Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A 10 GeV, 4 MW, FFAG, Proton Driver at 50 Hz G H Rees, RAL.
Advertisements

12 PERIOD HYBRID WARM-COLD SYNCHROTRON FOR THE MUON COLLIDER Al Garren November 10, 2011.
Insertions for an Isochronous, 8-16 turn, 8-20 GeV, Muon FFAG G H Rees, RAL.
EMMA Magnet Design Ben Shepherd Magnetics and Radiation Sources Group ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  So far, we’ve talked about nice, periodic lattice, but that may not be all that useful in the real world. In particular, we generally.
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Electron Model Components and Costing C. Johnstone Summary talk, C. Johnstone FFAG04 Oct 12-16, 2004 KEK, Tsukuba, Japan.
1 Dejan Trbojevic EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, Virginia May 19, 2008 Dejan Trbojevic e-RHIC with non-scaling FFAG’s.
FFAG Workshop 2005 Dejan Trbojevic April 3, 2005 Electron model lattice with added edge focusing  Introduction:  Rick Baartman : “Spiral focusing slides”
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
FFAG Workshopfermilab April 2005 f Summary: FFAG WORKSHOP nonscaling electron model muon FFAGs C. Johnstone Fermilab.
PAMELA Contact Author: CONFORM is an RCUK-funded Basic Technology Programme PAMELA: Concepts Particle Accelerator for MEdicaL Applications K.Peach(JAI,
Options for a 50Hz, 10 MW, Short Pulse Spallation Neutron Source G H Rees, ASTeC, CCLRC, RAL, UK.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
Poster reference: FR5PFP025 Extending the Energy Range of 50Hz Proton FFAGs S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Magnetic.
Magnets for the FFAG ‘Pumplet’ Neil Marks ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory FFAG Worksop, Grenoble, April 2007.
Neutrino Factory,  ± Decay Rings C Johnstone, FNAL, F Meot, CEA, & G H Rees, RAL.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Y. Mori Kyoto/KEK FFAG C. OH FFAG: Fixed Field Alternating Gradient Strong focusing(AG focusing, phase focusing) Like synchrotron, but fixed field Moving.
A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
UK FFAG Plans Introduction to FFAGs Scaling vs non-scaling Non-scaling FFAGs Non-scaling POP Why the interest? UK plans.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
Neutrino Factory,  ± Decay Rings C Johnstone, FNAL, F Meot, CNRS, & G H Rees, RAL.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
Part I Optics. FFAG is “Fixed Field Alternating Gradient”. Ordinary synchrotron needs ramping magnets to keep the orbit radius constant. FFAG has Alternating.
First Thoughts on IDS G H Rees, RAL. Topics 1.Two-way, μ ± injection chicane for the dog-bone RLA. 2.Injection energy & efficiency for a first dog-bone.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
WG3 Summary (Achievements in 2005) 28 Talks & 5 focus sessions 17 talks &2 focus sessions in this talk 12 taks & 3 focus sessions by H. Kirk.
NUFACT’05 24-June-2005 H. Schönauer CERN The typical approaches to Muon acceleration at higher energies: Recirculating linacs Scaling FFAG’s : constant.
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model Main topic : Tracking code development : 3-D simulation of the field in an isochronous FFAG optics.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
WG2 (Proton FFAG) Summary G.H. Rees. Proton Driver Working Group  Participants: M. Yashimoto, S. Ohnuma, C.R. Prior, G.H. Rees, A.G. Ruggiero  Topics:
New Gantry Idea for H + /C 6+ Therapy G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL 4 th September, 2008.
HYBRID WARM-COLD SYNCHROTRON FOR THE MUON COLLIDER Al Garren July 28, 2011.
4 MW, 50 Hz, 10 GeV, 1 ns (rms), FFAG Proton Driver Study G H Rees, RAL.
3 GeV, 1.2 MW, RCS Booster and 10 GeV, 4.0 MW, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Scaling Gas-filled Muon Ring Coolers Al Garren, UCLA Ringcooler Mini-workshop Tucson, December 15-16, 2003.
ISS Muon Bunch Structure Convenors: S Berg, BNL, and G H Rees, RAL.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
FFAG’07 GrenobleJ. Pasternak, LPSC Grenoble Medical Spiral FFAG (RACCAM Ring) J. Pasternak, LPSC Grenoble 1.Motivations for medical FFAG. 2.Principle of.
“2:1” Scaled eRHIC FFAG Design Featuring ≤30T/m quadrupoles August 18, 2014Stephen Brooks, eRHIC FFAG meeting1.
An Alternative to Grahame Rees’ Isochronous FFAG Lattice for the Acceleration of Muons from 10 – 20 GeV Horst Schönauer, CERN Proposed FFAG-type Muon Accelerators:
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring February 11 th, 2008 LIS Section Meeting Y. Papaphilippou.
A Compact FFAG for Radioisotope Production D. Bruton R. Barlow, R. Edgecock, and C.J. Johnstone.
Optics considerations for PS2
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
eRHIC FFAG Lattice Design
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Optics considerations for PS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL

Non-scaling, Non-linear FFAGs Categories for FFAG Lattice Cells of Five Magnets: 1. IFFAG: isochronous, no Q v =n and 2Q v =n crossing 2. IFFAGI: IFFAG with combined function insertions 3. NFFAG: non-isochronous, high/imag  -t, no Q var’n 4. NFFAGI: NFFAG with insertions, some Q h variation 1 and 2: rapid acceleration of muons or electrons 3 and 4: high power proton drivers or medical rings

Pros and Cons for Insertions Pros:  Reduced ring circumference  Easier injection and extraction  Space for beam loss collimators  Fewer integer resonances crossed  Easier acceleration system to operate  Four times fewer, four-cell, 201 MHz cavities Cons:  Reduced ring periodicity  More magnet types required: 6, not 3 or 2  Small β h (max) ripple effects over a superperiod

Criteria for Insertion Designs  Isochronous conditions for the normal cells  Isochronous conditions for the insertion cells  Unchanged (x, x´) closed orbits on adding insertions  Minimising the separations of the radial closed orbits  Unchanged vertical α and β-functions on adding insertions  Unchanged horizontal α and β-functions on adding insertions Non-linear magnet, lattice study techniques are required. If x´= α h = α v = 0 at match points, 6 control variables needed: Match symmetrical, 5 unit, single cells, at long straight centres. Allow some small ripple in β h (max) over a superperiod

Options for the Insertion Designs Normal cell Insertion Magnet types Doublet D D 1 + T 0 + D Triplet T T 1 + T 2 + T Pumplet P 1 P Easiest solution is to match the two, pumplet cells:  P 1 has a smaller β-range than either D or T  The insertion has only one type of cell, P 2  P 2 has the smallest closed orbit “lever arm” No 2  dispersion suppressors, as too many are needed

8-20 GeV Muon, Normal & Insertion Cells bd(-) BF(±) BD (+) BF(±) bd(-) O O Normal cell (3º, 6.4 m) Insertion cell (3º, 10.2 m) 2.4 Lattice: 4 superperiods of 22(20) normal + 8(10) insertion cells New / old ring circumferences: or / m

Evaluation of Non-linear Lattices  First, at a reference energy for the insertion cell, a routine seeks a required value for Q v, and the value of gamma-t that provides for isochronism  Next, adopting the same reference energy for the normal cell, a second routine searches for a match to the relevant β v and γ-t values of the insertion cell  Then, the normal cell is re-matched, using a revised field gradient in its bd, and this is continued until the two cells have identical, closed orbit, end positions  Arrange for no Q v =n, 2Q v =n resonances to be crossed

Lattice Functions at GeV

Lattice Functions at 8 GeV

Lattice Functions near 20 GeV

Superperiod Parameters The insertion and normal cells are unlike those in other rings as they both have 3 º closed orbit bend angles and use non- linear combined function magnets. The fields, in Tesla, are: Insertion Normal cell bd magnets: to to BF magnets: 2.7 to to BD magnets: 3.0 to to 5.0 Range of radial tunes: to Range of vertical tunes: to 13.88

Reference Orbit Separations (mm) Energy range in GeV 9.5 to to to 20 Long straight sections Insertion cell bd unit Normal cell bd unit Insertion cell BF quad Normal cell BF quad Insertion cell BD unit Normal cell BD unit

Insertion Design Summary Superperiods meet all nine, design criteria at ~ 15 GeV, but eight, only, for most of the energy range, GeV A superperiod has 22 (20) normal + 8 (10) insertion cells & all four have the same, small, acceptable ripple in β h (max) Ripple is << than that of TRIUMF’s KAON Factory, D ring Normal & insertion cells require slightly different magnets From 8 to 20 GeV, no Q v =n, 2Q v = n resonances are crossed From 8 to 10 GeV, no Q h =n resonances are crossed From 10 to 20 GeV, 26,Q h =n resonances are crossed

10.4 to 20 MeV Electron Model Model ring for 6-D electron tracking studies Computing time less than for 8-20 GeV muons Studies of F Meot & F Lemuet now underway 3 superperiods of 9 normal & 4 insertion cells 16 turns at 0.6 MeV/ turn & 2997 MHz (h=270) No full/ half integer vertical resonances crossed

20 MeV, Electron Model, Cell Layouts bd(-) BF(±) BD(+) BF(±) bd(-) O O Normal cell (9.231º, 0.6 m) Insertion cell (9.231º, 0.9 m) 0.20 Three superperiods, each of 9 normal and 4 insertion cells New (previous) ring circumferences: 27.0 (29.2) m

Electron Model Studies  Matching between the insertions and normal cells  Isochronous properties of the 3 GHz, FFAG ring  Emittance growth in fast & slow resonance crossing  Transient beam loading of the three, 3-cell cavities Inject (s.c) & extract from the outer side of the ring ? Figure of eight and C-type magnets for the insertion ? Long transmission line kickers, no septum magnets ? Larger aperture in magnets adjacent to fast kickers ? Diagnostics in the insertions, with radial adjustment ?