The Affordable Care Act and Realignment Article 13 Counties.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Property Tax Relief and Reform: Plan Overview Joint Select Committee on Property Tax Relief and Reform June 11, 2007.
Advertisements

City of Kalamazoo Early Retirement Incentive (ERI) 2011.
Clearing a Path to Savings: Removing Federal Barriers in Public Assistance Programs Amy-Ellen Duke The Center for Law and Social Policy November 15, 2006.
1 OAS Quarterly Resource Management and Performance Report June 30, 2013 Secretariat for Administration and Finance.
Annual meeting with the MA of the ETC programmes April 2013 Financial management Juan Lopez Lledo, Budget and Financial mangement, Unit REGIO.A.3.
1 Targeted Case Management (TCM) Changes Iowa Medicaid Enterprise October 14, 2008.
1 Advisory Council April 1, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Budget and Caseload Update Policy and Fiscal Committee December 6, 2010.
1 Board Meeting June 14, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
1 EEC Board Meeting May 10, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
FY11 Budget and Caseload Update Policy and Fiscal Committee June 6, 2011.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
1 Understanding IDEA and MOE under the ARRA The basics of maintenance of effort 4/09.
Webinar: June 6, :00am – 11:30am EDT The Community Eligibility Option.
Planning After PLANYC: A Framework for Developing New York Citys Next Ten-Year Capital Strategy 1 The Most Important Economic and Fiscal Decisions Facing.
Job Order and Process Costing
1 Payment Systems Funds Availability Problems. 2 Problems Funds Availability Scenarios All deposits made in Oklahoma City on Monday March 1 Bank open.
Economics 302 Lecture 2 Topics Topics Aggregate Output (Standard Measure) GDP vs GPI discussion The Other Major Macroeconomic Variables (Unemployment and.
1 Equity in School Lunch Pricing (Section 205) Howard Leikert Supervisor School Nutrition Programs March 22, 2011.
IHPA and the National Efficient Price (NEP) Independent Hospital Pricing Authority.
Low Income Health Program Update County Welfare Directors Association Health Care Reform Workshop July 14, 2011.
IDEA-B LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) FY 2014 and Beyond Texas Education Agency (TEA) Division of Federal Fiscal Compliance and Reporting November 2013.
 Program Overview 1. 2 Assembly Bills 1494 and 1468 provide for the transition of children from Healthy Families Program (HFP) to the California Medi-Cal.
San Marino Unified School District Second Interim Financial Report Board of Education Meeting March 12, 2013.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Figure 1. More Than Two-Thirds of Opinion Leaders Say Current Payment System Is Not Effective at Encouraging High Quality of Care.
Mental Health Funding.
Lora Duzyk Assistant Superintendent, Business Services.
(a) Amount of funds provided: The amount of funds provided under the terms of the contract shall NOT be less than the Secretary would have provided for.
FISCAL CONSTRAINTS & CHALLENGES PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION DECEMBER 9, Rye City School District.
Michigan Department of Treasury August 2014
Weekly Attendance by Class w/e 6 th September 2013.
Cost-Revenue Analysis for Decision Making
Commission Briefing Low Performing Schools in Urban High Poverty Communities November 11, 2014 House Committee on Education.
Obamacare and UC Students Heather Pineda, MPH Director - UC Student Health Insurance Plan.
Health Insurance Exchanges under the Affordable Care Act Deborah Chollet, Ph.D. Senior Fellow.
California AB 2244 Applicants Under Age 19 Final Starting March 2, 2011.
 Created by City Council in October Original purpose of the fund: To support housing opportunities for workforce families. $600,000 fund.  On.
Joe Nestler, P.E. Bureau of State Highway Programs Division of Transportation Investment Management WTBA / WisDOT Contractor Engineer Conference January.
Hearing: The Road Home Testimony Before the CA Assembly Select Committee on Homelessness Peggy Bailey Senior Policy Advisor Corporation for Supportive.
Retirement Planning Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Location: 1111 H Street Fresno, CA Phone: (559) Stop Mail #: 40 Web Address:
Sequestration How Does it Work. Passed the Congress in August 2011 Established the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction It’s the Law! P.L
CWDA Fiscal Meeting: Realignment 1991 & 2011 & AB85 November 14, 2013
Preliminary Budget Update March 10, 2015 MARPLE NEWTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Redirection of 1991 Realignment Los Angeles County.
1 Assembly Bill x Dissolution Act Thomas P. Clark, Jr., Special Counsel to the City of Santa Ana Acting and Serving as Successor Agency to the Community.
Overview and Children’s Advocates’ Response The Healthy Families Program Transition into Medi-Cal Kristen Golden Testa Director, CA Health Program The.
 Estimates of the influx of newly-covered individuals in California by 2014: ◦ range from 1.5 to 2 million new Medi-Cal beneficiaries ◦ over 3 million.
The Hilltop Health Care Reform Simulation Model Hamid Fakhraei, Ph.D. July 2012.
Redirection of 1991 Realignment Designated Public Hospital Counties
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Tuesday, July 7, 2015.
MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP) AN OVERVIEW OF HOW THE FORMULA IS CALCULATED.
1 County MHDD Funding What is happening with the funding of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Services in Iowa and Fayette County. Julie Jetter,
Anticipated Phase 2 Realignment November 28, 2012 Long Beach, CA CSAC Health & Human Services Policy Committee CSAC Annual Meeting.
FUNDING MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IN CALIFORNIA August 13, 2015.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Annual COLA for April 2006 February 15, 2006 P.
2011 Tax Levy Hearing Board of Education Meeting December 19,
Public Behavioral Health Policy and Fiscal Updates California Institute for Mental Health (CiMH) Behavioral Health Financial Managers' Fiscal Leadership.
CSAC Institute: Realignment Workshop Health Services June 4, 2010 Judith Reigel, CHEAC Executive Director Margaret Szczepaniak, Assistant Director, Health.
Budget and Caseload Update Policy and Fiscal Committee April 4, 2011.
Presenters & Panelists Presenters Robert Manchia, San Mateo, Health & Human Services Dorothy Thrush, San Diego – Public Safety Services Andrew Pease,
California Community Mental Health Revenue Update California Institute for Behavioral Health Solutions (CIBHS) County Behavioral Health Fiscal Leadership.
MHSA Revised Fiscal Policies California Department of Mental Health Carol Hood January 17, 2008.
UPCOMING STATE INITIATIVES WHAT IS ON THE HORIZON? MERCED COUNTY HEALTH CARE CONSORTIUM Thursday, October 23, 2014 Pacific Health Consulting Group.
True-Up Service Fee Adjustment with OMI/Thames January 10, 2006.
Health Director Orientation May 4, Fiscal 101: Basics of LHD Funding Streams Presented by Ann Moore Public Health Administrative Consultant Department.
Impact of the AHCA on Medicaid
Minimum Foundation Program (MFP) Past, Present & Future
WASHINGTON COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL 2017 Tax Levy
Mental Health Financial Issues
Commonwealth of Virginia
Presentation transcript:

The Affordable Care Act and Realignment Article 13 Counties

Background California elected to implement a state-run Medicaid Expansion starting in With the state taking on the obligation for the county indigent population currently served by counties, it is assumed that counties’ costs associated with the indigent population will decrease. Assembly Bill (AB) 85 lays out a process by which a portion of the 1991 County Health Realignment Funds would be redirected to support Social Services programs. Article 13 Counties2

Background (cont.) The formula, should these counties not choose to redirect 60%, is addressed in Section Redirection to begin effective January 2014 Article 13 Counties3

Fresno Merced Orange Placer Sacramento San Diego San Luis Obispo Santa Barbara Santa Cruz Stanislaus Tulare Yolo Article 13 Counties4

Overview Counties have 2 options for determining the redirected amount. Each county must inform DHCS of tentative decision by 11/1/13 Must adopt a resolution by 1/22/14 60% of 1991 Health Realignment Funds + 60% of Maintenance of Effort Maintenance of Effort is capped at 14.6% of the total value of each county’s allocation. County Savings Determination Process (Formula) Lesser of: (Revenues-Costs) x.80 (.70 in 13/14) Or County Indigent Care Health Realignment Amount (=Health Realignment Amount x Health Realignment Indigent Care Percentage) If the counties do not adopt a resolution or fail to inform DHCS of their chosen option, then the calculation is 62.5% of County Realignment funds and 62.5% of the MOE. Counties that select the 60%/40% option may later petition the Health Care Funding Resolution Committee to elect the formula option. Article 13 Counties5

6 Overview Continued - County Savings Determination Process (Formula) The purpose of the formula is to calculate the health care savings the county is experiencing as a result of health care reform. This is achieved by determining if the overall available revenues exceed the costs the county is incurring (subject to a cost containment limit) Revenue 1. Indigent Program Revenues 2. Special Local Health Funds 3. County Indigent Care Health Realignment Amount 4. Imputed County Low-Income Health Amount Costs 5. Indigent Program Costs incurred by the county for the fiscal year, not to exceed the cost containment limit. County Indigent Care Health Realignment Amount Health Realignment Amount x Health Realignment Indigent Care Percentage =MIN((SUM( )-5) x.80*, [or] County Indigent Care Health Realignment Amount) *In 2013/14, the savings percentage will be.70

Revenues Article 13 Counties7

Definitions – Indigent Program Revenues Self-pay payments made by or on behalf of indigent program individuals to the county for services rendered in the fiscal year. Excludes revenues received for mental health and substance use disorder services. Article 13 Counties8

Definitions – Special Local Health Funds  Tobacco Settlement Funds The amount of tobacco settlement funds used in the revenue calculation will be the greater of: A. The actual amount of tobacco settlement funds expended by the county during the fiscal year OR B. The tobacco settlement funds that the counties receive x the average of the historical percentages (FY08/09- FY11/12). Article 13 Counties9

Definitions – County Indigent Care Health Realignment Amount = Health Realignment amount for the fiscal year x Historical health realignment indigent care percentage OR = 85%  85% will be used if the county does not provide the information needed to calculate the health realignment indigent care percentage Article 13 Counties10

Article 13 Counties11 Health Realignment Indigent Care Percentage County-specific percentage determined as follows: The average of the percentages for each historical fiscal year of the percentage of county health realignment that was used to provide health services to the indigent. If the county does not provide the required information or insufficient data, the percentage shall be set at 85%.

Definitions – Imputed County Low-Income Health Amount Predetermined, county general fund subsidy used for county indigent care Calculated as follows: 1. Take the historical amount for each historical fiscal year (FY08/09-FY11/12) 2. Find the average percentage increase 3. Average the historical amounts in (1.) and multiply it by the lessor of the average percentage increase (2.) or the applicable blended CPI Article 13 Counties12

Costs Article 13 Counties13

Definitions – Indigent Program Costs Costs incurred by the county for purchasing, providing or ensuring the availability of services to the indigent program individuals during the fiscal year.  Mental health and substance use disorder costs are not included Article 13 Counties14

Blended Consumer Price Index (CPI) Bureau of Labor Statistics data Non-seasonally adjusted CPI for All Urban Consumers – US city average Category 1 – Hospital and Related Services – weighted at 75% Category 2 – Medical Care Services – weighted at 25% Article 13 Counties15

Cost Containment Limit (formula) = Base Year Cost Per person X Blended CPI X Indigent program individuals in the relevant fiscal year *base year = FY ending 3 years prior to subject FY. Article 13 Counties16

Cost Containment Limit IF – the subject years actual indigent program costs exceed the calculated cost containment limit for the year THEN the cost containment limit is used for the calculation OR adjustments to the cost containment limit can be sought. Article 13 Counties17

Adjustments to the Cost Containment Limit The following costs, if applicable, can be added to the cost containment limit prior to the application of the limit in the formula: Costs related to state or federally mandated activities, requirements, or benefit changes. Costs resulting from a court order or settlement. Costs incurred as a result of a natural disaster or act of terrorism. Other costs as requested and approved by DHCS. Article 13 Counties18

Article 13 Counties19 Cost Containment Limit Example

Timeline FY 2013/14 10/31/13 – Counties using formula give data needed for formula to state for 1) Health Realignment Amount 2) Imputed County Low-Income Health Amount 3) Indigent Program Costs o 12/15/13 – State notifies counties if we disagree with data listed above o 1/13/14 – If no agreement has been reached regarding data, DHCS shall use county’s data until a decision is made. o The County Health Care Funding Resolution Committee shall decide whether the data is accurate/sufficient within 45 days. By 6/30/15 – Counties submit final data to state By 12/31/15 – State provides final FY 2013/14 calculations to counties Article 13 Counties20

Timeline Continued FY 2014/15 and future years November - 5 months after the end of each fiscal year, counties using the formula submit reports on all revenue and cost data to DHCS. January - DHCS completes the interim calculation the January prior to the starting fiscal year, using the most current/accurate data available. May – DHCS updates the interim calculation in May before the start of the fiscal year. June - 12 months/by June 30th of the year after subject fiscal year, counties submit final data to DHCS. July - December – DHCS completes the final calculation and submits to counties by December 31 st of the fiscal year following the receipt of the final data – one and a half years after the subject fiscal year. Article 13 Counties 21