TOSS-BFK Administrators’ Evaluation Crosswalk to School-wide Changes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
1 Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for New Jersey New Jersey State Board of Education May 4, 2011 Dorothy.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
When Students Can’t Read…
Making the Connection to Assessment. Three components: Common Core State Standards Excellent Matches to State Curriculum Essential Skills and Knowledge.
Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Creating a Roadmap for Change: Utilizing School Planning to Reculture Schools Darius S. Adamson, Sr. School Transformation Coach District and School Transformation.
Welcome to College and Career Ready Standards Quarterly Meeting # 1.
Parents as Partners in Education
Continuous Improvement Through Continuous Learning Until you are willing to be confused about what you already know, what you know will never become wider,
IMPLEMENTING THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS: THE ROLE OF SCHOOL LEADERS IMPLEMENTING THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS: THE ROLE OF SCHOOL LEADERS Dr. Paul.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Keystone State Reading Conference October 29, 2012 Dr. Deb Carr, King’s College.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Texas Education Agency Updated F-2 FOUNDATION.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
State Role in Supporting Educators C HRIS M INNICH M AY 2012 | SCEE M EETING.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
1 CCR Conference Summer 2014 Building Capacity of Content Teachers through A Comprehensive Literacy Initiative.
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation ___________________ Dublin High School ___________________ March 9-11, 2009.
Instructional Leadership and the Iowa Core ELA Standards Great Prairie AEA Burlington: April 9, 2013 Ottumwa: April 16, 2013.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
High Performance Leaders in Irving Independent School District (IISD) Administrator’s Leadership Conference August 3, 2010 Leadership 1.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
STRONG FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IS CENTRAL TO EFFECTIVE SCHOOL REFORM Jan Patterson and Ann Bliss Smarter Schools National Partnerships Key Reform.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Southern Regional Education Board Annual Leadership Forum
Purposeful Literacy Leadership for Administrators: Start a Movement
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
2010 NEASC Self-Study and Evaluation Visit
Presentation transcript:

TOSS-BFK Administrators’ Evaluation Crosswalk to School-wide Changes IMPLEMENTING THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS: THE ROLE OF SCHOOL LEADERS TOSS-BFK Administrators’ Evaluation Crosswalk to School-wide Changes

Today’s Schedule 8:30-10:00 – Instructional Changes – Barb 10:15-11:30 – Backward Design – Paul 11:30-12:15 – Lunch 12:15- end – Crosswalk: Evaluation to Changes – Paul and Barb

Action Briefs with 10 Changes Supporting the Role of School Leaders in Transitioning to CCSS

“Principals and teachers must have access to the essential professional development opportunities they need to fully implement the Common Core, to transition to rigorous standards that strengthen teaching and learning, and to develop effective strategies that engage families and communities in schools.” Gail Connelly, Executive Director NAESP

Action Brief for School Leaders Increase awareness of the standards Create a sense of urgency around standards implementation Provide a deeper understanding of standards leaders’ roles in implementation leaders are faced with dramatically increased expectations in the context of fewer resources —

Successful Implementation of CCSS National and state educational leaders work hand-in-hand with building principals Building principals need educational leaders’ guidance to understand the CCSS vision to be willing to put in the hard effort that is required to shift expectations, curriculum, and instruction in their schools. This will require time, patience, communication, and a partnership in leading our schools and educational systems. Pg 10

School-wide Changes #1 – Culture #2 – Literacy Instruction #3 – Text Complexity & Informational Text #4 – Close Reading and Text-based Response #5 – Writing Across Content Areas #6 – Mathematics Instruction #7 – Student Engagement & Collaboration #8 – Instructional Time #9 – Create-and-Learn vs. Sit-and-Get #10 – Professional Learning #11 – Assessment #12 – Technology Integration

Three Critical Questions What will be the impact of these changes on the evaluation process? What challenges will these present for new/current principals? What levels of support will be needed for both leaders and staff?

School-wide Change #1 Culture “Study after study points to the principal as the single key to a strong school culture.” An effective principal accounts for 25 percent of a school’s impact on student gains, while teacher effectiveness accounts for 33 percent. Principal affects the entire school culture in addition to the performance of each and every teacher and student in the school.

School-wide Change #1 Culture School culture is a result of the staff’s collective thoughts, beliefs, expectations and conversations that lead directly to both individual and group behaviors. If CCSS ways of interacting & teaching are practiced consistently over time, they will turn into new habits and new patterns of behavior.

School-wide Change #1 Culture Culture drives decisions and behavior that reflect staff expectations. High performing schools reveal practices that focus on student needs, not staff desires.

School-wide Change #1 Culture Characteristics of faculty/staff in strong school cultures More adaptable to change Higher motivation More commitment More cooperation and collaboration Better able to resolve conflicts Greater capacity for innovation Effective in achieving goals

School-wide Change #1 Culture Four Focus Areas for Strong Culture Partnerships with learning focus Collaborative conversations centered around student learning Build trust Develop leaders

School-wide Change #2 Literacy Instruction “Literacy is the common ground of the Common Core.” Janet Allen, author Teaching Content Literacy

School-wide Change #2 Literacy Instruction The success of the new standards will depend heavily on the ability of school leaders to implement school-wide literacy initiatives in their schools. In a literacy-rich school environment, cross-content or school-wide literacy instruction has moved from an option to a necessity.

School-wide Change #2 Literacy Instruction Cross-content or school-wide literacy — reading, writing, speaking and listening — is perhaps the most significant change faced by middle schools and high schools. Assessment includes heavy emphasis on content text.

School-wide Change #2 Literacy Instruction Most secondary content teachers lack training & resources to embed literacy into their content instruction. Principals need to begin immediately building teacher capacity.

1 “Students should already know how to read.” School-wide Change #2: Literacy Instruction Three major misconceptions about literacy instruction 1 “Students should already know how to read.” many are functionally literate but lack skills to read on grade-level many require explicit instruction yearly all students can learn, but do not all learn at the same rate all students need to continue developing literacy skills

School-wide Change #2: Literacy Instruction Three major misconceptions about literacy instruction 2 “I don’t have the time.” “The best place to teach literacy skills is in the content areas. Reading, writing, listening and discussing course content improves student understanding and promotes higher-level thinking, application and long-term retention of learned content.”

3 “I’m not a reading teacher.” School-wide Change #2: Literacy Instruction Three major misconceptions about literacy instruction 3 “I’m not a reading teacher.” “Teachers teach using language. It is not expected that all teachers be reading teachers. It is expected that each teacher teach the language of the content area — more directly and more explicitly. For example, science teachers need to teach students to read science text, write like a scientist, and think and discuss employing the scientific method.”

School-wide Change #2 Literacy Instruction Action Plan to Develop Literacy Instruction Analyze current data from literacy perspective Create school-wide literacy council Hold open discussions about capacity to embed literacy Discuss the 3 misconceptions with leadership team Develop with literacy council a plan with short- and long-term components Ask members of literacy council to begin piloting plans Communicate all plans with entire literacy council Monitor progress throughout year, making necessary adjustments Revise literacy plan to reflect the year’s experiences

School-wide Change #3 Text Complexity & Informational Text “Everything about the Common Core implicitly and explicitly promotes text as the most important element of any education.” Jan Burkins and Kim Yaris

School-wide Change #3 Text Complexity & Informational Text Reading complex text does for reading skills what resistance training does for muscle strength — it makes students stronger readers.

School-wide Change #3 Text Complexity & Informational Text Reading should dramatically increase in all content areas Note that a shift to more informational text does not mean an abandonment of literature.

School-wide Change #3 Text Complexity & Informational Text Training is needed to evaluate the appropriateness of the material for students using quantitative measures qualitative measures reader and task considerations. Teachers must provide students with appropriate level texts.

School-wide Change #3 Text Complexity & Informational Text True differentiated instruction demands a current quantitative measure of student reading comprehension skills AND the complexity of the text.

Filter 1 Can students read the text? School-wide Change #3: Text Complexity & Informational Text Three Filters to Work with Staff on Text Complexity Filter 1 Can students read the text?

Filter 2 Should students read the text? School-wide Change #3: Text Complexity & Informational Text Three Filters to Work with Staff on Text Complexity Filter 2 Should students read the text?

Filter 3 Do students want to read the text? School-wide Change #3: Text Complexity & Informational Text Three Filters to Work with Staff on Text Complexity Filter 3 Do students want to read the text?

School-wide Change #3 Text Complexity & Informational Text Action Steps Begin discussions about complexity & informational text Analyze texts currently used; compare to CCSS Appendix A Conduct annual diagnostic literacy assessment of all or use state data Analyze assessment data to identify current expected comprehension levels

Questions?

Backwards Design

Evaluation Crosswalk

Three Critical Questions What will be the impact of these changes on the evaluation process? What challenges will these present for new/current principals? What levels of support will be needed for both leaders and staff?

Evidence in ELA Culture We all believe all children can learn We can be the leaders of culture change in our school

Evidence in ELA Literacy We can learn how to manage the shift to literacy with informational text. We can learn how to embed reading strategies into all text-based instruction.

Evidence in ELA Text Complexity and Informational Text We can identify the complexity of the text we have used in the past and make changes to past practice to align to CCSS guidelines. We can learn to use informational text other than only narrative non-fiction as we support our content colleagues in teaching how to read informational text.

Questions?