The Asset Recovery Imperative

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
11 COUNTER-TERRORISM COMMITTEE CTED PRESENTATION ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE TO MEMBER STATES presentation by CTED GENERAL LEGAL ISSUES GROUP, INCLUDING.
Advertisements

The Inter-American Convention against Corruption, its Follow-Up Mechanism (MESICIC), and the Inter-American Program of Cooperation to Fight Corruption.
Session 1: WTO Work on Transparency in Government Procurement January, Dar es Salaam Vesile Kulaçoglu,WTO Secretariat.
Measuring and assessing corruption and economic crime: The role and mandate of UNODC Dimosthenis Chrysikos UNODC/DTA/CEB/CSS.
EuropeAid International Conventions Combating Corruption Mr Sumedh Rao, Governance & Social Development Resource Centre (GSDRC) European Commission Training.
The Work of the Commonwealth in facilitating the repatriation of Assets Veronic Wright Legal Adviser Legal and Constitutional Affairs Division Commonwealth.
Thematic Area 4: Law Enforcement: Dealing with illicit proceeds Global Forum Against Corruption V Johannesburg 3 April 2007 Willie Hofmeyr Head: Asset.
Global Forum V: Fighting Corruption and Safeguarding Integrity Fulfilling our commitment: Effective action against corruption Sandton Convention Centre,
EUFJE BRUSSELS CONFERENCE 19 Octobre 2010 Joint meeting EUFJE – public prosecutors,
Pol. Col. Seehanat Prayoonrat, Ph.D. (Law) Acting Secretary-General
Money Laundering and Corruption
Global Forum V –April 2007 Rainer Bührer The Interpol Anti-Corruption Academy ‘A partnership approach’
International Country Cooperation and Coordination in Implementing the Palermo Protocol Ruby Marks Chief Director: Gender Department of International Relations.
1. Asset Recovery Rules in Jordan 5 th Pan-European High Level Conference on asset Recovery Offices Cyprus Oct Prof. Fayyad Alqudah (LL.B,
Preconditions for Effective Implementation of anti-corruption measures.
GETTING THE MONEY BACK Daniel H. Claman Senior Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice.
1 StAR Initiative Progress and Next Steps November 2009.
By conservative estimates, US$20 billion to $40 billion is stolen from developing countries each year. This is equivalent to 20 to 40 percent of total.
Detection and Confiscation of the property obtained by criminal means Dalian, 2012.
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION Daniel H. Claman Senior Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice.
Cross-border Transfer of Currency or Assets through Informal Systems or Networks for Use in the Financing of Terrorism CICTE Ninth Regular Session Washington.
1 Towards A Global Architecture for Asset Recovery November 2009.
United Nations Convention against Corruption United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Division for Treaty Affairs.
Using the UN Convention against Corruption as a Basis for Good Governance.
International Standards Simon Goddard 31 August 2012 MOLI Serbia.
Bratislava October 2007 PAR - AC CoP Meeting Anti Corruption Regional Programme Regional Programme.
United Nations Convention against Corruption United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Division for Treaty Affairs South East Asia Parliamentarians against.
Heba Shams (World Bank) & Nadim Kyriakos –Saad (IMF) World Bank
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B Strategies to Control Illicit Trade.
Regional Conference Intellectual Property Crime Bahrain April 2008.
© 2012 Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP & Edwards Wildman Palmer UK LLP Criminal & civil recovery mechanisms to recover the proceeds of corruption a common law.
UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION. Negotiation and adoption of the Convention  The United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized.
CHILEAN SYSTEM OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF LEGAL ENTITIES BASIC ELEMENTS OF CRIME PREVENTION (LAW Nº20.393) Pablo Gómez Niada Valparaíso’s Regional Prosecutor.
United Nations Convention against Corruption United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Regional Office – South Asia Nimesh Jani.
GLOBAL FORUM V ON FIGHTING CORRUPTION AND SAFEGUARDING INTEGRITY INTER-RELATIONSHIP AMONG THE VARIOUS FRAMEWORKS.
Anti-Corruption Conference – Corruption: Impact & Monitoring Anti-korupcijska konferencija – Korupcija: uticaj & monitoring 19. oktobar 2005, Podgorica.
Illicit Enrichment and Alternatives: Criminalization, Asset Declarations and Non- Conviction Based Forfeiture Stuart C. Gilman, Ph.D. Tunis, Tunisia July.
Division for Treaty Affairs Aims and Structure of Convention Preventive Measures International Cooperation Asset Recovery Technical Assistance Information.
Chapter IV. International Cooperation. 2 2 International Cooperation Mandatory Offences Optional Offences Narrow Dual Criminality Requirements In MLAs.
World Bank – GOPAC – APNAC – Forum, 20 September 2006, Arusha (Tanzania) International Framework to Fight Corruption: International Treaties and Standards;
United Nations Convention against Corruption United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Division for Treaty Affairs (Updated: 5 July 2004)
Addressing fraudulent manipulation of sport results : the UNODC perspective Dimosthenis Chrysikos UNODC/DTA/CEB/CSS.
1 The Challenges of Globalization of Criminal Investigations Countries need to: Enact sufficient laws to criminalize computer abuses; Commit adequate personnel.
Ratification of the United Nations Convention against Corruption in Lithuania A Review of the Compliance of the Lithuanian Legal and Institutional Framework.
World Bank International Standards and Action to Combat Money Laundering - Legal Aspects Mark Butler Financial Sector Specialist, Financial Market Integrity,
Mobilizing Anti-Money Laundering regimes to Combat Wildlife Crime Marilyne Pereira Goncalves, World Bank.
The MESICIC Experience & Civil Society Participation.
Organization of American States Secretariat for Multidimensional Security Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission Proposal for addressing TOC in the.
Asset Recovery in the United Nations Convention against Corruption
UN Convention against Corruption: Asset Recovery and StAR Prime Ministry Inspection Board Ankara, Turkey February 2009.
Meeting of Fraudnet, Rio de Janeiro 13 April 2007 Presented By:- Martin S. Kenney Martin Kenney & Co., Solicitors Preferred Area of Practice: International.
ASSET RECOVERY AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN INDONESIA ASSET RECOVERY AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN INDONESIA THE 6 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF IAACA.
IBA Conference Buenos Aires Anti-Corruption Committee Recovery of looted assets 15 October 2008 Switzerland Yves Klein Monfrini Crettol & Associés, Geneva.
FIGHTING CORRUPTION IN SIERRA LEONE- IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION (UNCAC)
3rd Annual Cross Border Litigation and Asset Recovery Forum 2015, Lagos, November 6, 2015 How criminal prosecutions can be used to improve recovery opportunities.
ASEAN v Transnational Crime and Terrorism…..an Introduction
3rd Annual Cross Border Litigation and Asset Recovery Forum 2015, Lagos, November 6, 2015 International co-operation in fraud investigation, use of.
The StAR Initiative: An Overview EAMJA-KIGALI May 24, 2012
The Inter-American Convention against Corruption and its Follow-Up Mechanism (MESICIC) The Inter-American Convention against Corruption, its Follow-Up.
ASSET SHARING Between countries in criminal cases
FATF and MONEYVAL The soft law approach.
Fundamental principle of UNCAC
Philip Hackett Q.C The 36 Group SPEAKER.
1. Introduction to the Convention 2
Fundamental principle of UNCAC
Madhab Paudel Kathmandu 19 June 2017
Civil society guide on working with the UNCAC
A fundamental principle of UNCAC
Civil society guide on working with the UNCAC
Presentation transcript:

The Asset Recovery Imperative Daniel H. Claman Senior Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice

USD 1.5 to 5 billion USD 1 to 2.8 billion USD 3 to 14 billion Global Problem of Money Laundering: IMF Estimates: between 2% y 5% of Gross World Product, At least USD $600,000,000 USD 23 million to 1 billion USD 100 million USD 250 million or more USD 106 to 700 million

CHALLENGES Difficulty Proving Underlying Crime Difficulty Proving Financial Relationships Resource Intensive Strong presumptions in favor of property rights Differences in Legal Systems

OPPORTUNITY NOW International Commitment to Asset Recovery Legal tools Denial of Safe Haven commitments G-8 Justice and Home Affairs Declaration on Asset Recovery Legal tools Inter-American Convention OECD Convention U.N. Convention Against Corruption Recent Successes

DECLARATION OFNUEVO LEON “In the framework of applicable national and international law, we commit to deny safe haven to corrupt officials, to those who corrupt them, and their assets; and to cooperate in their extradition as well as in the recovery and return of the proceeds of corruption to their legitimate owners. We also commit to enhance regional mechanisms for mutual legal assistance in criminal matters and their implementation.”

DENIAL OF SAFE HAVEN Political Commitments Broadly Endorsed Visa Denial Extradition Asset Recovery Broadly Endorsed Summit of the Americas G-8 APEC

G-8 JUSTICE MINISTERIAL INITIATIVE 2004 Justice and Home Affairs Ministers Declaration on Recovering the Proceeds of Corruption Practical steps to facilitate cooperation Ensure G-8 states have legal tools to be able to provide assistance

G-8 JUSTICE MINISTERIAL INITIATIVE Facilitate Requests for Assistance Multilateral Case Coordination Seminars to share experiences, practices Enhanced Due Diligence and Wire Originator Information Examine Recovery without Conviction (death, immunity, fugitivity) Facilitate Repatriation

MULTILATERAL ANTI-CORRUPTION TREATIES Inter-American Convention Against Corruption Entered into force: 6 March 1997; Parties: 33 OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions Entered into force: 17 December 1997; Parties: 36 United Nations Convention Against Corruption Entered into force: 14 December 2005; Parties: 51 United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime Entered into force: 29 September 2003; Parties: 119

MULTILATERAL TREATIES Set Binding Standards for National Law Legal Framework for Mutual Legal Assistance Follow-up, Monitoring Mechanisms

INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION Wide range of corruption offenses Illicit Enrichment offense (Article IX) Subject to Constitution, fundamental principles Assistance regarding property (Article XV) Broadest possible measure of assistance in identification, tracing, freezing, seizure and forfeiture Property derived from or used in covered offenses Authorizes transfers to assisting countries

OECD CONVENTION AGAINST BRIBERY Attack the Supply Side of Corruption Criminalize Payment of Bribes to Foreign Officials Nationality Jurisdiction Peer Review

United Nations Convention Against Corruption Negotiated January 2002 to October 2003 Opened for signature December 9, 2003 in Merida, Mexico Entered into force December 14, 2005 51 Parties, 140 Signatories U.S. is a signatory but not yet a Party

STRUCTURE Chapter V: Asset Recovery Chapter I: General Provisions Chapter II: Preventive Measures Chapter III: Criminalization and Law Enforcement Chapter IV: International Cooperation Chapter V: Asset Recovery Chapter VI: Technical Assistance and Information Exchange Chapter VII: Mechanisms for Implementation Chapter VIII: Final Provisions TOC – 41 articles UNCAC – 71 Articles More focus on prevention and implementation

HIGHLIGHTS FOR ASSET RECOVERY Detection/Identification – Articles 14, 52, 58 Money laundering, confiscation – Articles 23, 31 Required ability to provide assistance in forfeiture – Articles 53, 54 Forfeiture assistance – Article 55 Disposition of forfeited property – Article 57 Dual criminality – Article 46 (9) Article 40 Bank Secrecy

MONEY LAUNDERING PREVENTION – ARTICLE 14 Based upon Palermo Transnational Organized Crime Convention Must require customer identification Must have suspicious activity reporting Should have a financial intelligence unit Should require inclusion of wire originator information

MONEY LAUNDERING PREVENTION – ARTICLE 14 Should require complete wire originator information Accurate, meaningful information on originator Maintain information throughout payment chain Enhanced scrutiny to transfers that do not include complete originator information

DETECTION OF GRAND CORRUPTION – ARTICLE 52 MUST require financial institutions to identify beneficial owner of high-value accounts MUST require financial institutions to conduct enhanced scrutiny of accounts of politically exposed persons Senior foreign politicians, family, associates MUST issue advisories concerning types of accounts/persons Disseminate identification of officials on request

DETECTION OF GRAND CORRUPTION – ARTICLE 52 No business with shell banks (no physical presence) Should require financial disclosure and permit to share with foreign authorities Should require disclosure of existence of foreign accounts

OLD FORFEITURE LEGAL ASSISTANCE REGIME 1988 Vienna Convention on Narcotics 2000 Palermo Convention on Transnational Organized Crime Requested country either open own case OR enforce a foreign confiscation judgment

NEW FORFEITURE LEGAL ASSISTANCE REGIME Direct recovery without forfeiture (Art. 53) MUST have basis to provide assistance (Art. 54) Procedures for international cooperation (Art. 55)

RETURN AND DISPOSAL ARTICLE 57 Major Focus of Negotiations REMEMBER: DIRECT FORFEITURE ALSO AVAILABLE (ARTICLE 53) MUST FIRST FIND, RESTRAIN, PRESERVE VALUE, CONFISCATE

DEVELOPING PRACTICE Abacha Fujimori/Montesinos Aleman/Jerez Switzerland $500 million repatriated Jersey $160 million repatriated Fujimori/Montesinos Switzerland $77 million repatriated United States $20.2 million repatriated Aleman/Jerez United States $2.7 million repatriated

CONFERENCE Corruption Investigations Asset Tracking and Financial Investigations Mutual Legal Assistance Transparency and Looking Forward

? USD 1.5 to 5 billion USD 1 to 2.8 billion USD 3 to 14 billion Global Problem of Money Laundering: IMF Estimates: between 2% y 5% of Gross World Product, At least USD $600,000,000 USD 23 million to 1 billion USD 100 million USD 250 million or more USD 106 to 700 million

SHARED COMMITMENTS SHARED RESPONSIBILITY

Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section Daniel H. Claman Senior Trial Attorney Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division (AFMLS) Washington, D.C. 20530 Tel. (202) 514-6340 Fax (202) 514-5522 Daniel.Claman@usdoj.gov