Institute of Environmental Physics and Remote Sensing IUP/IFE-UB Physics/Electrical Engineering Department 1 NORS/NDACC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
8 th Meeting of Ozone Research Managers of the Parties to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer Geneva, Switzerland 2-4 May 2011.
Advertisements

Future Directions and Initiatives in the Use of Remote Sensing for Water Quality.
GEMS-Aerosol WP_AER_4: Evaluation of the model and analysis Lead Partners: NUIG & CNRS-LOA Partners: DWD, RMIB, MPI-M, CEA- IPSL-LSCE,ECMWF, DLR (at no.
Martin G. Schultz, MPI Meteorology, Hamburg GEMS proposal preparation meeting, Reading, Dec 2003 GEMS RG Global reactive gases monitoring and forecast.
Page 1 Tropospheric NO 2 workshop, KNMI, De Bilt NL, Sept 2007M. Van Roozendael Tropospheric NO 2 from space: retrieval issues and perspectives for.
SCIAMACHY data archive Bremen Level 2 - reading tools Institute of Environmental Physics and Institute of Remote Sensing University of Bremen K. Bramstedt.
Institute of Environmental Physics and Remote Sensing IUP/IFE-UB Physics/Electrical Engineering Department 1 Institute.
M. De Mazière et al., HYMN, May 2007 Status of WP4: FTIR measurements M. De Mazière (BIRA-IASB) K. Petersen, T. Warneke, J. Notholt (U. Bremen)
ISSI WG on H 2 O Bern, Switzerland Feb , 2008 Information Content from Satellites 1/24 Collocation Error budget Vertical Horizontal Perspectives.
Institute of Environmental Physics University of Bremen, Germany A. Kleindienst, N. Buschmann, S. Golchert, K.Künzi, J.Notholt, J. de La Noe, N.Schneider,
Methane inversion from satellite, TRANSCOM workshop, Jena, May 2003 Inverse modelling of methane sources and sinks using satellite observations Jan.
ISSI WG on H 2 O Bern, Switzerland Feb , 2008 Contribution to GEO-CEOS ? Contacts: Jean-Christopher LAMBERT and Bojan BOJKOV aeronomy.be,
Variability of Atmospheric Composition associated with Global Circulation Patterns using Satellite Data A contribution to ACCENT-TROPOSAT-2, Task Group.
NASA Trace Gas Products for Air Quality Applications NASA Remote Sensing Training September 2014 ARSET Applied Remote SEnsing Training A project of NASA.
2010 CEOS Field Reflectance Intercomparisons Lessons Learned K. Thome 1, N. Fox 2 1 NASA/GSFC, 2 National Physical Laboratory.
ORM 9, Geneva, May , 2014 Evolution of Measurement Capabilities + cooperating networks.
M. De Mazière et al. NDACC Steering Committee, 15-19/10/2012 Progress in the first year of NORS De Mazière Martine, Hocke Klemens, Richter Andreas, Godin-Beekmann.
M. De Mazière MACCII KO, Reading, 1/3/2012 Project full title: " Demonstration Network Of ground-based Remote Sensing Observations in support of the GMES.
Introduction A new methodology is developed for integrating complementary ground-based data sources to provide consistent ozone vertical distribution time.
MAXDOAS formaldehyde slant column measurements during CINDI: intercomparison and analysis improvement G. Pinardi, M. Van Roozendael, N. Abuhassan, C. Adams,
M. De Mazière NDACC SC 2011, Nov. 11, 2011 NORS Demonstration Network Of ground-based Remote Sensing observations in support of the GMES Atmospheric Service.
WP3: ‘Rapid data delivery at 4 NDACC stations’ Partners: BIRA-IASB INTA Universitaet Bern Karlsruher Institut fuer Technologie CNRS Universitaet Bremen.
NORS project (Network Of ground-based Remote Sensing Observation ) Contribution of the CNRS LIDAR team  Maud Pastel, Sophie Godin-Beekmann Latmos CNRS.
Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Validation of ENVISAT trace gas data products by comparison.
Institut für Umweltphysik (iup) AMFIC 1 st Progress Meeting, May 2008, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece Carbon monoxide columns and methane.
Reanalysis: When observations meet models
Institute of Environmental Physics and Remote Sensing IUP/IFE-UB Physics/Electrical Engineering Department 1 Measurements.
S5P Ozone Profile (including Troposphere) verification: RAL Algorithm R.Siddans, G.Miles, B.Latter S5P Verification Workshop, MPIC, Mainz th May.
CAPACITY Composition of the Atmosphere: Progress to Applications in the user CommunITY STUDY OVERVIEW AND LOGIC Michiel van Weele, KNMI Kick Off/ Negotiation.
M. De Mazière GEO-AQCOP, Dublin, 5-7/9/2012 Need for metadata in NORS - adoption of GEOMS Martine De Mazière Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
CEOS ACC-8, Columbia, MD, April 18-19, th Atmospheric Composition Constellation Meeting (ACC-8), April 2012, Columbia, MD Smoothing and Sampling.
Sciamachy features and usage with respect to end-users The typical fate of retrieval people dealing with large datasets… C. Frankenberg, SRON team, IUP.
Work package 4 OBSERVATIONS FROM GROUND NETWORKS.
3/30/04 16:14 1 Lessons Learned CERES Data Management Presented to GIST 21 “If the 3 laws of climate are calibrate, calibrate, calibrate, then the 3 laws.
CARPE DIEM 6 th meeting – Helsinki Critical Assessment of available Radar Precipitation Estimation techniques and Development of Innovative approaches.
Institut für Umweltphysik (iup) AMFIC Kick-off Meeting, 26 October 2007, KNMI, The Netherlands Carbon monoxide columns and methane column- averaged mixing.
Aristeidis K. Georgoulias Contribution of Democritus University of Thrace-DUTH in AMFIC-Project Democritus University of Thrace Laboratory of Atmospheric.
JERICO KICK OFF MEETING WP 3PARIS – Maison de la recherche - 24 & 25 May 2011 WP3: Harmonizing technological aspects Wilhelm Petersen Helmholtz-Zentrum.
Retrieval of Methane Distributions from IASI
ENEON first workshop Observing Europe: Networking the Earth Observation Networks in Europe September, Paris Total Carbon Column Observing Network.
ENEON first workshop Observing Europe: Networking the Earth Observation Networks in Europe September, Paris Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy.
November 2008 Philippe Keckhut Service d’Aéronomie/IPSL P. Ciais, C. Textor, M. Logan, CEA/LSCE, F ; E. G. Nisbet, RHUL, UK ; B. Buchmann,
Use of space-based tropospheric NO 2 observations in regional air quality modeling Robert W. Pinder 1, Sergey L. Napelenok 1, Alice B. Gilliland 1, Randall.
Validation of OMI NO 2 data using ground-based spectrometric NO 2 measurements at Zvenigorod, Russia A.N. Gruzdev and A.S. Elokhov A.M. Obukhov Institute.
University of Liège (ULg) activities based on long-term FTIR observations performed at the Jungfraujoch station Jungfraujoch, 46.5°N, 8.0°E, 3580m alt.
Project full title: " Demonstration Network Of ground-based Remote Sensing Observations in support of the GMES Atmospheric Service "
Retrieval of Vertical Columns of Sulfur Dioxide from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development, Validation, and Error Analysis Chulkyu Lee.
ICDC7, Boulder September 2005 Estimation of atmospheric CO 2 from AIRS infrared satellite radiances in the ECMWF data assimilation system Richard.
Uncertainty in aerosol retrievals: interaction with the community Adam Povey 1, Thomas Holzer-Popp 2, Gareth Thomas 3, Don Grainger 1, Gerrit de Leeuw.
1 COST 723 WG1 Meeting 1 October 6-7, 2003 University of Bern, CH Availability of UTLS relevant SCIAMACHY data C. von.
HYMN 2nd annual meeting FTIR Introduction/Overview A.K. Petersen, J. Notholt, T. Warneke Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets.
Validation of OMI and SCIAMACHY tropospheric NO 2 columns using DANDELIONS ground-based data J. Hains 1, H. Volten 2, F. Boersma 1, F. Wittrock 3, A. Richter.
François Hendrick and the NDACC/NORS UVVIS Working Group Demonstration Network Of ground-based Remote Sensing observations in support of the GMES Atmospheric.
HYMN FTIR-WG meeting J. Notholt, M. De Mazière, K. Petersen Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the biosphere.
Page 1 OMI ST Meeting #11, KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands, June 2006 Validation of OMI trace gas products Main contributors (this work): Michel Van.
SADDU1/13 SCIAVALIG status report: Product website & Quality assessment status Annelise du Piesanie, Ankie Piters.
L2 Processor: CH4 Our first operational processor's Methane L2 products Verification strategy: - Reference year 2004 (w/o anomaly and decontamination orbits)
Upgrade from SGP V5.02 to V6.00: Conclusions from delta-validation of Diagnostic Data Set D. Hubert, A. Keppens, J. Granville, F. Hendrick, J.-C. Lambert.
CARPE DIEM 4 th meeting Critical Assessment of available Radar Precipitation Estimation techniques and Development of Innovative approaches for Environmental.
WP4: Observations from ground networks. Work package 4 OBSERVATIONS FROM GROUND NETWORKS.
Institute of Environmental Physics
Latest insights from validation activities
Tuning the retrieval: treat or cheat Klemens Hocke, Simone Studer
Users Requirements The inconsistencies between the UR and GCOS-2006 identified in some of the URDs will be reduced with the new iteration of the GCOS.
MERRA Data Access and Services
A European Brewer Network - EUBREWNET ES1207 Start date: 29/04/2013
EUBREWNET A European Brewer Network COST Action no. ES1207 Objectives
2018 STCE Annual Meeting Surface UV radiation.
A Discussion on TEMPO Draft CH2O Validation Plan
National REMOTE SENSING Validation Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Institute of Environmental Physics and Remote Sensing IUP/IFE-UB Physics/Electrical Engineering Department 1 NORS/NDACC UV-VIS Working Group Meeting Brussels, Institute of Environmental Physics and Institute of Remote Sensing University of Bremen NORS WP4: Advanced characterisation of NORS data products Andreas Richter, Folkard Wittrock and the WP4 Team

2 Main Objectives of NORS WP4 “Ensure that the products provided by NORS are tailored so that the data can be used directly as validation data in the GMES atmospheric service (= GAS = MACC-II).” Harmonization of data in terms of format and contents Full characterisation of data with respect to integration volume, resolution, and sensitivity Full description of uncertainties Comparison to satellite data used for assimilation in GAS

3 Changes to current NDACC UV/vis approach Application of NDACC UV/vis data in GAS necessitates important changes in approach: Data of interest Both stratospheric and tropospheric column amounts, profiles and surface concentrations Data formats Common GEOMS HDF/netCDF format for all instruments and products Data provision NRT or within a few weeks, not months / years Uncertainties Detailed error budget needed for assimilation system Application Automated use for daily validation

4 Structure of NORS WP4 Task 4.1 Data Formats Task 4.2 Information Content and Harmonization of Networks / Techniques Task 4.3 Uncertainties Task 4.4 Comparison to Satellite Observations

5 Structure of WP4 Task 4.1 Data Formats Collection of current formats and contents Iteration with data providers and GAS Harmonisation of data files following GEOMS (Generic Earth Observation Metadata Standard) Definition of new formats by all data providers for WP3 and WP7. If needed, development of conversion tools => GEOMS standards will be applied ULg, UBremen, BIRA-IASB, INTA, UBern, KIT, CNRS, MPIC, UH, S&T

6 Structure of WP4 Task 4.2 Information Content and Harmonization of Networks / Techniques Characterisation of vertical sensitivity and resolution Analysis of horizontal displacement and averaging using different RTMs Development of CH 4 retrievals for NDACC and TCCON using overlapping windows Standardisation of retrieval settings Comparison of periods with parallel measurements of same quantity using different NORS techniques Documentation of procedures and results U. Bremen, BIRA-IASB, INTA, UBern, KIT, CNRS, ULg, MPIC, UH

7 Structure of WP4 Task 4.3 Uncertainties Collection of existing error assessments Execution of additional sensitivity studies and theoretical uncertainty estimates Consistent documentation of results Recommendation for harmonized uncertainty reporting KIT, U Bremen, BIRA-IASB, INTA, UBern, CNRS, ULg, MPIC, UH

8 Structure of WP4 Task 4.4 Comparison to Satellite Observations Evaluation of existing studies comparing satellite and NORS type data Definition of validation approach and protocol Execution of additional comparisons where possible and needed Report on consistency INTA, UBremen, BIRA-IASB, INTA, UBern, KIT, CNRS, ULg, MPIC, UH

9 Summary With NORS, a small subset of NDACC UV/vis stations will move to –Rapid data delivery –Use of GEOMS formats –Detailed measurement and error characterisation –Comparison between different NDACC measurement systems As a result, data will be much more applicable for use in data assimilation and model / satellite data validation It is foreseen to extend this approach to other stations after the project if resources are available => If successful, the NORS approach will substantially enhance the usability of NDACC UV/vis data and hopefully open an opportunity for future funding through link to the operational GAS service

10 Deliverables of WP4 NoTitleLeadDue D4.1Data format definitionsULg D4.2Data user guideBIRA-IASB D4.3Error budgetsKIT D4.4Data representativenessUBremen D4.5NORS data consistencyUBremen D4.6Methane data assessmentUBremen D4.7Consistency with satellite dataUBern

11 Milestones of WP4 NoTitleLeadDue MS 2Formats agreementUlg MS 8Start of NDACC – TCCON x-calibration UBremen MS 10Unceratinties in NORS data products KIT MS 11Start verification of NORS data products UBremen MS 13Multi-D characterisation of NORS data products UBremen