Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of the off-axis NuMI beam with MiniBooNE Zelimir Djurcic Columbia University Zelimir Djurcic Columbia University Outline of this Presentation.
Advertisements

05/31/2007Teppei Katori, Indiana University, NuInt '07 1 Charged Current Interaction measurements in MiniBooNE hep-ex/XXX Teppei Katori for the MiniBooNE.
P AUL N IENABER S AINT M ARY ’ S U NIVERSITY OF M INNESOTA FOR THE M INI B OO NE C OLLABORATION J ULY DPF2009.
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
H. Ray, University of Florida1 MINIBOONE  e e .
Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
8/5/2002Ulrich Heintz - Quarknet neutrino puzzles Ulrich Heintz Boston University
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
Forward Detectors and Measurement of Proton-Antiproton Collision Rates by Zachary Einzig, Mentor Michele Gallinaro INTRODUCTION THE DETECTORS EXPERIMENTAL.
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
Analysis of  and e events from NuMI beamline at MiniBooNE
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
NEW RESULTS FROM MINOS Patricia Vahle, for the MINOS collaboration College of William and Mary.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU.
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
The Muon Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Cross Section Measurement on Plastic Scintillator Tammy Walton December 4, 2013 Hampton University Physics Group Meeting.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE LLWI, 25 Feb 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
MiniBooNE Michel Sorel (Valencia U.) for the MiniBooNE Collaboration TAUP Conference September 2005 Zaragoza (Spain)
1 MiniBooNE Update and Extension Request Richard Van de Water and Steve Brice for the MiniBooNE Collaboration Nov 2, 2007.
MiniBooNE : Current Status Heather Ray Los Alamos National Lab.
Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #3 Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.How is neutrino beam produced? 2.Physics.
Muon Identification in the MINOS Calibration Detector Anna Holin 05 December 2005 University College London.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
MiniBooNE Cross Section Results H. Ray, University of Florida ICHEP Interactions of the future!
October 14, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries 1 Single Spin Asymmetries for charged pions. Overview  One physics slide  What is measured, kinematic variables.
DOE Review 3/18/03Steve Brice FNALPage 1 MiniBooNE Status Steve Brice Fermilab Overview Beam – Primary Beam – Secondary Beam Detector – Calibration – Triggering.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
J. Goodman – January 03 The Solution to the Solar Problem Jordan A. Goodman University of Maryland January 2003 Solar Neutrinos MSW Oscillations Super-K.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
Low Z Detector Simulations
Atmospheric Neutrinos Phenomenology and Detection p 00 ++  e+e+ e-e- ++  Michelangelo D’Agostino Physics C228 October 18, 2004.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
An experiment to measure   with the CNGS beam off axis and a deep underwater Cherenkov detector in the Gulf of Taranto CNGS.
4/19/2007Jonathan Link First Oscillation Results from the MiniBooNE Experiment Jonathan Link Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University April 19.
Status of MiniBooNE Short Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jonathan Link Columbia University International Conference on Flavor Physics October.
Jonathan Link Columbia University Fermilab Wine & Cheese November 18 th 2005 Meson Production Results from E910 and Their Relevance to MiniBooNE E910 MiniBooNE.
1 Limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance Tord Ekelöf /Uppsala University Roger Forty /CERN Christian Hansen This talk.
Outline: IntroJanet Event Rates Particle IdBill Backgrounds and signal Status of the first MiniBooNE Neutrino Oscillation Analysis Janet Conrad & Bill.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE: Neutrino Oscillations and Cross Sections 15 th Lomonosov Conference, 19 Aug 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
Measurement of the Muon Charge Ratio in Cosmic Ray Events with the CMS Experiment at the LHC S. Marcellini, INFN Bologna – Italy on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Neutrino Interaction measurement in K2K experiment (1kton water Cherenkov detector) Jun Kameda(ICRR) for K2K collaboration RCCN international workshop.
MiniBooNE: Status and Plans Outline Physics motivation Beamline performance Detector performance First look at the data Conclusions Fernanda G. Garcia,
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Some Thoughts on Analysis Blindness Steve Brice Ex-Analysis Coordinator for MiniBooNE.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Neutrino-Nucleon Neutral Current Elastic Interactions in MiniBooNE Denis Perevalov University of Alabama for the MiniBooNE collaboration presented by:
EPS HEP 2007 M. Sorel – IFIC (Valencia U. & CSIC)1 MiniBooNE, Part 2: First Results of the Muon-To-Electron Neutrino Oscillation Search M. Sorel (IFIC.
R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The.
Neutrino-Nucleon Neutral Current Elastic Interactions in MiniBooNE Denis Perevalov University of Alabama for the MiniBooNE collaboration presented by:
Systematics Sanghoon Jeon.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
F.Sánchez for the K2K collaboration UAB/IFAE
Hadronic Interaction Model Analysis Air Shower Development
Neutrino interaction measurements in K2K SciBar
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Presentation transcript:

Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE –high energy events Summary

MiniBooNE beamline MiniBooNE is searching for  to e oscillations –Produce a beam of , look for e 8 GeV protons hit Be target, producing: –  + (primary source of  ) – K+/- (decay to , e ) – K 0 (decay to e )

Oscillation search backgrounds Three major backgrounds: –misID’d  0 s constrained by observed  0 s – e from muon decay muon produced for each , constrained via  spectrum – e from kaon decay 00 e ++ ++  e+e+ e   +,  0 e

K+ flux predictions All flux predictions are from a parameterized fit to external data with uncorrelated uncertainties K+ external data shown here in transverse momentum ( p T ) vs x F –Feynman x, the longitudinal momentum / maximum allowed longitudinal momentum –Currently use Aleshin, Abbot, Eichten, Piroue and Vorontsov data x F p T (GeV/C)

Measurements of kaons in MiniBooNE MiniBooNE is a blinded analysis: –we can’t look at e -like events at energies where there might be oscillation events –must measure kaons outside the signal region and extrapolate

Measurements of kaons in MiniBooNE Measure kaons via muons: Little Muon Counter (LMC) –Large angle muons are predominantly from kaon decays (higher allowed p T for muons from kaons) –Count muons at 7  angle from decay pipe and determine corresponding kaon rate Measure kaons via neutrino events: high energy “box” –A neutrino from a kaon will have a higher energy than if it came from a pion of the same momentum –Highest energy tank events tend to be from K+ –Directly measure e background in different energy region

Neutrino Events in MiniBooNE 12 m diameter light detector filled with mineral oil 1280 PMTs in inner region 240 PMTs in outer “veto” region Neutrino events emit Cherenkov light in a characteristic pattern for different events Muons have long tracks, constant light over distance Electrons have shorter tracks; scattering causes the ring to be “fuzzier”  e

Neutrino Interactions Charged Current Quasi-elastic (CCQE) Energy of neutrino is related to the outgoing leptons’ energy and angle l l p l+l+ n ++ l C E (QE)= m p E l - m l 2 /2 m p - E l + √(E l 2 -m l 2 ) cos   Charged Current Pion production (CC  ) X

High Energy Box Event selection: Event is in time with the beam Has a E  QE) (assuming muon) > 1.5 GeV, < 4 GeV Passes cosmic ray reduction cuts –within forward cone along the beam direction –Veto hits less than 30 –Entering cluster hits less than 1 Less than 1 hit in the veto corresponding to the track direction x x x   

High Energy Box Predominantly  + below 2 GeV, predominantly K+ above E (QE) in GeV Monte Carlo  + K+ K 0,   GeV

High Energy Box:  events Look at CCQE, CC   events as a check of  +, K+ –long tracks consistent with muon –veto hits<6 (contained) E  QE) in GeV Total MC Data(stat only)  + K+ 1.5 GeV logarithmic scale Note: All plots are relatively normalized to 1 Absolutely normalized plots show a normalization difference of ~50% => MiniBooNE is working on this Preliminary

High Energy Box:  events Look at CCQE, CC   events as a check of  +, K+ –long tracks consistent with muon –veto hits<6 (contained) E  QE) in GeV Total MC Data(stat only) CCQE CC  GeV logarithmic scale Note: All plots are relatively normalized to 1 Absolutely normalized plots show a normalization difference of ~50% => MiniBooNE is working on this Preliminary

High Energy Box: e events Look at CCQE e events as a check of all e backgrounds –run the e PID prepared for the oscillation analysis on this sample E  QE) (electron) GeV Oscillation K+ misID  K 0   HE box data (stat only) Preliminary

High Energy Box: e events Look at CCQE e events as a check of all e backgrounds –run the e PID prepared for the oscillation analysis on this sample Oscillation K+ misID  K 0   HE box data (stat only, 3.25e20 pot) Preliminary E  QE) (electron) GeV

Using the HE box The different event samples in the HE provide checks of the predicted neutrino from kaon rate –Example: CCQE contained events: 2 subevents, decay michel electron energy <70 MeV, veto hits < 6, muon-like track ~11K data events for 5e20 pot, 82% CCQE, 15% CC  17% error due to cross sections, 5% due to flux, 7% optical model

Summary MiniBooNE is searching for  to e oscillations –Observing these oscillations depends on understanding the content of the neutrino beam The HE box and LMC provide MiniBooNE with checks using the same beamline of the kaons –Check of K+  from the LMC –Check of  +, K+  from HE box CCQE, CCpi muon-like events –Check of K 0, K+ e from HE box CCQE electron-like events