MobilityFirst Project Update FIA PI Meeting, March 18-19, 2013 Part-II – Protocol Details, Use Cases & Prototyping D. Raychaudhuri & Arun Venkataramani.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NetServ Dynamic in-network service deployment Henning Schulzrinne (Columbia University) Srinivasan Seetharaman (Georgia Tech) Volker Hilt (Bell Labs)
Advertisements

Towards Software Defined Cellular Networks
Internetworking II: MPLS, Security, and Traffic Engineering
Transitioning to IPv6 April 15,2005 Presented By: Richard Moore PBS Enterprise Technology.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Addressing the Network – IPv4 Network Fundamentals – Chapter 6.
Cs/ee 143 Communication Networks Chapter 6 Internetworking Text: Walrand & Parekh, 2010 Steven Low CMS, EE, Caltech.
Mobility Jennifer Rexford COS 461: Computer Networks Lectures: MW 10-10:50am in Architecture N101
Hard Architectural Challenges and Initial Approaches Arun Venkataramani Univ. Massachusetts Amherst
PROTOCOLS AND ARCHITECTURE Lesson 2 NETS2150/2850.
CS335 Networking & Network Administration Tuesday, April 20, 2010.
COS 461: Computer Networks
1 TCP/IP architecture A set of protocols allowing communication across diverse networks Out of ARPANET Emphasize on robustness regarding to failure Emphasize.
Virtual LANs. VLAN introduction VLANs logically segment switched networks based on the functions, project teams, or applications of the organization regardless.
Real-Time Cyber Physical Systems Application on MobilityFirst Winlab Summer Internship 2015.
Serval: Software Defined Service-Centric Networking Jen Rexford Erik Nordstrom, David Shue, Prem Gopalan, Rob Kiefer, Mat Arye, Steven Ko, Mike Freedman.
WINLAB Comparing Alternative Approaches for Networking of Named Objects in the Future Internet Akash Baid, Tam Vu, Dipankar Raychaudhuri WINLAB, Rutgers.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Wireless Infrastructure and GENI Ivan Seskar, Francesco Bronzino Rutgers University.
What is a Protocol A set of definitions and rules defining the method by which data is transferred between two or more entities or systems. The key elements.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Research & Experiments on GENI GENI CC-NIE Workshop NSF Mark Berman, Mike Zink January 7,
Remote Access Chapter 4. Learning Objectives Understand implications of IEEE 802.1x and how it is used Understand VPN technology and its uses for securing.
Remote Access Chapter 4. Learning Objectives Understand implications of IEEE 802.1x and how it is used Understand VPN technology and its uses for securing.
Networks – Network Architecture Network architecture is specification of design principles (including data formats and procedures) for creating a network.
Router and Routing Basics
CMPT 471 Networking II Address Resolution IPv4 ARP RARP 1© Janice Regan, 2012.
DMAP : Global Name Resolution Services Through Direct Mapping Tam Vu, Akash Baid WINLAB, Rutgers University (Joint.
Wireless Networks of Devices (WIND) Hari Balakrishnan and John Guttag MIT Lab for Computer Science NTT-MIT Meeting, January 2000.
NETWORKING COMPONENTS AN OVERVIEW OF COMMONLY USED HARDWARE Christopher Johnson LTEC 4550.
The Network of Information: Architecture and Applications SAIL – Scalable and Adaptable Internet Solutions Bengt Ahlgren et. al Presented by wshin.
Chapter 6-2 the TCP/IP Layers. The four layers of the TCP/IP model are listed in Table 6-2. The layers are The four layers of the TCP/IP model are listed.
CS1Q Computer Systems Lecture 17 Simon Gay. Lecture 17CS1Q Computer Systems - Simon Gay2 The Layered Model of Networks It is useful to think of networks.
Floodless in SEATTLE : A Scalable Ethernet ArchiTecTure for Large Enterprises. Changhoon Kim, Matthew Caesar and Jenifer Rexford. Princeton University.
Geneva, Switzerland, 11 June 2012 Switching and routing in Future Network John Grant Nine Tiles
Internetworking Internet: A network among networks, or a network of networks Allows accommodation of multiple network technologies Universal Service Routers.
Vytautas Valancius, Nick Feamster, Akihiro Nakao, and Jennifer Rexford.
IP1 The Underlying Technologies. What is inside the Internet? Or What are the key underlying technologies that make it work so successfully? –Packet Switching.
William Stallings Data and Computer Communications
1 | © 2015 Infinera Open SDN in Metro P-OTS Networks Sten Nordell CTO Metro Business Group
Internet of Things. IoT Novel paradigm – Rapidly gaining ground in the wireless scenario Basic idea – Pervasive presence around us a variety of things.
AMQP, Message Broker Babu Ram Dawadi. overview Why MOM architecture? Messaging broker like RabbitMQ in brief RabbitMQ AMQP – What is it ?
1. Layered Architecture of Communication Networks: TCP/IP Model
Internet Protocol Storage Area Networks (IP SAN)
+ Routing Concepts 1 st semester Objectives  Describe the primary functions and features of a router.  Explain how routers use information.
TCP/IP1 Address Resolution Protocol Internet uses IP address to recognize a computer. But IP address needs to be translated to physical address (NIC).
Multicasting EECS June Multicast One-to-many, many-to-many communications Applications: – Teleconferencing – Database – Distributed computing.
Software Defined Networking and OpenFlow Geddings Barrineau Ryan Izard.
Communication Networks NETW 501 Tutorial 2
Atrium Router Project Proposal Subhas Mondal, Manoj Nair, Subhash Singh.
Ethernet Packet Filtering - Part1 Øyvind Holmeide Jean-Frédéric Gauvin 05/06/2014 by.
What is a Protocol A set of definitions and rules defining the method by which data is transferred between two or more entities or systems. The key elements.
Computer Communication Networks
Chapter 5 Network and Transport Layers
Multi Node Label Routing – A layer 2.5 routing protocol
Chapter 5 Network and Transport Layers
Architecture and Algorithms for an IEEE 802
Networking Applications
Scaling the Network: The Internet Protocol
MAC Addresses and ARP 32-bit IP address:
Overview of SDN Controller Design
Virtual LANs.
Data and Computer Communications by William Stallings Eighth Edition
D. Raychaudhuri WINLAB, Rutgers University
COMP/ELEC 429/556 Introduction to Computer Networks
Scaling the Network: The Internet Protocol
Computer Networking A Top-Down Approach Featuring the Internet
Ch 17 - Binding Protocol Addresses
Mobile IP Outline Homework #4 Solutions Intro to mobile IP Operation
Mobile IP Outline Intro to mobile IP Operation Problems with mobility.
Mobile IP Outline Intro to mobile IP Operation Problems with mobility.
Reconciling Zero-conf with Efficiency in Enterprises
Chapter 4: outline 4.1 Overview of Network layer data plane
Presentation transcript:

MobilityFirst Project Update FIA PI Meeting, March 18-19, 2013 Part-II – Protocol Details, Use Cases & Prototyping D. Raychaudhuri & Arun Venkataramani WINLAB, Rutgers UniversityCS Dept, Umass - Amherst

MobilityFirst Protocol

WINLAB MobilityFirst Protocol: Feature Summary Routers with Integrated Storage & Computing Heterogeneous Wireless Access End-Point mobility with multi-homing In-network content cache Network Mobility & Disconnected Mode Hop-by-hop file transport Edge-aware Inter-domain routing Named devices, content, and context …0011 Public Key Based Global Identifier (GUID) Storage-aware Intra-domain routing Service API with unicast, multi-homing, mcast, anycast, content query, etc. Strong authentication, privacy Ad-hoc p2p mode Human-readable name Connectionless Packet Switched Network with hybrid name/address routing MobilityFirst Protocol Design Goals: -10B+ mobile/wireless devices -Mobility as a basic service -BW variation & disconnection tolerance -Ad-hoc edge networks & network mobility -Multihoming, multipath, multicast -Content & context-aware services -Strong security/trust and privacy model

WINLAB MobilityFirst Protocol: Technology Solution Global Name Resolution Service (GNRS) Hybrid GUID/NA Global Routing (Edge-aware, mobile, Late binding, etc.) Storage-Aware & DTN Routing (GSTAR) in Edge Networks Optional Compute Layer Plug-Ins (cache, privacy, etc.) Hop-by-Hop Transport (w/bypass option) Name-Based Services (mobility, mcast, content, context, M2M) Name Certification Service (NCS) Meta-level Network Services Core Transport Services Pure connectionless packet switching with in-network storage Flexible name-based network service layer

WINLAB MobilityFirst Protocol: The Protocol Stack IP Hop-by-Hop Block Transfer Link Layer 1 (802.11) Link Layer 2 (LTE) Link Layer 3 (Ethernet) Link Layer 4 (SONET) Link Layer 5 (etc.) GSTAR RoutingMF Inter-Domain E2E TP1E2E TP2E2E TP3E2E TP4 App 1App 2App 3App 4 GUID Service Layer Narrow Waist GNRS MF Routing Control Protocol NCS Name Certification & Assignment Service Global Name Resolution Service Data Plane Control Plane Socket API Switching Option Optional Compute Layer Plug-In A

WINLAB MF Protocol: Name-Address Separation  GUIDs Separation of names (ID) from network addresses (NA) Globally unique name (GUID) for network attached objects  User name, device ID, content, context, AS name, and so on  Multiple domain-specific naming services Global Name Resolution Service for GUID  NA mappings Hybrid GUID/NA approach  Both name/address headers in PDU  “Fast path” when NA is available  GUID resolution, late binding option Globally Unique Flat Identifier (GUID) John’s _laptop_1 Sue’s_mobile_2 Server_1234 Media File_ABC Host Naming Service Network Sensor Naming Service Content Naming Service Global Name Resolution Service Network address Net1.local_ID Net2.local_ID Context Naming Service Taxis in NB

WINLAB MF Protocol: Hybrid GUID/NA Storage Router in MobilityFirst GUID-Address Mapping – virtual DHT table NA Forwarding Table – stored physically at router GUIDNA NA99,32 Dest NA Port #, Next Hop NA99Port 5, NA11 GUID –based forwarding (slow path) Network Address Based Forwarding (fast path) Router Storage Store when: -Poor short-term path quality -Delivery failure, no NA entry -GNRS query failure -etc. NA32 Port 7, NA51 DATA SID GUID= 11001…11 NA99,NA32 NA62Port 5, NA11 To NA11 To NA51 Look up GUID-NA table when: - no NAs in pkt header - encapsulated GUID - delivery failure or expired NA entry Look up NA-next hop table when: - pkt header includes NAs - valid NA to next hop entry DATA Hybrid name-address based routing in MobilityFirst requires a new router design with in-network storage and two lookup tables: “Virtual DHT” table for GUID-to-NA lookup as needed Conventional NA-to-port # forwarding table for “fast path” Also, enhanced routing algorithm for store/forward decisions

WINLAB MF Protocol: Service Abstractions (1) MobilityFirst offers a named-object service API that supports mobility, disconnection, multi-homing, multicast in a natural way Replaces the point-to-point virtual link abstraction of IP … Example: Sending to a mobile device with multiple interfaces IP Abstraction: Virtual Link Dest Device Network Interface IP Addr=X Name= MAC Send(IP=X, data) Static MAC=X binding Dynamic GUID – NA bindings MF Abstraction: Multi-homed Network Object NA=X1NA=X2 NA=X3 GUID=Y Network Attached Object Send(GUID=Y, data, options)..options for multi-homing & late binding e.g., Y may be a mobile device with 3 interfaces (WiFi & 2 cellular)

WINLAB MF Protocol: Service Abstractions (2) Use of MF Service API for content retrieval and dynamic group multicast (..membership may be specified by context) MF Abstraction: Get Replicated Content Object NA=X1 NA=X2 NA=X3 Content Object With GUID=A Get (Content_GUID=A, options)..option for shortest path e.g., A is a replicated content object at multiple network locations e.g., Z may be a context group of M2M devices or a cloud service GUID=A MF Abstraction: Send to Group Object with Multicast reachability NA=X2 GUID1 GUID2 GUID3 Group GUID = Z Send (GUID=Z, data, options)..option for mcast delivery Broadcast Medium

WINLAB MobilityFirst Protocol Stack: GUID addressing GUID-based addressing available at host, service/application, socket, and file level  GUIDs can also address groups of entities Port-less addressing of application end-points  Each application end-point can have a separate GUID  No port contention, and no assumed well-known ports for services GUID aggregation and Service Directories  Applications may choose to use host-GUID with a demux – appID  Demux identifiers advertised at local directory services APP-1APP-2APP-3APP-4 GUID-4 GUID-3GUID-2GUID-1 Host GUID-0 APP-1APP-2APP-3APP-4 appID-4appID-3appID-2 appID-1 Host GUID-0 Transport Layer Directory Service Port-less, 1 GUID per endpoint GUID Aggregation and Service Directory

WINLAB MobilityFirst Protocol Stack: Service API MobilityFirst API (or “socket” interface) provides a new set of services corresponding to the MF protocol stack’s capabilities Key features are:  GUID as the unique identifier right up to application level (no need for port #)  Service identifier choice including: basic unicast/mcast, anycast, dual-homing, late binding mobile delivery, delayed delivery, content query, context delivery, plug-in computing service, etc. (others TBD)  Unicast vs multicast determined  Lightweight transport protocol choices for end-to-end reliability and flow control  Socket interface examples: Open(URL, myGUID, TP=A, TP_options) - identity specification and stack customization Send(GUID=X, SvcFlags/SID=anycast, data, len) Send(GUID=X, SvcFlags/SID=unicast, TP=B, data, len) Send(GUID=X, SvcFlags/SID=late binding, options, data) Send(GUID=X, SvcFlags/SID=anycast+, data) Recv(data_buffer, len, GUID_allow={X, Y, X}) Get(GUID=X, SvcFlags/SID=anycast+content query, options, data_buffer, len) ….

WINLAB MobilityFirst Protocol Stack: Network Service API open (profile-URL, src-GUID, [profile-options])  A profile declares the customization of the stack such as choice of transport and security features for the duration of a session. Profile option parameterize a profile  Optional source GUID identifies the initiating end-point and results in an update of attachment point to the GNRS. send (message, dst-GUID, [service-option])  GUID based endpoint addressing  Options include: MULTICAST, ANYCAST, GET (content), CACHE (a directive to allow content caching), MULTI-PATH, MULTI-HOME, DTN (delay-tolerant), REALTIME (with delay constraints), COMPUTE (with GUID of compute service) … recv (buffer, [GUID-set])  Intentional data receipt - GUID-set defined white list  Synchronous and asynchronous implementations get (content-GUID, buffer, [service-options])  Content-centric apps: native network support for direct (GUID-based) content discovery and retrieval of content  ANYCAST service: retrieval attempted from the closest among replicas listed in GNRS

WINLAB MobilityFirst Protocol Stack: Network Service API (Contd.) attach (GUID-set)  Publishes network reachability for the specified GUID(s)  GUID services layer initiates an association request for each GUID  Network cooperation (co-sign) to publish attachment point locator to GNRS  Periodic association exchanged keeps locator bindings ‘fresh’ at GNRS close ()  Terminates a session by clearing stack state and performing a clean disassociation from network  Locator bindings from GNRS can be removed or allowed to expire

Wireless/Mobile Use Case

WINLAB Wireless/Mobile Use Case MobilityFirst enables a stitched-together architecture for mobile networks Current Mobile Networks Planned Deployment Licensed Spectrum Fine-grained Managed QoS Centralized Mobility Support Homogeneous Topology Network-wide Authentication MF Network-of-Networks Ad-hoc Deployment Unlicensed Spectrum Coarse-grained Managed In-network Mobility Support Heterogeneous topology Authentication at APs

WINLAB Wireless/Mobile Use Case: Service Capability Examples MF provides several useful capabilities for mobile networks, e.g. mobility, multi-homing, multi-network access, late binding, multicast,.. INTERNET Wireless Access Net #1 Wireless Access Network Wireless Access Network Wireless Access Net #3 Wireless Access Net #3 Wireless Edge Network Wireless Edge Network BS-1 BS-2 BS-3 AP1 (3) Mobile device with Multi-network access Multiple Potential Paths (2) Mobile device with dual-homing (1) Mobile Device with Seamless Service INTERNET Wireless Access Net #3 Wireless Access Net #3 Wireless Access Network #2 Wireless Access Network #2 LTE BS WiFi AP Mobile device With dual-radio NICs BS1 INTERNET Wireless Access Net #3 Wireless Access Net #3 Wireless Access Network #2 Wireless Access Network #2 BS2 User/Device Mobility

WINLAB Protocol Example: Mobility Service via Name Resolution at Device End-Points MobilityFirst Network (Data Plane) GNRS Register “John Smith22’s devices” with NCS GUID lookup from directory GUID assigned GUID = Represents network object with 2 devices Send (GUID = , SID=01, data) Send (GUID = , SID=01, NA99, NA32, data) GUID NA lookup NA99 NA32 GNRS update (after link-layer association) DATA SID NAs Packet sent out by host GNRS query GUID Service API capabilities: - send (GUID, options, data) Options = anycast, mcast, time,.. - get (content_GUID, options) Options = nearest, all,.. Name Certification Services (NCS)

WINLAB Protocol Example: Dual Homing Service via Named-Object / GNRS Data Plane Send data file to “John Smith22’s laptop”, SID= 129 (multihoming – all interfaces) NA99 NA32 Router bifurcates PDU to NA99 & NA32 (no GUID resolution needed) GUID NetAddr= NA32 DATA GUID NetAddr= NA99 DATA GUID SID DATA SID GUID= 11001…11 NA99,NA32 DATA Multihoming service example

WINLAB Protocol Example: Handling Disconnection via Late Binding Data Plane Send data file to “John Smith22’s laptop”, SID= 11 (unicast, mobile delivery) NA99 NA75 Delivery failure at NA99 due to device mobility Router stores & periodically checks GNRS binding Deliver to new network NA75 when GNRS updates GUID NA75 DATA GUID NA99  rebind to NA75 DATA GUID SID DATA SID GUID NA99 Device mobility Disconnection interval Store-and-forward mobility service example

WINLAB Sample Results: MF vs TCP/IP for WiFi Roaming Quantifying the benefits of in-network mobility management & storage aware routing NS3 Simulation with full stack, different vehicular speeds & offered load Comparing TCP/IP with MF Transmission of stored packets  Throughput Jumps

WINLAB Sample Results: MF vs. TCP/IP for LTE/WiFi Switching MF provides several benefits in a heterogeneous wireless environment:  Mobility Mgmt. is not specific to each network  Automatic storage of packets in transition  Simultaneous use of multiple networks Throughput boost due to transmission of stored packets TCP takes more time to re-start session (DHCP + Application reset)

Content & Context/M2M Use Cases [22]

WINLAB Content Delivery Use Case: Content Retrieval via GUID Name Content Owner’s Server In-network cache Get (“content_GUID”) Send(“content_GUID”, dest_GUID) In-network cache Alternative paths for retrieval or delivery Network support for content addressability and caching  service primitives such as get(content-ID,..) Optional computing layer plug-in for enhanced services GUID=12379…78 Content Cache NA94 NA22 GNRS query with CGUID returns NA94, NA22

WINLAB Content Delivery Use Case: Enhanced CDN Service Content cache at mobile Operator’s network – NA99 User mobility Content Owner’s Server GUID= GNRS query Returns list: NA99,31,22,43 NA22 NA31 NA99 NA29 NA43 Data fetch from NA99 Data fetch from NA43 GNRS Query Get (content_GUID, SID=128 - cache service) Get (content_GUID) Enhanced service example – content delivery with in-network caching & transcoding MF Compute Layer with Content Cache Service plug-in Query SID=128 (enhanced service) GUID= Filter on SID=128 Mobile’s GUID Content file

WINLAB Context-aware delivery often associated with M2M services  Examples of context are group membership, location, network state, …  Requires framework for defining and addressing context (e.g. “taxis in New Brunswick”)  Anycast and multicast services for message delivery to dynamic group Mobile Device trajectory Context = geo-coordinates & taxi group Send (context, data) Context-based Multicast delivery Context GUID Global Name Resolution service ba x Context Naming Service NA1:P7, NA1:P9, NA2,P21,.. M2M Use Case: Supporting Context-Aware Services

WINLAB March 11, 2013MobilityFirst Review Meeting M2M Use Case: Protocol Example M2M: S1 data is picked up by Mobile GW and sent to MF for A1 that subscribes it Context: T1, is subscribed by P1 …P4;A2 sends a file to T1 reaches P1..P4 via MF M2M/Context server updates MF-GNRS for mappings: S1  A1 and T1  P1…P4 GNRS: Global Name Resolution Service Internet (MobilityFirst) Sensor S1 (temperature) M2M / Context (Naming) Server, GUID Assign & Publish (S1, S2, C1, T1) S1 -> A1 C1 -> NA1 Sensor S2 (location) Actuator C1 (air conditioning) Application A1 SmartGrid App Application A2 Presentation Context T1 Subscriber P1P2 P3 Lookup Context T1 Lookup S2, T1 & Subscribe T1 UPDATE S2  T1, T1  P1..P4 P1 -> NA2, P2->NA2 P3 -> NA2, P4->NA3 NA1 NA4 NA2 NA3 GNRS Entries: UPDATE A1 -> NA4 DATA M2M GateWay Lookup S1 Lookup S1, C1, subscribe S1 P4 DATA

Mobility First Prototyping & Deployment Status [27]

WINLAB MF Software Router and Host Protocol Stack 28 Click-based MF Router - Storage-aware routing (GSTAR) - Name resolution server (GNRS) - Reliable hop-by-hop link transport (Hop) Android/Linux MF Protocol Stack - Network API - Hop - Dual homing (WiFi/WiMAX) WiMAX BTS WiFi AP Native, user-level implementation on Android runtime MF Router

WINLAB MF Android Mobile Client JAVA (Android) and C (Linux) API prototype Usable with ARM based Android devices Multihoming capabilities for WiMAX enabled devices Distributed as a system library and jar library for easiness of deployment in Android SDK based applications App 2 App 1 App... MF JAVA Client API E2E Transport Protocol A E2E Transport Protocol B GUID Service Layer Storage-Aware Routing (GSTAR) Hop-by-Hop Block Transport Protocol Link Layer A (e.g. WIFI) Link Layer B (e.g. WIMAX)

WINLAB MF GNRS Implementation Two alternate designs:  network-level one-hop map service; co-located with routing (Dmap)  Locality-aware, cloud-hosted service (Auspice) Three alternate evaluation platforms: Network Emulation 3. Commercial cloud platform 1. GENI Wide Area Deployment 2. ORBIT lab with net. emulation

WINLAB MF Click Software Router 31 Inter-Domain (EIR) Inter-Domain (EIR) Multicast Lightweight, scalable multicast GNRS for maintenance of multicast memberships Heuristic approaches to reduce network load, limit duplicated buffering, and improve aggregate delivery delays Click prototype, with SID for multicast flows Evaluating hail a cab application as a example multipoint delivery scenario

WINLAB OpenFlow/SDN Implementation of MF 32 MF Protocol Stack  Protocol stack embedded within controller  Label switching, NA or GUID-based routing (incl. GNRS lookup)  Controllers interact with other controllers and network support services such as GNRS  Flow rule is set up for the remaining packets in the chunk based on Hop ID (which is inserted as a VLAN tag in all packets) E.g., SRC MAC = 04:5e:3f:76:84:4a, VLAN = 101 => OUT PORT = 16

WINLAB MF Prototype Deployment on GENI (GEC-12 Recap) 33 Physical Topology MF Routers at 7 campuses across US on ProtoGENI hosts Layer2 links: Internet2 & NLR backbones, OpenFlow switches Edge networks: WiFi and WiMAX access at BBN & Rutgers Robust Content Delivery Dual-homed mobile subscriber with WiFi + WiMAX Adapt to disconnection and variable link quality (GSTAR) Dual-homed delivery

WINLAB MF Multi-Site Deployment (GEC-16) Salt Lake, UT Cambridge, MA N. Brunswick, NJ Ann Arbor, MI Madison, WI Tokyo, Japan Lincoln, NE Los Angeles, CA Clemson, SC Long-term (non- GENI) MobilityFirst Access Net Short-term Wide Area ProtoGENI Palo Alto, CA ProtoGENI MobilityFirst Routing and Name Resolution Service Sites I2 NL R Atlanta, GA

WINLAB MF/GENI Connectivity: VLAN Stitching Salt Lake, UT Cambridge, MA New Brunswick, NJ Ann Arbor, MI Madison, WI Tokyo, Japan Lincoln, NE Los Angeles, CA Atlanta, GA Clemson, SC Long-term (non- GENI) MobilityFirst Access Net Short-term Wide Area ProtoGENI VLAN Y ProtoGENI Wide Area ProtoGENI nodes connect on VLAN 3716 at: Internet2 PoP OR NLR PoP VLAN 912 MobilityFirst Routing and Name Resolution Service Sites Palo Alto, CA VLAN 192 VLAN 3134/3135 VLAN 1750

WINLAB MF/GENI Setup: Emulated Topology Salt Lake, UT Cambridge, MA New Brunswick, NJ Ann Arbor, MI Madison, WI Tokyo, Japan Lincoln, NE Los Angeles, CA Atlanta, GA Clemson, SC Long-term (non- GENI) MobilityFirst Access Net Short-term Wide Area ProtoGENI ProtoGENI MobilityFirst Routing and Name Resolution Service Sites Palo Alto, CA