Sun Ag Water Quality Study Report for Total Phosphorus Marc von Canal, Regulatory Scientist Mark Crosby, Engineer Victor McDaniel, Supervising Professional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOC and THMP loads from a restored wetland in the Delta DWR RD1601 CALFED CBDA staff USGS staff Jacob A Fleck Steven J. Deverel Roger Fujii.
Advertisements

Organic Carbon and Urban Sources - What Do We Know? Michael Zanoli Department of Water Resources, Division of Environmental Services, MWQI Program CBDA.
Management of Drainage Water in Illinois
THE EFFECTS OF EXTREMELY HIGH DENSITY SEPTIC SYSTEMS ON SURFACE WATER QUALITY IN GWINNETT COUNTY, GEORGIA John Anderson Georgia Perimeter College Lawrence.
The Barton Springs Part of the Edwards Aquifer: Basic physical and hydrologic characteristics pertinent to permitted discharges Raymond Slade, Jr, Certified.
Truckee River Water Quality: Current Conditions and Trends Relevant to TMDLs and WLAs Prepared for: Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility. City of.
Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,
Nutrient Loading in the Klamath Basin K.A. Rykbost B.A. Charlton Oregon State University Klamath Experiment Station.
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
1 Hurunui River Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus Concentrations and Loads A tool to manage periphyton growth ? Review of Ecan & NIWA Dataset of DRP measurements.
Hung Le Paramount Farming Company Irrigation Manager May 05, 2014 AGRICULTURAL EXPERT PANEL TESTIMONY: NITROGEN & IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT 1.
Permeable Heavy Use Area for Livestock Farms Presentation for Kitsap County DCD, September 28 th, 2006, Lab Test Findings and Calculated Storm Water Performance.
Springs Protection Options Septic System Evaluation Program Board of County Commissioners Meeting November 13 th 2012.
Preparing for the Rainy Season SFWMD Operations & Actions.
Using HEC-1 for Subdivision Runoff Detention Pond Design Stacie Kato April 26, 2004.
Tifton Georgia Florida Gulf of Mexico Atlanta Athens SE Environmental Flows Conference Roles of Farm Ponds and Potential Impacts on Streams in the Coastal.
“That’s Not A Levee Boil !” or “How to do more with less” By Glen Pearson, Northern District 2005 Annual Geology and Groundwater Meeting Geology and Groundwater.
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
Upper Brushy Creek Flood Study – Flood mapping and management Rainfall depths were derived using USGS SIR , Atlas of Depth Duration Frequency.
Nidal Salim, Walter Wildi Institute F.-A. Forel, University of Geneva, Switzerland Impact of global climate change on water resources in the Israeli, Jordanian.
Group 1 Mobile, Alabama Alana Smith Meredith Karr Charles Edwards Chris Swaim Lindsay Ash.
Influence of Catchment Characteristics on Stream Nitrogen Transport to the Hood Canal Osborne, S.N.; Brett, M.T.; Richey, J.E.; Steinberg, P.D.; Newton,
Urban Hydrology and Water Budget Calculation Geog310 Urban Climatology.
Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution and Water Quality as a function of Land Management Practices on Four Kansas Farms William W. Spotts Dr. Donald Huggins.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Effects of golf course construction and operation on water chemistry of headwater streams on the Precambrian Shield Jennifer G. Winter Peter J. Dillon.
Nile Hydrology Preliminary Research Anthony Makana Paris
Chris M. Kapheim General Manager May 5, AID Groundwater Map.
COUNTRY PAPER ON REUSE OF LOW QUALITY WATER IN EGYPT.
Integrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska Association of Western State Engineers Spring Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah June 9, 2015 Mahesh.
How do Wetlands Factor into New Infiltration Policies?
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
Data Analysis for Source ID: Examples of Statistical Methods and Results Julie Kinzelman, City of Racine Beach Management Workshop April 14 – 15, 2005,
Interim Update: Preliminary Analyses of Excursions in the A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge August 18, 2009 Prepared by SFWMD and FDEP as part.
St. Lucie and Indian River Counties Water Resource Study Mark Elsner, P.E., Director Water Supply Development Division Mark Elsner, P.E., Director Water.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods by Marty Wanielista, Josh Spence, and Ewoud Hulstein Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
Bathymetry Changes Caused by a Tropical Storm Chris Scheiner and Gary Pelton US Army Corps of Engineers.
Stream water chemistry in three meso-scale hydrologic basins in Eastern Amazonian Ricardo de O. Figueiredo 1, Daniel Markewitz 2, Eric A. Davidson 3, Ewerton.
1 Questions Addressed What are the options for reducing pollutant inputs to Lake Tahoe? Pollutant Reduction Opportunities.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
Ric Lawson Watershed Planner Huron River Watershed Council MiCorps Staff.
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
NE Drought Conditions CARC Update: April 2010 Mark Svoboda and Brian Fuchs National Drought Mitigation Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln Al Dutcher,
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Source waters and flow paths in an alpine catchment, Colorado, Front Range, United States Fengjing Liu, Mark W. Williams, and Nel Caine 2004.
Review of SWRCB Water Availability Analysis Emphasis on Dry Creek Water Availability Analysis.
Trends in Precipitation and Stream Discharge over the Past Century for the Continental United States Andrew Simon 1 and Lauren Klimetz 1,2 1 USDA-ARS National.
Basin Specific Feasibility Studies Everglades Stormwater Program Basins Preliminary Findings Contract C-E024 HSA Engineers & Scientists DB Environmental.
1 Engineering Analysis of Properties Designated within the City of Bonita Springs as “Density Reduction/Groundwater Resource” (DR/GR) Land Use Category.
Edge of Field Monitoring in the Lake Champlain Basin of Vermont
Surface Water Surface runoff - Precipitation or snowmelt which moves across the land surface ultimately channelizing into streams or rivers or discharging.
Mercury and Suction Dredging Analysis of Data 10 May 2010 Eric Maksymyk.
LATE SEASON N APPLICATIONS FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED WHEAT PROTEIN ENHANCEMENT. S.E. Petrie*, Oregon State Univ, B.D. Brown, Univ. of Idaho. Introduction.
Lesson Understanding Soil Drainage Systems. Interest Approach Ask students the question, “What determines how fast water will flow through a funnel?”
Susan Sylvester Department Director Operations Control Department Mechanics of the Primary Water Management System.
CONEWAGO CREEK GROUND WATER STUDY Base Flow and Impervious Cover November 7, 2007 Watershed Alliance of Adams County Joe McNally, P.G. GeoServices, Ltd.
Basin-Specific Feasibility Studies, ECP Basins Evaluation of Alternatives Basin-Specific Feasibility Studies, ECP Basins Evaluation of Alternatives August.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
Beth Kacvinsky - Lead Project Manager Office of Everglades Policy and Coordination March 1, 2016 IRL-S / C-44 Overview.
Upper St. Johns River Basin Project US Army Corps of Engineers A joint project between the St. Johns River Water Management District and the Jacksonville.
S O U T H F L O R I D A W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T D I S T R I C T Water Conditions Summary Jeff Kivett, PE, Division Director Operations, Engineering.
EGS-AGU-EUG Joint Assembly Nice, France, 7th April 2003
Western Ozone Issues WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report
2018 Louisiana Soil Health and Cover Crop Conference
Preciptation.
Update to Loxahatchee River Coordinating Council
Chapter Four RUNOFF When a storm occurs, a portion of rainfall infiltrates into the ground and some portion may evaporate. The rest flows as a thin sheet.
Setback area relative to drainage area Runoff volume, mean of 4 events
Presentation transcript:

Sun Ag Water Quality Study Report for Total Phosphorus Marc von Canal, Regulatory Scientist Mark Crosby, Engineer Victor McDaniel, Supervising Professional Engineer SJRWMD, Division of Surface Water Management June 6, 2000

Purpose and Goals of Study Locate sources of high concentration of Total Phosphorus (TP) Identify contributing factors to these high concentrations of TP Investigate correlation between high on-site TP and high TP discharged at pump stations Use information to make recommendations regarding more effective on-site management practices to help reduce TP discharge loads

Background 26,000-acre farm in Indian River County Bordered by Fellsmere Canal & C-54 to North Berry Groves and City of Fellsmere to East BCWMA to South SJWMA and Blue Cypress Marsh CA to West (Illustrated on following map)

Sun Ag Local Area Map

Sun Ag Land Use Land uses include Citrus, Pasture, Sod and Row Crops

Sun Ag Irrigation & Drainage Western area primarily seepage irrigated by surface water from SJWMA Eastern area primarily microspray irrigated by groundwater Drainage is by 7 pump stations

BCWMA-W BCWMA-E Fellsmere Canal SJWMA C-54 Blue Cypress Lake BCMCA S-96D S-96 S-96C S-96B BCMCA Plug S-254 Berry Groves

Study Design Delineated farm according to three criteria: Land Use (Pasture, Sod, or Citrus) Soil Type (Muck or Sand) Irrigation Method (Microjet or Seepage) Then internal WQ sites were chosen to represent combinations of these criteria.

Three Letter Code: Land Use P-Pasture C-Citrus S-Sod R-Row Crop Irrigation F-Seepage (Flood) M-Microjet S-Sprinkler Soils S-Sand M-Muck Criteria Delineation

Sampling Frequency From 8/6/97 to 6/7/99 Limited by staff time Scheduled to coincide with pumping due to: –Irrigation –Storm Events 3 to 12 total sampling events per site

Results of Internal Sites For internal sites, a TP concentration exceeding mg/L was considered high. Three Sod sites and three Citrus sites exceeded an average TP concentration of mg/L for the study period. These sites are located in the basins for pumps stations PS#4, PS#5, and PS#6.

Average TP Summary for Internal WQ Stations

Characteristics of High Average TP Internal Sites

Field Blocks with High Average TP Extent of blocks with land use, irrigation and soils identical to block at WQ station Primarily muck areas in western portion of farm Sod fields on muck are directly adjacent to PS #4 and PS #5. Citrus runoff has greater distance to travel to discharge pump.

TP Concentration for Sod Sites High degree of variation Higher concentration during wet season Correlation between SAI04 and SAI22

TP Concentration for Citrus Sites SAI05 has high degree of variation SAI05 (west, muck) and SAI11 (east, sand) show opposite temporal fluctuations (unexplained).

Average TP Concentration Summary for Pump Stations Average concentration exceeding mg/L considered high All PSs except #3 exceed this guideline. PS#2, #6 and #7 only slightly exceed mg/L (~ +10%) PS#1 moderately exceeds mg/L (~ +30%) PS #4 and #5 significantly exceed mg/L (over +100%)

Correlation between Internal Sites and their Pump Stations High r value suggests that runoff from blocks at internal site significantly affects discharge TP concentration at PS If % change in TP is -, then internal site may add to TP If % change in TP is +, then internal site may dilute TP

Internal Sites vs. PS #1 Fair visual correlation between SAI15 and PS #1 (not statistically supported) Source of high TP concentration at PS #1 may be SAI19 (need more data to confirm)

Internal Sites vs. PS #4 High r between SAI03, SAI20, SAI22 and PS #4 Low r between SAI04 and PS #4 possibly due to significant dilution effects downstream (possibly SAI03).

Internal Sites vs. PS #5 Few data points High r between SAI17 and PS #5 Short distance between SAI17 and PS #5 = little treatment or dilution (~3% reduction)

Internal Sites vs. PS #6 Fair correlation between SAI11 and PS #6 Significant treatment (reduction) or dilution between SAI11 and PS #6 (~ 65% reduction or 3.2% per 1000 ft.)

PS #1 Annual Average TP Concentration Linear Trend Blue bars meet mg/L guideline Decreasing trend

PS #4 Annual Average TP Concentration Linear Trend Has never met the mg/L guideline Decreasing trend

PS #5 Annual Average TP Concentration Linear Trend Has never met the mg/L guideline Increasing trend

PS #6 Annual Average TP Concentration Linear Trend Blue bars meet mg/L guideline Increasing trend

Conclusion Summary Sources of High TP Concentration are sod fields and citrus on muck soils in west and SAI11 (citrus on sand) in east. High TP sites tend to drain through PS #4, #5, and #6. Sod farming and citrus on muck soils appear to be primary factors contributing to high TP concentrations. A theoretical average dilution/treatment efficiency of 2.7% per 1000 feet of canal distance traveled was calculated. PS #1 through #4, and #7 showed a long term decreasing trend of annual average TP concentration. PS #5 and #6 showed a long term increasing trend

Potential Recommendations Efforts to reduce TP prior to discharge should focus on sod and citrus areas on muck soils in western portion. Efforts to reduce TP at the discharge point should focus on PS #4, #5, and #6. On-site reduction of TP may be achieved by lengthening the travel distance (t.o.c.) between fields and pump. Runoff should be routed through areas of lower TP concentration while maximizing travel distance. Sod fields near PS #4 and #5 are primary candidates for this approach due to their proximity to the pumps.

Total Yearly and Monthly Discharge Data for Sun Ag ( ) Total Yearly and Monthly Rainfall Data for Sun Ag ( ) Total Phosphorus Loads Comparison of TP loads, Pumped Discharge, and TP Concentration Data

Sun Ag Total Monthly Discharge ( )

Sun Ag Pump Station Discharges

Sun Ag Total Phosphorus Loads

Sun Ag TP Monthly Average Loads

Sun Ag TP Loads by Pump Station

Sun Ag Pump Station 1

Sun Ag Pump Station 2

Sun Ag Pump Station 3

Sun Ag Pump Station 4

Sun Ag Pump Station 5

Sun Ag Pump Station 6

Sun Ag Pump Station 7

Sun Ag TP Loading Data

THE END

Sun Ag TKN Load (Averaged from )