O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y Rationale N. Macnack¹, J. Kelly², J. Mullock¹, I. Ortiz-Monasterio 3, and W. Raun¹. ¹Plant and Soil Sciences,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-01. Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-02.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 116.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 107.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 40.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 28.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 44.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 29.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 101.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 38.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 58.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 112.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 75.
Chapter 1 Image Slides Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
Clock will move after 1 minute
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter 11 Simple Linear Regression.
Multiple Regression and Model Building
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
PRECISION SIDEDRESS UAN APPLICATION FOR CORN PRODUCTION
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Use of sensor based nitrogen rates to improve maize nitrogen use efficiency in the Northern Argentinean Pampas. Ricardo Melchiori 1, Octavio Caviglia 1,
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
Effect of Long-term Cattle Manure Application on Soil Test Phosphorus, Organic Carbon and Winter Wheat Grain Yield Natasha Macnack, Peter Omara, Lawrence.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGIA AGROPECUARIA SECRETARIA DE AGRICULTURA, GANADERIA, PESCA Y ALIMENTACION "Wheat yield prediction by using an active sensor.
Results Effect of Simulated Grazing Intensity on Dual-Purpose Winter Wheat Growth and Grain Yield Dillon Butchee and Jeff Edwards Department of Plant and.
Sensor Orientation to maize canopy row and estimating biomass and Nitrogen Status Paul Hodgen, Fernando Solari, Jim Schepers, John Shanahan, Dennis Francis.
May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
2  Objective: Improve in-season estimate of yield for winter wheat utilizing profile soil moisture (0-80 cm) obtained from Oklahoma Mesonet data. Lahoma.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
Reverse N lookup, sensor based N rates using Weather improved INSEY Nicole Remondet.
Evaluation of Foliar UAN and Timing on Wheat Grain Yield and Protein Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, 371 Agricultural.
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Use of By-Plot CV’s for Refining Mid-Season Fertilizer N Rates Daryl Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Eric C. Miller Jeremiah L. Mullock, Jacob T. Bushong, and William R. Raun NUE Conference Sioux Falls, SD August 5 th, 2014.
Reverse N lookup, sensor based N rates using Weather improved INSEY Nicole Remondet Rationale Weather is an aspect of agricultural sciences that cannot.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
Evaluation of Drum Cavity Size and Planter-tip on Singulation and Plant Emergence in Maize (Zea mays L.) Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma.
2013 NUE Conference Des Moines, Iowa August 5-7 Jacob T. Bushong.
E FFECT OF S EED D ISTRIBUTION AND P OPULATION ON M AIZE G RAIN Y IELD B EE K HIM C HIM G RADUATE S TUDENT D EPARTMENT OF C ROP, S OIL & E NVIRONMENTAL.
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
Sensor Based Technologies in Mexico CIMMYT (Dr. Ivan Ortiz-Monasterio ) Oklahoma State University (Yumiko Kanke)
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
Effect of Preplant/Early Irrigation, Nitrogen and Population Rate on Winter Wheat Grain Yield Plant and Soil Sciences Department, Oklahoma State University,
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
Expression of Spatial Variability in Corn (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Growth Stage Using Optical Sensor Measurements By-Plant Prediction of Corn (Zea.
Theory of Predicting Crop Response to Non-Limiting Nitrogen.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Laboratory for Agriculture and Environmental Studies Sensor Based Variable Rate N Management in Mid-Atlantic.
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Evaluation of the Yield Potential Based NFOA for Cotton
EVOLUTION OF NITROGEN REFERENCE STRIPS
EFFECT OF DELAYED EMERGENCE ON CORN GRAIN YIELDS
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
Evaluation of Midseason UAN Application Depth in Winter Wheat
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Utilizing Indicator crop N-rich strips for anticipating pre plant and side dress Nitrogen rates for maize. Rationale Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in cereal.
REVIEW.
Annual ASA Meeting, Indianapolis
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
K. Freeman, B. Raun, K. Martin, R.Teal, D. Arnall, M. Stone, J. Solie
Tastes Great. Less Filling
Presentation transcript:

O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y Rationale N. Macnack¹, J. Kelly², J. Mullock¹, I. Ortiz-Monasterio 3, and W. Raun¹. ¹Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, and 3 CIMMYT ² Max Birney Aerial Spraying Inc. Sublette, KS Evaluate the relationships between stalk diameter, plant height, NDVI, and final maize grain yield. Materials and Methods  Site-years: Efaw Research Station, Stillwater, OK., Lake Carl Blackwell,Stillwater,OK., Eastern Research Station, (Haskell, OK.), Ciudad Obregon, Mexico, 2010  NDVI measurements using bike sensor (shaft encoder) (GreenSeeker TM ) (Fig. 1).  NDVI, individual plant height and stalk diameter at V6-VT growth stages in selected corn rows (Fig 2).  Pre-plant N rates 0, 45, 90, and 180 kg N ha -1, Oklahoma, and 35, 70, and 245 kg N ha -1, Mexico.  Linear and non -linear regression analysis using SAS. Results Conclusions  Excessive heat and raccoon damage lowered yields in 2011 and  Correlation between stalk diameter and grain yield highly variable across sites and years.  Stalk diameter X height was better correlated with by plant grain yield than NDVI.  Stalk diameter X plant height had improved correlation with yield compared to plant height alone in 2009 and  Overall, plant height at V6 and V8 was positively correlated with by-plant grain yield.  Stalk diameter X plant height was a good predictor of grain yield from V8-V12 in 2009 and  Stalk diameter and plant height are physiological traits that could be used to refine current mid-season fertilizer N recommendations. Figure 2. Measuring stalk diameter and plant height Acknowledgments  Oklahoma State University, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences  Soil Fertility Graduate Students By-plant Prediction of Maize (Zea Mays L.) Yield using Stalk Diameter and Plant Height Objective The algorithm presently used at Oklahoma State University for nitrogen (N) fertilizer recommendation utilizes the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) to predict yield potential, and the response index using N Rich Strips. Besides NDVI, other parameters such as plant height and stalk diameter can be utilized to predict yield. Combining these factors could aid in refining current mid-season N fertilizer recommendations in Maize (Zea Maize L.). Figure 1. Reflectance measurement using the bike sensor Figure 3. Grain yield versus stalk diameter at growth stage V8, Efaw, OK Figure 5. Grain yield versus stalk diameter at growth stage V8, Efaw, Haskell, and Lake Carl Blackwell, OK  In 2009 and 2010, plant height at V10 and V12 explained 52 and 53% of the yield variability, respectively.  Across all sites and years, plant height at V6 and V8 positively correlated with grain yield, with r 2 of 0.39 and 0.25, respectively (Table 1).  Across all years stalk diameter at V8 at Efaw, r 2 of 0.26 (Fig. 3).  Stalk diameter X plant height at V12, was highly correlated with grain yield, r²of 0.67 at Lake Carl Blackwell (Fig. 4).  From , positive correlation between grain yield and stalk diameter X plant height at V8 with r 2 of 0.17 averaged over Efaw, Haskell, and Lake Carl Blackwell, respectively (Fig. 5).  By-plant biomass highly correlated with stalk diameter (r 2 =0.68), Ciudad Obregon, Mexico. Figure 4. Grain yield versus stalk diameter x plant height at growth stage V12, Lake Carl Blackwell, OK Table 1. Linear relationship between by-plant grain yield and measured plant height, stalk diameter, and NDVI, at V6, V8, V10, V12, and VT corn growth stages, averaged across locations and years in Oklahoma and linear relationship between by plant and stalk diameter in Mexico, V15 in Growth stageIndependentDependentr2‡r2‡ V6Height, cmGrain yield, kg ha ** Stalk diameter0.09* Stalk diameter*height0.02 ¶ NDVI0.05 ¶ NDVI*height0.02 ¶ V8HeightGrain yield, kg ha ** Stalk diameter0.03* Stalk diameter*height0.17** NDVI0.06** NDVI*height0.23** V10HeightGrain yield, kg ha ** Stalk diameter0.06** Stalk diameter*height0.08** NDVI0.04** NDVI*height 0.06** V12HeightGrain yield, kg ha ** Stalk diameter0.13** Stalk diameter*height0.11** NDVI0.01* NDVI*height0.04** VTHeightGrain yield, kg ha ** Stalk diameter0.08** Stalk diameter*height0.14** NDVI0.05** NDVI*height0.02** V15Stalk diameterBiomass, kg plant **^ *, ** Model significant at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively. ‡ r², proportion of variability in the dependent variable explained by the independent variable by the selected model. ¶ ns, not significant. ^, 2 nd order polynomial