Pharmacodynamic Effects of Cangrelor on Platelet P2Y 12 Receptor Mediated Signaling in Prasugrel Treated Patients Fabiana Rollini, Francesco Franchi, Antonio.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antiplatelet Therapy in the Catheterization Laboratory
Advertisements

ACTIVE Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
August 30, 2009 at CET. Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes – the PLATO trial.
Invasive Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes – the PLATelet Inhibition and patient Outcomes trial Outcomes in.
Rethinking Lower Blood Pressure Goals for Diabetic Patients with Coronary Artery Disease – Findings from the INternational VErapamil SR – Trandolapril.
OPTIMIZE: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of 3 Months Versus 12 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with the Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Fausto.
Decline in the Use of Drug-Eluting Stents for Patients With NSTEMI Undergoing PCI: Results From the CRUSADE and ACTION Registries Matthew T. Roe, Christopher.
Proton Pump Inhibitor Use is Likely a Marker for, Rather than a Cause of, a Higher Risk of Cardiovascular Events: Insights from PLATO Shaun G. Goodman,
Inhibitory Effects of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel on Platelet Function in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes The PLATO PLATELET Substudy Storey.
Prasugrel vs ticagrelor in acute coronary syndromes
TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel TRITON-TIMI 38 TRITON-TIMI 38 Elliott M. Antman, MD.
Prasugrel Compared to Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI with Stenting: the TRITON - TIMI 38 Stent Analysis Stephen D.
Brar et al, JACC 2011 Impact of Platelet Reactivity When On-treatment With Clopidogrel on Mortality, MI or Stent Thrombosis After PCI Impact of Platelet.
Aspirinn doses in diabetics - AngiolilloSlide 1 Davide Capodanno, MD, Aasita Patel, MD, Kodlipet Dharmashankar, MD, José Luis Ferreiro, MD, Masafumi Ueno,
A Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Switching from Ticagrelor to Prasugrel in Subjects with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Results of the SWAP-2 Study A Pharmacodynamic.
Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD, PhD Director of Cardiovascular Research Assistant Professor of Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine – Jacksonville,
PRO-GR: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study of Maintenance High-Dose Clopidogrel vs. Prasugrel in Clopidogrel Resistant Patients With and Without.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
High Versus Standard Clopidogrel Maintenance Dose After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Effects on Platelet Inhibition, Endothelial Function and Inflammation.
Robert F. Storey Senior Lecturer and Honorary Consultant in Cardiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK Stent thrombosis Future directions.
ARMYDA-4 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) study Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double blind trial investigating.
CHARISMA: The “CAPRIE-like” Cohort Deepak L. Bhatt MD, FACC, FSCAI, FESC, FACP Associate Director, Cleveland Clinic Cardiovascular Coordinating Center.
Clinical Trial Results. org Randomized Comparison of a High Clopidogrel Maintenance Dose in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Artery Disease:
ADAPT-DES One-Year Results Assessment of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy with Drug-Eluting Stents A Large-Scale, Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study.
Clinical Trial Results. org Increased Risk in Patients with High Platelet Aggregation Receiving Chronic Clopidogrel Therapy Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary.
The Risk of CV Events for Patients Treated with Clopidogrel or Prasugrel in Combination with a Proton Pump Inhibitor Results from the TRITON-TIMI 38 Trial.
Meta Analysis of Primary PCI trials Andreas Baumbach*, Harold Dauerman, Bernardo Cortese, Martial Hamon, Jayne Prats, Efthymios Deliargyris, Roxana Mehran,
The Effect of Cangrelor and Access Site on Ischemic and Bleeding Events – Insights from CHAMPION PHOENIX J. Antonio Gutierrez, MD, MHS, Robert A. Harrington,
ARMYDA-4 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) study Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double blind trial investigating.
TRITON TIMI-38 STEMI cohort Clopidogrel Under Fire: Is Prasugrel in Primary PCI or Recent MI Superior? Insights From TRITON-TIMI-38 Gilles Montalescot,
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Patients With Poor Responsiveness to Thienopyridine.
Adapted from Angiolillo DJ et al. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97: Individual Response Variability to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in the Steady State Phase of.
Date of download: 6/24/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Pharmacodynamic Effects of Switching From Prasugrel.
Challenges with Drug Administration Optimal Loading Dose and Delivery of P2Y12 Inhibitors: Should the Loading Dose Be Crushed? Dominick J. Angiolillo,
Date of download: 7/10/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Crushed Prasugrel Tablets in Patients With STEMI.
The Big Antiplatelet Debate: Why I Prefer Ticagrelor Over Prasugrel
Heparin Should be the First-line Therapy for Patients with ACS/AMI
Stent Thrombosis and Optimal Duration of DAPT
Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD, PhD, FACC, FESC, FSCAI
When to Switch and How to Switch
When should we start a P2Y12 inhibitor in patients with an acute coronary syndrome? G. Montalescot Dr. Montalescot reports research Grants to the Institution.
Bedside monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy for Coronary stenting N Engl J Med Nov 29;367: Prof. Soo-Joong Kim / R3 Yu Ho Lee.
MCV Campus Ginger Edwards.
Randomisation before planned PCI with DES (n=2500)
Should We Preload STEMI Patients with Antiplatelet Therapy?
Influence of Omeprazole on the Antiplatelet Action of Clopidogrel Associated With Aspirin The Randomized, Double-Blind OCLA(Omeprazole CLopidogrel Aspirin)
Polypharmacy Anticoagulation: AF meets PCI
The TREAT Study: Can Devices Lower Bleeding Rates?
The GRAVITAS trial Matthew J. Price MD, FACC, FSCAI
Antiplatelet Therapy For STEMI: The Case for Cangrelor
ARCTIC-INTERRUPTION 2-year- Versus 1year Duration of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After DES implantation The randomized ARCTIC-Interruption Study JP Collet.
Platelet Function Testing: Which one Should we Perform and
The Big Antiplatelet Debate Why I Prefer Prasugrel Over Ticagrelor
We Should Tailor Antiplatelet Therapy Based on Platelet Function Testing and Genotyping Paul A. Gurbel Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research Baltimore,
Francesco Franchi, MD, Fabiana Rollini, MD, Jose Rivas Rios, MD, Andrea Rivas, MD, Malhar Agarwal, MD, Megha Kureti, MD, Deepa Nagaraju, MD, Mustafa Wali,
The ANTARCTIC investigators
ACTIVE A Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
Figure 3 Metabolism pathway of antiplatelet agents
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Figure 4 Pharmacodynamic comparison of crushed versus integral
Figure 3 Ischaemic outcomes in the ST-segment elevation myocardial
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Why I Prefer Ticagrelor
on Behalf of the COGENT Investigators
For the ACTION study group
Roberta Rossini et al. JCIN 2018;11:
The Case for Routine CYP2C19 ( Plavix® ) Genetic Testing
Presentation transcript:

Pharmacodynamic Effects of Cangrelor on Platelet P2Y 12 Receptor Mediated Signaling in Prasugrel Treated Patients Fabiana Rollini, Francesco Franchi, Antonio Tello-Montoliu, Ronakkumar Patel, Andrew Darlington, José Luis Ferreiro, Jung Rae Cho, Ana Muniz-Lozano, Bhaloo Desai, Martin M. Zenni, Luis A. Guzman, Theodore A. Bass and Dominick J. Angiolillo. University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA JACC Cardiovasc Interv Apr;7(4):

Authors and disclosures The present study was funded by a grant from The Medicines Company. The study was designed and undertaken by the investigators who had final responsibility for the decision to publish these results. Dominick J. Angiolillo: Received payment as an individual for: a) Consulting fee or honorarium from Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, The Medicines Company, AstraZeneca, Merck, Evolva, Abbott Vascular and PLx Pharma; b) Participation in review activities from Johnson & Johnson, St. Jude, and Sunovion. Institutional payments for grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, Glaxo Smith Kline, Otsuka, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, The Medicines Company, AstraZeneca, Evolva, Gilead; and has other financial relationships with Esther and King Biomedical Research Grant. José Luis Ferreiro: reports honoraria for lectures from Eli Lilly Co; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Astra Zeneca. Theodore A. Bass: has received research funds (paid to Institution) from Baxter. All other authors have not disclosures to report.

BACKGROUND Despite the more rapid and potent levels of platelet inhibition achieved compared with clopidogrel, pharmacodynamic studies have shown interindividual variability in prasugrel effects (1-5) In particular, delayed antiplatelet effects and high rates of high on platelete reactivity have been shown especially in the early hours after prasugrel administration in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI (6,7) The use of orally administered antiplatelet agents may be challenging in patients unable to swallow (e.g. patients sedated, intubated, in shock, or those with nausea or vomiting) These observations support the need for intravenous antiplatelet therapies able to yield more prompt and potent platelet inhibitory effects, which are unlikely to be achieved with oral medications (5) Cangrelor, is a potent intravenous direct-acting and reversible P2Y 12 receptor antagonist which has shown to reduce ischemic complications, including stent thrombosis, in P2Y 12 inhibitor naïve patients undergoing PCI (8,9) 1)Alexopoulos D et al. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19:5121-6; 2)Bonello L et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:467-73; 3)Alexopoulos D et al. Int J Cardiol. 2012;154:333-4; 4)Ferreiro JL et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:182-4; 5)Ferreiro JL et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:433-45; 6)Alexopoulos D et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5: ; 7)Parodi G et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1601-6; 8)Bhatt DL et al. N Engl J Med. 2013;368: ; 9)Steg PG et al. Lancet. 2013;382:

STUDY AIM The aim of this prospective, randomized, pharmacodynamic investigation was to assess by whole blood vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) the in vitro effects of cangrelor on platelets from patients with coronary artery disease on maintenance prasugrel 10mg/day therapy treated with two reloading dose (30mg or 60mg) regimens. PRIMARY END-POINT The primary endpoint of the study was the comparison between PRI before and after in vitro incubation with cangrelor at baseline, while patients were on maintenance prasugrel 10mg/day.

Inclusion criteria:  Age between 18 and 74 years old  aspirin (81 mg/day) and prasugrel (10 mg/day) for at least 14 days  stable coronary artery disease Exclusion criteria:  age ≥ 75 years old  active bleeding  prior cerebrovascular event  body weight < 60 kg  clinical instability after the index event  use of oral anticoagulation  platelet count < 100x10 6 /µl  hemoglobin <10 g/dl  creatinine > 2 mg/dl  hepatic enzymes >2.5 times the upper limit of normal  pregnant and lactating females STUDY POPULATION

STUDY DESIGN Patients on aspirin (81 mg/day) and prasugrel (10mg/day) ≥ 14 days post-PCI Prasugrel 30 mg Reload Prasugrel 60 mg Reload Pharmacodynamic testing: 1 hour Pharmacodynamic testing: Baseline Pharmacodynamic testing: 4 hours Pharmacodynamic testing (VASP) with and without in vitro cangrelor 500 nM

PLATELET FUNCTION TEST Whole blood vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) The VASP assay was used to determine the platelet reactivity index (PRI) according to standard protocols. VASP was performed before and after in vitro incubation with 500 nM cangrelor at each time point. In brief, VASP phosphorylation (VASP-P) was measured by quantitative flow cytometry using commercially available labelled monoclonal antibodies (Biocytex Inc, Marseille, France). A reduced PRI is indicative of greater inhibition of the P2Y 12 signalling pathway.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Conformity to the normal distribution was evaluated for continuous variables with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test (if expected value in any cell was fewer than 5) were used to compare categorical variables between two groups A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model was used to evaluate intra- group comparisons and the overall difference between groups, using Bonferroni approach to correct for multiple comparisons An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) method with a general linear model, using the baseline value of platelet reactivity as a covariate, was used to evaluate all between- groups comparisons A 2-tailed p value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference for all the analyses performed

RESULTS (1) Baseline Characteristics

RESULTS (2) Comparison of platelet reactivity values between 30 mg and 60 mg prasugrel re-loading dose in the absence of cangrelor Baseline1 hour 4 hours Prasugrel 30 mg Prasugrel 60 mg p=0.481 p=0.001 Prasugrel 30 mg Intragroup ANOVA p<0.001 Baseline vs 1hr p<0.001 Baseline vs 4hrs p< hr vs 4hrs p=0.065 Prasugrel 60 mg Intragroup ANOVA p<0.001 Baseline vs 1hr p<0.001 Baseline vs 4hrs p< hr vs 4hrs p=0.001 Platelet Reactivity Index % ANOVA p=0.935

RESULTS (3) Comparison of platelet reactivity values between 30 mg and 60 mg prasugrel re-loading dose in the presence of cangrelor Baseline + cangrelor1 hour4 hours Prasugrel 30 mg + cangrelor Prasugrel 60 mg + cangrelor p=0.604 p=0.334 Platelet Reactivity Index % ANOVA p=0.373 Prasugrel 30 mg + cangrelor Intragroup ANOVA p<0.001 Baseline vs 1h p=0.002 Baseline vs 4 hs p< h vs 4hs p=0.401 Prasugrel 60 mg + cangrelor Intragroup ANOVA p=0.001 Baseline vs 1hr p=0.124 Baseline vs 4 hrs p= hr vs 4 hrs p=0.016

RESULTS (4) p<0.001 p=0.013 p=0.001 ANOVA p=0.001 Platelet Reactivity Index % Comparison of PRI expressed as percentages measured by VASP across time points in the prasugrel 30 mg reload group in presence and absence of cangrelor

RESULTS (5) Comparison of PRI expressed as percentages measured by VASP across time points in the prasugrel 60 mg reload group in presence and absence of cangrelor p<0.001 p=0.002 p=0.325 ANOVA p<0.001 Platelet Reactivity Index %

Baseline + cangrelor1 hour4 hours Δ Platelet Reactivity Index % p>0.999 ANOVA p=0.290 Prasugrel 60 mg + cangrelor Prasugrel 30 mg + cangrelor RESULTS (6) Absolute change or delta (Δ) between PRI values in the absence and presence of cangrelor in each arm (30 mg and 60 mg prasugrel re-load)

CONCLUSIONS In vitro cangrelor is associated with enhanced platelet inhibition when added to platelets of patients on prasugrel maintenance therapy as well as when exposed to a reloading dose Platelet inhibitory effects of in vitro cangrelor are immediate and faster than prasugrel reloading alone Comparable levels of platelet reactivity to that achieved with in vitro cangrelor were observed only 4 hours after a 60 mg prasugrel reloading dose Rollini F. et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv Apr;7(4):426-34