1 Characterization of Spatial Heterogeneity for Scaling Non Linear Processes S. Garrigues 1, D. Allard 2, F. Baret 1. 1 INRA-CSE, Avignon, France 2 INRA-Biométrie,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lab for Remote Sensing Hydrology and Spatial Modeling Dept. of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, NTU Satellite Remote Sensing for Land-Use/Land-Cover.
Advertisements

Spatial point patterns and Geostatistics an introduction
Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
Bayesian Belief Propagation
Earth Observation for Agriculture – State of the Art – F. Baret INRA-EMMAH Avignon, France 1.
Carbon dynamics at the hillslope and catchment scale Greg Hancock 1, Jetse Kalma 1, Jeff McDonnell 2, Cristina Martinez 1, Barry Jacobs 1, Tony Wells 1.
A Framework for Integrating Remote Sensing, Soil Sampling, and Models for Monitoring Soil Carbon Sequestration J. W. Jones, S. Traore, J. Koo, M. Bostick,
Estimating forest structure in wetlands using multitemporal SAR by Philip A. Townsend Neal Simpson ES 5053 Final Project.
MODIS Science Team Meeting - 18 – 20 May Routine Mapping of Land-surface Carbon, Water and Energy Fluxes at Field to Regional Scales by Fusing Multi-scale.
Examples of Formosat-2 data use: Nezer-Arcachon datasets Framework: Vegetation and environnement monitoring of agriculture and forest landscapes in Aquitaine.
Regionalized Variables take on values according to spatial location. Given: Where: A “structural” coarse scale forcing or trend A random” Local spatial.
Applied Geostatistics
Remote Mapping of River Channel Morphology March 9, 2003 Carl J. Legleiter Geography Department University of California Santa Barbara.
VENUS (Vegetation and Environment New µ-Spacecraft) A demonstration space mission dedicated to land surface environment (Vegetation and Environment New.
THE PHYSICAL BASIS OF SST MEASUREMENTS Validation and evaluation of derived SST products 1.To develop systematic approaches to L4 product intercomparison.
Abstract In the case of the application of the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission to the field of hydrology, the question asked is the following:
Ph. D. Dissertation defense Evaluation of the Performance of the MODIS LAI and FPAR Algorithm with Multiresolution Satellite Data Yuhong Tian Department.
Method of Soil Analysis 1. 5 Geostatistics Introduction 1. 5
CSIRO LAND and WATER Estimation of Spatial Actual Evapotranspiration to Close Water Balance in Irrigation Systems 1- Key Research Issues 2- Evapotranspiration.
Review of Probability.
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA RPC – March, Evaluation for the Integration of a Virtual Evapotranspiration Sensor Based.
10/03/2005NOV-3300-SL M. Weiss, F. Baret D. Allard, S. Garrigues From local measurements to high spatial resolution VALERI maps.
Development of indicators of fire severity based on time series of SPOT VGT data Stefaan Lhermitte, Jan van Aardt, Pol Coppin Department Biosystems Modeling,
Satellite Cross comparisonMorisette 1 Satellite LAI Cross Comparison Jeff Morisette, Jeff Privette – MODLAND Validation Eric Vermote – MODIS Surface Reflectance.
Review of Statistics and Linear Algebra Mean: Variance:
The role of remote sensing in Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation.
Karnieli: Introduction to Remote Sensing
Antwerp march A Bottom-up Approach to Characterize Crop Functioning From VEGETATION Time series Toulouse, France Bucharest, Fundulea, Romania.
Texture. Texture is an innate property of all surfaces (clouds, trees, bricks, hair etc…). It refers to visual patterns of homogeneity and does not result.
Geographic Information Science
© geoland2 consortium European Commission Fast Track Service Land within the GMES initiative in FP-7 Approach for validation of geoland2 products: phenological.
Remote Sensing. Vulnerability is the degree to which a system is susceptible to, or unable to cope with, adverse effects of climate change, including.
PREFER 1 st Annual Review Meeting, 5-6 Dec 2013, Milano-Italy PREFER WP 3.2, Task 7.
Compression and Analysis of Very Large Imagery Data Sets Using Spatial Statistics James A. Shine George Mason University and US Army Topographic Engineering.
The Semivariogram in Remote Sensing: An Introduction P. J. Curran, Remote Sensing of Environment 24: (1988). Presented by Dahl Winters Geog 577,
Canada Centre for Remote Sensing Field measurements and remote sensing-derived maps of vegetation around two arctic communities in Nunavut F. Zhou, W.
1 of 26 Characterization of Atmospheric Aerosols using Integrated Multi-Sensor Earth Observations Presented by Ratish Menon (Roll Number ) PhD.
Applications of Spatial Statistics in Ecology Introduction.
BIOPHYS: A Physically-based Algorithm for Inferring Continuous Fields of Vegetative Biophysical and Structural Parameters Forrest Hall 1, Fred Huemmrich.
LAI/ fAPAR. definitions: see: MOD15 Running et al. LAI - one-sided leaf area per unit area of ground - dimensionless fAPAR - fraction of PAR (SW radiation.
Toward a mesoscale flux inversion in the 2005 CarboEurope Regional Experiment T.Lauvaux, C. Sarrat, F. Chevallier, P. Ciais, M. Uliasz, A. S. Denning,
1. School of Geography, University of Southampton, UK 2. Unité Mixte de Recherche Environnement Méditerranéen et Modélisation des Agro-Hydrosystèmes, INRA,
Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
Remotely sensed land cover heterogeneity
14 ARM Science Team Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, March 21-26, 2004 Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada Natural.
Introduction to kriging: The Best Linear Unbiased Estimator (BLUE) for space/time mapping.
Slide 1 NATO UNCLASSIFIEDMeeting title – Location - Date Satellite Inter-calibration of MODIS and VIIRS sensors Preliminary results A. Alvarez, G. Pennucci,
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information: 3 GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) Aihua Li Yanchen Bo
SIMULATION OF ALBEDO AT A LANDSCAPE SCALE WITH THE D.A.R.T. MODEL AN EFFICIENT TOOL FOR EVALUATING COARSE SCALE SATELLITE PRODUCTS? Sylvie DUTHOIT*, Valérie.
1/13 Development of high level biophysical products from the fusion of medium resolution sensors for regional to global applications: the CYCLOPES project.
The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) Mission: Retrieval Characterisation and Error Analysis H. Bösch 1, B. Connor 2, B. Sen 1, G. C. Toon 1 1 Jet Propulsion.
Stochastic Hydrology Random Field Simulation Professor Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University.
1  Vito 16/12/2004 VALERI Meeting 10 March 2005, INRA, Avignon, France A new VALERI validation site in North-Western China: The ‘Shandan’ grassland Four.
Spatial Analysis Variogram
References: 1)Ganguly, S., Samanta, A., Schull, M. A., Shabanov, N. V., Milesi, C., Nemani, R. R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B., Generating vegetation.
Assessment on Phytoplankton Quantity in Coastal Area by Using Remote Sensing Data RI Songgun Marine Environment Monitoring and Forecasting Division State.
Estimation of surface characteristics over heterogeneous landscapes from medium resolution sensors. F. Baret 1, S. Garrigues 1, D. Allard 2, R. Faivre.
1.Image Error and Quality 2.Sampling Theory 3.Univariate Descriptive Image Statistics 4.Multivariate Statistics 5.Geostatistics for RS Next Remote Sensing1.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document GlobAlbedo Aerosol Retrieval
Quantifying Scale and Pattern Lecture 7 February 15, 2005
Validation of CYCLOPES, MODIS & MERIS PRODUCTS
Ch9 Random Function Models (II)
Stochastic Hydrology Random Field Simulation
Planning a Remote Sensing Project
Sources of Variability in Canopy Spectra and the Convergent Properties of Plants Funding From: S.V. Ollinger, L. Lepine, H. Wicklein, F. Sullivan, M. Day.
Spectral Transformation
Lucie C. Lepine, Scott V. Ollinger, Mary E. Martin
Presentation transcript:

1 Characterization of Spatial Heterogeneity for Scaling Non Linear Processes S. Garrigues 1, D. Allard 2, F. Baret 1. 1 INRA-CSE, Avignon, France 2 INRA-Biométrie, Avignon, France

2 Different spatial and temporal scales 1. Background Vegetation monitoring at global scale (primary production, carbon cycle...) Transfer Function BV = f(R i ) Biophysical variable (LAI, FAPAR) Need of high time frequency data Non linear process Vegetation ground scene (different biome types) Reflectance Image ( {R i, i=1..n} ) Sensor function Technological constraints: Coarse spatial resolution sensor

3 2. Problematic Image spatial structure depends on vegetation type Counami: Tropical forest Alpilles: Cropland Puechabon: Woody savana Nezer: Pine forest Alpilles: Cropland Puechabon: Woody savana Nezer: Pine forest Counami: Tropical forest 20m SPOT NDVI image

4 2. Problematic Image spatial structure depends on vegetation type Alpilles: Cropland Puechabon: Woody Savana Nezer: Pine Forest Counami: Woody Savana

5  The sensor integrates the signal over the pixel; intra-pixel variance lost  Spatial heterogeneity depends on the spatial resolution « Homogeneous » (Guyana Forest) Spatial Resolution « Heterogeneous site » (Alpilles Cropland ) 2. Problematic 20m (SPOT) Image spatial structure depends on sensor spatial resolution 60m (  SPECTRA) 300m (  MERIS) 500m (  MODIS) 1000m (  VGT)

6 Heterogeneous pixel AB 2. Problematic Spatial heterogeneity and non linear process Spatial heterogeneity and non linear process Non linear transfer function between NDVI and LAI : LAI=f(NDVI) LAI B NDVI B NDVI A LAI A Bias: e=LAI apparent -LAI actual biais NDVI LAI apparent Apparent LAI LAI actual Actual LAI :

7 2. Problematic  Spatial heterogeneity definition: quantitative information characterizing the ground spatial structure spatial variance distribution of the variable considered, within the coarse resolution pixel  Our aim: using spatial heterogeneity as an a priori information to correct biophysical estimation biais, i.e. to scale up the transfer function at coarser spatial resolution  Spatial structure (i.e. spatial heterogeneity) depends on: - surface property variation - sensor regularization - spatial characteristics: spatial resolution, support geometry (PSF), viewing angle… - spectral characteristic, atmospheric effects - image extent  Working scale: the field scale Utilisation of high spatial resolution (SPOT 20m) to characterize ground spatial structure at field spatial frequency.

8 Stochastic framework for image exploitation  The image is a realization of a random process (random function model) with the following characteristics: Ergodicity: one realization of the random process allows to infer the statistical properties of the random function. Stationarity of the two first moments: - the mean image value is constant over the image - the correlation between two pixel values depends only on the distance between them.  Data support: SPOT pixel considered as punctual - No accounting for SPOT regularization (PSF) - No accounting for SPOT pixel radiometric uncertainties (measurement errors)  Variable studied : NDVI 3. Spatial heterogeneity characterization

9 The variogram: a structure function  Definition: spatial variance distribution of the regionalized variable z(x)  Sample variogram:  Theoretical variogram Sill (  ²) True Variance Range (r) Up to this distance data are spatially correlated  Variogram regionalization model of the image: nested structure Standard variogram structure characterizes a spatial variation of the image Range1 (r1) Range2 (r2) Sill(  ²)

10 3. Spatial heterogeneity characterization Spatial structure characterization by the variogram The variogram describes the ground spatial structure of different vegetation types. Alpilles,r1=264m, r2=1148m, sill=0.042 Puechabon r1=260m, r2=1806m, sill=0.012 Nezer,r1=222m, r2=1533m, sill= Counami,r1=57m, r2=676m, sill=

11 3. Spatial heterogeneity characterization Spatial heterogeneity typology Integral range is a yardstick that summarizes variogram on the image Variance Integral range

12 4. Spatial heterogeneity regularization with decreasing spatial resolution Spatial structure regularization is a function of sensor spatial characteristics Puechabon site Sensor regularization Image structureGround structure Point Spread Function Regularized variogram Ground variogram

13 Spatial heterogeneity quantification 4. Spatial heterogeneity regularization with decreasing spatial resolution  Sample dispersion variance Pixel x,Z(x) Pixel vi, Z(vi) o Our model of data regularization o Quantify spatial heterogeneity (spatial variance) with spatial resolution  Theoretical dispersion variance: Cropland Woody Savana Pine forest Tropical Forest

14 Biased LAI Sample dispersion variance 5 Bias correction model Univariate Model Non linearity degreeHeterogeneity degree

15 Cropland site (Alpilles) example 5. Bias correction model Resolution=500m Model problem: Non stationnarity pixel: sample dispersion variance (pixel spatial heterogeneity) is lower than theoretical variance dispersion predicted by variogram model

16 Cropland site (Alpilles) example 5. Bias correction model Resolution=500m Model problem: Non stationnarity pixel: the sample dispersion variance of the pixel is lower than the theoretical variance dispersion predicted by the variogram model

17 Resolution=1000m 5. Bias correction model Cropland site (Alpilles) example

18 6. Multivariate spatial heterogeneity characterization Multivariate description of spatial heterogeneity Coregionalization variogram model  multi-spectral spatial heterogeneity description: - more information on physical signal - using variance-covariance dispersion matrix to correct bias  Problems: disturbing factors (atmosphere) influence the spatial structure Alpilles (Cropland)

19 5. Conclusions and prospects  Using variograms to describe spatial heterogeneity : it describes the spatial structure of different landscapes it allows to model data regularization  Bias correction model : based on variogram models and accounts for the non linearity of the transfer function allows accounting for actual PSF (sensor spatial characteristics, registration for data fusion)  Problems: How to adjust variogram models for bias correction? Temporal stationnarity of the variogram models? Transfer function diversity: development of a multivariate model  Accounting for image spatial information for quantitative remote sensing is an important concern Use of SPECTRA data to adjust variogram models and investig ate their temporal stationnarity Optimizing the PSF design of future missions

20 LAI=f(NDVI) NDVI A LAI h LAI b LAI R NDVI B NDVI P A B C D R^R^ RVRV Raffy Method – Univariate case

21 Heterogeneous pixel AB 2. Problematic Spatial heterogeneity and non linear process Spatial heterogeneity and non linear process Non linear transfer function between NDVI and LAI : LAI=f(NDVI) LAI B NDVI B NDVI A LAI A Bias: e=LAI apparent -LAI actual biais NDVI LAI apparent Apparent LAI LAI actual Actual LAI :