Triggering on ISR Events Nicolas Berger BaBar Online/DAQ/Trigger Workshop December 2 nd, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 14 December 2006 Status of analysis.
Advertisements

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 Level 1 Trigger: Introduction L1 trigger objects and strategy Implementation features L1 composition.
Barbara Sciascia – LNF 1 K  semileptonic BR measurement B. Sciascia 4 may 2006 KpmKSL joint meeting.
Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 12 October 2005 Status of analysis.
Study of the e + e   η  process at √s = 1 GeV (main systematic error in the e + e   e + e  η analysis)
Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 L1 Configuration and Future Prospects DCZ cuts and new GLT objects L1 rate diagnosis Can an improved.
2 photon BaBar Trigger Workshop CalTech – 2 nd Dec 2004 Jamie Boyd.
Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar Bryan Fulsom SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 35 th International Conference on High Energy Physics Paris, France.
Light Dark Matter Search in B-factory O. Tajima (KEK) for Belle collaboration.
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
Search for 7-prong  Decays Ruben Ter-Antonyan on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration Tau04 Workshop, Sep 14, 2004, Nara, Japan Outline:  Introduction 
Inclusive  Production at Y(1S) Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang Syracuse University CLEO Meeting 09/13/02.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
Search for LFV  decays involving     ’ at Belle Y. Enari, Belle collaboration Nagoya University.
Takeo Higuchi Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, KEK Jan 21, 2004 Hawaii, USA Super B Factory Workshop Charged Higgs Search with B  D   
1 Update: High energy photon pairs Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech 04 December 2007.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.
STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002.
ALICE EMCal Physics and Functional Requirements Overview.
Luca Lista L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli Rare and Hadronic B decays in B A B AR.
N  for 2012 Zhiyong Wang May, 12,2015 Charmonium group meeting 1.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Quarkonium Physics with STAR Mauro Cosentino (University of Sao Paulo/BNL)
Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 1 Barbara Sciascia K  semileptonic decays Charged Kaon Meeting July, 29 th - LNF Single photon efficiency in KPM events.
Progress on F  with the KLOE experiment (untagged) Federico Nguyen Università Roma TRE February 27 th 2006.
Status of the hadronic cross section (small angle) Federico Nguyen February 22 nd 2005  the 2002 data sample and available MC sets  trigger efficiency.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
Preliminary Measurement of the Ke3 Form Factor f + (t) M. Antonelli, M. Dreucci, C. Gatti Introduction: Form Factor Parametrization Fitting Function and.
Recent results from KLOE Cesare Bini Universita’ “La Sapienza” and INFN Roma 1.The KLOE physics program 2.The KLOE detector 3.Status of the experiment.
1 Absolute Hadronic D 0 and D + Branching Fractions at CLEO-c Werner Sun, Cornell University for the CLEO-c Collaboration Particles and Nuclei International.
EM resolutions from low to high energy Jan Stark, LPSC Grenoble CAT Force meeting, May 13 th, 2003.
Σ Eγ comparison using Woochun Park Univ of South Carolina Feb 26,
D. LeoneNovosibirsk, , 2006Pion Form KLOE Debora Leone (IEKP – Universität Karlsruhe) for the KLOE collaboration International Workshop.
Tuning of trigger simulation parameters (Bossi, Moulson, Palutan, Sciascia) Calorimeter trigger thresholds calibration using prompt photons from K S 
First results from SND at VEPP-2000 S. Serednyakov On behalf of SND group VIII International Workshop on e + e - Collisions from Phi to Psi, PHIPSI11,
1 A Study On Photonic Electrons In The Endcap EMC  Purity of electrons from MC simulation & real data  Reconstructed photonic electrons Naresh Subba,KSU.
LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.
Objectives: Measure production of vector mesons ( , ,  ) on nuclei in the energy range Measure production of vector mesons ( , ,  ) on nuclei in.
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
KLOE general meeting December 2002 Tor Vergata K charged status report DST production status New analysis items:  K + K - cross section/  line.
QCHS 2010 Lei Zhang1 Lei Zhang (on behalf of BESIII Collaboration) Physics School of Nanjing University Recent.
Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|
Photon Selection Algorithm Ming Yang , Mingshui Chen BESIII Meeting
EMC session, Annecy General Meeting
The truth information in the hadronic samples
Salvatore Fiore Università di Roma “La Sapienza”
Matteo Negrini Frascati, Jan 19, 2006
ZH (H -> tau tau) Study Current Status
Cross section of the process
Special edition: Farewell for Valerie Halyo
Progress on Pion Form Factor at KLOE (large photon polar angle)
PrimEx II 0 analysis status
Special edition: Farewell for Stephen Bailey
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Special edition: Farewell for Eunil Won
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
e+e−→ J/ D(*)D(*) & ψ(4160) → DD
Search for (3770) non-DD-bar Decays
Hadronic recoil analysis:
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
Search for Invisible Decay of Y(1S)
M. Ohlerich, A. Raspiareza, W. Lohmann DESY and MPI Munich
Search for Lepton Flavour Violation in the decay  → BaBar
Tau Lepton Flavor Violation Search at Belle, tgmg/eg
Search for
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

Triggering on ISR Events Nicolas Berger BaBar Online/DAQ/Trigger Workshop December 2 nd, 2004

ISR Signal Look for events with –high-E photon (E* = GeV) –Recoiling hadronic system (charged or neutral) Produce qq continuum and 1 -- resonances (  …) Use s’ = inv. mass squared of Had system as reference

BG Filter Improvements 2 New filters in 2003 reprocessing: BGFIsr: Select ISR events –Require cluster with E*>2.5 GeV, < cos(  *)< 0.93 and one of: –1 track E/p 600 MeV/c OR –2 tracks, E/p 250 MeV/c OR –2 clusters, E > 100 MeV –Veto if tracks with E/p > 0.8 and p*>4 GeV/c –Veto on  topologies BGFRadTwoProng: Unbiased 2-prong sample for  efficiency studies. –2 tracks with p* > 250 MeV –Missing p* > 2 GeV, Pointing in EMC acceptance –Missing M < 2 GeV.

BG Filter Improvements BG Filter efficiency vs. s’ for different filter configurations, on  0   +  - MC Denominator = fiducial events BGFIsr gives significant improvement Only BGFMultiHadron with BGFNeutralHadron with BGFTau with BGFTwoProngwith BGFIsr  s’ [GeV] Efficiency

Trigger/Filter Overall Performance We use: – L3 Physics = (L3OutDch || L3OutEmc) – MH = BGFMultiHadron – NH = BGFNeutralHadron – ISR = BGFIsr –  = BGFPhiGamma Denominator = Events with >0 clusters with –E* > 3 GeV –|cos(  *)|<0.95 Filter LevelEff (%) L L399.5 L3 Physics99.4 BGF97.2 MH, NH, ISR,  94.4 MH, NH, ISR93.7 MH, ISR93.0 ISR90.1

Trigger/Filter Overall Performance Events Passing: L1 L3 L3 Physics BGF MultiHad, NeutralHad, ISR and  MultiHad, NeutralHad and ISR MultiHad, ISR ISR  s’ [GeV]

L1 Line Breakdown  s’ [GeV] +

L3 Breakdown  s’ [GeV] High L3OutEmc efficiency due to auxiliary clusters caused by  interaction in EMC

0  +-0  +- Filter LevelEff (%) L L398.9 L3 Physics98.9 BGF97.4 MH, NH, ISR,  90.7 MH, NH, ISR90.2 MH, ISR90.2 ISR89.6  s’ [GeV] BGFPhiGamma designed to pick up  K + K - but also works for low-mass    

 0   +  - Issue 1: Close Tracks Fails L1 Fails L3 (2 L3 tracks but misreconstructed)

 0   +  - Issue 2: Pion showers Fails BGF Doesn’t fire BGFIsr due to Bhabha veto

 0   +  - Issue 3: Interactions Fails L3, No IP tracks (We probably don’t want this event anyway!)

  K0SK0L  K0SK0L Filter LevelEff (%) L L397.3 L3 Physics96.0 BGF71.8 MH, NH, ISR,  61.6 MH, NH, ISR56.5 MH, ISR56.3 ISR56.0 Fails L3 Accounts for almost all of the overall efficiency dip at  mass

  e+e-  e+e- Filter LevelEff (%) L L399.6 L3 Physics99.5 BGF57.4 MH, NH, ISR,  9.5 MH, NH, ISR9.5 MH, ISR9.1 ISR7.8 Almost completely removed by Bhabha Vetos Accounts for most of the dip in efficiency at  mass.

Break-up by N GoodTracksLoose : N GTL =0 Filter LevelEff (%) L199.0 L394.0 L3 Physics93.6 BGF58.4 MH, NH, ISR,  48.5 MH, NH, ISR48.5 MH, ISR47.5 ISR47.5  s’ [GeV] BGF dominated by BGFIsr, requires 2 mips Low eff. At low s’, but not clear how useful these events are anyways.

Break-up by N GTL : N GTL =1 Filter LevelEff (%) L L398.0 L3 Physics97.9 BGF88.8 MH, NH, ISR,  86.3 MH, NH, ISR86.2 MH, ISR84.1 ISR84.0  s’ [GeV]

Break-up by N GTL : N GTL =2 Filter LevelEff (%) L L399.5 L3 Physics99.5 BGF98.7 MH, NH, ISR,  93.1 MH, NH, ISR91.5 MH, ISR90.4 ISR90.2  s’ [GeV] BGFPhiGamma efficient on low-mass events for both  KK and 

Break-up by N GTL : N GTL =3 Filter LevelEff (%) L1100 L L3 Physics99.93 BGF99.7 MH, NH, ISR,  99.5 MH, NH, ISR99.5 MH, ISR99.4 ISR92.5  s’ [GeV]

Break-up by N GTL : N GTL >4 Filter LevelEff (%) L1100 L L3 Physics99.99 BGF99.97 MH, NH, ISR,  MH, NH, ISR99.96 MH, ISR99.96 ISR94,4  s’ [GeV]

Conclusions ISR events are a challenge for the trigger The BaBar trigger performs well –Most of the events useful for physics are selected –For L1 and L3, benefit of the “inclusive” selection approach. –For BGF, more problems originally but modifications always possible (if willing to wait ~6 months!)