Chandler Elementary A School of Intervention. Goal for today: By the end of the session today, you will be able to identify 3-5 changes our school made.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
+ I used to ___, but now I ___. ROGERS PUBLIC SCHOOLS October 2011.
Advertisements

Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Continuous Improvement
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Literacy Subject Leaders
Effective Assessment and Feedback
Highlights USING THE CAFÉ MENU to Support Balanced Literacy
More is not better… Better is better
Many roads, one destination.
Session Two Review SEF analysis –Benefits –Issues.
The Principal’s Role in Leading College and Career Readiness September, 2013.
Thomas Edison: Inventor of:-
Why has data become so important in education? n Accountability requires school districts to measure effectiveness. n Standards that identify what all.
A Teaching and Learning Cycle:
Implementing the CCSS Through Coaching Atomic Conference December 2, 2014.
Lori Pitcock REED 663 Dr. Pitcher Fall 2010
Universal Design for Learning Part II: Classroom Application
 It is an “out of the classroom” intervention  A tutor works with a small group of 3 students  The goal is to get the students ready for the maths classroom.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
© 2013 National Center on Time and Learning; The TIME Collaborative Extended Day Updates Dr. Thomas S. O’Connell Elementary We’ve.
RTI 2 Murfreesboro City Schools Lessons Learned Linda Gilbert, Director of SchoolsLinda Gilbert, Director of Schools Caresa Brooks, Coordinator, Reading/InterventionCaresa.
“I am new to my school this year. I had little understanding before this project as to what the instructional knowledge and/or experience was of the J/I.
RtI Basics for Secondary School District of Manatee County PS-RtI Team.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
State Affiliate Name Here Classroom Management Through Student Engagement February 14, 2013 Strategies for engaging and active lessons.
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
Balanced Literacy A student-centered approach to teaching and learning.
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Professional Learning Communities Changing the Way of Thinking About Teaching and Learning.
Principal’s Forecast Tangipahoa Parish School System Leadership Focus Strategy June 2015 Gary T. Porter.
EVERYONE IS WRITING, NOW WHAT?! TEACHING SMARTER DURING INDEPENDENT WRITING Presented by: Jackie Novak Lake Orion Community Schools 1 st -3 rd Session.
Kacie Pugh » Deciding on the most important material to bring back to your site. » Deciding how you will bring items back to staff.
EngageNY.org Session 5: Criteria for Speaking and Listening November, 2013 Network Teams Institute.
TAG Presentation Grouping Strategies
Digital Data Displays Displaying Data iLearn Elementary Math Session 5 of 8.
ACCOUNTABILITY Teacher Data Meetings. Description of School 1,000 students 72% Free and Reduced Lunch 280 ELL Students 6 to 9 teachers per Grade Level.
Formative assessment and effective feedback at Manor Lakes College
Collaborative Data Teams Growing to Learn & Learning to Grow Eugene Field Elementary Kindergarten-4 th grade Maryville, Missouri.
Outcomes By the end of the session, we will have : Reflected on our own perspectives about assessment. Considered a rationale for on-going assessment.
A Formative Assessment System That Really Works Lee Ann Pruske, MTS Kim O’Brien, MTL Milwaukee.
Module 3: Unit 2, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 2.
Teaching Academic Vocabulary Focus on: Activities 10/29/2015.
Warilla Public School Journey of Literacy Development with Primary Students.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
School Improvement through Data and Best Practices Anytown Middle School Best Practice Audit Report.
Introduction to the Process of Formative Assessment.
Based on the work of Assessment FOR Learning by Rick Stiggins October 29, 2007 ASSESSMENT “OF” AND “FOR”: DOES IT REALLY MAKE A DIFFERNCE?
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
“Do Now”. Introduce yourself to new colleagues at your table. Then Turn and Talk about this; What’s wrong with this picture? What can teachers do to ensure.
Assessment for Learning “Assessment for Learning”: A brief synopsis of a PLC working towards higher student achievement through assessment, data-based.
Fair Oak’s PLC Work. Our History 2004  Brand New Principal – 5 th in 5 years.  6 New Teachers  Training/Professional Development Attended CA Reading.
Mrs. Gaines’ Second Grade Welcome to our classroom!
Embedding ELPS, CCSS, and GLAD Strategies through Co-planning and Co-teaching.
Meeting the LEAPS Act May 5, PEI: Building Rigorous and Robust PreK-3 Family Engagement 1.
USING RTI TO IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN LITERACY A Report to Our Stakeholders TEMPLATE to fill in/ add to/ delete as you see fit! SCHOOL NAME– Board.
SUCCESS AT POST 16 MICHAEL SENIOR. Key aspects of success at A level LEARNING MINDSET (students and staff) PRACTISE RECALL (in and out of lessons) INDEPENDENT.
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Elementary
Building a Culture of Sustainable Leadership: Growing Teacher Leaders
Dr. Jeannine Perry Ms. Tami Slater
Lynne Stallings Ball State University November 11, 2017
Lakeisha Vaughan-Jones
EDU 650 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 650 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
EDU 650 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Response to Intervention
Taking Note of CCSD Resources
Ensuring Success for Every Reader
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Presentation transcript:

Chandler Elementary A School of Intervention

Goal for today: By the end of the session today, you will be able to identify 3-5 changes our school made in the last two years that increased our student achievement and helped us make AYP.

How I will set up our session today Compare the old model to the new and improved model. Use the graphic organizer of a t-chart. Organize the content of the presentation to a t-chart in your head or on your paper.

Background to the story New principal “Failing school” Restructured Having a plan Changing our focus

One of the first things we did: Got rid of our fixed mindsets by reading and embracing Mindset by Carol Dweck.

And next... Got rid of our inconsistent techniques by using Teach Like a Champion by Doug Lemov.

And then... If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and hoping for different results. So, we began to deconstruct the old model and construct a new one.

The old model: You need EL training to teach EL kids. The new model: We believe much of our knowledge comes with experience, not only from textbooks or classes we take. Therefore all of us are EL teachers. We are all qualified to teach EL students.

The old model: EL students and other students need different things. The new model: “Many students don’t come from strong oral language or literacy backgrounds. Lower SES students need the same practice with oral language as our EL kids. There is not a huge gap or difference in needs.” ~ EL teacher

The old model: The EL teachers often worked alone in isolation. One EL teacher plugged into three grade levels. Instructional time lost because EL teachers were going to meetings to find out what teachers were doing. EL teachers pulled students out.

The new and improved model: Grade level teams For example, the Kindergarten team looks like this: – EL para, prime time para, Title One Instructor, EL teacher, 3 classroom teachers = 7 staff to support 73 students Switch from “my kids” to “our kids.” All staff are teachers. PE and Music teacher teach reading during the reading block.

Old model: EL teachers “guessed” what their students needed. Had more of a set program to take kids through. The new model: Team Time Collaboration – ½ day every other week. Use data from formative and summative assessments (around LG’s and objectives) to group students. Progress monitor – regroup.

Old model: We didn’t know what to do to make Safe Harbor/AYP The new model: Safe Harbor spreadsheet

Old model We didn’t know which students fit which categories The new model: Tracking students – knowing how many we need in each category

The old model Homeroom teachers kept their students during RW/WW/Math. The new model: During 90 minute Reading Block, we use ALL staff to group around Learning Goals/Objectives. Groups of kids for 90 minutes across the building. (Safety in small numbers.)

The new model: “We aren’t the little old EL team anymore. We are part of teams and also the broader school team. Because of teams, we are more aware of what a grade level is doing. We collaborate more with what EL and other students need. We trade around duties and use people’s strengths to support our students.” ~EL teacher

Old model: Classroom teachers thought, “I need to keep my students. No one knows them like I do.” The new model: “These are my kids. I trust my colleagues to help our students learn.” Intervention meeting story.

Old model “We sort of knew what we were teaching.” ~EL teacher The new model: A very strong focus on Learning Goals and Objectives. “Today, I (the student) will read a story and prove I understand it by answering a who, what, and where question.” “Today I will write a complete sentence by including a noun and a verb.”

Old model: Inconsistent teaching models. The new model: Identify objective. Use I do, We do, You do. – (Model and gradually release the responsibility) Assess.

Old model: Many vague questions with little wait time. The new model: Focused, well thought out questions with attention to using the word “How” to preface many. Teaching and using wait time.(TLC) Using a mix of whole class vs. individual response.

The old model: Some feedback given. “Great job.” “I am so proud of you.” “I like when you...” The new model: Feedback is focused, frequent, and of high quality. “When you answered “The story is about Maria,” you gave the right answer to “Who is the story about?” That is excellent thinking.”

The old model: Taught too often in the abstract. “Today we are going to learn about a topic and supporting details. The new model: “A topic is like this orange I have in my hand. The details are like the peel, the seeds, and the juice. Watch me while I show you.”

The old model: We are a failing school. The new model: We made AYP by making Safe Harbor. We are no longer a failing school.

The old model: We are here for the kids. We are here to teach them. The new model: We are here for student achievement. Our job is to help kids learn.

Old model: The “test” was our enemy. It is trying to trick kids. The new model: We made peace with the test and quit making excuses. Our students deserve to learn what they have to learn to pass these tests.

In closing As our culture shifted to one of “Intervention for All,” we had to make some very thoughtful decisions. Happens one step at a time. There are many variables that make the difference.-

Goal for today: By the end of the session today, you will be able to identify 3-5 changes our school made in the last two years that increased our student achievement and helped us make AYP.

Your turn: Turn to your shoulder partner and share at least three things you learned that our school does to support all learners. Jot down one thing you will take back to your school that will increase student achievement for your EL students and all students.