LOINC and SNOMED Tim Benson Abies Ltd

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kristiina Rebane Ministry of Social Affairs of Estonia eHealth in Estonia.
Advertisements

Semantic Interoperability in Health Informatics: Lessons Learned 10 January 2008Semantic Interoperability in Health Informatics: Lessons Learned 1 Medical.
Archetypes in HL7 v2 Andrew McIntyre Medical-Objects HL7 International May 2009.
SNOMED CT Update Denise Downs Implementation and Education Lead.
Term list(s) vs. SNOMED -CT ® subset. 2 nd AAHA Software Vendors Summit – April 21, 2009.
Archetypes in HL7 2.x Archetypes in HL7 Version 2.x Andrew McIntyre Medical Objects 9 th HL7 Australia Conference, 8.
1 Sep 15Fall 05 Standards in Medical Informatics Standards Nomenclature Terminologies Vocabularies.
WHO Agenda: Classifications – Terminologies - Standards
Just what you need to know and do NOW!
Archetypes in HL7 2.x Archetypes/Structure in HL7 Version 2.x Andrew McIntyre Medical-Objects 10 th HL7 Australia Conference,
Intensional Value Set Definitions Referencing LOINC Formal Names for Axes (and other Parts) for use in defining Value Sets Ted Klein August 29, 2013.
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 4e Basic Health Data Standards Component 9/Unit.
Ethical Principles and the Practice of Qualitative Research: Insights from a social science research project Professor Lindsay Prior School of Sociology,
Best Practices for Interoperable Data Exchange Using LOINC Ming-Chin (Mark) Lin, MD Stanley M. Huff, MD.
Introduction to openEHR
A proposal for interoperable health information exchange with two Esperantos: ICF and LOINC® originally presented at: Daniel J. Vreeman, PT, DPT, MSc Assistant.
Copyright © 2001 College of American Pathologists Sample Hierarchy for Fine Needle Biopsy of Abdominal Wall Mass Tru cut biopsy of lesion of abdominal.
Archetypes in HL7 2.x Snomed-CT “Computable Medical Records” Andrew McIntyre Medical-Objects NEHTA Snomed-CT Workshop.
Lecture 5 Standardized Terminology and Language in Health Care (Chapter 15)
MEDICAL RECORDS MANAGEMENT IN EYE CARE SERVICES 6.International classification of Disease & Procedures and the method of Indexing data.
THEORIES, MODELS, AND FRAMEWORKS
Medical Informatics Basics
Theories, Models and Frameworks
Terminology in Health Care and Public Health Settings
Evaluating Educational Technology and Integration Strategies By: Dakota Tucker, Derrick Haney, Demi Ford, and Kent Elmore Chapter 7.
Document information 3.02 Understand Health Informatics
Working Together to Advance Terminology Tooling Presentation to OHT Board, Birmingham Jennifer Zelmer & Karen Gibson.
Medical Informatics Basics Lection 1 Associated professor Andriy Semenets Department of Medical Informatics.
Betsy L. Humphreys Betsy L. Humphreys ~ National Library of Medicine National Institutes of.
1 st June 2006 St. George’s University of LondonSlide 1 Using UMLS to map from a Library to a Clinical Classification: Improving the Functionality of a.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Survey of Medical Informatics CS 493 – Fall 2004 September 27, 2004.
Component 11/Unit 8b Data Dictionary Understanding and Development.
ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 4c Basic Health Data Standards Component 9/Unit.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Component 3-Terminology in Healthcare and Public Health Settings Unit 17-Clinical Vocabularies This material was developed by The University of Alabama.
AMIA 2007 Monday, Nov :30-1:30 National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services UMLS ® Users Meeting.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard University February 24, 2010.
Lab and Messaging CoP 11/29/2012. Agenda Agenda review Introduction to the Specimen Cross-Mapping Table (Specimen CMT) – Background – Expected uses –
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 6a EHR Functional Model Standards.
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 4a Basic Health Data Standards Component 9/Unit.
FROM ONE NOMENCLATURES TO ANOTHER… Drs. Sven Van Laere.
Terminology Server - Semantics for Medical Documentation and Interoperability / Dortmund © Peter Haas, Robert Mützner / Working Group Med. Informatics.
Terminology in Healthcare and Public Health Settings Standards to Promote Health Information Exchange This material Comp3_Unit 16 was developed by The.
Health Informatics Career Responsibilities Communicate information File records Use technology Schedule appointments Complete medical records forms Maintain.
Enhancing interoperation: an i2b2 ETL schema for Epic EHRs
3.02 Understand Health Informatics
Table core Part file Answer file Group file
Assessing SNOMED CT for Large Scale eHealth Deployments in the EU Workpackage 2- Building new Evidence Daniel Karlsson, Linköping University Stefan Schulz,
Healthcare and Medicine: New frontiers for analytics and data mining
LOINC – SNOMED CT Cooperation on Content
UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS (UMLS)
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) version 2
11th HL7 Australia Conference, 13th December 2006
W. Scott Campbell, MBA, PhD James R. Campbell, MD
Enhancing interoperation: an i2b2 ETL schema for Epic EHRs
Achieving Semantic Interoperability of Cancer Registries
Education SIG Implementors Curriculum
3.02 Understand Health Informatics
WP1: D 1.3 Standards Framework Status June 25, 2015
Clinical Assessment Instruments and the LOINC/SNOMED CT Relationship
Networking and Health Information Exchange
LOCAL EXPERIENCES Innovation practices and experiences related to FIC development and implementation Ariadna Rius Clinical Dictionary for iSalut.
3.02 Understand Health Informatics
Comprehensive Medical Assisting, 3rd Ed Unit Three: Managing the Finances in the Practice Chapter 15 – Outpatient Procedural Coding.
Comprehensive Medical Assisting, 3rd Ed Unit Three: Managing the Finances in the Practice Chapter 14 - Diagnostic Coding.
3.02 Understand Health Informatics
3.02 Understand Health Informatics
Presentation transcript:

LOINC and SNOMED Tim Benson Abies Ltd Wellcome Trust Sintero Server Project Cardiff University Author: Principles of Health Interoperability HL7 and SNOMED, Springer 2010

Outline Origins of LOINC Origins of SNOMED CT Complementary or Competitive

Scope of LOINC Clinical Laboratory Tests Clinical observables The test not the result Clinical observables “Eye colour”, not “Blue eyes” Form headings Document types Assessment scales

Origins of LOINC Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes Designed for use in interoperability Clem McDonald ASTM 1238:88 Standard Specification for Transferring Clinical Laboratory Data Between Independent Computer Systems HL7 V2.0 1988 OBX Segment EU EUCLIDES and OpenLabs projects

HL7 v2 OBX segment Turn-round document Observable Value Code Physical quantity

EUCLIDES European Clinical Laboratory Data Exchange Standard 1988-1991 Georges De Moor, Gent 6 dimensional classification

LOINC Codes LOINC Code Short convenient name Long common name Consecutive number + Check digit e.g. 12345-9 Short convenient name Long common name All codes are pre-coordinated to common concept model Six dimensions slightly different from EUCLIDES

LOINC Dimensions Component Property Timing System Scale Method what is being measured Property kind of property measured Timing point in time or period System sample or body part Scale nominal, ordinal, interval or ratio Method procedure used to produce the result or other observation

RELMA Regenstrief LOINC Mapping Assistant LOINC database search Map local codes to LOINC codes

Problems of LOINC Complex Many similar codes with only small differences mass concentration v molecular concentration anatomical position of pulse or BP Dimensions are not hierarchical so limits subsumption testing

Good aspects of LOINC Completely free Does what it claims to do (but no more) Fit for purpose Easy and quick to add new codes

Origins of SNOMED CT (1) SNOMED CAP committee 1955 SNOP 1965 topography morphology etiology function (physiology) SNOMED 1975 SNOMED III 1993 SNOMED RT (Reference Terminology) 1997

Origins of SNOMED CT (2) Read Codes Used by all GPs in UK (100%) Coded terms in EHR e.g. “Blue Eyes” Developed by Abies and James Read for use in GP computer system 1983-1986 Purchased by DH in 1990 V2 1990 Version 3 (CTV3) 1996 Used by all GPs in UK (100%) Basis of payment Unsuccessful in other specialties

Read Code (v1,2) Chapters Diagnoses Medication History and physical ICD Chapters A-Z Medication BNF Chapters a-z History and physical Occupations (0), history and symptoms (1), physical examination findings (2) Procedures Diagnostic (3), lab (4), imaging (5), prevention (6), therapy (7), surgery (8), admin (9)

SNOMED CT Merger of Read Codes and SNOMED RT Reference Terminology All concepts are in hierarchies (19) Concepts Descriptions (terms) Relationships Defining, qualifying, sub-type, association Description Logic

Problems of SNOMED CT Much legacy baggage Lack of transparency Lack of free access Lack of good web-based tools Complexity Post-coordination is not yet a practical proposition Undefined boundaries Over-sold as answer to all terminology problems

Benefits of SNOMED CT Future-proof structure Inherently multi-lingual Broad coverage

Education Problem Few people are competent in both LOINC and SNOMED Clinical terminology is not taught well One of 186 topics in AMIA Core Curriculum for Clinical Informatics (JAMIA, 2009) Formal training is essential 93% of all those who rated themselves as competent had had more than 3 days formal training in SNOMED CT (Report for DH, unpublished)

Education – needs a blended approach Learn by doing (assignments and examples) Face-to-face presentations Web-based presentations and videos User guides and books Pick it up from colleagues

LOINC and SNOMED CT together Clinical statement consists of: Narrative text Context (who, when , where, etc) Observable Finding (Rector A. What’s in a code, MEDINFO 2007)

Observable “Observables” are qualities of patients that are present in all patients and whose values or states are determined by observation This is what LOINC is designed to code and does it well

Finding Information specific to a particular patient Finding = Observable + Value Value may be various data types Physical quantity, code, date, text etc SNOMED CT is good for Observation Value Codes

Conclusions LOINC and SNOMED CT were originally designed to do different things They are complementary