Presentation to TEACHING & LEARNING COMMITTEE 2010 International Student Barometer & Student Barometer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Advertisements

Directorate of Corporate Affairs International Student Barometer - international student feedback Dr Sue Piggott International Director.
Making the Case for Christian Higher Education: New Challenges, New Opportunities Laurie A. Schreiner, Ph.D. Azusa Pacific University CCCU CEO Conference.
The PGT Student Experience Dan Hooper. Who am I? Daniel Hooper Exeter Graduate – BA Politics 1 st Class MA Public Administration and Public Policy Army.
Summary of Results from Spring 2014 Presented: 11/5/14.
Building our Future: The First 100 Days A presentation and summary of survey responses and emerging themes.
2008/2009 Surveys of Indiana University Graduate Students and Chairs/Directors of Graduate Studies 1.
 The Global Marketplace for HE  Warwick’s position in the Global Marketplace  Strategies for the Global Marketplace  Questions  Your ideas! Overview.
Role of students in quality assurance UPQUAL- Kraków
International Tutoring Evaluation Matrix Bastian Fähnrich April 2011 Based on Meetings & Reports/Study Journals with International Tutors 2011 N.B.! Qualitative.
Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.
1 Student Shoreline Community College Results from the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)
Teaching & Learning Presentation to Board July 2007.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Welcome!. Project Insight Principles Student Focused Enhancing services to students to enrich the learning experience is at the core of the decisions.
Enhancing the Student Experience: Top 10 Education for Exeter Janice Kay, Ashley Petrons, Michele Shoebridge, Keith Zimmerman.
Implementing a framework for employability Penny Renwick, Pro Vice Chancellor, Manchester Metropolitan University.
Benchmarks from the Harvard Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey University Faculty Meeting October.
EAIE Annual Conference 2011, Copenhagen Perils, pitfalls and new opportunities in international education Case study: The United Arab Emirates (UAE)
The enterprise university University of Plymouth An ambitious university where innovation and creativity are at the heart of all activities The enterprise.
DIT STUDENT SATISFACTION SURVEY 2010 Dr Rachel O Connor Mark Russell Campus Life & Student Retention Office DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.
University strategy Jan 2012 update. Our core strategies.
LEAGUE TABLES AND NEW KPIs VC’s OPEN MEETING Anita Wright Head of Planning November 2013.
Johnson & Wales University’s Strategic Plan Denver Campus Presentation.
Full-time Faculty  This survey had 63 questions specific to our experience at BMCC and our departments.  There were 10 categories of questions: 1) Your.
Understanding the postgraduate experience Chris Park Director, Lancaster University Graduate School Senior Associate, Higher Education Academy (HEA)
The International Office Sandra Morris 25 th October 2006.
Teaching and Learning Grants Workshop Teaching and Learning Enhancement at UQ Professor Deborah Terry 8 February 2008.
Faculty of Business. USC’s Faculty of Business Commenced in 1996 with: –289 Undergraduate students –8 Staff 10 years later in 2006: –1212 Undergraduate.
SPE Engagement Survey Results Summary Digital Media Group Masek November 2012 Confidential 1.
Raising the Bar – Implications for Learning, Teaching and the Student Experience Suzanne Cholerton Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Teaching)
Mark Hallett Senior Director, International Student & Scholar Services International Students at CSU: Dramatic Growth and a Quality Experience.
University Strategy Marcus Williams. Contents 0.1 Strategic goals 0.2 Re-positioning 0.3 Campus infrastructure 0.4 Sussex off campus 0.5 Malaysia Office.
HONG KONG AND SINGAPORE 22 – 30 MARCH EXCELLENCE IN RESEARCH AND INNOVATION  Focus on Areas of Strength (Flagship Programme/Research Niches)
Entering Student Surveys (UG & Grad) and Non-Enrolling Survey (UG): Fall 2011 November 1, 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Principal's briefing - Strategy and Structure 7 th March 2012.
The learning experience and satisfaction of management students in a diverse learning environment: A Cross Campus Study at the University of Toronto Dr.
BM0019 ICA2 Marketing Presented By: Chong Kai Ling (042304Q)
International Student Experience ~ Sport’s Contribution Zena Wooldridge April 2010.
SINGAPORE ARTS FESTIVAL SURVEY 2006 AUDIENCE SURVEY - HIGHLIGHTS 30 Aug 2006.
Student Barometer Entry Wave 2011 All material strictly copyright © IGI Services Ltd
Five key nationalities represent 52% of Australia’s enrolments in all sectors Nationality YTD November 2005 YTD November 2006 %Change Share of Australian.
Study in the UK Your Name and Here!. Huddersfield Easy to reach 1 hour to Manchester airport, 30 minutes to Manchester, 20 minutes to Leeds Beautiful.
Strategy Statement for the University of Southern Denmark December 16, 2013.
BEAMS – Using NSSE Data: Understanding the Benchmark Reports.
Directors of Student Education October 2014 Vivien Jones.
Prospective Student Decision Making Rachel Sandison Head of SRAS.
Enrolling Student Surveys: Fall 2009 November 10, 2009.
Student Satisfaction Spring 2007 (long version) Institutional Research and Planning.
1 Quality Assurance in VET M. Kirsch & Y. Beernaert Internal Quality Assurance and the self-evaluation report Magda Kirsch & Yves Beernaert Bulgaria –
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
Kapil Bawa, Ph.D., Professor of Marketing, Zicklin School of Business Micheline Blum, Director, Baruch College Survey Research, Distinguished Lecturer,
Educational Excellence – Phase One Lisa Blazer & Dan Gelo Presenting.
Summary of VCU Student Satisfaction Fall 2012
Our Vision: Prosperous communities and transformed lives Our Mission: Creating new realities by opening endless opportunities.
Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey
Leaders’ Forum • February 10, 2005
Irish Survey of Student Engagement (ISSE) Results 2016
A nationwide US student survey
International Student Barometer highlights 2016
Risks & Opportunities AN INTERCULTURAL, MULTI-STAKEHOLDER APPROACH
Student Satisfaction Spring 2009 Short Version
Student Satisfaction Spring 2009
University of Limerick Academic Year 2017/18
Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007
McPherson College, Fall 2017
Departure View Glossary
Beyond Graduate Survey 2015 Summary Analysis
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2018 Undergraduate Trends
College of Business Scorecard
Presentation transcript:

Presentation to TEACHING & LEARNING COMMITTEE 2010 International Student Barometer & Student Barometer

Management Summary ISB Overall satisfaction at UQ remains high (89%) – ranked in top 5 in Australia Excellent response 38% Current students main marketing asset (28% recommend - up 2%) Postgraduate population particularly supportive –( HDR 89%) Attracting students - diverse range of markets – reliance on China, Malaysia, Singapore Large UG sample – growth at PGT/HDR? Diverse range of subjects – spread the risk UQ reputation continues to be a major decision-making factor - word of mouth promotion, staff, students, alumni, parents – core marketing efforts

Management Summary ISB Less reliant on agents than competition Application processes are slow– especially for HDR (manage expectations) 10% student sample looking for further study – opportunity? Strengths – safety; good place to be; library; learning technologies Weaknesses – Host friends; employability/careers; faith provision; cost

Arrival satisfaction – element year on year comparison (International Students) 1: Very dissatisfied 4: Very satisfied Arrival Satisfaction

Arrival satisfaction – element year on year comparison (International Students) 1: Very dissatisfied 4: Very satisfied Arrival Satisfaction

Matrix Elements in the top right quadrant are important to students and perform well. Those in the bottom right quadrant are important, but do not perform well and should be improved. Elements in the top and bottom left quadrants are of lower priority. These elements should be reviewed and monitored to ensure that we focus on the most important issues for students. Institution Importance Institution Satisfaction IMPROVE MAINTAINMONITOR REVIEW APPENDIX

The learning matrix shows the Institution performance (average student satisfaction) against how important that element is for its students ( average student importance). Institution Importance Institution Satisfaction Learning Matrix (International Students) Learning Matrix

Learning satisfaction – element year on year comparison (International Students) 1: Very dissatisfied 4: Very satisfied Learning Satisfaction

Learning satisfaction – element year on year comparison (International Students) 1: Very dissatisfied 4: Very satisfied Learning Satisfaction

10 Learning satisfaction Institution Overall (% satisfied - International = Institution ABC = Faculty A – Arts B – Sci C – SBS D – Health E – NRAVS F – EAIT G – BEL Benchmarking – Learning Satisfaction

The Living Matrix shows the Institution performance (average student satisfaction) against how important that element is for its students (average student importance). Institution Importance Institution Satisfaction Living Matrix (International Students) Living Matrix

Living satisfaction – element year on year comparison (International Students) APPENIX 1: Very dissatisfied 4: Very satisfied Living Satisfaction

Living satisfaction – element year on year comparison (International Students) APPENIX 1: Very dissatisfied 4: Very satisfied Living Satisfaction

The Support Matrix shows the Institution performance (average student satisfaction) against the Institution usage (average student usage). Institution Usage Institution Satisfaction Support Matrix (International Students) Support Matrix

Support satisfaction – element year on year comparison (International Students) 1: Very dissatisfied 4: Very satisfied Support Satisfaction

Support satisfaction – element year on year comparison (International Students) 1: Very dissatisfied 4: Very satisfied Support Satisfaction

Management Summary SB Overall satisfaction at UQ is high (92%) - Good response 23% - above Aus benchmark Current students main marketing asset (37% recommend) word of mouth promotion - staff, students, alumni, parents – core marketing efforts UG & PG (course work) application processes working well – issue with satisfaction at HDR Strengths – safety, good place to be, sports facilities; halls welfare, university orientation Employability/work experience/ careers advice; living costs; Graduate School support; welcome and meeting staff

The learning matrix shows the Institution performance (average student satisfaction) against how important that element is for its students ( average student importance). Institution Importance Institution Satisfaction Learning Matrix (Domestic Students) Learning Matrix

The Living Matrix shows the Institution performance (average student satisfaction) against how important that element is for its students (average student importance). Institution Importance Institution Satisfaction Living Matrix (Domestic Students) Living Matrix

The Support Matrix shows the Institution performance (average student satisfaction) against the Institution usage (average student usage). Institution Usage Institution Satisfaction Support Matrix (Domestic Students) Support Matrix