the best approach to the Spectral Calibration?

First Results: Orbit dependency for Channel 4 The algorithm performs correctly the harmonic fit of the coefficients. … but is this the best approach to the Spectral Calibration?

First Results: Orbit dependency for Channel 5 The algorithm performs correctly the harmonic fit of the coefficients. … but is this the best approach to the Spectral Calibration?

First Results: Orbit dependency for Channel 6 The algorithm performs correctly the harmonic fit of the coefficients. … but is this the best approach to the Spectral Calibration?

First Analysis: the harmonic fit approach for Channel 1 Orbit 1613 Maximum variation long the orbit: E-03 nm or 0.01 of a pixel

First Analysis: the harmonic fit approach for Channel 3 Orbit 1613 Maximum variation long the orbit: E-02 nm or of a pixel

First Analysis: the harmonic fit approach for Channel 4 Orbit 1613 Maximum variation long the orbit: E-03 nm or of a pixel

First Analysis: the harmonic fit approach for Channel 5 Orbit 1613 Maximum variation long the orbit: E-02 nm or 0.07 of a pixel

First Analysis: the harmonic fit approach for Channel 6 Orbit 1613 Maximum variation long the orbit: E-02nm or of a pixel

First analysis: variation on the input for Channel 1 Coefficient average long the orbit as reference Maximum variation long the orbit from average: E-03 nm or of a pixel Maximum variation long the orbit from fit: E-03 nm or 0.01 of a pixel

First analysis: variation on the input for Channel 3 Coefficient average long the orbit as reference Maximum variation long the orbit from average: E-03 nm or of a pixel Maximum variation long the orbit from fit: E-02 nm or of a pixel

First analysis: variation on the input for Channel 4 Coefficient average long the orbit as reference Maximum variation long the orbit from average: E-03 nm or of a pixel Maximum variation long the orbit from fit: E-03 nm or of a pixel

First analysis: variation on the input for Channel 5 Coefficient average long the orbit as reference Maximum variation long the orbit from average: E-03 nm or of a pixel Maximum variation long the orbit: E-02 nm or 0.07 of a pixel

First analysis: variation on the input for Channel 6 Coefficient average long the orbit as reference Maximum variation long the orbit from average: E-03 nm or of a pixel Maximum variation long the orbit: E-02nm or of a pixel

22 First Analysis: Summary

23 All Spectral Cal Related Verification Tasks L Number of orbital regions for spectral calibration L Wavelength calibration - selected line list not changes L Slit function parameters unchanged L Verification of precise basis for spectral calibration L Verification of selected lines for calibration L Verify orbit region dependency L Verify whether SLS or Fraunhofer calibration shall be the baseline L : Wavelength calibration differences monitoring

24 Level 1b Spectral Calibration analysis: Recommendations The approach averaging the coefficients from the Level 1b seems to give better results Fit based on a lower order polynomial shall be investigated …