Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Child Protection Cases A Presentation by the National Child Welfare Resource Center for Legal and Judicial Issues ABA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
St. Louis Public Schools Human Resources Support for District Improvement Initiatives (Note: The bullets beneath each initiative indicate actions taken.
Advertisements

Overview of Child Protection Process Presented to: Task Force on Child Protection August 3, 2007 Bill Navas Office of Attorney General 13 th Judicial Circuit.
Effective Casework Practice (Foster Care) Ongoing assessment of childs needs and interventions Ongoing assessment and implementation of services/supports.
Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts Child Protection Data Courts Project Using Data to Continuously Improve Illinois Courts.
Practice Guidelines for Attorneys Representing Parents in Abuse, Neglect and Termination of Parental Rights Cases Cindi Wood, JD John Chambers, JD February.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Supporting the education of looked after learners Rob Mills LAC Education Coordinator.
1 During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training. You will answer questions based upon information.
Assessment and eligibility
CQI in Idaho August 20, 2013 Presenters: Debra Alsaker-Burke, Statewide Child Protection Manager, Idaho Supreme Court Sarah Siron, Mgmt. Analyst, Sr. for.
Reinstatement of Parental Rights: The Oklahoma Experience Presented by: Judge Doris Fransein Richard, Ro’derick, and Richard Jr. Hampton Kimberly Lynn.
 Clarence H. Carter, Director, Department of Economic Security Edward B. Truman, Special Counsel, Arizona Attorney General’s Office 1.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Denver Family Integrated Drug Court
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
YOUTH ATTORNEY. GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 1:  The primary change in the general provisions article is the establishment of an attorney for children.
GUARDIANSHIP IN UTAH Legal Terms and Procedures. HOW DO I KNOW IF MY FAMILY MEMBER NEEDS GUARDIANSHIP? These questions are directly from the Utah Protective.
AN OUTLINE OF IT’S ROLES AND STRUCTURE IN MATTERS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES RI’s Family Court System.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
1 Public Justice Center Baltimore Outreach Services.
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
Parents with Mental Illness in the Child Protection System Susan Smalling.
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Pre-Trial Management of Criminal Cases
Abuse allegations in custody cases. Child Welfare generally responds to cases when the child is in direct contact with the perpetrator – however, they.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
Seen and Heard Involving Children in Dependency Court Andrea Khoury ABA Center on Children and the Law.
The Family Drug and Alcohol Court Sophie Kershaw Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust Copyright presentation: FDAC Team.
Jill Malat Office of Civil Legal Aid Children’s Representation Program
Family/Whānau Caregiver Assessment and Approval Engaging with families to achieve better outcomes for children and young people.
Seen and Heard Involving Children in Dependency Court Andrea Khoury ABA Center on Children and the Law Judge Nushin Sayfie Justin Taylor.
Seamless System of Information Sharing Safe Children’s Action Group Plenary Session June 26, 2002.
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
Child Protection Conferences Caroline Alexander Service Coordinator for Child Protection.
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Early Intervention EYFS Framework Guide. Early intervention The emphasis placed on early intervention strategies – addressing issues early on in a child’s.
Seen and Heard Involving Children in Dependency Court Andrea Khoury ABA Center on Children and the Law Amy LaMere Attorney Guardian Ad Litem.
Presented by Margaret Robbins Program Director, TMCEC.
1 Issues in Preparing and Supporting the Workforce to Implement the Part C Referral Requirements of CAPTA Cordelia C. Robinson, Ph.D., RN Departments of.
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
BJA/AU Criminal Courts Technical Assistance Project Differentiated Case Management in the General and Limited Jurisdiction Court Settings Presentation.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
Department of Human Services
National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement Teleconference June 3, 2010 National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal & Judicial.
Hon. Robin Sage Tara Garlinghouse  Continuation of study of legal system to assess the quality of our child protection hearings  Project Goals: ▪ Establish.
The Future of Court Improvement in Child Protection Cases A Presentation by the National Child Welfare Resource Center for Legal and Judicial Issues ABA.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
A.J. (Tony) Brandenburg August 21, 2015 TCAP Tribal Court Conference Protecting Indian Children (760)
DISPOSITION. Dispositional Hearing  What is it?  A dispositional hearing is required whenever a petition for dependency or neglect has been sustained.
November 2015 Common weaknesses in local authorities judged inadequate under the single inspection framework – a summary.
Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.
Permanency.
Supervising to Permanency PRESENTED BY THE ALLIANCE FOR CHILD WELFARE EXCELLENCE.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
IV-D Impact on Tribal Clerks of Courts 10:45 a.m. – 12:00 PM, July 15, 2009 National Tribal Child Support Association Ninth Annual Conference Attorney.
10 Tips for Judges on Establishing Adult Guardianships Mary Joy Quinn Director, Probate State of California County of San Francisco.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011.
Roles and Responsibilities of the IRO. Role and Responsibilities of IRO When consulted about the guidance, children and young people were clear what they.
The Changing World of Guardianships
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
House Human Services Committee
Background checks are required by state and federal law prior to CA/DCYF staff authorizing an individual (other than a parent) to have unsupervised access.
Presentation transcript:

Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Child Protection Cases A Presentation by the National Child Welfare Resource Center for Legal and Judicial Issues ABA Center on Children and the Law May 2002 Copyright ©MMII By the American Bar Association

Potential Benefits of Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Court Improvement Judicial decisions based on more complete information. Agency planning and court decisions more in sync. Courts and agencies identify and diagnose cross- disciplinary and agency-judicial problems. Improved mutual respect and courtesy. Better outcomes for abused and neglected children.

Some Typical Interdisciplinary Problems Excess waiting time in court. Insufficient case documentation and preparation for court. Incomplete testimony and evidence. Mutual hostility or wariness. Inefficient process for scheduling hearings. Turnover of judges and caseworkers. Unhelpful or wrongly focused court reports. Difficulties with access to services.

Some Interdisciplinary Court Improvement Issues Investigations and assessments. Court reports and pleadings. Case preparation and presentation. Scheduling of hearings and appearances. Co-location of services. Joint projects. Automated performance evaluation and case management. Mutual relationships. Consumer surveys.

Investigations When might the court be involved? –Court ordered entry when parties do not cooperate. –Court ordered access to documents. –Court ordered interviews or depositions of non cooperative witnesses. Why is this important? These procedures are not often needed. –To encourage workers not to give up on investigations. –To provide more complete information to the judge. How can we establish these processes? –Enact laws? –Establish the procedures through the legal process itself. –Then work out logistics with the court.

Assessments and Access to Complete Information Why? –Early permanency and well focused early case plans. Examples : –Criminal records –Justice system involvement –Mental health issues –Drug treatment –Prior court proceedings

Scenario A parent has been involved in drug related criminal activities for years. Several times, as a condition of probation or parole, the parent has been ordered into drug treatment. Each time, the parent failed to successfully complete the treatment. The child protection agency, not knowing about the history of criminal involvement or the court ordered drug treatment, develops a case plan calling for additional drug treatment. If the agency had the full criminal and treatment records, it could have decided whether to fast track the case and move more quickly for a new permanent home for the child.

Getting Information More Consistently 1. We need to make sure that our law allows the agency to get the records. 2. We need to set up good interagency communications and information sharing procedures. 3. The child protection agency needs forms and routine procedures that require caseworkers to get very complete records at the beginning of each case. 4. The child protection agency needs good legal help when parents or other agencies do not agree to provide information. 5. There should be a routine and swift process for agency attorneys to go to court to get information when the agency needs it and isn’t getting cooperation.

Steps to Gain Early Access to Needed Confidential Information  Attorneys and courts restructure early motions and hearings to ensure that court orders will, when appropriate, include include orders for assessments and access to records.  Example: Use shelter care hearing to begin the process of getting timely access to drug treatment records.  Example: There are criminal records checks of parents and other adults that might reside in the child’s household, and the agency informs the judge of the results.  Attorneys and caseworkers routinely inform the judge when they may need records and information.  Judges routinely ask attorneys and parties about the child’s and parents’ involvement with other systems and treatment.

Court Reports and Pleadings  Purpose of court report and pleadings  Help the judge decide issues before the judge at the specific hearing.  Convince the judge of the need to make decisions requested by the agency.  Strategy of court reports and pleadings  Provide relevant information and eliminate extraneous information.  Make it convenient for judge to use your suggestions -- provide the information in the most helpful format.  Linkage of court reports and court orders  Format the court report to match the format of the court order.  Attorneys, judges, and agency managers consult in designing general formats for court reports and court orders.

Case Preparation and Presentation An example: The termination petition the judge couldn’t grant. Ideas: –Interdisciplinary discussions of agency case preparation and presentation -- include judges, CASA administrators, and defense counsel. –Reformatting of court reports. –Develop sample good and mediocre examples of court reports and pleadings. Develop uniform forms and policies for case documentation. –Information from visits. –Information from contacts with services providers. Develop protocols for case preparation and information sharing with defense counsel.

Scheduling of Hearings and Appearances Goals: –Each hearing occurs at a specified time. –Needs and convenience of attorneys and agency workers are taken into account in scheduling hearings. The ability of the court to make scheduling improvements is linked, in part, to judicial caseloads and workloads. In some states, elected court clerks set court schedules. The agency and bar must cooperate in improved schedules by reliably being present and prepared on time.

Co-location of Services Why co-locate services? –Time and efficiency, permanency and safety What would they be in an ideal world? –Paternity testing –Parent locator services –Psychological testing –Drug testing –And? Typical features: –One time only or episodic types of services –Not performed by public child protection agency –May require court order to gain cooperation –Important to for moving forward the court process

Joint Projects Why?” –Agencies, attorneys, and courts necessarily work with one another, and it takes joint efforts to improve the working relationships. Limits of joint projects: –Projects addressing particular issues or problems must include persons taking different views of the issues. –Projects must deal with issues of common concern. –Judges must remain independent concerning substantive issues coming before the court.

Examples of Joint Projects Problem solving task forces -- e.g., for reduction of delays. Protocol development. Establishing “problem solving courts” -- e.g., drug courts. Establishing ADR, such as mediation or family group conferences.

Collaboration in Automated Performance Measurement: Purposes of Information Exchange Measuring performance regarding permanency: –Time between events -- e.g., removal from home to adoption. –Changes of placements –Disruptions of placements intended to be permanent –Rates of permanency alternatives -- return home, adoption, legal guardianship, etc. Measuring performance regarding safety: –New incidents of abuse or neglect, during or after court involvement –Comparing safety results for different case categories (e.g., cases in drug court) Measuring performance regarding fairness and thoroughness: –Notice on both parents –Notice on foster parents –Presence of counsel during hearings –Presence of parents and age appropriate children during hearings

Collaboration in Automated Performance Measurement: Automated Data Exchange to Help Evaluate Performance 1. Transmitting information from the agency to the court: Date of removal (permanency). Demographic information: age, sex, ethnic background, sibling groups (diagnosis of problems). Changes of placement (permanency). Incidents of reoccurrence (safety). Disruptions of permanent placements (permanency). 2. Transmitting information from the court to the agency : Date of key legal events -- petitions, adjudication, termination of parental rights, and adoption (permanency). Presence of caseworkers, key witnesses, attorneys at hearings(quality assurance).

Collaboration in Automated Case Management: Future Uses of Computers Electronic transfer of reports and petitions. Automated but selective downloading of generally undisputed information on each case. –E.g., demographic information and addresses of foster parents. –The information then populates the court’s computer screens screens and documents. –The downloaded information aids in automatically generation of notices, reminders, and other documents. Capacity to download reports, petitions, and motions from different parties –Judge decides what and when to download. –On demand, system incorporates information into court orders and findings. –Judge can modify downloaded information.

Collaboration in Automated Case Management: Future Uses of Computers (Continued)  Templates for agency and court documents.  Agency staff and attorneys can file documents by completing court templates.  Staff can download information from their data system into the templates.  Templates have built-in reminders for requirements like reasonable efforts, ICWA.  Templates for court orders have built-in reminders of issues the court is to to address, such as compliance of parties with prior court orders.

Interdisciplinary and Cross System Relationships: “Playing Social Worker” When is an attorney or judge “playing social worker”? When the judge or attorney tries to build strong personal relationships with clients? –What about in drug court? When an authority figure tries to be a father or mother figure? When the judge modifies details of the case plan (or an attorney asks the judge to do so)? –What if the judge modifies the case plan because the parties have a dispute about its terms? –What if someone introduced evidence supporting the modification? When the judge asks penetrating questions? When you are convinced the attorney or judge is wrong?

Interdisciplinary and Cross System Relationships: Mutual Respect Workers encourage people to come to court?  Note: Attendance at court hearings in Cincinnati and Grand Rapids.  Note: Foster parents not appearing in court. Court hearings encourage people to come to court.  Court hearings are substantive.  Judges deal with parties and witnesses respectfully. Behavior in court is professional.  Judge prepares for court.  Caseworkers and attorneys prepare before coming to court.  Professionals dress for court.  Judges, attorneys, and caseworkers are respectful.

Consumer Surveys Public feedback.  Teachers, mandatory reporters. Consumer feedback.  Expert witnesses  Caseworkers and supervisors  Parents  Age appropriate children  Foster parents  Focus groups and surveys?  Agency help in this process?