State Resource Assessment (SRA) Peter Bautista WATCAC January 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FARM SERVICE AGENCY Conservation Reserve Program Conservation Reserve Program.
Advertisements

Conservation Programs and Agricultural Policy The New Landscape Bradley D. Lubben Extension Agricultural Economist Kansas State University Policy and ag.
Maryland Higher Education Commission BRAC Higher Education Investment Fund Technical Assistance Meeting June 21, 2010.
FARM BILL UPDATE. LAST FARM BILL: A LOT ACCOMPLISHED ON WORKING LANDS.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Mary Webb-Marek Zone Forester USDA-NRCS Bryan, Texas Longleaf Pine Initiative Longleaf Pine Initiative Rick.
Programs for Water and Energy Efficiency Technical Assistance and Cost-share Opportunities from the Natural Resources Conservation Service.
“ Know Your Farmer; Know Your Food” USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. “Organic EQIP” September 2010.
IPM in NRCS Programs Joe Bagdon USDA - NRCS National Water & Climate Center Amherst, Massachusetts.
Helping People Help the Land National Organic Program and the Organic Initiative.
Working Lands Programs Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 Jim Pease Dept of Agricultural & Applied Economics Virginia Tech 540/
U.S. Department of Agriculture Structure and Programs
Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska – Lincoln Bob Broz University of Missouri - Columbia.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Agroforestry Assistance §History §Technical §Financial.
Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Grazing – Our Most Commonly Used Conservation Practices.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Desired Outcomes / Impacts ActionsKnowledge Occurs when there is a behavior change based upon what participants have learned (medium term): -Adoption of.
New Jersey Local Work Group Pilot Project Camden County, Gloucester County, Freehold and Morris County Soil Conservation Districts.
FY2013 PROGRAM STATUS 2012 Farm Bill (?) FY2013 Budget – CR until March  Limited authority to work on Programs 1.
The Field Office Technical Guide and Other Technical Resources CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
Jennifer Abbey NRCS District Conservationist Plant City Field Office.
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Title II – Conservation Environmental Quality Incentives Program and other Conservation Programs 2002 Farm Bill Education Conference Kansas City, Missouri.
2015 Georgia Organics Conference Recipe for Change Engaging Veteran Farmers Bryan Barrett GA-NRCS GA-NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service 1.
Arkansas Conservation Districts Training Program Power Point 2 Locally Led Planning.
Green Payments Now—What’s Missing? WWF Workshop Building the Scientific Basis for Green Payments April 14-15, 2005.
United States Department of Agriculture Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative Illinois River and Eucha-Spavinaw Watershed Initiative Bayou.
USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service Kenneth Morgan, Program Specialist USDA - NRCS Phone: (352) Phone: (352) FAX: (352)
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
NRCSNRCS 1 Natural Resources Conservation Service Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Updates.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Tom Krapf Assistant State Conservationist NRCS - Wisconsin The Regional Conservation Partnership Program.
APPLYING CONSERVATION TO THE TEXAS LANDSCAPE Norman Bade, NRCS State Resource Conservationist Conservation Provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill (Farm Security.
Increasing the Adoption of the Management of Ag Drainage Water for Conservation Benefits “Into the Future” by Paul J. Sweeney
Is NRCS “EQIPed” to Get the Most from EQIP? State Allocation and Ranking Procedures Ralph Heimlich Agricultural Conservation Economics for Environmental.
Our Mission Helping people help the land. NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service Our Vision Productive Lands ---- Healthy Environment.
Sediment & Nutrient Management in the L’Anguille River Watershed St. Francis County Cost Share Project Patricia Perry St. Francis County Conservation.
  Vision: Productive Lands—Healthy Environment   Mission: Helping People Help the Land   Guiding Principles Service Technical Excellence Partnerships.
Conservation By:Cole, Sam, Beth, Bryant and Chris.
Desired Outcomes / Impacts ActionsKnowledge Occurs when there is a behavior change based upon what participants have learned (medium term): Development.
Green Jobs and Agriculture Green Today, Jobs Tomorrow Conference May 11, 2009 James Johnson, Director Environmental Stewardship Division Michigan Department.
An Overview of Air, Water & Soil in Agriculture Barbara McCarthy, Ph.D. Environmental Health Department Colorado State University.
2 2 State Component The intent of the State Component is to provide flexibility to NRCS State Conservationists to target CIG funds to individual producers.
Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative (MRBI) Request for Proposal (RFP) Aaron Lauster Acting MRBI Coordinator USDA Natural Resources Conservation.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Name Title Location, Kansas Helping People Help the Land Attachment 3 to Bulletin KS dated 7/30/2012.
1 Food, Conservation and Energy Act of Information on NRCS Conservation Programs EQIP-Environmental Quality Incentives Program WHIP-Wildlife Habitat.
Soil & Water Conservation Districts HELPING LAND OWNERS PROTECT, MAINTAIN, AND ENHANCE THEIR NATURAL RESOURCES.
C.E.A.P. Conservation Effects Assessment Project Wayne M. Maresch Director Resources Inventory & Assessment Division USDA - NRCS.
1 CONSERVATION STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM (CSP) Continuous Sign-Up Kick-Off Steve Parkin Stewardship Program Team August 10, 2009.
Local Working Group Meetings.  Local Working Groups have an opportunity to provide NRCS with recommendations on how to focus program funds in their local.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Recommendations From the New Jersey Climate Adaptation Alliance Marjorie B. Kaplan, Associate Director Rutgers.
The Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) promotes coordination between NRCS and its partners to deliver conservation assistance to producers.
Local Input – Shaping the Soil & Water Resources Conservation Act Appraisal National Association of Conservation Districts Annual Meeting Orlando, FL 2.
Resource Management Goal “Use every acre of land within its capability and treat it according to its needs” Hugh Hammond Bennett Founder Soil Conservation.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Environmental Quality Improvement Program (EQIP) Edwards Aquifer State Resource Concern (EA SRC) Jim.
Natural Resources Conservation Service “Helping People Help the Land” June 8, 2016.
Introduction to the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) June 10, 2016 Carol Rivera– Program Manager An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP).
Local Work Group Reports Accomplishment & Identified Needs.
Regional Conservation Partnership Program Partnership Information Sherre Copeland, Partnership Liaison.
Soil Conservation.
Natural Resource Conservation Service
Water Conservation Update
Texas Water Resources Institute
District Board Meetings Local Work Group Meetings
VOLUNTARY CONSERVATION- WORKING? STRENGTHEN PARTNERSHIPS?
Conservation Activity Plans (CAP)
Agriculture and Soil Unit 9: Food April 22, 2009 Sanders.
Presentation transcript:

State Resource Assessment (SRA) Peter Bautista WATCAC January 2012

In 2011, the USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) conducted a statewide assessment to identify natural resources in Washington that might be impacted by agriculture, grazing, and private forestry operations. History of State Resource Assessment

The assessment addressed natural resources: Soil Water Air Plants Animals (both farm animals and wildlife) Humans Energy History of State Resource Assessment

Natural resources of greatest concern were identified and prioritized based on: Data gathered Local and regional stakeholder and shareholder input Analysis and assessment History of State Resource Assessment

How the SRA is Used The State Resource Assessment: Helps NRCS focus attention and funding Guides collaboration with partners that have similar concerns. Is an on-going process that will be adjusted to account for new innovations and technologies

NRCS gathers state resource data for assessment LWGs identify resource concerns and priorities NRCS submits budget based on top resource concerns National headquarters evaluates the proposal NRCS receives funding and goals based on proposal NRCS Implements practices to treat priority resource concerns State Resource Assessment Process

1. Soil erosion – sheet, rill, wind 2. Water quality degradation – sediment 3. Water quality degradation – nutrients 4. Degraded plant condition – undesirable plant productivity 5. Inefficient use of irrigation 6. Inadequate habitat for fish and wildlife – habitat degradation 7. Degraded plant condition – excessive plant pest pressure 8. Water quality degradation – pathogens 9. Water quality degradation – pesticides 10. Degraded plant condition – wildfire 11. Energy NRCS-WA Priority Natural Resource Concerns

A New Budget Process in 2011 For the first time, NRCS-WA was asked to submit a budget proposal based on treating priority resource concerns in Washington State. NRCS National Headquarters evaluated proposals to determine states’ budgets for the next three (3) years. Performance measures will be based on the State Resource Assessment and each states’ individual goals and priorities. FY 2012 is a transitional year By FY 2013 NRCS-WA will be expected to meet all goals set by the State Resource Assessment

The Future of Funding Stakeholder support and participation in the SRA continues to be very important. Funding pools will be set based on the priority resource concerns, Payment schedules will only include practices associated with the identified resource concerns. Ranking criteria will favor applications that treat the priority resource concerns.

For More Information Contact NRCS-WA to look at the State Resource Assessment 2011: Priority Resource Concerns booklet. Call the NRCS state office at Obtain a copy of the booklet on the web at For more info on your local work group, contact your local NRCS Field office.