Impact of Software Process on Quality Workshop – Day 2 Ege University 22 May 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

1 Copyright © 2011 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 9 Developing Management Skills.
Requirements Engineering Processes – 2
Planning Reports and Proposals
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
The 4 T’s of Test Automation:
Requirements Engineering Process
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Source of slides: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
FREEDOM DRIVE 2013 The Future of Independent Living, Active Citizenship and Europe – 12 September 2013.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
ZMQS ZMQS
1 Implementing Internet Web Sites in Counseling and Career Development James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University Copyright 2003 by James P. Sampson,
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
Marketing University Technologies : Linking University Research and Industry Interests Heidjer Staecker, J.D., LLM TreMonti Consulting LLC
Chapter 5 – Enterprise Analysis
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
ABC Technology Project
1 Undirected Breadth First Search F A BCG DE H 2 F A BCG DE H Queue: A get Undiscovered Fringe Finished Active 0 distance from A visit(A)
TQA CONCEPTS & CORE VALUES
2 |SharePoint Saturday New York City
© S Haughton more than 3?
VARIABILITY IN SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE ARCHITECTURES VARI-ARCH 2010 ECSA 4th European Conference on Software Architecture Copenhagen, August 23, 2010.
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
VOORBLAD.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 27 Slide 1 Quality Management.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 5 Slide 1 Project management.
Lecture 5: Requirements Engineering
QualTech Prize Finals 1www.qimpro.com. QualTech Prize Finals Managing for Improvement vs Managing for Innovation.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
Online Rubric Assessment Tool for Marine Engineering Course
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
1 First EMRAS II Technical Meeting IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 19–23 January 2009.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Handling data: session 4.
25 seconds left…...
Introduction to Coaching and Mentoring
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Conference Program 09:00 Welcome 09:30 Session 1: Optics and Photonics 10:45 Coffee Break (Poster Session) 11:15 Session 2: Gravitation, Cosmology and.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
PSSA Preparation.
Ch. 13: Supply Chain Performance Measurement: Introduction
Supply Chain Performance Measurement
Presentation transcript:

Impact of Software Process on Quality Workshop – Day 2 Ege University 22 May 2004

2 Reklamlar… HAREZMI Newsgroup – Türk Yazılım Mühendisliği Haber/Tartışma Grubu Dil: Türkçe Yazilim muhendisligi konulari hakkinda sorular/cevaplar Yazilim muhendisligi ile alakali calistay/seminer duyurusu Yazilim muhendisligi hakkinda is imkanlari duyurusu (yurtici ve yurtdisi) Beraber proje calisma onerisi (yurtici/yurtdisi) Yazilim muhendisligi hakkinda ilginc linkler Beraber calistay/seminer organizesinin onerisi Son teknoloji duyurulari Ilginc makaleler/kitaplar/dergiler Yazilim muhendisligi egitimi hakkinda sorular/bilgiler Yazilim muhendisligi musabakalarin duyurusu - vs. Üye Olun! Bizlere Katılın

3

4

5 Program – Discussion Sessions 9: :30 Panel Session I 10:30-11:00Break 11:00-12:00Introduction to Discussion Session and start of Discussions 12:00-13:30Lunch 13:30-15:00Discussion Session II – Define Mindmap and related questions 15:00-15:30Break 15:30-16:30Discussion Session III – Describe Approach 16:30-17:00Plenary Session – Presentation of Results

6 Panel Topic:  Relation between process and quality Panel Members:  Naci Akkök, University of Oslo  Yenal Göğebakan, Cybersoft  Orhan Kalaycı, Nitelik Danışmanlık  Alpay Karagöz, Bilgi Grubu  Halil Şengonca, Ege Universitesi

7 Approach 5-10 minutes view of each panel member Open discussion with audience

8 Questions Different processes; processes are not independent from each other How to derive the best possible processes and/or improvement models? Goal driven process selection, customization and improvement (what are the business goals) Metrics for process selection and customization and improvement (tailoring)  usability of process for company; usability is upper metric consisting of sub-metrics (size of project, application characteristics…) Constraints for selecting processes  Organizational perspectives of selecting processes  Social issues  Psychological (resistance/acceptance)  Technological  Skills of persons

9 Questions What is the quality of company? How to evaluate?  Metric based on process level (CMM level)  Other metrics independent from CMM level? Company/Organisation improvement instead of process improvement? How to categorize projects to select the appropriate process?

10 Questions Impact of stakeholders (clients) for impact of selection on process/process improvement model? What’s the impact of the domain on process? How to evaluate process improvement models? “Selecting a process selects quality” Context analysis

11 Questions Tailoring of processes  Select/refine processes based on project criteria/characteristics  How to compose processes? Usability

12 Short/initial summary Business Requirements Process Selection Process Improvement Models Evaluation of Process Improvement Models Constraints Product Requirements Process refinement

13 Questions

Discussion Session I

15 Splitting the group Tools Criteria for Processes Comp.SD and DE(Process) Metrics Modeling?

16 Deliverables The session should deliver (1) a mindmap and (2) a set of problem descriptions:

17 Mindmap (1) Mindmap: Draw one mindmap that shows the context of the described problems/domain.

18 Alternative Representation Conference Organization Tutorials Planning Social Program Workshops Invited Talk Costs Demonstrations

19 Define for each main idea the most important problems Core Idea Main Topic2 Main Topic3 Main Topic4 Main Topic5 Main Topic1 Problem 4 Problem 5 Problem 2 Problem 3 Problem 1

20 Problem Description The problems should be described in the following form: Problem: describe textually what the problem is. Why is it a problem?: Motivate why is this a fundamental problem.

21 Deliverables The session should deliver a set of solution descriptions. A solution description should be in the following format: Problem: Describe the problem. Potential Approach: Describe the approach to tackle the problem Related Work: List the related knowledge domains/related work for this problem

22 Deliverables lead to assignments/projects Example: Problem:  Software Architecture Design is a Heavy Process which takes a long time before it is finished. In practice however, due to stringent time-to-market requirements faster delivery is required… Potential Approach:  Apply agile methods to software architecture design methods. Related Work:  Software Architecture Design  Agile Methods  Method Engineering