Workpackage 4 Malmö, 8 January 2010. Overview Objectives Year 2 Progress Year 2 Planning Year 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Case Presentation Multiple Immediate Implant Placement With Fixed Porcelain Restoration.
Advertisements

Functional skills framework A framework for a whole organisation approach to deliver functional skills.
Bilateral Maxillary Sinus Lift Right side is planned as a staged sinus lift procedure with the surgical removal of the second bicuspid Right side is planned.
Low-power scanning electron microscope image of normal bone architecture in the 3 rd lumbar vertebra of a 30 year old woman marrow and other cells removed.
Principles of Radiographic Interpretation
+ ABOI/ID Part II Case Presentation – Template 2016.
InFUSE ™ Bone Graft / LT-CAGE ™ Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device IDE Clinical Results G Hallett H. Mathews, M.D. Richmond, Virginia.
Application of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Imaging to Dental and Maxillofacial Practice. ABSTRACT ID NO: IRIA-1162.
Surgical Guides With GuideMia. About dental implant surgical guides Designed according to patient’s anatomy Accurately guide implant drilling and placement.
“Dosimetry and optimisation of Cone Beam CT for dentomaxillofacial applications” Safety and Efficacy of a New and Emerging Dental X-ray Modality Cone Beam.
Invention for Innovation (i4i) Bev Luchmun Industry Lead NISCHR
M24 meeting MP-Paedigree Amsterdam, 23 February, 2015 Neurological and Neuromuscular Diseases WP6 – WP11.
REFERENCES INTRODUCTION The periapical lesion is a localized inflammation of periapical tissues. In some cases the periapical radiography doesn’t permit.
CASE DOCUMENTATION Dr Abby Abraham MDS. Patient 2. Name: Arun Kumar Arch: Upper Arch Date of placement: March 2013 Type of Implant: Root Form (RF) Implant.
Work package 5 Cost effectiveness Participant responsible MAHOD Participants contributing CLUJ KUL UNIMAN VU SEDENTEXCT consortium meeting Malmö, January.
WP3.2 Software design, implementation and validation Ruben Pauwels (KUL) Guozhi Zhang (KUL) Pavel Nyvlt (LTO)
WP3. OPTIMISATION SEDENTEXCT ANNUAL REPORT WORKPACKAGE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION WORKPACKAGE 3 (NKUA - Kostas Tsiklakis)
DEPT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY Clinical Evaluation of a Novel 4D-CBCT Reconstruction Scheme Based on Simultaneous Motion Estimation and Image Reconstruction.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S BRIEFING Tom Taylor Chief Executive 23 rd May 2006.
QIBA CT Volumetrics - Cross-Platform Study (Group 1C) March 18, 2009 Interclinic Comparison of CT Volumetry Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance.
Your Name Here, DDS/DMD Month 30, Patient’s Chief Complaint.
CASE DOCUMENTATION FOR ICOI -FELLOWSHIP APPLICATION
QIBA CT Volumetrics Group 1B: (Patient Image Datasets) Teleconference Nov 5, 2008.
Integrated System for Planning Peripheral Bronchoscopic Procedures Jason D. Gibbs, Michael W. Graham, Kun-Chang Yu, and William E. Higgins Penn State University.
WP6 status report A. Di Mauro (CERN) ITS plenary meeting
Radiographic Interpretation Review: Anatomic Landmarks, Caries, Bone loss & Dental Materials Also processing/operator errors.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم. Case presentation 10-year-old female painless swelling left perimandibular area Firm three months No palpable neck lymphnode.
Diagnosis & Reconstruction of Benign Odontogenic Tumor
SR Dental Hospital Introduction Best dental hospital Best dental hospital in Chennai will always be the one and only SR.
The Clinical Application of Biocompatible Bone Grafts Steiner Biotechnology.
The Effect of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Arthrodesis by J. Michielsen, J. Sys, A. Rigaux,
Biologic Fixation of Total Hip Implants by Charles R. Bragdon, Murali Jasty, Meridith Greene, Harry E. Rubash, and William H. Harris J Bone Joint Surg.
Year 1 In-Service Cert Ed / PGCE/PGDipE Session 21 Individual Progress Review Independent Study.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY Part 19.04: Optimization of protection in Mammography.
Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Overview of Radiography and Medical Imaging Course Associate Professor Peter Wells, PhD Adjunct Professor Department.
Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Multimodality Treatment of Pediatric Lymphatic Malformations.
Dental Radiography RVT: Chapter 24.
# 23 SINGLE IMPLANT CASE Osteotomy Progression in Open Guide Sleeve
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
Guide Right™ Immediate Placement & Immediate Load
Fig. 1. Differences between old lamellar bone, at a distance >1 mm from the implant surface, and new bone (arrowheads) formation all along the implant.
Guide Right™ Surgical Guide System
UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA 2016
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
Mid-Term Review – Workpackage 3 « New methods of assessment of ReDVA using imaging techniques » E. Lancelot – 03/06/2015.
Implant replacing missing lower posterior teeth
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
David Wood Clinical Dental Advisor
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2019 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
Pretreatment Lesions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection Diagnosed With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Initiating.
Endodontic Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Spectral CT Overview Different materials have different absorption profiles depending on the incident x-ray energy Spectral CT* uses this property to separate.
Bone morphological effects on post-implantation remodeling of maxillary anterior buccal bone: A clinical and biomechanical study  Nobuhiro Yoda, DDS,
2018 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
2020 American Board of Oral Implantology/Implant Dentistry Case Submission template.
Clinical images of 2 patients acquired with the MiniCAT dedicated head and neck CBCT scanner. Clinical images of 2 patients acquired with the MiniCAT dedicated.
Name that bone....
Diagnosis of transverse problems
Fig. 6. Measurements for the evaluation of interocclusal accuracy
Noncontrast dentomaxillofacial CBCT scan (iCAT) of a patient with an impacted left mandibular third molar (0.4-mm pixels, 120 kVp, mA). Noncontrast.
Treatment Planning K. Chavez
Figure 1.(A, B) Initial clinical presentation showing the extent of the buccal marginal gingival recession and the exposure of both root and implant surfaces.
Impact of approaches for clinical and radiological monitoring on predicting of short-term and long-term disability outcomes in multiple sclerosis Brian.
Presentation transcript:

Workpackage 4 Malmö, 8 January 2010

Overview Objectives Year 2 Progress Year 2 Planning Year 3

Objectives Yr 2 ObjectiveDeliv./Milest.Status WP4.1Phantom scanning (MSCT-CBCT-µCT) D4.2 WP4.1In vitro accuracy measurements M4.3On-going WP4.2Extension of dataset No D/MOn-going WP4.3Recruitment implant placement M4.4 WP4.3Recruitment impacted canines No D/MOn-going WP4.3Recruitment impacted 3rd molars No D/M WP4.3Recruitment sinus grafts No D/MOn-going

Progress Yr 2 ObjectiveDeliv./Milest.Status WP4.1 Phantom scanning (MSCT-CBCT-µCT) D4.2 WP4.1In vitro accuracy measurements M4.3On-going WP4.2Extension of dataset No D/MOn-going WP4.3Recruitment implant placement M4.4Achieved WP4.3Recruitment impacted canines No D/MOn-going WP4.3Recruitment impacted 3rd molars No D/MAchieved WP4.3Recruitment sinus grafts No D/MOn-going

WP4.1 Phantom scanning Subsection# phantoms# CBCT# settingsGold S Segmentation accuracy Surface394 – 15MSCT + µCT Internal4121µCT Linear accuracy 3120DM Diagnostic accuracy Bone lesions1061DM Root lesions1061DM

Objectives Yr 2 ObjectiveDeliv./Milest.Status WP4.1Phantom scanning (MSCT-CBCT-µCT)D4.2 WP4.1 In vitro measurementsM4.3 On- going WP4.2Extension of datasetNo D/MOn-going WP4.3Recruitment implant placementM4.4 WP4.3Recruitment impacted caninesNo D/MOn-going WP4.3Recruitment impacted 3rd molarsNo D/M WP4.3Recruitment sinus graftsNo D/MOn-going

WP4.1 In vitro measurements Segmentation accuracy –Surface –Trabecular structure

WP4.1 In vitro measurements Linear accuracy –kV, mA, vox (n = 20) –Distance CEJ-bone –Observer software

WP4.1 In vitro measurements Diagnostic accuracy –Bone lesions n = 10x3 - 6 CBCT - 6 ob % corr x size x CBCT

WP4.1 In vitro measurements Diagnostic accuracy –Root lesions n = 10 – 6 CBCT – 6 ob % corr x param. x CBCT prelim.

Objectives Yr 2 ObjectiveDeliv./Milest.Status WP4.1Phantom scanning (MSCT-CBCT-µCT)D4.2 WP4.1 In vitro measurementsM4.3On-going WP4.2 Extension of datasetNo D/M On- going WP4.3Recruitment implant placementM4.4 WP4.3Recruitment impacted caninesNo D/MOn-going WP4.3Recruitment impacted 3rd molarsNo D/M WP4.3Recruitment sinus graftsNo D/MOn-going

WP4.2 Animal model D4.1 OK Yr 1 Extention of dataset Img KUL: + 3 CBCT Data analysis 7 ob

Objectives Yr 2 ObjectiveDeliv./Milest.Status WP4.1Phantom scanning (MSCT-CBCT-µCT)D4.2 WP4.1 In vitro measurementsM4.3On-going WP4.2 Extension of datasetNo D/MOn-going WP4.3 Recruitment implant patients M4.4 WP4.3Recruitment impacted caninesNo D/MOn-going WP4.3Recruitment impacted 3rd molarsNo D/M WP4.3Recruitment sinus graftsNo D/MOn-going

WP4.3Clinical studies Recruitment implant patients –n = 40 –Infopre-surg peri-surg post-surg

Objectives Yr 2 ObjectiveDeliv./Milest.Status WP4.1Phantom scanning (MSCT-CBCT-µCT)D4.2 WP4.1 In vitro measurementsM4.3On-going WP4.2 Extension of datasetNo D/MOn-going WP4.3 Recruitment implant patientsM4.4 WP4.3 Recruitment impacted canines No D/M On- going WP4.3Recruitment impacted 3rd molarsNo D/M WP4.3Recruitment sinus graftsNo D/MOn-going

WP4.3Clinical studies Recruitment impacted canines –n = 7 –Infopre-surg peri-surg post-surg –Recruitment rate low

Objectives Yr 2 ObjectiveDeliv./Milest.Status WP4.1Phantom scanning (MSCT-CBCT-µCT)D4.2 WP4.1 In vitro measurementsM4.3On-going WP4.2 Extension of datasetNo D/MOn-going WP4.3 Recruitment implant patientsM4.4 WP4.3 Recruitment impacted caninesNo D/MOn-going WP4.3 Recruitment impacted 3rd molars No D/M WP4.3Recruitment sinus graftsNo D/MOn-going

WP4.3Clinical studies Recruitment impacted 3rd molars –n = 54 –Infopre-surg peri-surg post-surg

Objectives Yr 2 ObjectiveDeliv./Milest.Status WP4.1Phantom scanning (MSCT-CBCT-µCT)D4.2 WP4.1 In vitro measurementsM4.3On-going WP4.2 Extension of datasetNo D/MOn-going WP4.3 Recruitment implant patientsM4.4 WP4.3Recruitment impacted caninesNo D/MOn-going WP4.3Recruitment impacted 3rd molarsNo D/M WP4.3 Recruitment sinus grafts No D/M On- going

WP4.3Clinical studies Recruitment sinus grafts –n = 4 –Recruitment rate low

Planning Yr 3 Priority: rounding up recruitment Data analysis clinical studies –Ongoing in both centers –Visiting researchers Report writing –Priority in vitro studies

M4.1Skull phantoms delivered (m12) M4.2Report animal study (m12) M4.3Report phantom study (m18) M4.4Oral implants (m24) M4.5Report in vitro studies (m28) M4.6Other clinical studies (m30) M4.7WP4 completed (m36) D4.1Animal study completed (m12) D4.2Phantom models scanned (m18) D4.3In vitro studies report (m28) D4.4Diagnostic accuracy report (m36)