© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron Novi Sad, Oct. 12, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technology Transfer 101 An Overview of the Process
Advertisements

2nd Panel, Best Practices: “ IPR in Successful University-Industry Collaborations” Dr. Tamar Raz, CEO Hadasit, the Technology Transfer Company of Hadassah.
OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION University Patent Process September 30, 2013 Mina W. Zion, J.D. Director.
BUSINESS YOUR BUSINESS About us Services Contact SOLUTIONS Professional SOLUTIONS GROWTH Supporting the GROWTH of Why work with us?
Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain Countries in Europe and Asia,
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
Principal Patent Analyst
North Carolina State University © 2014 Technology Transfer Outcomes February 27, 2014 Research Retreat Kelly B. Sexton, Ph.D. Director Office of Technology.
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 2015 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
Creation of IP Culture in Universities & Advantages of Universities having an IP Culture Dr Duncan Matthews Queen Mary University of London.
University Technology Transfer Presentation to Legislative Biotechnology Task Force 29 September 2005 Gene A. Merrell Assistant Vice President - Research.
Technology Transfer University of Colorado Denver Rick Silva, Ph.D., M.B.A. -- Director Senior Licensing Managers David Poticha, M.S., J.D. Paul Tabor,
Starting a Company from Research at the UW James A. Severson, Ph.D. Vice Provost, Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer January 30, 2007.
Best Practices: “IPR in Successful University-Industry Collaborations” Disputes relating to University Inventions Tal Band, Adv. Senior Partner S. Horowitz.
What is Commercialization of IP Josiah Hernandez.
1 Wildcat Venture Management Technology Transfer Tactics Audio Panel September 30, 2008 Chicago, IL Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.
Wyoming Research Products Center Intellectual Property and Licensing Services Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 12, 2008 Davona K. Douglass, Acting.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
The use of patents by a university spin-off. Sub-module BThe use of patents by a university spin-off 2/21 Structure of the case study University technology.
© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2013 Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron President, OUI Budapest, April 15, 2013.
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
University Intellectual Property Transfer Mechanisms: Adaptation and Learning Maryann P. Feldman Johns Hopkins University.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
Constructing the “Price” of the Technology in IP Licensing Negotiations Sub Regional Training Program on IP Valuation Maribor November 5 to 7, 2012.
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
Integrating Innovation
© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2012 Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron President, OUI Baku, October 24, 2012.
INNOVATION ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM Jonathan Coury Interim Director Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law Arizona State University.
IP Institutional Policy “Ten Questions Method” Santiago, October 21 – 24, 2013.
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
Elements of a Workable Intellectual Property Policy OPIC IP Roundtable Noel Courage Bereskin & Parr November 21, 2007.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY IP Policy for Universities Tamas Bene, IP manager University.
Dr. Tom Corr CEO Accelerator Centre Waterloo Research and Technology Park Associate Vice President of Commercialization – University of Waterloo April.
Copyright © Harvard Medical School. All Rights Reserved. Outside Activity Report: What Do I Need to Report?
Current status and future prospectives of technology transfer at the Croatian Ruđer Bošković Institute Danica Ramljak, D.V.M., Ph.D.
General Guidelines for Institutional IP Policies: What Should be There Franco G. Teves, Ph.D., Dipl. PAM Director of Research MSU-IIT.
© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2013 Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron President, OUI Budapest, April 15, 2013.
Wyoming Research Products Center Technology Transfer and Licensing Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 20, 2013 Phillip Wulf, Intellectual Property.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
HOW DO PATENTING AND LICENSING AFFECT RESEARCH? JOAN S. LEONARD VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE The National Academies.
Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind Journal of.
Research Administration Forum May 2005 Tom Hagerty Office of Technology Management.
How to establish a successful IP Policy for Universities and Research Institutes Anton Habjanič, D.Sc. director of TechnoCenter at the UM ERF-FEMISE Expert.
Reconciling Science and Innovation in Israel – Lessons Learned Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron Tel Aviv University Pargue, April 21, 2016.
HMY 2012 Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron President, OUI INTER-REGIONAL SEMINAR ON: Economic Issues of Intellectual Property Rights Sept. 11,
Patent Review Overview Summary of different types of Intellectual Property What is a patent? Why would you want one? What are the requirements for patentability?
2016/6/24 All rights Reserved. Copyright (c) 2008 The University of Tokyo University Corporate Relations, Intellectual Property Management and Technology.
Shared Intellectual Property CHALLENGES OF ACADEMIA COLLABORATING WITH INDUSTRY Per Mercke and Sara Ljung.
OTC FELLOWS PROGRAM INFORMATION SESSION Fall 2016.
Technology Transfer Office
Taking Discoveries from Lab to the Market
Industry-Academy Collaboration for Pioneering New Medicine
Impact of EU structural funds in research and innovation: the experience of the Lithuanian 'Valleys’ April, 2016.
Lecture 28 Intellectual Property(Cont’d)
Universities and the Commercial World
Technology Transfer 101 An Overview of the Process
Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind
Rosetta Developers Conference August 10, 2004 Leavenworth, WA
Roles and Perspectives in Science Collaboration – the view of the high-tech industry Dr. Peter Kurz Agilent Technologies International Sàrl Morges 25 April.
Partnering with Business and Industry
University & Industry Collaborative IP Development
Israel: The Start-Up Nation
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
Intellectual Property &Technology Transfer
Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Maribor, November 5 to 7, 2012 Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain.
Presentation transcript:

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Prof. Hagit Messer-Yaron Novi Sad, Oct. 12, 2011

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Technology Transfer in Countries in Transition: Policy and Recommendations 1. Introduction, background and implementation 1.1 What is Technology Transfer and who benefits from it? 1.2 Metamorphosis of an invention – from scientific research to a product. 2. Best Practice Examples: Technology Transfer in Israel 2.1 National and institutional policy 2.2. Bridging the "Development Gap" – providing proof of principle 2.3 Technology entrepreneurship in a research university 3. In the Public Interest: Guidelines for Commercializing University Technology in Countries in Transition 3.1 Case study on technology transfer in countries in transition 3.2 Guidelines and recommendations

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Industry vs. university industry university knowledge money Researchers (people!), Faculties, Administration, etc. Entrepreneurs VCs Productions Marketing Management Stocks holders etc. TT

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 The Death Valley Academia Science "Valley Death" Products Industry

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Bridging over the “Death Valley” Structured relations between universities and industries: R&D agreements Licensing deals New venture formation/Spin-offs Other: Individual entrepreneurship

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 The technology transfer process Revenues IDF Discovery & Innovation Evaluation Patenting & Marketing Strategy R&D agreement Or Licensing deal OrSpin-off Follow Up on Contract Academic Basic and Applied Research publications To inventors Individual entrepreneurship To Industry 3 2 1

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Academia Science "Valley Death" Products Industry R&D agreements Research and development agreements

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Example: ’s 4X technology SanDisk's Press Release: Milpitas, Calif., Oct. 13, SanDisk Corporation (NASDAQ: SNDK), the global leader in flash memory cards, today announced it has begun production shipments of flash memory cards based on the company's advanced X4 flash memory technology. This innovative new technology holds four bits of data in each memory cell, twice as many as the cells in conventional multi-level cell (MLC) NAND (2-bits-per-cell) memory chips.SanDisk Tel Aviv University (TAU) had provided a significant contribution to the X4 advanced error correcting and digital signal processing technology, which was licensed exclusively to SanDisk by Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd., TAU's technology transfer company. "X4 took five years of development at SanDisk, and the finished product is a testament to the hard work and collaboration of the parties involved," said Dr. Ze'ev Weinfeld, Ramot's CEO. "Once we created the basic approach, SanDisk brought this to fruition by developing its advanced X4 controller and matching it with its advanced 43nm, 64Gb X4 memory thus making full X4 product implementation possible. This highlights the benefit commercial companies may gain from cooperation with TAU, building on our pool of talent and expertise.“ memory-cards-with-64-gigabit-x4-(4-bits-per-cell)-nand-flash-technology

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Licensing deals Academia Science "Valley Death" Products Industry Licensing deals

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Example: Merz Pharmaceuticals and Tel Aviv University Become Partners in Novel Drug Technology Development for Treatment of Alzheimer's Example: Merz Pharmaceuticals and Tel Aviv University Become Partners in Novel Drug Technology Development for Treatment of Alzheimer's “ Tel Aviv, Israel/Frankfurt am Main, Germany – July 10, – A novel drug technology to treat Alzheimer's disease developed by Prof. Ehud Gazit and his team of researchers at the George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences at Tel Aviv University (TAU), Israel, was licensed to Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH by Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd., the University’s technology transfer company. The worldwide exclusive license deal includes an upfront fee and milestone payments as well as royalties on future sales.”

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Academia Science "Valley Death" Products Industry Spin offs New venture formation / Spin-offs

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011Example:

Individual entrepreneurship Is there a room for Individual entrepreneurship of university professors, outside the structural technology transfer process? Is there a need for Individual entrepreneurship of university professors, outside the structural technology transfer process? Can it be done?

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Individual entrepreneurship Why YES The researcher feels responsible and is more motivated More efficient knowledge transfer to the industry. Why NO Public to Private Public to Private Potential conflict of interest May be inefficient in the longer term => Doable, but calls for coherent policy and clear rules of operation

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Issues to be considered Ownership of IP: service inventions? If YES – set up an agreement between all parties to reflect freedom of operation vs. obligation. If no – consider the statues of future IP. Conflict of interests, conflict of commitment: Set up clear rules regarding the use of university resources, researcher own time resources; involvements of students.

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Example #1: Weizmann Inst. Rules of IP: anything IS a service invention

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Weizmann’s pipeline: 50-70Patent applications/year Licensing agreements/year. 2-5Spin-off companies/year. Team of 17 employees with an annual budget of € 2.3M. More than € 1M are spend on patent filing and prosecution. Successful Technology Transfer

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Selected Weizmann Success Stories QuantomiX TM | QX Capsule QuantomiX TM | QX Capsule Copaxone ® | Teva Copaxone ® | Teva Rebif ® | Merck Serono Rebif ® | Merck Serono Encryption Algorithm | NDS Encryption Algorithm | NDS GeneCards TM | XenneX GeneCards TM | XenneX NanoLub TM | Nanomaterials NanoLub TM | Nanomaterials Dunaliella | Nikken Sohonsha Dunaliella | Nikken Sohonsha Erbitux TM | ImClone Erbitux TM | ImClone Total sale of Weizmann based products €6 Bilion/year

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 With THE BEST Science MONDAY, JULY 4, 2011 Weizmann rated best academic workplace outside US The 150,000-square-meter leafy, landscaped campus of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot has again been named in The Scientist magazine’s annual survey as the “best place to work in academia” outside the US.

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Example #2 – TAU’s policy regarding Individual Entrepreneurship As in the Weizmann inst., the default is that a researcher’s invention is a service (university) invention. A claim that the invention is not DUE to his/her “service” and it is NOT a university invention is studied and an invention can be defined (by the university) as a non-service invention * => The researcher has a complete freedom of operation (subject to NO COI/COC) With a service invention, there are cases where the University decides that it is not interested in commercialize the invention, and the IP is assigned to him/her with an obligation to share with the university 20% of his/her income. * => The researcher has a complete freedom of operation (subject to NO COI/COC)

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011 Dealing with Future IP Once freedom of operation (FOO) were given to an individual researcher, based on existing IP, the main challenge is dealing with future IP created by the researcher. The policy should leave FOO together with the rights of the university w.r.to its IP. In TAU, a specific regime where FOO is guaranteed has been formally defined, with on obligation for full disclosure to the University, and sharing revenues from activities outside this regime.

© Hagit Messer-Yaron, 2011

Legal Infrastructure Policy Implementation Personnel What is needed for successful TT?