GERB-2 GEO 22/11/05 J. Hanafin Using IDL coastline information as independent check on L15 and L2 Geolocations Only SW and SWF day time radiances used.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CDOP NWC SAF Workshop on Physical Retrieval Gabriela Cuevas Tascón, INM (Spain) November, 28th CDOP NWCSAF Workshop on Physical Retrieval.
Advertisements

GERB SW fluxes: an update (Clear ocean SW radiances and fluxes in the reprocessed V999 June 04 data) Cédric Bertrand GIST th December, Imperial.
Daytime Cloud Shadow Detection With MODIS Denis Grljusic Philipps University Marburg, Germany Kathy Strabala, Liam Gumley CIMSS Paul Menzel NOAA / NESDIS.
1 High resolution SST products for 2001 Satellite SST products and coverage In situ observations, coverage Quality control procedures Satellite error statistics.
SAR Altimetry in Coastal Zone: Performances, Limits, Perspectives Salvatore Dinardo Serco/ESRIN Bruno Lucas Deimos/ESRIN Jerome Benveniste ESA/ESRIN.
Validation of CrIMSS sounding products of Cloud contamination and angle dependency Zhenglong Li, Jun Li, and Yue Li University of Wisconsin -
Chukchi/Beaufort Seas Surface Wind Climatology, Variability, and Extremes from Reanalysis Data: Xiangdong Zhang, Jeremy Krieger, Paula Moreira,
Diurnal asymmetry in the GERB(-like) fluxes: an update Cédric Bertrand Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium.
NRL09/21/2004_Davis.1 GOES-R HES-CW Atmospheric Correction Curtiss O. Davis Code 7203 Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375
Constraining aerosol sources using MODIS backscattered radiances Easan Drury - G2
The Radiative Budget of an Atmospheric Column in Tropical Western Pacific Zheng Liu Department of Atmospheric Science University of Washington.
Quantifying aerosol direct radiative effect with MISR observations Yang Chen, Qinbin Li, Ralph Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology,
Results of an Adaptive Radiative Transfer Parameterisation for the Lokal-Modell LM-User-Seminar 5 th – 7 th March 2007, Langen Annika Schomburg 1), Victor.
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin - Madison Steve Ackerman Director, Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
1 Comparisons of Daily SST Analyses for NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, NCDC) Dudley B. Chelton.
Neighborhood Operations
CRN Workshop, March 3-5, An Attempt to Evaluate Satellite LST Using SURFRAD Data Yunyue Yu a, Jeffrey L. Privette b, Mitch Goldberg a a NOAA/NESDIS/StAR.
Plans for interim data release J E Russell (Imperial)
The Land Around Us An Introduction to Maps By: Mrs. Miles.
Z. P. Szewczyk GIST 25, Oct Recent Field Campaigns with CERES Instruments Z. Peter Szewczyk Kory J. Priestley Lou Smith Remote Sensing of Clouds.
Level 1.5 Processing Updates Martin Bates, RAL GIST th December, 2005.
Remote Sensing Supervised Image Classification. Supervised Image Classification ► An image classification procedure that requires interaction with the.
Data Release Requirements, decisions and plans. What we need New machine Implement (and test) all proposed changes from current Provide data quality summary,
AN ENHANCED SST COMPOSITE FOR WEATHER FORECASTING AND REGIONAL CLIMATE STUDIES Gary Jedlovec 1, Jorge Vazquez 2, and Ed Armstrong 2 1NASA/MSFC Earth Science.
A Simple Image Model Image: a 2-D light-intensity function f(x,y)
Overview of the “Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB)” Experience. Nicolas Clerbaux Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMIB) In collaboration.
RGP geolocation analysis. The geolocation problem We don’t have all the necessary information: –Optical model needs tuning Can prob. do this now but not.
GERB-2 V999 Unfiltering Nicolas Clerbaux & RMIB GERB Team. GIST 24, Imperial College, London 15 december 2005.
Direct LW radiative forcing of Saharan dust aerosols Vincent Gimbert, H.E. Brindley, J.E. Harries Imperial College London GIST 25, 24 Oct 2006, UK Met.
ESTIMATION OF OCEAN CURRENT VELOCITY IN COASTAL AREA USING RADARSAT-1 SAR IMAGES AND HF-RADAR DATA Moon-Kyung Kang 1, Hoonyol Lee 2, Chan-Su Yang 3, Wang-Jung.
MSG, GERB calibration and data status May ‘07 J E Russell Imperial College, London
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Cloud Forcing Studies using CERES and GERB(-like) data Joanna Futyan, Jacqui Russell and John Harries GIST 22 RMIB, Brussels,
Slide 1 NATO UNCLASSIFIEDMeeting title – Location - Date Satellite Inter-calibration of MODIS and VIIRS sensors Preliminary results A. Alvarez, G. Pennucci,
Investigations of Artifacts in the ISCCP Datasets William B. Rossow July 2006.
RMIB involvement in the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) and Climate Monitoring SAF projects Nicolas Clerbaux Remote sensing from Space Division.
Validation of Coastwatch Ocean Color products S. Ramachandran, R. Sinha ( SP Systems NOAA/NESDIS) Kent Hughes and C. W. Brown ( NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
Co-Retrieval of Surface Color and Aerosols from SeaWiFS Satellite Data Outline of a Seminar Presentation at EPA May 2003 Sean Raffuse and Rudolf Husar.
2004/04/02GIST 21, Boulder M. Viollier et al.1 Time sampling bias: combination of CERES with Meteosat narrow-bands and beginning a comparison with GERB.
Introduction GOES-R ABI will be the first GOES imaging instrument providing observations in both the visible and the near infrared spectral bands. Therefore.
Diurnal Cycle of Cloud and Precipitation Associated with the North American Monsoon System Pingping Xie, Yelena Yarosh, Mingyue Chen, Robert Joyce, John.
MODIS Cryosphere Science Data Product Metrics Prepared by the ESDIS SOO Metrics Team for the Cryosphere Science Data Review January 11-12, 2006.
2004/11/10GIST 22, Brussels, LMD, M. Viollier1 POLDER, CERES, GERB flux comparisons and information on AMMA and MeghaTropiques Michel Viollier Laboratoire.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Inter-comparisons of monthly mean (and monthly time-step mean) GERB clear sky fluxes Joanna Futyan, Richard Allan and Jacqui.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Deriving clear-sky fluxes for GERB Jo Futyan Gist 21, CERES-GERB meeting 02/04/04 Boulder, Colorado.
GIST, Boulder, 31/03/2004 RMIB GERB Processing: overview and status S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
Level 1.5 Processing Updates Martin Bates, RAL GIST th April, 2005.
MODIS Atmosphere Level-3 Product & Web Site Review Paul A. Hubanks Science Systems and Applications, Inc.
AIRS Land Surface Temperature and Emissivity Validation Bob Knuteson Hank Revercomb, Dave Tobin, Ken Vinson, Chia Lee University of Wisconsin-Madison Space.
Satellite Imagery and Remote Sensing DeeDee Whitaker SW Guilford High EES & Chemistry
JMA GPRC report Arata OKUYAMA Meteorological Satellite Center,
Hyperspectral Cloud-Clearing Allen Huang, Jun Li, Chian-Yi Liu, Kevin Baggett, Li Guan, & Xuebao Wu SSEC/CIMSS, University of Wisconsin-Madison AIRS/AMSU.
Validation status overivew
Validation status overivew
Tony Reale ATOVS Sounding Products (ITSVC-12)
CTTH Cloud Top Temperature and Height
Climate Connections Geo 20F.
A Discussion on TEMPO Draft CH2O Validation Plan
Singular Value Decomposition North Atlantic SST
AHI IR Tb bias variation diurnal & at low temperature
COASTS.
©G Dear2008 – Not to be sold/Free to use
Richard Allan, Tony Slingo ESSC, Reading University
Comparing Images Using Hausdorff Distance
Ulrike Romatschke, Robert Houze, Socorro Medina
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
MAX-DOAS#1, North Direction
The Image The pixels in the image The mask The resulting image 255 X
Map Test COUNTRIES Number 1-18.
Discussion Way Forward for Multispectral IR
Number Summaries and Box Plots.
Presentation transcript:

GERB-2 GEO 22/11/05 J. Hanafin Using IDL coastline information as independent check on L15 and L2 Geolocations Only SW and SWF day time radiances used

Data Used the sum of 2 normalised data arrays to identify pixels with largest SW radiance gradients (  SW): North-South pix-pix SW radiance gradient (SWRad row(n-1) - SWRad row(n+1) ) (SWRad row(n-1) + SWRad row(n+1) ) East-West pix-pix SW radiance gradient (SWRad col(n-1) - SWRad col(n+1) ) (SWRad col(n-1) + SWRad col(n+1) )

Sample  SW over Libyan coastline

Shifting coastlines Retrieved IDL coast data within each GERB grid pixel Defined land, sea and coastal pixel mask Shifted mask relative to data arrays by -1, -0.5, 0, 0.5, 1 pixels in both directions: 25 different instances Stored mean and std dev of SW radiance gradient for each type of surface for each pixel shift

Pixel shifts N S EW

Rank each pixel shift according to it’s quality of fit relative to the other pixel shifts: Maximise: Coastal mean and std dev: = 100*(  SW – min) (max – min) Minimise Land/sea mean and std dev: =100*(1 – (  SW – min)) (max – min)

Pixel shifts 13 and 14 score equally highly: 13: 0 N-S, 0 E-W 14: 0 N-S, 0.5 E

Results so far… Method good to checking GEO +/- 0.2 GERB pixel –Sensitivity was tested using L15N V001 and Vttt data (pre-reprocessing version). Method useful for checking diurnal/spatial patterns of GEO –No obvious diurnal patterns in limited amount of L15 GEO looked at so far –L2 ‘jumps’ seem to be fixed in V999.

L15/L2 ARG comparison V001 v V999 L15 ARG (with L2 cloud mask) V002 v V999 L2 ARG June/July/Dec 2004 Chose 8 regions around Africa/Med. Sea Analyzed times when regions were cloud- free: cloudy pixel = cloud cover > 20% –times when a region had more than 10% of cloudy pixels were excluded –cloudy pixels were excluded from analysis of scenes with less than 10% cloudy pixels

L15/L2 V001/V999 comparisons Calculated  SW for each cloud-free instance of all 8 regions over June, July and Dec 2004 Used 2 pixel shift grids: –Low-res: 1.5, -1, -0.5, 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 pixels –High-res: -0.6, -0.4, -0.2, 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 pixels Calculated daily mean ‘quality of fit’ for each region

L2 V001L2 V999

L15 06/07 L15 L2 VersionV001V999 V002V999 Pix shift Spain/ Morocco 0.5 S0.5 E0.2 E0.5 S00.2 N S. Medit0.5 S0.5 E0.2 E, 0.2 S 0.5 S00 N. Medit0.5 S00.2 E0.5 S00 NW Africa0.5 S00.2 S0.5 S00 Red Sea0.5 S00.2 S0.5 S00 SW Africa0.5 S0.5 E0.2 E, 0.2 S 0.5 S00 S Africa0.5 S00.2 E0.5 S00.2 N, 0.2 E Summary of results of cloud-free coastline comparison

Effect of GEO on SW radiances Remapped filtered SW radiance image based on RGP GEO. Calculated minimum distance between GGSPS Reproc and RGP Reproc GEO for each pixel Replaced SW radiance of that pixel with that of the pixel closest to the RGP GEO location

Comparing GGSPS with different RGP GEO versions

realtimereproc_ 2 reproc_ 5 reproc_ 10 reproc_ 15 reproc_ 20 reproc_ 30 opti (km) (Wm-2) (% pixels >2%)