Risk Measurement for a Credit Portfolio: Part One CHAPTER 20 Risk Measurement for a Credit Portfolio: Part One

INTRODUCTION In the preceding chapters, we created a framework for measuring and quantifying the risk of isolated credit facilities such as loans We now need to do the same for a portfolio of credit risks However, this effort requires a different set of tools because we need to include the effects of correlation Correlation describes the extent to which loans tend to default at the same time Intuitively, we would expect that companies would have some tendency to default together

This could happen because the whole economy is in recession, forcing many companies into bankruptcy at the same time, or it could be that the default of one company triggers the default of another company For example, the collapse of a car factory would tend to push suppliers and businesses in the local town closer to default

These correlation effects produce loss distributions that are highly skewed: there are many years of low losses, then a few years of "surprisingly" high loss The description of this correlation and skew is one of the most difficult problems in credit-risk measurement In this chapter and the next, we describe the five most common approaches used to measure the credit risk of a portfolio

Each approach estimates the probability distribution for the credit losses and specifically estimates the portfolio's expected loss, unexpected loss, and economic capital This allows us to determine how much capital the bank should hold to maintain its credit rating Also, in Chapter 22, we use the economic capital to calculate the risk-adjusted profitability of each loan in the portfolio

MODELING TECHNIQUES TO MEASURE AND QUANTIFYA PORTFOLIO OF CREDIT RISKS Correlation effects for credit defaults are difficult to observe because defaults are relatively infrequent For example, in any given year we would only expect 1 in1000 single-A-rated companies to default This contrasts with market-risk analysis in which we collect new price data on all traded securities every day

There are five common approaches: Given the scarcity of data, credit-risk models use assumptions and financial theories to estimate loss statistics based on the small amounts of observable data There are five common approaches: The covariance model The actuarial model The Merton-based simulation model The macroeconomic default model The macroeconomic cash-flow model

THE COVARIANCE CREDIT-PORTFOLIO MODEL The covariance portfolio model is also sometimes referred to as the Markowitz model It is largely the same as the parametric approach for VaR except that the correlations used are default correlations and the probability distribution is assumed to be a Beta distribution rather than a Normal distribution

THE COVARIANCE CREDIT-PORTFOLIO MODEL Another difference is that for credit risk, one of the results we are concerned about is the mean of the distribution (the expected loss), whereas for market risks, we assume the mean is zero In this discussion, we use the term "loan" to refer to any general credit exposure

THE COVARIANCE CREDIT-PORTFOLIO MODEL This discussion applies equally to other types of credit exposures, such as bonds, lines, and derivatives exposures There are four steps required in the covariance model:

THE COVARIANCE CREDIT-PORTFOLIO MODEL 1. Defining the expected loss (EL) and unexpected loss (UL) of the portfolio in terms of the EL and UL of the individual loans 2. Estimating the default correlation, which is the longest step 3. Estimating the portfolio's overall probability distribution based on its EL and UL. 4. Allocating the capital of the whole portfolio to the individual loans using the concept of unexpected loss contribution

Defining the Expected Loss and Unexpected Loss The expected loss for the portfolio (ELp) is simply the sum of the expected losses for the individual loans (ELi) within the portfolio:

Defining the Expected Loss and Unexpected Loss As with parametric VaR, the standard deviation for the portfolio (ULp) is obtained from the sum of the variances for the individual loans. If there are only two loans, ULp would be as follows:

Defining the Expected Loss and Unexpected Loss

Estimation of Loss Correlation Loss correlations can be estimated based on the historical data of losses or on asset correlations The approach taken in any given situation depends mostly on the data available Ideally, correlations should be calculated using both methods, and then compared

Using Historical Observations to Estimate Loss Correlation Let us begin by considering the simple case of a portfolio of two loans. The UL for this portfolio is given by the variance equation:

Using Historical Observations to Estimate Loss Correlation

Using Historical Observations to Estimate Loss Correlation

Using Historical Observations to Estimate Loss Correlation

Using Historical Observations to Estimate Loss Correlation

Using Historical Observations to Estimate Loss Correlation

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations The analysis above used portfolio-level data We now discuss the asset-correlation approach, which calculates the loss correlation between two individual companies The loss correlation is estimated based on the correlation between their net asset values or equity prices The approach calculates the loss correlation from the joint default probability

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations The joint default probability between two loans, 1 and 2 (JDP1,2), is the probability that both loans will default at the same time The relationship between the joint default probability and the loss correlation is detailed in Appendix C to this chapter The result is that the loss correlation between loans 1 and 2 can be expressed in terms of the joint default probability and the individual probabilities of default for the loans (P1, P2) as follows:

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations We can estimate P1 and P2 from the calculation of default probabilities as in Chapter 19 The problem now is to calculate JDP1,2

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations The calculation of the joint default probability can be based on the Merton approach that was discussed in Chapter 19 In Chapter 19, we estimated the probability of default for a single company as the probability that its asset value would fall below its debt value For this calculation, we assumed that the equity (E) was a good measure of the difference between the assets and debts

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations The probability of default was then calculated as the probability that the equity price would fall below zero:

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations E/σE is the distance to default or the critical value is the Standard Normal probability-density function This gave us the probability that one company will default We now want to know the probability of two companies' defaulting at the same time Let us define z1 and z2 as follows:

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations Here, E1 is the equity value for company 1, and E2 is the value for company 2 If we assume that the equity values are Normally distributed, then z1 and z2 will be Normally distributed Each with a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1 The probability of each company's defaulting is as follows:

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations The correlation between Z1 and z2 equals the correlation between the equity prices, ρE Figure 20-1 shows a scatter plot for 1000 possible changes in z1 and z2 for 2 companies with an equity correlation equal to 0.7 Notice that when one company has a low value, the other also tends to have a low value The probability of both companies' having a particular value is described by the joint-probability density function The formula for the joint probability density for 2 correlated Standard Normal variables is given below:

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations This function is plotted in Figure 20-2 for a correlation of 0.7 Notice that the plot is flattened and twisted along a 45-degree line If the correlation was lower, the twist along the 45-degree line would be less pronounced Figure 20-3 shows the probability-density function for a correlation of 0.1 Notice that the height of the function is now much less in the area where both companies have low values

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations Table 20-3 and Table 20-4 show the results for companies of differing credit quality and asset correlation In each table, the credit quality of the companies is increased from a default rate of 0.01 per year (1 basis point) to 10 per year (1000basis points) As the default rate increases, the default correlation also increases Comparison of Table 20-3 and Table 20-4 also shows that an increase in the equity correlation causes an increase in the default correlation

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations

Using Asset Correlations to Estimate Default Correlations

Estimation of the Economic Capital for Credit Losses Using the Covariance Portfolio Model From the discussions above, we can calculate the portfolio's EL and UL We now wish to use those results to estimate the portfolio's economic capital To do this, we need to estimate the probability distribution of the portfolio's losses In the covariance model, the losses are typically assumed to have a Beta distribution

Estimation of the Economic Capital for Credit Losses Using the Covariance Portfolio Model The Beta distribution is used for three reasons: 1. It can have highly skewed shapes similar to the distributions that have been observed for historical credit losses. 2. It only requires two parameters to determine the shape (ELp and ULp) 3. The possible losses are limited to being between 0% and 100% The formula for the Beta probability-density function for losses (L) is as follows:

Estimation of the Economic Capital for Credit Losses Using the Covariance Portfolio Model

Estimation of the Economic Capital for Credit Losses Using the Covariance Portfolio Model Figure 20-4 shows three Beta distributions for which (ULp) is held constant at 1%, and ELp equals 1%, 2%, and 3% Notice that as EL becomes larger relative to UL, the distribution becomes more like a Normal distribution Portfolios of lower-quality loans (e.g., credit cards) have a higher ratio of EL to UL, and therefore, have Beta distributions that tend to look like Normal distributions

Estimation of the Economic Capital for Credit Losses Using the Covariance Portfolio Model

Estimation of the Economic Capital for Credit Losses Using the Covariance Portfolio Model From the tail of the Beta distributions, we can obtain estimates of the economic capital required for the portfolio In Chapter 2, we discussed risk measurement at the corporate level and said that the common definition of economic capital for credit losses is the maximum probable loss minus the expected loss:

Estimation of the Economic Capital for Credit Losses Using the Covariance Portfolio Model The maximum probable loss is the point in the tail where there is a "very low“ probability that losses will exceed that point The "very low" probability is chosen to match the bank's desired credit rating For example, a single-A-rated bank would require that there should be only 10 basis points of probability in the tail, whereas AAA banks require around 1 basis point

Estimation of the Economic Capital for Credit Losses Using the Covariance Portfolio Model For the 3 distributions shown in Figure20-4, the 10-basis-point confidence level is close to 7%, and the 1-basis-point confidence level is between 8% and 9%. Figure 20-5 shows the process for calculating the economic capital using the covariance model with default correlations estimated from asset correlations.

Estimation of the Economic Capital for Credit Losses Using the Covariance Portfolio Model

Calculation of the Unexpected Loss Contribution We have now calculated the UL and economic capital of the portfolio as a whole Using the unexpected loss contribution, we can allocate the capital to the individual loans in the portfolio The unexpected loss contribution (ULC) allocates the total UL of the portfolio to the individual loans in the portfolio in such as way that the ULCs sum back up to the ULp of the portfolio

Calculation of the Unexpected Loss Contribution In Chapter 22, we use this capital allocation to calculate the risk-adjusted profitability for each loan The unexpected loss contribution takes the same approach as the Value at Risk contribution (VaRC) One approach is to differentiate ULp with respect to ULi, as shown in Appendix D An alternative derivation is simply to rearrange the terms in the summation notation:

Calculation of the Unexpected Loss Contribution

Calculation of the Unexpected Loss Contribution

Calculation of the Unexpected Loss Contribution This allows the economic capital contribution to be written simply as follows: ECCi = M x ULCi Knowing the economic capital contribution for an individual loan, we can calculate the risk-adjusted return on capital (RAROC) for that loan and set the required price if it is a new loan