UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY CHEMOTHERAPY ISSUES: WEEKLY DOSING Andrés Poveda, MD Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integration of Taxanes in the Management of Breast Cancer
Advertisements

AGO-Austria Phase-III Studie: HECTOR
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
“Taking Care of Tomorrows Patient Better than Today”… the Future is Now Set A1 – Title Slide David O’Malley, M.D.
OvCa Clinical Trials Planning Meeting Orlando May 2009
Gynecologic Oncology Group Gynecologic Oncology Group Uterine Corpus Trials: GCIG David Scott Miller, M.D., F.A.C.O.G., F.A.C.S. Director and Dallas Foundation.
Intraperitoneal therapy in ovarian cancer Edward L. Trimble, MD, MPH National Cancer Institute, USA.
O VARIAN C ANCER C LINICAL T RIALS P LANNING M EETING Unanswered Questions in Upfront Therapy IP Therapy Issue Keiichi Fujiwara, MD, PhD Saitama Medical.
Immune therapy in NSCLC Presentation – 劉惠文 Supervisor – 劉俊煌教授.
Biomarker Analyses in CLEOPATRA: A Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Study of Pertuzumab in HER2- Positive, First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Baselga.
Paz-Ares LG et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract CRA7510.
Facon T et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 2.
Randomized Phase III Trials of Intravenous vs. Intraperitoneal Therapy in Optimal Ovarian Cancer Deborah K. Armstrong, M.D. Associate Professor of Oncology,
‍‍‍‍Chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer. Dr.Azarm.
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Fabio Puglisi Dipartimento di Oncologia Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Udine Antiangiogenic Treatment Mediterranean School of Oncology.
Unanswered Questions in Primary Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: Controversial Areas Deborah K. Armstrong, M.D. May 29, 2009.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Key issues in trial design.
Mary McCormack & Jonathan Ledermann NCRI Gynae Clinical Studies Group.
Drug Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
GCIG Meeting 29th May 2009 The Implications of Primary Chemotherapy for Clinical Trials Iain McNeish Professor of Gynaecological Oncology Barts and the.
Phase III Trial of Bevacizumab in the Primary Treatment of Advanced Epithelial Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology.
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
Phase 1b Study of Iniparib (BSI-201) Combined with Irinotecan for Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 Cell Cycle Effects of Iniparib plus Gemcitabine.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Efficacy results from the ToGA trial: a phase III study of trastuzumab added to standard chemotherapy in first-line human epidermal growth factor receptor.
Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) upregulation Dose- and time-dependent upregulation of TP in human colon cancer xenografts PaclitaxelDocetaxel.
Investigating the Role of Anti- Angiogenic Agents in Ovarian Cancer Carol Aghajanian, M.D. Chief, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Memorial Sloan-Kettering.
Result of Interim Analysis of Overall Survival in the GCIG ICON7 Phase III Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab in Women with Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
GOG0172: The Dings The recommended regimen is not feasible –Substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin –Reduce cisplatin from 100 mg/m 2 to 75 mg/m 2 –Change.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer Angiolo Gadducci Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pisa Rome.
WHAT WILL THE KEY ISSUES IN END- POINT ASSESSMENT BE, IN FUTURE OVARIAN CANCER TRIALS INVOLVING NOVEL TARGETED AGENTS? first line treatment maintenance/consolidation.
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
Endometrial Committee David Scott Miller, M.D., F.A.C.O.G., F.A.C.S. Director and Dallas Foundation Chair in Gynecologic Oncology Professor of Obstetrics.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients with.
TAXOL® (paclitaxel) for Adjuvant Treatment of Node Positive Breast Cancer Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee TAXOL® (paclitaxel) for Adjuvant Treatment.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
CALYPSO Trial: Carboplatin & Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) versus Carboplatin & Paclitaxel in Relapsed, Platinum- Sensitive Ovarian Cancer Pujade-Lauraine.
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Pazopanib in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A new galloping horse. Dr. Raafat Ragaie, MD,FRCR.
Relapsed/Refractory Ovarian Cancer: Decision Points in Diagnosis and New Treatment Strategies Friday, March 24, 2006 Palm Springs Convention Center Primrose.
Results Increased median PFS 2.8 months No apparent increased survival. HR=0.985 CR+PR=46% Gemzar vs 36% control Independently Assessed Increased toxicity,
Elderly Women Ovarian Cancer Multicenter, randomized trial of carboplatin +/- paclitaxel in vulnerable elderly patients with stage III-IV advanced ovarian.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 GOG0213: Bevacizumab Retreatment of Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian.
Weekly Paclitaxel Combined with Monthly Carboplatin versus Single-Agent Therapy in Patients Age 70 to 89: IFCT-0501 Randomized Phase III Study in Advanced.
Phase I/II CheckMate 032: Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Advanced SCLC
Results from the International, Randomized Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib versus Chlorambucil in Patients 65 Years and Older with Treatment-Naïve CLL/SLL (RESONATE-2TM)1.
Geisler C et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 290.
Belani CP et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract CRA8000. (Oral Presentation)
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
MITO 29 Randomized Phase II study on Decitabine plus Carboplatin versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
ASCO 2002 Advances in the Adjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer
Oki Y et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 252.
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Participating groups:
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
CTCL: INNOVATIVE TREATMENTS GEMCITABINE
Martin M et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-7.
MITO 29 Randomized Phase II study on Decitabine plus Carboplatin versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Efficacy of BSI-201, a PARP Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (GC) in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (mTNBC): Results.
Joan L. Walker, M.D. Stephenson Cancer Center University of Oklahoma
Presentation transcript:

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY CHEMOTHERAPY ISSUES: WEEKLY DOSING Andrés Poveda, MD Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología On behalf of GEICO and GCIG Ovarian Cancer Clinical Trials Planning Meeting Friday, May 29, 2009

3rd International Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference

4-A4:Which regimen / kind of regimens can be regarded as standard comparator for future first-line trials? Within a given trial the chemotherapy regimen should be standardized and consistent with respect to drugs, dose, and schedule. The recommended standard comparator for trials on medical treatment in advanced ovarian cancer (FIGO IIB-IV) is carboplatin-paclitaxel The recommended regimen is carboplatin with a dose of AUC and paclitaxel 175 mg/m²/ 3h given every three weeks for 6 courses The recommended standard in early stage ovarian cancer (FIGO I-IIA) patients in whom adjuvant chemotherapy is indicated should contain at least carboplatin AUC Level of Acceptance: 13 / 13

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY WEEKLY DOSING RATIONALE Antiangiogenic property of Paclitaxel independent of its anti-proliferative action Lau DH et al. Proc ASCO 17:4141, 1998 Antiangiogenic scheduling chemotherapy improves efficacy against experimental drug-resistant cancer Browder T, Cancer Res; 2000 Norton-Simon hypothesis: a more frequent drug administration would be a more effective way of avoiding the regrowth of cell populations resistant to the agents used (Gomperzian model of tumor growth). Proven activity in other tumours (Breast Cancer,..) Better tolerance schedule

Mechanisms of Paclitaxel-induced cell death are concentration dependent Paclitaxel-mediated cell death may result from two different mechanisms: –At low Paclitaxel concentrations (<9 nM), cell death may occur after an aberrant mitosis by Raf-1 independent pathway –At higher Paclitaxel concentrations (>9 nM) cell death may be the result of a terminal mitotic arrest occurring by a Raf-1 dependent pathway Torres R and Horwitz B: Cancer Res 1998, 58:3620

Potential Advantages of Weekly Paclitaxel  Greater dose intensity greater inhibition of mitotic cellular activity  Higher frequency of administration Higher cellular exposure in M phase Higher inhibition of mitotic cellular activity  Cause of cellular death mediated by other mechanisms (apoptosis)  Inhibition of neovascularization  Better pharmacodynamic profile

IIIIIIIVV ANC (  1000/µL) Level Fennelly et al. JCO 15: ; 1997 WEEKLY PACLITAXEL: NO INCREASE IN MYELOSUPPRESSION WITH DOSE ESCALATION

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY WEEKLY DOSING PHASE II STUDIES paclitaxel in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer Schedule (mg/m2)PPNRRPFSOS 1)60-80 weekly100%3253% )80 weekly100%4821%3.6- 3)80 weekly x 3/ 4~10%1428% 4)80 weekly100%5325%24 w58 w 5)80 weekly x 6/ 896%2850%6*8* 6) weekly (1)45%2770%4.8**13.5** 7)80 weekly68%5756% ) Canada Le. Gyn Oncol 2005: 2) GOG Markman. Gyn Oncol 2006; 3) Japan Kita Gyn Oncol 2004; 4) Markman at Cleveland. Markman. JCO 2002; 5) Roswell Park. Ghamande. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003; * in responders; 6) Royal Mardsden Lynch. Gyn Oncol 2008 ** including the platinum sensitive patients (1) retrospective; 7) Norwegian Kaern Eur J Gynecol Oncol 2002

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY WEEKLY DOSING PHASE II STUDIES paclitaxel in combination in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer TDose/m2/wk C AUC Author NRR % DFS months OS months T90 C AUC4 d1,8,q 21 Cadron Gynecol Oncol T80 C AUC2 d1,8,15, q 28 Havrilesky, Gynecol Oncol T90 C AUC4 d1,8,15, q 28 Van der Burg, Int J Gynecol Cancer, T80 C AUC3 d1,8,15 q28 Roxburgh P ESMO 08 A # T70 C AUC 3 d1,8,15, q28 Sharma R Br J Cancer ,9 13,3

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY WEEKLY DOSING RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDIES 3weekly vs weekly paclitaxel in ovarian cancer AuthorNScenarioT Doses/m2Conclusion Wu, Front-lineT175 C AUC6 T60 C AUC 2 Equal RR Less toxicity Rosenberg, 02208Second-lineT 200 T 67 Equal RR,TTP, OS Less toxicity Shen, 05 CGOG 125Front-lineTC Twkly C Equal RR,TTP, OS Less toxicity

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY WEEKLY DOSING PHASE II STUDIES paclitaxel in combination in front-line ovarian cancer AuthorNScenarioT Doses/m2Conclusion Pignata, 2008 (MITO5) 26Front-line elderlyT60 C AUC2 d1,8,15 q28 RR: 38,5% mPFS: 13,6m mOS: 32 m Sehouli, 2008 (NOGGO) 129Front-line IIb-IV radical resected T100 C AUC2 d1,8, q21 RR: 74% mPFS: 21m mOS: 43m Safra, 2009 (Tel Aviv) 64Front-line Ic-IVT 80 C AUC2 d1,8,15 q28 RR: 92,1% mPFS:25,5m mOS: 52m

AGO Ovarian Cancer Study Group (AGO- OVAR) What else?

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY WEEKLY DOSING Randomized PHASE III TC vs DDT+C in first-line AOC patients : a JGOG Study Isohishi S et al. ASCO 2008,Abstract-5506

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY WEEKLY DOSING Randomized PHASE III TC vs DDT+C in first-line AOC patients : a JGOG Study Endpoint: PFS n: 637 pts PFS (median follow up 29 m): –17,1m vs 27,9m (p:0.0014) log-rank test OS (at 2 years): –77,7% vs 83,6% (p:0.05) RR: similar Toxicity: Anemia G3-4 in weekly arm more freq Isohishi S et al. ASCO 2008,Abstract-5506 (Oral)

TreatmentnEventMedian PFSP valueHR95%CI c-TC mos. dd-TC mos Isohishi et al, ASCO 2008 (abstract #5506, oral) JGOG: Conventional TC vs Dose-Dense TC in ADOVCA Progression-free survival

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY WEEKLY DOSING ONGOING STUDIES in front-line ovarian cancer GroupStudy Design Tmg/m2 nPrimary Objetive Secondary Objetives Status Intergroup MO22225 (OCTAVIA) GEICO, GINECO, NSGO, MITO Phase II T80 d1,8,15 q21 + C AUC 6 q21 + Beva 7.5q21 180PFSORR RR Duration OS Safety Open in June 09 MITO-7 Particip: MANGO Phase III R C AUC6+ T175 vs T60 d1,8,15, q21 C AUC 2 q QoLORR PFS, OS Safety Open

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY Weekly Dosing Conclusion Results of trials with impact in FRONT-LINE: –TC remains standard since 2003 and after many trials including more than 6000 patients!!! CP vs TC: GOG-111, OV10 Carbo T vs Cis T: GOG, AGO, SWOG –Weekly T + C (JGOG) : improved PFS (phase III) –Ongoing: Triplet: TC + Avastin: –ICON-7: (recently closed) –GOG-218 –GOG-213

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY Weekly Dosing Open Questions Which is the optimal weekly dose? Which drugs should be administered in a weekly schedule –Only Taxane? –Taxane + carboplatin? How to incorporate weekly dose to –i.p strategy? –biologic agents combination? How to determine the appropriate duration of weekly dose therapy?