Insertions for an Isochronous, 8-16 turn, 8-20 GeV, Muon FFAG G H Rees, RAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A 10 GeV, 4 MW, FFAG, Proton Driver at 50 Hz G H Rees, RAL.
Advertisements

12 PERIOD HYBRID WARM-COLD SYNCHROTRON FOR THE MUON COLLIDER Al Garren November 10, 2011.
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
EMMA Magnet Design Ben Shepherd Magnetics and Radiation Sources Group ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  So far, we’ve talked about nice, periodic lattice, but that may not be all that useful in the real world. In particular, we generally.
Electron Model Components and Costing C. Johnstone Summary talk, C. Johnstone FFAG04 Oct 12-16, 2004 KEK, Tsukuba, Japan.
1 Dejan Trbojevic EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, Virginia May 19, 2008 Dejan Trbojevic e-RHIC with non-scaling FFAG’s.
FFAG Workshop 2005 Dejan Trbojevic April 3, 2005 Electron model lattice with added edge focusing  Introduction:  Rick Baartman : “Spiral focusing slides”
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
Options for a 50Hz, 10 MW, Short Pulse Spallation Neutron Source G H Rees, ASTeC, CCLRC, RAL, UK.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
Neutrino Factory,  ± Decay Rings C Johnstone, FNAL, F Meot, CEA, & G H Rees, RAL.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
, EUROnu Meeting, Strasbourg J. Pasternak Status and recent progress on muon IDS-FFAG J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC Work.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Acceleration System Comparisons S. Machida ASTeC/RAL September, 2005, ISS meeting at CERN.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
First Thoughts on IDS G H Rees, RAL. Topics 1.Two-way, μ ± injection chicane for the dog-bone RLA. 2.Injection energy & efficiency for a first dog-bone.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
ERHIC FFAG Design for 21GeV I.Final Arc Cells for Design Report II.eRHIC FFAGs in RHIC Tunnel January 27, 2014Stephen Brooks, eRHIC FFAG meeting1.
NUFACT’05 24-June-2005 H. Schönauer CERN The typical approaches to Muon acceleration at higher energies: Recirculating linacs Scaling FFAG’s : constant.
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model Main topic : Tracking code development : 3-D simulation of the field in an isochronous FFAG optics.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
WG2 (Proton FFAG) Summary G.H. Rees. Proton Driver Working Group  Participants: M. Yashimoto, S. Ohnuma, C.R. Prior, G.H. Rees, A.G. Ruggiero  Topics:
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
New Gantry Idea for H + /C 6+ Therapy G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL 4 th September, 2008.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
HYBRID WARM-COLD SYNCHROTRON FOR THE MUON COLLIDER Al Garren July 28, 2011.
4 MW, 50 Hz, 10 GeV, 1 ns (rms), FFAG Proton Driver Study G H Rees, RAL.
3 GeV, 1.2 MW, RCS Booster and 10 GeV, 4.0 MW, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Scaling Gas-filled Muon Ring Coolers Al Garren, UCLA Ringcooler Mini-workshop Tucson, December 15-16, 2003.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
FFAG’07 GrenobleJ. Pasternak, LPSC Grenoble Medical Spiral FFAG (RACCAM Ring) J. Pasternak, LPSC Grenoble 1.Motivations for medical FFAG. 2.Principle of.
“2:1” Scaled eRHIC FFAG Design Featuring ≤30T/m quadrupoles August 18, 2014Stephen Brooks, eRHIC FFAG meeting1.
An Alternative to Grahame Rees’ Isochronous FFAG Lattice for the Acceleration of Muons from 10 – 20 GeV Horst Schönauer, CERN Proposed FFAG-type Muon Accelerators:
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Optics considerations for PS2 October 4 th, 2007 CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, C. Carli, B. Goddard, S. Hancock, J.M. Jowett, A. Koschik,
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring February 11 th, 2008 LIS Section Meeting Y. Papaphilippou.
Optics considerations for PS2
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
eRHIC FFAG Lattice Design
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
Alternate Lattice for LCLS-II LTU Y
NuSTORM - μ Storage Ring with Injection
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
6-D dynamics in an isochronous FFAG lattice e-model
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Optics solutions for the PS2 ring
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Comparison of NMC rings for PS2
PS2 meeting NMC lattice for PS2 Y. Papaphilippou September 28th, 2007.
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Optics considerations for PS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, August 20, 2014
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Insertions for an Isochronous, 8-16 turn, 8-20 GeV, Muon FFAG G H Rees, RAL

Pros and Cons for Insertions Pros:  Reduced ring circumference  Easier injection and extraction  Space for beam loss collimators  Fewer integer resonances crossed  Easier acceleration system to operate  Four times fewer, four-cell, 201 MHz cavities Cons:  Reduced ring periodicity  More magnet types required: 6, not 3 or 2  Small β h (max) ripple effects over a superperiod

Criteria for Insertion Designs  Isochronous conditions for the normal cells  Isochronous conditions for the insertion cells  Unchanged (x, x) closed orbits on adding insertions  Minimising the separations of the radial closed orbits  Unchanged vertical α and β-functions on adding insertions  Unchanged horizontal α and β-functions on adding insertions There are nine parameters that need to be controlled. These become six if x = α h = α v = 0 at the matching points. Hence, match symmetrical cells at long straight centres, eg Use the five-unit pumplets of the original isochronous design. Use the non-linear lattice study technique adopted previously.

Options for the Insertion Designs Normal cell Insertion Magnet types Doublet D D 1 + T 0 + D Triplet T T 1 + T 2 + T Pumplet P 1 P Easiest solution is to match the two, pumplet cells:  P 1 has a smaller β-range than either D or T  The insertion has only one cell type, P 2  P 2 has the smallest closed orbit “lever arm” Dispersion suppressors (2  ) have not been included as too many are needed & they are non-isochronous

20 GeV, Normal & Insertion Cell Layouts bd(-) BF(±) BD (+) BF(±) bd(-) O O Normal cell (3º, 6.4 m) Insertion cell (3º, 10.2 m) 2.4 Four superperiods, each of 20 normal & 10 insertion cells New and old ring circumferences: and m

Evaluation of Non-linear Lattices  First, at a reference energy for the insertion cell, a routine seeks a required value for Q v, and the value of gamma-t that provides for isochronism  Next, adopting the same reference energy for the normal cell, a second routine searches for a match to the relevant β v and γ-t values of the insertion cell  Then, the normal cell is re-matched, using a revised field gradient in its bd, and this is continued until the two cells have identical, closed orbit, end positions  Almost exact dispersion matching is obtained

Lattice Functions at GeV

Lattice Functions at 8 GeV

Lattice Functions near 20 GeV

Superperiod Parameters The insertion and normal cells are unlike those in other rings as they both have 3 º closed orbit bend angles and use non- linear combined function magnets. The fields, in Tesla, are: Insertion Normal cell bd magnets: -4.0 to to -2.2 BF magnets: 2.7 to to -2.3 BD magnets: 3.0 to to 4.9 Range of the radial tunes: to Range of the vertical tunes: to 14.39

Reference Orbit Separations (mm) Energy range in GeV 9.5 to to to 20 Long straight sections Insertion cell bd unit Normal cell bd unit Insertion cell BF quad Normal cell BF quad Insertion cell BD unit Normal cell BD unit

Insertion Design Summary  Superperiods meet all nine, design criteria at ~ 15 GeV, but eight, only, for most of the energy range, GeV  A superperiod has 20 normal and 10 insertion cells, and all four have the same, small, acceptable ripple in β h (max)  Ripple is << than that of TRIUMF’s KAON Factory, D ring  BD, BF & bd magnet types are needed in the normal cells Three slightly different types are needed for the insertions  Three, integer resonances are crossed in the vertical plane and 26, integer resonances are crossed in the radial plane

20 MeV, Electron Model, Cell Layouts bd(-) BF(±) BD(+) BF(±) bd(-) O O Normal cell (9.231º, 0.6 m) Insertion cell (9.231º, 0.9 m).20 Three superperiods, each of 9 normal & 4 insertion cells New and original ring circumferences: 27.0 and m

Electron Model Design Studies An e-model with insertions allows studies of:  Matching between the insertions and normal cells  Emittance growth in fast & slow resonance crossing  Isochronous properties of the 3 GHz, FFAG ring  Transient beam loading of the three, 3-cell cavities Inject (s.c) & extract from outermost side of the ring ? Costs of injection, & ejection over range MeV? Diagnostics, with radial adjustment, in the insertions? Figure of eight and C-type magnets for the insertion? Long transmission line kickers, no septum magnets? Larger aperture in magnets adjacent to fast kickers ?