GOSIA As a Simulation Tool J.Iwanicki, Heavy Ion Laboratory, UW.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Program Degrad.1.0 Auger cascade model for electron thermalisation in gas mixtures produced by photons or particles in electric and magnetic fields S.F.Biagi.
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
Low x workshop Helsinki 2007 Joël Feltesse 1 Inclusive F 2 at low x and F L measurement at HERA Joël Feltesse Desy/Hamburg/Saclay On behalf of the H1 and.
Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams
March 1, 2013GRETINA workshop Coulomb excitation of even Ru and Mo isotopes Juho Rissanen Nuclear Structure Group, Lawrence Berkeley.
Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams
Geant4 Low Energy Polarized Compton Processes Gerardo Depaola * Francesco Longo + Francesco Longo + * National University of Córdoba (Argentina) + University.
Physics of Fusion Lecture 1: The basics Lecturer: A.G. Peeters.
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
Introduction to stellar reaction rates Nuclear reactions generate energy create new isotopes and elements Notation for stellar rates: p 12 C 13 N  12.
12C(p,g)13N g III. Nuclear Reaction Rates 12C 13N Nuclear reactions
Revision – A simple program How to start a program? How to end a program? How to declare variables? What are the mathematical operators? How to start a.
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry
Particle Interactions
EURISOL User Group, Florence, Jan Spin-Dependent Pre-Equilibrium Exciton Model Calculations for Heavy Ions E. Běták Institute of Physics SAS,
Compton Scattering Reporter: Hui He. Outline Theory Experimental setup Experimental results (1) Calibration (2) Angular Distribution of the 137 Cs Source.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Physical Chemistry 2 nd Edition Thomas Engel, Philip Reid Chapter 28 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
EWON Workshop, Prague, May 2007 GOSIA as a tool for COULEX on exotic beams Katarzyna Wrzosek Heavy Ion Laboratory Warsaw University.
Cross section for potential scattering
Finish Momentum Start Spinning Around
Announcements Homework returned now 9/19 Switching to more lecture-style class starting today Good luck on me getting powerpoint lectures ready every day.
Study of the Halo Nucleus 6 He using the 6 Li(   ) 6 He Reaction Derek Branford - Edinburgh University for the A2-Collaboration MAMI-B Mainz.
Search for the Exotic Wobbling Mode in 171 Re MIDN 1/C Eowyn Pedicini, USN Advisers: Professor Daryl Hartley LT Brian Cummings, USN.
Lecture I.1 Nuclear Structure Observables Alexandru Negret.
abrasion ablation  σ f [cm 2 ] for projectile fragmentation + fission  luminosity [atoms cm -2 s -1 ]  70% transmission SIS – FRS  ε trans transmission.
Digital analysis of scintillator pulses generated by high-energy neutrons. Jan Novák, Mitja Majerle, Pavel Bém, Z. Matěj 1, František Cvachovec 2, 1 Faculty.
In-beam performance of AGATA-DEMONSTRATOR Ideas for the firsts commissioning experiments of the AGATA-DEMONSTRATOR campaign at LNL-Legnaro F. Recchia INFN-LNL.
Crystal Ball Collaboration Meeting, Mainz, October 2007 Claire Tarbert, Univeristy of Edinburgh Coherent  0 Photoproduction on Nuclei Claire Tarbert,
Conception of cross section 1) Base conceptions – differential, integral cross section, total cross section, geometric interpretation of cross section.
2. RUTHERFORD BACKSCATTERING SPECTROMETRY Basic Principles.
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
Simulation of the energy response of  rays in CsI crystal arrays Thomas ZERGUERRAS EXL-R3B Collaboration Meeting, Orsay (France), 02/02/ /03/2006.
Monday, Sep. 20, 2010PHYS 3446, Fall 2010 Andrew Brandt 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Sep Dr. Brandt 1.Differential Cross Section of Rutherford.
Quantum Mechanical Cross Sections In a practical scattering experiment the observables we have on hand are momenta, spins, masses, etc.. We do not directly.
PHYS 3446, Fall 2010 Andrew Brandt
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #3 Wednesday, Sept. 3, 2008 Dr. Andrew Brandt
1 Introduction to Atomic Spectroscopy Lecture 10.
P HI T S Setting of various source Part I Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System Title1 Aug revised.
Determination of activity of 51 Cr source on gamma radiation measurements V.V.Gorbachev, V.N.Gavrin, T.V.Ibragimova, A.V.Kalikhov, Yu.M.Malyshkin,A.A.Shikhin.
Tracking Background GRETINA Software Working Group Meeting September 21-22, 2012, NSCL MSU I-Yang Lee Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS)
A.V. Ramayya and J.H. Hamilton Vanderbilt University.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
We are investigating the dependence of efficiency of diamond detector samples on accumulated radiation dose. We have Sr 90  -source of known activity.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1.
If information seems to be missing, make any reasonable assumptions. 1.A target has an areal density of 2.3 g/cm 2 and a thickness of 0.8 inch. What is.
Crystal Ball Collaboration Meeting, Basel, October 2006 Claire Tarbert, Univeristy of Edinburgh Coherent  0 Photoproduction on Nuclei Claire Tarbert,
Deuteron polarimetry from 1.0 to 1.5 GeV/c Ed Stephenson, IUCF EDM discussion April 14, 2006 Based on work from: France:POMME B. Bonin et al. Nucl. Inst.
Neutrino states in oscillation experiments – are they pure or mixd? Pheno 07, May, 07-09, 2007, Madison, Wisconsin Marek Zralek, Univ. of Silesia.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
12th Geant4 Space Users Workshop
Coulex Analysis Code – GOSIA: Current Status of Development
Elastic Scattering in Electromagnetism
Setting of various sources A
Isospin Symmetry test on the semimagic 44Cr
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
Status of Compton Analysis
Status of Compton Analysis
Nuclear Decays Unstable nuclei can change N,Z.A to a nuclei at a lower energy (mass) If there is a mass difference such that energy is released, pretty.
Setting of various source Part II
PHYS 3446, Spring 2012 Andrew Brandt
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #5 Monday, Feb Dr. Brandt
Lesson 4: Application to transport distributions
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Scattering Cross Section Total Cross Section
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

GOSIA As a Simulation Tool J.Iwanicki, Heavy Ion Laboratory, UW

OUTLINE Our goal is to estimate gamma yieds What the yield is –Point Yield vs. Integrated Yield What they are needed for What is needed to calculate it –Definition of the nucleus considered –Definition of the experiment

YIELD GOSIA recognizes two types of yields: Point yields calculated for: –Excited levels layout –Collision partner –Matrix element values –CHOSEN particle energy and scattering angle Integrated yields calculated for: –(... as above but...) –A RANGE of scattering angles and energies

POINT YIELD How GOSIA does it? Assumes nucleus properties and collision partner; starts with experimental conditions (angle, energy) and matrix element set solves differential equations to find level populations; calculates deexcitation using gamma detection geometry, angular distributions, deorientation and internal conversion into acount.

POINT YIELD Point yields: are fast to be calculated......so they are used at minimisation stage OP,POIN – if one needs a quick look but are good for one energy and one (particle scattering) angle

INTEGRATED YIELD Integrated yields are something close to reality but quite slow to calculate Useful integration options: axial symmetry option circular detector option PIN detector option (multiple particle detectors)

YIELD CORRECTION However Correction Factors can be found by comparison of calculated point and integrated yields. Correcting the yield is like averaging point yields over energy and angular range, –so the better the choice of mean energy/angle, Correction Factor is closer to 1. One needs as many C.F.s as gamma yields CF

YIELD CORRECTION Correction depends on the matrix element set so it is usually performed after satisfactory initial set is found. Minimisation is usually performed using corrected yields After minimisation, another correction should be performed with the new found matrix element set so the process is recursive but converges very well.

YIELD GOSIA calculates yields as differential cross sections, integrated over in-target particle energies and particle scattering angles –‘differential’ in  but integrated for particles The ‘GOSIA yield’ may be understood as a mean differential cross section multiplied by target thickness (in mg/cm 2 ) [Y]=mb/sr  mg/cm 2

88 Kr simulation – level layout

One usually adds some „buffer” states on top of observed ones to avoid artificial population build-up it the highest observed state

megen generation of matrix elements set Apply  transition selection rules to create a set of all possible matrix elements involved in excitation. This is easy but takes time and any error will corrupt the results of simulation! Tomek quickly wrote a simple code to do the job which uses data in GOSIA format.

megen generation of matrix elements set parity level number spin level energy [MeV] input termination

megen 1 Create setup for this multipolarity (y/n) n 2 Create setup for this multipolarity (y/n) y Do you want them coupled ? n Please give limit value Create setup for this multipolarity (y/n) n (…) 7 Create setup for this multipolarity (y/n) y Do you want them coupled ? n Please give limit value Create setup for this multipolarity (y/n) n megen generation of matrix elements set E2 M1

megen output E2 M1 initial level | final level | starting value (1) | low limit | high limit

How to get matrix elements for simulation from? Check the literature for published values Get all the available spectroscopic data (lifetimes, E2/M1 mixing ratios, branching ratios) Ask a theoretician Use OP,THEO to generate the rest from rotational model Do some fitting with spectroscopic data only

OP,THEO generation of a starting point From the GOSIA manual: OP, THEO generates only the matrix speci fi ed in the ME input and writes them to the (...) fi le. For in-band or equal-K interband transitions only one (moment) marked Q1 is relevant. For non-equal K values generally two moments with the projections equal to the sum and difference of K’s are required (Q1 and Q2), unless one of the K’s is zero, when again only Q1 is needed. For the K-forbidden transitions a three parameter Mikhailov formula is used.

OP,THEO for 88 Kr OP,THEO 2 0,4 1,2,3,4 2,2 5,6 2 1,1 0.3,0,0 1,2 0.05,0,0 0,0 7 1,2 0.05,0,0 0,0 0 number of bands (2) First band, K and number of states band member indices Second band, K and number of states Multipolarity E2 Bands 1 and 1 (in-band) Moment Q1 of the rotational band Multipolarity M band 1 band 2 end of band-band input end of multipolarities loop

Minimisation with OP,MINI Some minimisation would be in order but minimisation itself is a bit complex subject... Let’s assume we have some best possible Matrix Elements set. Next step is the integration over particle energy and angle.

Integration with OP,INTG Few hints: READ THE MANUAL, it is not easy! Integration over angles: assume axial symmetry if possible (suboption of EXPT) Theta and energy meshpoints have to be given manually, do it right or GOSIA will go astray!

Integration with OP,INTG Yield integration over energies: stopping power used to replace thickness with energy for integration: One has to find projectile energy E min at the end of the target to know the energy range for integration.

elo screen dump elo Notes to ELO users: 1) Maximum of energy steps = 100 2) Maximum of absorbers number = 40 3) Maximum of projectiles number = 40 4) For energies less than 10 keV/u uncertainty of range (and energy loss) may be greater then 10%, especially for lighter projectiles or absorbers *** Input data *** *** Absorbers specification *** Enter number of absorbers 1 Absorber # 1: Solid of 1 components Enter mass and atomic numbers and number of atoms in component # Element # 1: 120Sn 1 atoms Enter thickness of solid absorber ( 0 - mg/cm**2) 1 Equivalent Values : Z = 50.00, A = , Av.Ion.En. = eV Thickness = mm ( mg/cm**2 ) *** Projectile specification *** Enter number of projectiles 1 Mass and atomic numbers of projectile #

elo screen dump *** Projectile specification *** Enter number of projectiles 1 Mass and atomic numbers of projectile # Projectile # 1: 88Kr *** Energy specification *** Enter indeks, if indeks = 0 - total energy, if indeks = 1 - energy per nucleon 1 Enter minimum, maximum and step of energy Choose output specification - enter iout iout = 1 - only energy losses iout = 2 - energy losses and ranges iout = 3 - energy losses, ranges and stopping powers 3 End of input data reading Output data will be written on file ELO.OUT

YIELD  COUNT RATE GOSIA is aware of gamma detectors set-up Gamma yield depends on detector angle (angular distribution) However, angular distributions are flattened by detection geometry (both for particle and gamma ) Gamma detector geometry is calculated at the initial stage (geometry correction factors are calculated and stored for yield calculation)

YIELD  COUNT RATE One may try to reproduce gamma detector set-up of the intended experiment or assume the symmetry of the detection array and calculate everything with a virtual gamma detector covering 2  of the full space (huge radius, small distance to target)

YIELD  COUNT RATE Taking into account the solid angle, Avogadro number, barns etc, beam current, total efficiency... y2c code Count Rate = yield   count rate target

Having the yields calculated... Kasia is going to show the way to estimate experimental errors of matrix elements to be measured: GOSIA spectroscopic data generated yields GOSIA matrix element errors estimate

“Saturation” of the yield

88 Kr on 208 Pb target, simple sensitivity to the diagonal E2 matrix element of the state

How does GOSIA work? (1/3)

How does GOSIA work? (2/3)

How does GOSIA work? (3/3)

How does GOSIA work? normalisation factor calculated yield experimental yield spectroscopic data point calculated magnitude