Qualified Health Claims Pauline M. Ippolito* Bureau of Economics Federal Trade Commission * The views expressed in this presentation are my own and do.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Pump head syndrome On May 6, 1953, the heart-lung machine was first used successfully on 18 year old Cecelia Bavolek. In the six months before surgery,
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
INYS, Lund, November 29, 2006 Consumer aspects relating to the development of functional foods Klaus G. Grunert MAPP – Centre for Research on Customer.
Labeling claims for patient- reported outcomes (A regulatory perspective) FDA/Industry Workshop Washington, DC September 16, 2005 Lisa A. Kammerman, Ph.D.
Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Genetic Tests
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
1 Reproducibility Working Group Stan Young Val Johnson Steve Goodman Stan Young.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
ZMQS ZMQS
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
Qualified Health Claims: Food for Thought? Neal H. Hooker and Ratapol P. Teratanavat Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics.
ABC Technology Project
Dietary Supplements Foods or Drugs?
Mobile Payments and the FTC Manas Mohapatra Director of Mobile Policy Mobile Technology Unit Federal Trade Commission The views expressed are not necessarily.
Brendan McGivern Partner White & Case LLP May 20, 2009 US – Continued Suspension and the Deference Standard BIICL - Ninth Annual WTO Conference Panel 4:
© S Haughton more than 3?
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
VOORBLAD.
Twenty Questions Subject: Twenty Questions
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Do you have the Maths Factor?. Maths Can you beat this term’s Maths Challenge?
Understanding Nutrition Labelling to Make Informed Food Choices.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
SIMOCODE-DP Software.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
1 Using one or more of your senses to gather information.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
Is it True? Lose the Fat, Keep the Vitamins-Drink LowFat Milk Source: Sacramento County WIC Program.
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
A SMALL TRUTH TO MAKE LIFE 100%
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
Testing Hypotheses About Proportions
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
Section 9.3 Nutrition for Individual Needs Objectives
Section 8.2 Vitamins, Minerals, and Water Objectives
Substantiation of Health Claims in Advertising: Probiotics Richard L. Cleland Division of Advertising Practices Federal Trade Commission.
Label Claims Blakeley Denkinger, MPH, RD, CSSD Nutrition Assessment and Evaluation Team, Nutrition Programs Staff Office of Nutrition, Labeling, and Dietary.
Claims – Consumer Perspective David Schardt Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI)
Effects of Strength of Science Disclaimers on the Communication Impacts of Health Claims Brenda M. Derby, Ph.D. & Alan S. Levy, Ph.D. Food & Drug Administration.
HHS Office of the General Counsel
Reading Labels. Why Read Labels? To be informed about the products we purchase. To help us distinguish between nutrient dense foods and non-nutrient dense.
November 17, 2005 FDA Public Meeting: Assessing Consumers’ Perception of Health Claims 1 Policy Makers’ Paradigms and Evidence from Consumer Interpretations.
Assessing Consumers’ Perceptions of Health Claims Presentation of IFIC Foundation Consumer Research on Health Claims and Other Label Statements Wendy Reinhardt.
Reading Labels How to determine which snack is best for you.
Food Labels. The Nutrition Facts Label  Contains product specific information  Based on a 2,000 calorie diet  Helps you to compare one snack to the.
The Health Benefits of Olive Oil By Mona Douglas.
Opener #9 Are you eating healthier than you did 2 weeks ago (before the nutrition unit)? Explain.    
How to determine which snack is best for you
How to determine which snack is best for you
Presentation transcript:

Qualified Health Claims Pauline M. Ippolito* Bureau of Economics Federal Trade Commission * The views expressed in this presentation are my own and do not necessarily represent the views of the FTC, its staff or any individual Commissioner.

2 Deception Statement & Advertising Substantiation Statement  Claims must be truthful and not misleading.  Firms must have a reasonable basis for any material claim that a substantial number of reasonable consumers would take from an ad.

3 Research on Qualified Health Claims  Can uncertain scientific support be communicated to consumers?  Can different levels of support be communicated? Weight of the evidence versus weaker support?  Consumer research since the late 1990s.

4 Mildly Qualified Claim Some medical studies are now suggesting that supplements containing these same antioxidant vitamins may also reduce the risk of cancer. What This Means to You It looks promising, but scientists won’t be sure until longer term research is completed.

5 Tested Claims from Earlier Research Proof Claim Scientists have now proven that supplements containing these same antioxidant vitamins also reduce the risk of cancer. It’s a fact! Mildly Qualified Claim Some medical studies are now suggesting that supplements containing these same antioxidant vitamins may also reduce the risk of cancer. What This Means to You It looks promising, but scientists won’t be sure until longer term research is completed.

6 Tested Claims from Earlier Research Qualified Claim Some medical studies are now suggesting that supplements containing these same antioxidant vitamins may also reduce the risk of cancer. What This Means to You It’s too early to tell for sure. Some studies have failed to show that these vitamins protect against cancer. Longer term research is needed.

7 Tested Claims from Earlier Research Highly Qualified Claim with Box Disclaimer Some scientific evidence suggests that consumption of antioxidant vitamin supplements may reduce the risk of certain kinds of cancer. … There is much scientific debate about whether antioxidant vitamin supplements reduce the risk of some kinds of cancer. Most studies have failed to show that these vitamin supplements reduce the risk of cancer.

8 Sure Somewhat Sure Neither Sure nor Unsure Somewhat Unsure Vitamin Ads * All differences are significant in one-tailed tests.

9 Sure Somewhat Sure Neither Sure nor Unsure Somewhat Unsure Cheese AdVitamin Ads * All differences are significant in one-tailed tests except for two proof claims.

10 Sure Vitamin Ads * All differences are significant except for that between Qualified and Highly Qualified.

11 Sure Cheese AdVitamin Ads

12 Latest Round of Experiments FDA Disclosure Language Some scientific evidence suggests that consumption of antioxidant vitamin supplements may reduce the risk of certain kinds of cancers. However, FDA has determined that this evidence is limited and not conclusive. FDA Report Card Language Some scientific evidence suggests …. FDA evaluated the scientific evidence and gave it a “C” rating, based on a scale from A (strongest evidence) to D (weakest evidence).

13 Not at All Certain Slightly Certain Somewhat Certain Very Certain * The Report Card is significantly different from the Box Disclaimer.

14 % Replying * The FDA Language is significantly different from the Box Disclaimer.

15 % Replying Not at All Certain Slightly Certain Somewhat Certain Very Certain

16 % Replying Not at All Certain Slightly Certain Somewhat Certain Very Certain

17 % Replying Not at All Certain Slightly Certain Somewhat Certain Very Certain

18 Lycopene Fact Sheet What We Know About Lycopene and Heart Disease A number of studies have found that people who eat diets rich in tomatoes and tomato products tend to have fewer heart attacks and other heart problems. Scientists have also studied whether some of this benefit may be due to lycopene, which is a nutrient found mostly in tomatoes. So far, we have learned that people with heart disease have less lycopene in their bodies than heart-healthy people do. Some studies have reported beneficial effects on cholesterol in the blood when people take lycopene supplements. But other studies have not found any benefits. At present there are no long-term studies of whether people who take lycopene will actually lower their risk of having a heart attack. So we do not know whether there is any benefit from taking lycopene supplements. Carefully controlled and long-term clinical studies will be needed to answer this question.

19 % Replying Not at All Certain Slightly Certain Somewhat Certain Very Certain

20 Some Conclusions  Qualifying language does change the message consumers take away in our tests. Mean consumer perceptions of scientific certainty fall with stronger qualifying language. Sure Somewhat Sure Neither Sure nor Unsure Somewhat Unsure

21 Some Conclusions  Consumers discount “proof” claims. Only 58% of consumers said scientists were “sure” for the vitamin “proof” claim; a bit more for cheese- osteoporosis “proof” claim. Implications for SSA claims?  Consumer interpretation of qualifying language varies widely.

22 References  Dennis Murphy, “Consumer Perceptions of Qualified Health Claims in Advertising,” FTC Bureau of Economics Working Paper No. 277, July  Dennis Murphy, Theodore H. Hoppock, and Michelle K. Rusk, Generic Copy Test of Food Health Claims in Advertising, Joint Staff Report of the Bureaus of Economics and Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, November 1998.