Update on Regional Haze November 15, 2012 Michele Notarianni EPA Region 4 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Haze Update & Current Results Michele Notarianni Brenda Johnson EPA Region 4.
Advertisements

1 NC-DAQ Educational Opportunities Series 18 March 2015 Regional Haze Discussions and Issues in North Carolina.
Identification of BART-Eligible Sources in the WRAP Region A Summary of the April 4, 2005 Draft Report.
Region 9 Tribal Air Quality Conference Regional Haze Rulemakings: Western Regional Air Partnership Annex July 25, 2002.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
Overview of Ozone and PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Regional Air Quality Workshop November 17, 2004.
1 Year in Review: Clean Air Act Presented by: Tom Wood Stoel Rives LLP October 8, 2010 Things Are Getting Really Complicated.
What options do states have? What is Georgia planning to do? What are some of the other states doing? What are the possible implications to permit fees?
Overview of the Tribal New Source Review (NSR) Rule U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Research.
New Source Review Reform Vera S. Kornylak, Associate Regional Counsel EPA Region 4 Office of Regional Counsel and Gregg Worley, Chief, Air Permits Section,
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and State Implementation Plan (SIP) Updates October 30, 2013 Lynorae Benjamin, Chief Regulatory Development.
Working with State and Federal Regulatory and Land Management Agencies Trent Wickman USDA Forest Service Eastern Region, Lakes States.
Draft model for the Annual and Final implementation report under the Investment for Growth and Jobs goal Marko Prijatelj Directorate General for Regional.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
Where to find Information About Facilities. Overview of Title V Permits.
1 WRAP Policy Fire Tracking Systems Draft December 9, 2002 FEJF Meeting December 10-11, 2002 Jackson, WY.
Developing a Workplan for Implementing the Strategic Plan for the WRAP Board October 1, 2008.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
Final Amendments to the Regional Haze Rule: BART Rule Making June 16, 2005.
PA Department of Environmental Protection Continuous Source Monitoring Manual (Manual, Revision 8)
1 Update on the STIP-II Project & Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Meeting Portland, OR April 3, 2003.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31,
Ozone and NOx in the West WRAP November 11, 2009 Santa Fe, New Mexico Don Arkell Regional Haze Implementation.
BART Guideline Overview WESTAR August 31, 2005 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Todd Hawes
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
REGIONAL HAZE BART – Key Issues For Consideration Eric Massey, Arizona DEQ Lee Alter, WGA SSJF Meeting June 3, 2004 Denver, Colorado.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
NACAA Fall Meeting October 2012 Innovative and Replicable Initiatives - The Colorado Clean Air/Clean Jobs Act Will Allison, Director CDPHE Air Pollution.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
Best Available Retrofit Technology Rule - Colorado David R. Ouimette Colorado Air Pollution Control Division.
Proposed Reasonable Progress Rule Workshop Brief Background and Procedure Public Workshop June 14, 2007.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.
Update on the STIP-II Project: Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Air Manager’s Committee Santa Fe, NM March.
BART SIP Development: Example from Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park WRAP IWG Meeting, Denver, CO August 29, 2007 Presented by: Ray Mohr and Curt Taipale.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q 1 Regional Haze Update WESTAR September 17-19, 2007 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards.
Reproposal of the Regional Haze Rule and BART Guidelines.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.
Alternatives to BART Rule Discussion with WRAP Nov , 2006.
Summary of June 15, 2005 Revisions to RH BART and BART Guidelines.
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
VISIBILITY SIPS The Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Fire The Role of the RPOs Opportunities for Participation US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Dennis Haddow.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
Indiana Chamber of Commerce Environmental Roundtable August 25, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
OTC Control Strategy Committee Meeting Tad Aburn, Chair, Multi-P Workgroup October 5, 2005 The OTC Multipollutant Model Rule.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
Pulp & Paper Sector Strategy & New Source Performance Standards Strategy Peter Tsirigotis, Director Sector Policies & Programs Division National Association.
Amendments to 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 123: Final-form Rulemaking: Commercial Fuel Oil Sulfur Limits for Combustion Units Environmental Quality Board.
Significance of Mobile Source Emissions for the Purposes of Section 309 of the Regional Haze Rule Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board.
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
CAIR Replacement Rule and Regional Haze
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
John Bunyak National Park Service
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
EPA’s Current Air Toxics Activities
Status of Regional Haze Rule
EPA Clarification on Regional Haze SIP Issues
Initiatives Oversight Committee Update on Other Activities
Status of Exceptional Events Implementation Guidance
Workshop Technical and Policy Studies to Support the Annex
Summary of RH-LTS Requirements (d)(3)
Wildland Fire Policy Revision
RA BART Overview Deb Wolfe 8/9/2019.
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Update on Regional Haze November 15, 2012 Michele Notarianni EPA Region 4 1

Overview of Regional Haze Provisions Clean Air Act: – Requires visibility protection for Federal Class I Areas (e.g., national parks and wilderness areas) – Establishes national goal to prevent future and remedy existing visibility impairment from manmade air pollution in Class I areas EPA’s Regional Haze Rule: – Mandates submission of a series of State Implementation Plans (SIPs) that will improve visibility in 156 Class I areas across the country The first regional haze SIPs were due December 17, 2007 Second SIP due July 31, 2018, and every ten years thereafter. The first Progress Report SIPs are due five years after submittal of initial SIP. – Key SIP components include, but are not limited to: Reasonable progress (RP) and RP Goals (RPGs) Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Long term Strategy (LTS) 2

EPA’s Regional Haze Program 3

EPA Action on Regional Haze SIPs National Updates: – EPA is in the process of acting on the 52 required SIPs (or instituting FIPs) due from all states, Washington D.C., and the Virgin Islands. – As of September 2012, EPA has issued over 100 Federal Register actions on these SIPs. – EPA’s Better-Than-BART (BTB) Rulemaking: BTB Proposal - 12/30/2011 and BTB Final - 06/07/2012. Regional Updates: – In R4, EPA has issued (or signed) 17 Federal Register actions (9 proposals, 8 finals) between June of 2011 and the present (i.e., 11/15/2012). – All R4 states' regional haze SIPs acted on except portion of Florida’s regional haze SIP. 4

Consent Decrees on Regional Haze SIPs 124 consent decree deadlines in 5 consent decrees, and over 100 EPA regulatory actions to date. R4: All but two obligations have been met as of 11/15/2012. FL: Propose by 12/03/2012 and go final by 07/15/2013 on certain elements of Florida’s regional haze SIP. FL: 2012 SIP Revisions - EGU Control Analyses: – 31 RP EGUs and 23 BART sources with BART-eligible (B-E) EGUs. – April 13, 2012 – draft SIP with shutdowns, exempters, and top-level controls for 13 RP EGUs and 12 BART sources with B-E EGUs. – July 31, 2012 – draft SIP with control determinations for 18 RP EGUs and 11 BART sources (total of 20 B-E EGUs). – September 17, 2012 – consolidated final SIP with finalized determinations for EGUs covered in the April and July draft SIP revisions. 5

Progress Report & Adequacy Check Requirements: – Progress Report – 40 CFR (g); Adequacy Check – 40 CFR (h). – Due five years after submittal of initial regional haze SIP. National Activities: – Federal Register template for EPA’s future actions on Progress SIPs. – EPA is internally discussing its expectations to aid Agency internal reviews. – EPA has also reached out externally: Mid-September 2012 – calls with FLMs and RPOs October NACAA call general discussion 6

Progress Report & Adequacy Check Regional Activities: – SC and NC draft Progress SIPs and SC proposed SIP for public comment submitted to date. – EPA is working with SC and NC to provide input on their SIPs. – Preliminary lessons learned to date from this process….. 7

*Tips for R4 Progress Report SIPs TIPs = Suggestions to strengthen technical support for Region 4 states’ Progress SIP conclusions. *Disclaimer: The TIPs are intended to help the Region 4 states portray the visibility improvement made to date. The TIPs are not all inclusive and are likely to change as we review more Progress SIPs. Characterizations of EPA’s regulations here are for summary purposes only. Please refer to 40 CFR (g) and 40 CFR (h) for the actual requirements. 8

*Tips for R4 Progress Report SIPs 40 CFR (g): – General TIP: Be sure to include the conclusions of any assessments required along with the supporting data. g1 – Status of Measures: – TIP: Briefly explain if any measures in original SIP are not discussed in Progress SIP. – TIP: For national/regional measures, helpful to highlight those measures which apply to your State’s sources/units which have visibility impacts on Class I areas. 9

*Tips for R4 Progress Report SIPs (ctd) g2 – Emissions Reductions Summary of “g1” Measures: – TIP: For national/regional measures, highlight those emissions reductions which apply to your State’s sources/units which have visibility impacts on Class I areas. – TIP: Helpful to include early on in SIP why the focus of emissions reporting for RP is on SO2 reductions. 10

*Tips for R4 Progress Report SIPs (ctd) g2 – Emissions Reductions Summary of “g1” Measures: (ctd.) – TIP: Industrial/Commercial/Institutional (ICI) Boiler and Process Heater MACT standard - ideas to tailor to State vs VISTAS: Could include revised rule data for your state (or use data from 1 st SIP showing percent reductions expected in your state from vacated rule). Could include a statement that given the expectation that the revised rule will result in greater emissions reductions of visibility- impairing pollutants, this provides further assurance that your State will achieve its RPGs. 11

*Tips for R4 Progress Report SIPs (ctd) g3 – Visibility Data: – TIP: Helpful to include IMPROVE visibility monitoring data in a table to aid with readability if data shown in a figure. g4 - Evaluation of Emissions Changes Over Five-Year Period: – TIP: At least two lookback years needed for this evaluation. – TIP: Could also include VISTAS 2009 emissions projections for your state from 1 st SIP to compare to updated emissions inventory. – TIP: Could include most recent emissions data for significant sources of focus (e.g., 2010 data for EGUs). 12

*Tips for R4 Progress Report SIPs (ctd) g5 – Significant Emissions Changes Assessment: – TIP: Include explicit statement and explanation to indicate whether there are significant changes in emissions of concern that have limited or impeded progress in reducing pollutant emissions and improving visibility. 13

*Tips for R4 Progress Report SIPs (ctd) g6 – Assessment of SIP Sufficient to Meet RPGs: – TIP: Include explicit statement with explanation for the conclusions from the assessment of SIP sufficiency. – TIP: Also address SIP sufficiency re: RPGs of out of state Class I areas impacted by your State’s sources. g7 – Monitoring Strategy Review: – TIP: Include explicit statement if review determines that no modifications to the existing visibility monitoring strategy are necessary. 14

*Tips for R4 Progress Report SIPs (ctd) 40 CFR (h) – Adequacy Determination of SIP: – TIP: 308(h) determination is subject to public notice and comment. – TIP: Explicitly address State’s determination in SIP or accompanying letter. 15

For More Information EPA Visibility Home Website: – Basic Information – includes links to FLM websites Basic Information – Regulatory Actions – chronological list of EPA actions Regulatory Actions – Regional Planning Organizations – incl. links to 5 RPO websites Regional Planning Organizations – Visibility in Parks and Wilderness Areas - Pollutants, photos, trends, and real-time images; incl. links to IMPROVE website Visibility in Parks and Wilderness Areas EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual: – Visibility Monitoring Networks: – IMPROVE: – VIEWS: