NON-EXPONENTIAL T 2 * DECAY IN WHITE MATTER P. van Gelderen 1, J. A. de Zwart 1, J. Lee 1,3, P. Sati 1, D. S. Reich 1, and J. H. Duyn 1. 1 Advanced MRI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pulse Timing parameters & Weighting
Advertisements

Assessment of tumoural ADC’s in rectal Tumours using Burst: New methodological Developments SJ Doran 1, ASK Dzik-Jurasz 2, J Wolber 2, C Domenig 1, MO.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lorenz Mitschang Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, 23 rd February 2009 I. Basic Concepts.
BOLD Imaging at 7T Mark Elliott CfN Symposium 4/9/2008.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Sequences part I
In Chan Song, Ph.D. Seoul National University Hospital
Richard Wise FMRI Director +44(0)
M R I Pulse Sequences Jerry Allison Ph.D..
Six-week project Lauren Villemaire MBP 3970Z Department of Medical Biophysics University of Western Ontario.
Institute for Biomedical Engineering EXCITE Afternoon Hands-On MRI Sessions: fMRI & DTI.
Methods for Medical Imaging– Prof. G. Baselli 2012 Diffusion weighted MRI and DTI tractography Maria Giulia Preti
Statistical Parametric Mapping
Clinical Evaluation of Fast T2-Corrected MR Spectroscopy Compared to Multi-Point 3D Dixon for Hepatic Lipid and Iron Quantification Puneet Sharma 1, Xiaodong.
Figure 2. Signal level (left) degrades with slice offset and slice thickness when Z2 SEM is used in GradLoc imaging (ROI = FOV/2). To recover the full.
ISMRM Hawaii 2009 slide 1 P.S.Tofts 1,2, M. Cutajar 1,2, I.Gordon 2 1 = Brighton and Sussex Medical School, UK 2 = Institute of Neurology, University College.
Parameters and Trade-offs
MaxEnt 2007 Saratoga Springs, NY
Diffusion Tensor MRI And Fiber Tacking Presented By: Eng. Inas Yassine.
Methods: Scanner: GE 7T Excite (bore 60cm diam x 335cm length) and GE 3T LX (bore 60cm diam x 262cm length). The gradient performance of both scanners.
Inferring Axon Diameter Sizes using Monte Carlo Simulations of Magnetic Resonance Oscillating Gradient Spin Echo Sequences ME Mercredi 1, TJ Vincent 2,3,
Reproducibility of diffusion tractography E Heiervang 1,2, TEJ Behrens 1, CEM Mackay 3, MD Robson 3, H Johansen-Berg 1 1 Centre for Functional MRI of the.
ISMRM 2010 Quantitative Imaging and MS. N. D. Gai and J. A. Butman, NIH T1 Error Analysis for Double Angle Technique and Comparison to Inversion Recovery.
Mungunkhuyag Majigsuren1, Takashi Abe1, Masafumi Harada1
Introduction to diffusion MRI
FMRI: Biological Basis and Experiment Design Lecture 5: non-BOLD MRI Equilibrium and excitation Relaxation rates Image contrast –TE –TR.
Multi-site Investigation of DTI Reproducibility K. G. Helmer 1, M-C. Chou 2, A. Song 3, J. Turner 4, B. Gimi 5, and S. Mori 6 1 Massachusetts General Hospital,
Multimodal Visualization for neurosurgical planning CMPS 261 June 8 th 2010 Uliana Popov.
Ultra-High-Resolution Skin Imaging at 7 T with Motion Correction and Fat/Water Separation Presentation: 1:30pm # Electrical Engineering,
Tissue Contrast intrinsic factors –relative quantity of protons tissue proton density –relaxation properties of tissues T1 & T2 relaxation secondary factors.
Model-based Automatic AC/PC Detection on Three-dimensional MRI Scans Babak A. Ardekani, Ph.D., Alvin H. Bachman, Ph.D., Ali Tabesh, Ph.D. The Nathan S.
A new method for diffusion imaging using Burst excitation C. Wheeler-Kingshott 1, D. Thomas 2, M. Lythgoe 2, S. Williams 2 and S. J. Doran 1 1 University.
Trajectory Physics Based Fibertracking in Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging Garrett Jenkinson, Advisor: José Moura, Graduate Student: Hsun-Hsien.
THE CORRELATIONS OF 3D PSEUDO-CONTINUOUS ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING AND DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST PERFUSION MRI IN BRAIN TUMORS Delgerdalai Khashbat,
Basics of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. How MRI Works Put a person inside a big magnetic field Transmit radio waves into the person –These "energize"
Fig. 1. Images of the three E-field cells. Two cells fit inside a 5 mm NMR tube (a) and produce and E-field  (b) and // (c) to the B o field. The third.
Ramifications of Isotropic Sampling and Acquisition Orientation on DTI Analyses David H. Laidlaw 1, Song Zhang 1, Mark Bastin 2,3, Stephen Correia 4, Stephen.
 Participants Right-handed, community-dwelling individuals; 16 younger adults (19-28 years; 8 female); 16 older adults (60-82 years; 8 female). Participants.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft EPIK for TRIMAGE Seong Dae Yun 1 and N. Jon Shah 1,2 1 Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 4 Forschungszentrum Jülich.
-- Results There was a significant relationship between disease severity (FSRP) and measures of FA in the internal capsule (p
References: [1]S.M. Smith et al. (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation in FSL. Neuroimage 23: [2]S.M.
MRI Physics Dr Mohamed El Safwany, MD.. MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
FMRI – Week 4 – Contrast Scott Huettel, Duke University MR Contrast FMRI Graduate Course (NBIO 381, PSY 362) Dr. Scott Huettel, Course Director.
V.G.Wimalasena Principal School of Radiography
MRI Physics: Spatial Encoding Anna Beaumont FRCR Part I Physics.
White Matter Structural Integrity in Healthy Aging Adults and Patients With Alzheimer Disease: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Bartzokis, et al. UCLA.
Principles of MRI Physics and Engineering Allen W. Song Brain Imaging and Analysis Center Duke University.
DTI Acquisition Guide Donald Brien February 2016.
Receive Coil Arrays and Parallel Imaging for fMRI of the Human Brain
Real time shimming (RTS) for compensation of respiratory induced field changes P van Gelderen, JA de Zwart, P Starewicz, RS Hinks, JH Duyn Introduction.
Melanie Martin University of Winnipeg
Microstructure Imaging Sequence Simulation Toolbox
FMRI data acquisition.
COMPARISON OF OPTICAL AND fMRI MEASURES OF NEUROVASCULAR COUPLING
Non-linear Realignment Using Minimum Deformation Averaging for Single-subject fMRI at Ultra-high Field Saskia Bollmann1, Steffen Bollmann1, Alexander.
Introduction to diffusion MRI
Introduction to diffusion MRI
Sunday Case of the Day Physics
Ali Batouli1 Dennis Monks1 Sobia Mirza1 Michael Goldberg1
MRI Physics in a Nutshell Christian Schwarzbauer
Where Mt is the magnetization at time = t, the time after the 90o pulse, Mmax is the maximum magnetization at full recovery. At a time = one T1, the signal.
Introduction to diffusion MRI
Signal fluctuations in 2D and 3D fMRI at 7 Tesla
MRI Pulse Sequences: IR, EPI, PC, 2D and 3D
Cognition And Neocortical Volume After Stroke
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
3T-versus-7T DTI with 36 diffusion-encoding directions at b = 3000 s/mm2 and 2.0 × 2.0 × 2.0 mm isotropic voxel resolution. 3T-versus-7T DTI with 36 diffusion-encoding.
Attentional Modulations Related to Spatial Gating but Not to Allocation of Limited Resources in Primate V1  Yuzhi Chen, Eyal Seidemann  Neuron  Volume.
Left, T1 spin-echo image at 1
Same section position with spin-echo T1-weighted sequences at 1
Presentation transcript:

NON-EXPONENTIAL T 2 * DECAY IN WHITE MATTER P. van Gelderen 1, J. A. de Zwart 1, J. Lee 1,3, P. Sati 1, D. S. Reich 1, and J. H. Duyn 1. 1 Advanced MRI section, LFMI, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States 2 Translational Neuroradiology Unit, Neuroimmunology Branch, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States 3 Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, PA, United States I have no conflict to report regarding this presentation.

Introduction Measuring myelin content in the brain is important for many neurological diseases, most notably Multiple Sclerosis Magnetization transfer {1} can be used as a measure for large molecules, e.g. proteins and fatty acids as found in myelin T 1 and T 2 contrast have been proposed {2,3} as measure of a myelin water fractio and thus as a more specific measure of myelin volume and condition The water between myelin layers is thought to have a faster relaxation and may be detectable as a separate component in the decay 1) Wolff, Balaban. MRM 10:135. 2) Deoni et.al. MRM 60: ) MacKay et.al. MRM 31:673.

Introduction II: T 2 * T 2 * measurements have been proposed at 3T {4} for the detection of myelin water Potential advantages: simple multi gradient echo acquisition, high SNR Higher field strength should increase SNR and potentially the separation of components, as the field inhomogeneity induced part of T 2 * (sometime labeled T 2 ’ ) results in a faster with higher field strength 4) Hwang D, Kim DH, Du YP. Neuroimage 52:198.

Goal Explore the potential of myelin water detection using the T 2 * decay at 7T Method: Analyze multi gradient echo signal decay at 7T in human brain for the presence of a short (fast decaying) component that can be separated from the main component in the T 2 * decay

Methods Equipment: GE 3T and 7T with Nova Medical 32 channel receive array Subjects: 7T: 3 female, 4 male, ages 33-54, average age 41, one scanned twice 3T: 1 female, 3 male, ages 24-45, average 36 years, 3 out of 4 participated in 7T study as well Sequence: monopolar multi gradient echo, 256x96 resolution, 240x180mm 2 FOV, 30° flip angle, TR 70ms, 1 axial slice, 50 averages, 18 echoes, TE from 2.7ms to 45ms (2.35ms spacing)

Results I Example of T2* decay, showing every other echo, TE (in ms) is indicated in the images.

Results II Residue after mono-exponential fit, scaled to +/- 6% of baseline. Note the changes in contrast, especially in the first echo when compared to later echoes.

Results III Left: signal decay in the (splenium of the) corpus callosum, with mono- exponential fit (excluding the first two echoes). Right: the relative difference between the data and the mono-exponential fit in the splenium of the corpus callosum (black), posterior white matter (blue) and posterior internal capsule (green), showing the deviation at both short and long TE and illustrating the orientation effect (the corpus callosum is perpendicular to the field, the internal capsule parallel, the posterior white matter is mixed).

Results IV Comparison of the residue after mono-exponential fitting of the decay for 7T and 3T for a corpus callosum ROI. The short component in the 3T data appears slower than the 7T version and of somewhat reduced amplitude. Both effects are likely a consequence of the field dependence of the T2* decay. The decay rate of the short component scales with field strength. The decay rate of main component (which dominates the signal and fitting) is limited by the (field independent) T2 decay, which means the separation between the short and main T2* is smaller at 3T. The smaller separation may have reduced the amplitude of the short component apparent in the residue.

Results V Fitting results for a three component model {5}, for the average signal in the splenium of the corpus callosum. Left is the data and the fitted curve, right the residue. Although the fit is close, there is clearly a significant deviation from the model. The error bars indicate the standard error over the 8 studies. 5) Lancaster JL, Andrews T, Hardies LJ, Dodd S, Fox PT. J MRI 17:1.

Results VI Fitting results for a new three component model for the same data (corpus callosum). The new model fits the decay curve more accurately as is apparent from the smaller (and noisier) residue. This model includes offset frequencies for the two smaller components (1 and 3). The main component (2) does not have phase or frequency, as we use the magnitude of the data.

Results VII The average and SD (over subjects) of the multi compartment model parameters for two field strength (3 components for 7T, two for 3T) fitted to the averaged signal decays in the splenium of the corpus callosum.

Discussion I The T 2 * decay does show a deviation from mono- exponential decay in white matter At higher field strength the short component decays faster and has a better separation from the main signal The short component amplitude appears heterogeneous within the white matter, and is likely dependent on the orientation of the fiber bundles with respect to the main magnetic field A multi-component model, which includes a frequency offset for the smaller components, describes the data better than the previous models without a frequency offset

Discussion II The observed third (long T 2 *) component may be due to CSF or other ‘free’ water, or alternatively could stem from non-exponential decay due to macroscopic susceptibility effects, which could induce a sinc-type decay resulting in a deviation from exponential shape for the later TEs. Difference with an earlier report {4}, which shows a stronger and more homogeneous effect for the short component in the T 2 * decay, may be due to the applied processing in that report (anisotropic diffusion filtering on the data before fitting and voxel by voxel fitting of a three component model). For more details and discussion, see {6}. 4) Hwang D, Kim DH, Du YP. Neuroimage 52:198. 6) P van Gelderen et.al., MRM 2011, in press.

Conclusion Higher field T 2 * decay can be used to detect a short component likely related to myelin water The observed contrast is heterogeneous and likely orientation dependent, which has to be taken into account when estimating relative myelin content in different brain areas