A Randomized Study of the Effects of Defibrillator Implantation Early after Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Patients on Optimal Medical Therapy Gerhard.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linoxsmart S DX Master Study
Advertisements

ACTION Registry (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) Initial Report 1st Quarter 2007 Results Report prepared by: www. ncdr.com.
The prevalence of use of beta- blockers in secondary prevention of myocardial infarctions in patients hospitalized 1 Institute of Epidemiology and biostatistics,
The MADIT II Trial Multicenter Autonomic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Presented at the American College of Cardiology 51st Annual Scientific Session.
Presenter Disclosure Information
The Application of Propensity Score Analysis to Non-randomized Medical Device Clinical Studies: A Regulatory Perspective Lilly Yue, Ph.D.* CDRH, FDA,
Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II
RAte Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation A Randomized Comparison of Lenient Rate Control versus Strict Rate Control Concerning Morbidity.
Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS III) Trial
Allen Jeremias MD MSc, Sanjay Kaul MD, Luis Gruberg MD, Todd K. Rosengart MD, David L. Brown MD Divisions of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiothoracic.
Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention: Clinical Trials Alena Goldman, MD September 9, 2004.
Associations Between Outpatient Heart Failure Process of Care Measures and Mortality Gregg C. Fonarow, Nancy M. Albert, Anne B. Curtis, Mihai Gheorghiade,
Cardiac Resynchronization Heart Failure Study Cardiac Resynchronization Heart Failure Study Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions.
Myocardial Repair by Percutaneous Cell Transplantation of Autologous Skeletal Myoblast as a Stand Alone Procedure in Post Myocardial Infarction Chronic.
Thank You This PowerPoint document contains the images that you requested. Copyright Notice All Online Service materials, including, without limitation,
Widimsky P, Tousek P, Rokyta R, et al. Charles University Prague, CZ PRAGUE-7 Study (Hot Lines presenter)
MADIT Randomized Trial to Reduce Inappropriate Therapy (MADIT-RIT) Arthur J. Moss, MD for the MADIT-RIT Executive Committee AHA Late Breaking Trials November.
Effects of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomized trial -- the Losartan Heart Failure Survival.
Purpose To determine whether metoprolol controlled/extended release
Multivessel coronary disease diagnosed at the time of primary PCI for STEMI: complete revascularization versus conservative strategy. PRAGUE 13 trial O.
Preliminary results from the C-Pulse OPTIONS HF European Multicenter Post-Market Study Holger Hotz, CardioCentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Antonia Schulz,
ICD FOR PRIMARY PREVENTION EVIDENCE REVIEW
Sudden death as co-morbidity in patients following vascular intervention Sudden death as co-morbidity in patients following vascular intervention Impact.
Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2004 Presented by Dr. Gust H. Bardy SCD-HeFTSCD-HeFT.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
Cardiac Arrhythmias in Coronary Heart Disease SIGN 94.
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
Presenter Disclosure Information John F. Beshai, MD RethinQ Trial Results Disclosures Information: The following relationships exist related to this presentation:
CAST: Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial Purpose To determine whether therapy with class Ic antiarrhythmics to suppress asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic.
AIRE: Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy study Purpose To determine whether the ACE inhibitor ramipril reduces mortality in patients with evidence of heart.
Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPH On behalf of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Steering.
Which Early ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Therapy (WEST) Trial Paul W. Armstrong, WEST Steering Committee Published in The European Heart Journal.
IRIS Post-hoc Analysis Background IRIS compared the safety and efficacy of early ICD implantation with medical treatment alone in 898 patients at high.
CIBIS II Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study
CONFIDENTIAL SLIDE SET FOR THE CHAIR OF THE ACC08 Late Breaker; embargoed until 1 April 2008 Long-term Cardiac Arrhythmias recorded by Insertable Loop.
UC c EN. Through Medtronic sponsored research, the Transcatheter Aortic Valves clinical portfolio is studying over 11,000 subjects at over 125.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
1 Pulminiq™ Cyclosporine Inhalation Solution Pulmonary Drug Advisory Committee Meeting June 6, 2005 Statistical Evaluation Statistical Evaluation Jyoti.
Rosuvastatin 10 mg n=2514 Placebo n= to 4 weeks Randomization 6weeks3 monthly Closing date 20 May 2007 Eligibility Optimal HF treatment instituted.
Early Eplerenone Treatment in Patients with Acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction without Heart Failure REMINDER* Gilles Montalescot, Bertram Pitt,
2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial Aron Goldhirsch, Richard.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Clinical Effectiveness of CRT and ICD Therapy in.
Ventricular Arrhythmias:A General Cardiologist’s Assessment of Therapies in 2004 C.Richard Conti M.D. MACC.
Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy for Acute Myocardial Infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI) Trial ASSENT- 4 PCI Trial Presented at.
Ethical Scenario: Cardiovascular System
BLOCK HF Study Biventricular versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Atrioventricular Block – Preliminary Results.
These slides highlight a presentation at the Late Breaking Trial Session of the American College of Cardiology 52nd Annual Scientific Sessions in Chicago,
Update on the Watchman Device CRT 2010 Washington, DC
Defibrillator in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial
American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Stuart J. Connolly
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial Investigators
O’Connor Efficacy and Safety of Exercise Training as a Treatment Modality in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Results of A Randomized Controlled.
Preventing SCD With a WCD: Reviewing the Results of the VEST Trial
Jeff Macemon Waikato Cardiothoracic Unit
The following slides highlight a presentation at the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials session of the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November.
European Heart Association Journal 2007 April
MASTER Trial Inclusion Criteria
Univ. of Copenhagen, Denmark
CIBIS II: Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II
MK-0954 PN948 NOT APPROVED FOR USE (date)
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
The Heart Rhythm Society Meeting Presented by Dr. Johan De Sutter
Presenter Disclosure Information
Presentation transcript:

A Randomized Study of the Effects of Defibrillator Implantation Early after Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Patients on Optimal Medical Therapy Gerhard Steinbeck, D. Andresen, K. Seidl, J. Brachmann, E. Hoffmann, D. Wojciechowski, Z. Kornacewicz-Jach, M. Zembala, G. Lupkovics, F. Hofgärtner, A. Lubinski, K. Wegscheider, M. Rosenqvist, F. Habets, J. Senges on behalf of the IRIS investigators

Presenter Disclosure Information Gerhard Steinbeck, MD The following relationships exist related to this presentation: Lecture Fees: AstraZeneca, Medtronic Advisory Board: Medtronic

Committees: Data and Safety Monitoring Board: A. Hjalmarson (chair), L. Kappenberger, N. Victor Steering Committee: Principal investigators: D. Andresen, J. Senges, G. Steinbeck Members: E. Hoffmann, K. Seidl, J. Brachmann, A. Lubinski Adverse Event Committee: M. Rosenqvist (chair), M. Block, W. Schöls, B. Sredniawa Data Verification Committee: U. Dorwarth, F. Gindele, B. Mark Statistics: K. Wegscheider Data Coordination Center: OSE Oncology Services Europe S.a.r.l. München Investigators: AUSTRIA: F. Hintringer, Innsbruck. CZECH REPUBLIC: M. Herold, Prague; J. Kauzner, Prague; M. Pleskot, Kralove. GERMANY: E. Altmann, Dresden; D. Andresen, Berlin; J. Aring, Leverkusen; G. Baumann, Chemnitz; R. Becker, Heidelberg; S. Behrens, Berlin; H. Blanke, Gelsenkirchen; C. Bossaller, Gehrden; J. Brachmann, Coburg; B. Cabell, Herrsching; G. Dannberg, Jena; W. Doering (†), München Schwabing; Th. Dorsel, Warendorf; E. Dünninger, Lichtenfels; H. Duwald, Gronau/Leine; R. Fenzl, Berlin; W. Feth, Rockenhausen; S. Fredersdorf, Regensburg; H. Friedl, Amberg; H. Glunz, Kaiserslautern; O. Göing, Berlin; L. Griesbach, Kirchberg; B. Hailer, Essen; A. Hartmann, Leipzig; H. Heuer, Dortmund; F. Hofgärtner, Göppingen; E. Hoffmann, München-Bogenhausen; H. Jenss, Waldshut; W. Jung, Villingen-Schwenningen; J. Isbary, Biberach; Th. Ittel, Stralsund; B. Kaufmann, Wolfach; C. Kirsch, Salzkotten; G. Liebau, Ludwigsburg; J. Manthey, Bad Friedrichshall; M. Manz, Koblenz; H. Mudra, München Neuperlach; A. Mügge, Bochum; H. Nebelsieck, Sindelfingen; J. Neuzner, Kassel; H. Odenthal, Rheine; C. Perings, Lünen; G. Richardt, Bad Segeberg; K. Schmailzl, Neuruppin; B. Schneider, Lübeck; F. Seidel, Kempten-Oberallgäu; J. Senges, Ludwigshafen; G. Steinbeck, München; C. Stellbrink, Bielefeld Mitte; G. Strupp, Fulda; U. Tebbe, Lippe-Detmold; M. Weber, Dachau; K. Weber, Unna; M. Sigg, Ravensburg; C. Wolpert, Mannheim; R. Zotz, Herford; R. Zotz, Schwalmstadt. HUNGARY: I. Édes, Debrecen; T. Forster, Szeged; G. Lupkovics, Zalaegerszeg; B. Merkely, Budapest. P0LAND: A. Cieslinski, Poznan; R. Gil, Warsawa; J. Goch, Lodz; J. Gorny, Olsztyn; W. Kargul, Katowice; K. Kawecka-Jaszcz, Krakow; A. Kleinrok, Zamosc; C. Kornacewicz-Jach, Szczecin; J. Kubica, Bydgoszcz; M. Kurowski, Szczecin; J. Kuzniar, Rzeszow; J. Lelakowsky, Krakow; A. Lubinski, Lodz; P. Miekus, Gdynia; W. Musial, Bialystok; G. Opolski, Warsawa; W. Pluta, Opole; P. Ponikowski, Wroclaw; A. Rynkiewicz, Gdansku; H. Szwed, Warsaw; M. Trusz-Gluza, Katowice; D. Wojciechowski, Warsawa; T. Widomska- Czekajska, Lublin; M. Zembala, Zabrze. RUSSIA: E. Chazov, Moscow; D. Sponsors:Medtronic Bakken Research Center, AstraZeneca Committees and Investigators

All cause mortality and sudden death are highest early after myocardial infarction Guidelines based on randomized trials recommend not to implant a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) within 40 days after acute myocardial infarction (MI) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death Background

Immediate Risk-Stratification Improves Survival (IRIS) study High-risk patients after acute MI will show a better survival when treated early with an ICD compared to patients receiving optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone Study Hypothesis

Criterion I Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 40% on day 5–31, together with heart rate ≥ 90 beats per minute (bpm) on the first available electrocardiogram and/or Criterion II Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia at a rate ≥ 150 bpm during Holter-ECG on day 5-31 Methods Used for Risk-Stratification

1:1 randomized, open-label, investigator-initiated European multicenter trial ICD implantation early after MI Optimal acute and long-term medical therapy in both groups Follow up ≥ 2 years Intention-to-treat analysis Primary endpoint:all cause mortality Secondary endpoints:sudden cardiac death non-sudden cardiac death non-cardiac death Study Organization

Registry of 62,944 patients Exclusion criteria n=26,445 Inclusion criteria not met n=35,188 Acute Myocardial Infarction Criterion I ++ - Criterion II Strata: Randomization: n= 902 ICD + OMT n=445 OMT n=453 Consent not valid n=2 Enrollment: June ’99 – October 2007 Follow-up: mean 37 months, range months OMT: Optimal Medical Treatment Eligible day 5-31: n=1,311 No consent: n=409 Study Flow Diagram

Baseline Demographic Characteristics I

Baseline Demographic Characteristics II

All Cause Mortality 117 deaths

All Cause Mortality 117 deaths 116 deaths

EF ≤ 40%, Heart Rate ≥ 90 bpm

Rapid Non-sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

Hazard Ratios for Death From any Cause in Sselected Subgroups of Interest I

Hazard Ratios for Death From any Cause in Selected Subgroups of Interest II

Cardiac death occurring within minutes after the onset of acute symptoms, resulted from a documented cardiac arrhythmia, or was unwitnessed and occurred unexpectedly and without recognizable causes (e.g. during sleep) Definition of Sudden Cardiac Death

Sudden Cardiac Death Non-Sudden Cardiac Death Month after Randomisation Cumulative Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death p=0.049 Month after Randomisation Cumulative Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death p=0.001

Death within 30 days after randomization: 9 patients in the ICD group 11 patients in the control group Clinically significant complications (requiring surgical correction, hospitalization, or intravenous drug administration) occurred in 65/415 ICD patients (15.7%) - up to 30 days after implant in 19 patients (4.6%) - during later follow-up in 48 patients (11.6%) ICD-related Adverse Events

In a carefully selected post MI study group with moderately reduced EF (mean 35%), all cause mortality and sudden cardiac death were substantial (22.9% and 11.6% at three years, respectively) Early initiation of ICD therapy did not reduce all cause mortality, independent of the way of risk-stratification Sudden cardiac death was reduced by the ICD, which was, however, counterbalanced by an increase of non-sudden cardiac death, an observation that deserves further study Summary

During the first month after myocardial infarction, in an optimally treated high-risk patient population, ICD implantation does not offer a survival benefit Conclusions

415/445 patients in the ICD arm actually received the device (withdrawal of consent n=14, refusing ICD implant n=11, death prior to implant n=5) ICD implantation was performed 8.8 ± 14.5 days (mean ± SD) after randomization During follow-up, according data provided by investigators, 21.4 % of patients received appropriate shocks 8.0 % of patients received inappropriate shocks ICD explanted or permanently deactivated in 15 patients In summary:45 patients in the ICD group did not receive (or did not continue on) the ICD 39 patients in the control group received an ICD Therapy Compliance