Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Participatory Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Improve program impact by increasing use of evidence-based practices Relevance Increase program relevance and diversity of constituents served.
Advertisements

Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
Audience: Local school/PTA leaders (PTA president, school principal, school board members, PTA board) Presenter: State/district PTA leader.
The Community Themes and Strengths Assessment A How-To Guide.
The Core Competencies for Youth Development Professionals were developed with leadership from the OPEN Initiative, Missouri Afterschool Network (MASN),
Community Outreach Strategies 101
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Social Action.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using Internet-based Tools to Promote Community Health and Development.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Participatory Approaches to Planning Community Interventions.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the PAHO Guide for Documenting Health Promotion Initiatives.
Succeeding in the first 1000 days EARLY IS GOOD, EARLIER IS BETTER.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Some Core Values, Principles, and Assumptions to Guide the Work.
Historical Research.
A Healthy Place to Live, Learn, Work and Play:
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Healthy Cities / Healthy Communities.
Community Needs Assessments Thomas P. Holland, Ph.D., Professor UGA Institute for Nonprofit Organizations.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Choosing Questions and Planning the Evaluation.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Including Youth on Your Board, Commission, or Committee.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Community (Locality) Development.
Investing in Change: Funding Collective Impact
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Techniques For Leading Group Discussions.
Getting Started in Service Learning Lemons to Lemonade Program Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation 2009.
Systems Advocacy: helping systems help families BETH OLSON, MSW.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Evaluation: Building the Evidence To Demonstrate Impacts and Outcomes Latrice Rollins, PhD, MSW Assistant Director of Evaluation and Institutional Assessment.
HIV AND HOUSING WORKSHOP : JOHANNESBURG 14—19 SEPTEMBER 2014 CONGEH PRESENTATION ON ADVOCACY AND NETWORK.
Including Youth on Your Board, Commission, or Committee.
Multilingualism Serving Social Inclusion and Professional Development.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Identifying and Analyzing Stakeholders and Their Interests.
The “Recipe” for Systems Change The Vision The Current Status/Self- Assessment & Objective Evaluation The Goal(s) The Objectives The plan of action Who.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Communities That Care.
Ethics of Community-Based Prevention Research: A Reflection and Dialogue Stephen B. Fawcett University of Kansas.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Developing and Using Criteria and Processes to Set Priorities.
Community-based Participatory Action
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Choosing a Consultant.
1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.
Chapter 17 Managing Work Teams Hellriegel, Jackson, and Slocum MANAGEMENT: A Competency-Based Approach South-Western College Publishing Copyright © 2002.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Developing Multisector Task Forces or Action Committees for the Initiative.
October 20 th, Beliefs and Expectations for Site Council Seek and listen to the insights of all stakeholder perspectives and groups. Deal with issues.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Community-based Participatory Action.
This was developed as part of the Scottish Government’s Better Community Engagement Programme.
Identifying and Analyzing Stakeholders and Their Interests
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas The Strategic Prevention Framework.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using Community Sectors to Reach Targets and Agents of Change.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Collaborative Leadership.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Institute of Medicine’s Community Health Improvement Process (CHIP)
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Developing a Local Time Dollars Program.
Community (Locality) Development. What is locality development? Locality development is community building through improving the process by which things.
- CAT 1 - Developing the Organization: By Recognizing the Importance and Relevance of Student Voices in Developing a Positive School Climate.
Choosing Questions and Planning the Evaluation. What do we mean by choosing questions? Evaluation questions are the questions your evaluation is meant.
Advancing learning through service Tamara Thorpe Trainer | Coach | Consultant Region 2 NAFSA Albuquerque, NM.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Developing Multisector Collaborations.
Community Practice for Community Change
Building Teams and Empowering Members 1. Empowerment Empowerment is not bestowed by a leader, it is the process of an individual enabling himself to take.
Developing Multisector Task Forces or Action Committees for the Initiative.
Youth Participatory Evaluation in a Public School District
Participatory Evaluation
Trust Matters Workplace Skills: Builds Trusting Relationships
Developing a Plan for Involving Volunteers
The Strategic Prevention Framework
Participatory Evaluation
Involving Parents in Systems of Care.
Action Research Designs
Evaluation tools training
Healthy Cities / Healthy Communities
BASIC PRINCIPLES OF GAME THEORY AND PARTICIPATORY DECISION-MAKING
Capturing stories of change and The Most Significant Change technique
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Participatory Evaluation

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas What is participatory evaluation? Participatory evaluation is an evaluation that involves all the stakeholders in a project - those directly affected by it or by carrying it out - in every phase of evaluating it, and in applying the results of that evaluation to the improvement of the work.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Why would you use participatory evaluation? Advantages of participatory evaluation: It gives you a better perspective on both the initial needs of the project's beneficiaries, and on its ultimate effects. It can get you information you wouldn't get otherwise. It tells you what worked and what didn't from the perspective of those most directly involved - beneficiaries and staff. It can tell you why something does or doesn't work. It results in a more effective project. It empowers stakeholders. It can provide a voice for those who are often not heard. It teaches skills that can be used in employment and other areas of life. It bolsters self-confidence and self-esteem in those who may have little of either. It demonstrates to people ways in which they can take more control of their lives. It encourages stakeholder ownership of the project. It can spark creativity in everyone involved. It encourages working collaboratively. It fits into a larger participatory effort.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Why wouldn't you use participatory evaluation? Disadvantages of participatory evaluation: It takes more time than conventional process. It takes the establishment of trust among all participants in the process. You have to make sure that everyone's involved, not just "leaders" of various groups. You have to train people to understand evaluation and how the participatory process works, as well as teaching them basic research skills. You have to get buy-in and commitment from participants. People's lives - illness, child care and relationship problems, getting the crops in, etc. - may cause delays or get in the way of the evaluation. You may have to be creative about how you get, record, and report information. Funders and policy makers may not understand or believe in participatory evaluation.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas When would you use participatory evaluation? When you're already committed to a participatory process for your project. When you have the time, or when results are more important than time. When you can convince funders that it's a good idea. When there may be issues in the community or population that outside evaluators (or program providers, for that matter) aren't likely to be aware of. When you need information that it will be difficult for anyone outside the community or population to get. When part of the goal of the project is to empower participants and help them develop transferable skills. When you want to bring the community or population together.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Who should be involved in participatory evaluation? All stakeholders, including: Participants or beneficiaries. Project line staff and/or volunteers. Administrators. Outside evaluators, if they're involved. Community officials. Others whose lives are affected by the project.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas How do you conduct a participatory evaluation? Recruit stakeholders as participant evaluators. Train evaluators. Name and frame the issue. Develop a theory of practice to address it. Determine the evaluation questions. Collect information. Analyze the information. Use your analysis to celebrate what worked and adjust the rest to improve the project. Stick with it indefinitely.