Are the New Public Servants Ordinary People, Too? Hun Myoung Park James L. Perry (Indiana University) August 10, 2009 Annual Meeting of the Academy of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

National Prevention Strategy
Terms. 1. Globalization 2. Financing 3. Inputs.
Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Union Members in 2009 Jim Walker Economist Bureau of Labor Statistics January 29, 2010.
1 Alternative measures of well-being Joint work by ECO/ELSA/STD.
Scope and method of pilot survey in China Yang kuan kuan Deputy director-general of office on Leading group of the Second National Economic Census under.
Republic of the Philippines NATIONAL STATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD 1 International Workshop From Data to Accounts: Measuring Production in National Accounting.
Hispanic America 2002 New Orleans April 26, 2002.
Audience Response System * Press the button on your keypad that corresponds with your answer. * Green light means your answer has been received. Press.
1 The SEP Gradient, Race, or the SEP Gradient and Race: Understanding Disparities in Child Health and Functioning Lisa Dubay, PhD, ScM The Urban Institute.
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1.0: Trends in the Overall Health Care Market Chart 1.1: Total National Health Expenditures, 1980 – 2005 Chart 1.2: Percent Change.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
1 The Academic Profession and the Managerial University: An International Comparative Study from Japan Akira Arimoto Research Institute for Higher Education.
REALISING BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINAS EUROPEAN POTENTIAL: FROM WAR ECONOMY TO CREDITWORTHINESS AND SUSTAINABILITY MACRO AND FISCAL FRAMEWORK Ljerka Marić,
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
11 Liang Y. Liu, Ph.D. Community Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services Section Texas Department of State Health Services
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Ethnic Penalties in the Labour Market: The Public-Private Sector Divide Sin Yi Cheung Oxford Brookes University Anthony Heath University of Oxford.
ZMQS ZMQS
Micro Focus Research 1 As far as youre aware, how does your organization plan to drive business growth over the next three years? (Respondents' first choices)
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
1 The Social Survey ICBS Nurit Dobrin December 2010.
1 Performance Management Challenges and Opportunities Harry P. Hatry The Urban Institute Washington DC.
American Politics In a Nutshell. STRUCTURE AGENT INSTITUTIONS ECONOMICSCULTURE.
Customer-Driven Marketing Strategy Creating Value for Target Customers
By Laura Lamb & material from McConnell, Brue, Flynn & Barbiero 1.
6/10/ It Takes A Village Exploring the Role of Otherfathers in African Communities in the Diaspora Dr. Wanda Thomas Bernard.
Chapter 16 Public Goods and Public Choice © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Founding Family CEO Pay Incentives and Investment Policy: Evidence from a Structural Model Mieszko Mazur IESEG School of Management Betty Wu University.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Political Ideologies.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009 American Sociological Association Annual Meeting Atlanta, GA August 14-17, 2010 Rose M. Kreider,
Week 1.
Prof.dr Tammo H.A. Bijmolt Do Political or Economic Factors Drive Healthcare Financing Privatisations? Empirical Evidence from OECD.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
Retail Organization and Human Resource Management
Earnings, Productivity, and the Job market
© 2006 Prentice Hall Leadership in Organizations 14-1 Chapter 14 Ethical Leadership and Diversity.
Foreign Finance, Investment, and Aid: Controversies and Opportunities
Question 1  What is the use of fear, violence or threats meant to force people onto acting a certain way?
Building a World Class School
Scott Keeter Pew Research Center Brookings West / UNLV October 8, 2010 Political Attitudes of the Millennial Generation in the Intermountain West.
Unit 2: Political Ideology. Political Ideology One’s basic beliefs about power, political values, and the role of government Comes from your economical,
Urban Politics Federal Urban Policy III. Aims of Federal Policy: 1 1.Coordination of urban service delivery Transportation networks.
Examples of Presentations  The following are examples of presentations of regression tables and their interpretations.  These interpretations target.
Support for Budget, Tax and Social Welfare Programs The Political Environment.
Democrats and Republicans Mr. Holt Social Studies.
Political Behavior Who Votes and Why?. Democracy depends on its people  1800s ended religious qualifications, property qualifications and taxes  15.
Democracy and Public Opinion  Core beliefs are shared  Political attitudes differ  What is public opinion?  Public opinion is critical to democracy.
AP US Government & Politics Review Part II. II. Political beliefs and behaviors of individuals (10-20%) Beliefs that citizens hold about their government.
Political Ideology Review
POLITICAL IDEOLOGY Political Ideology: A consistent set of views about the policies government should pursue (e.g. liberal vs. conservative)
Chapter 5: Public Opinion
Political Ideology.
Political Ideologies Democracies.
Political Ideology.
Political Ideology.
Presentation transcript:

Are the New Public Servants Ordinary People, Too? Hun Myoung Park James L. Perry (Indiana University) August 10, 2009 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Outline  New Public Servants  Literature Review Goodsell (1983) Lewis (1990) Bureau Voting Model  Classification of Public Services  Data and Methods  Results  Conclusion

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August New Public Servants  New Governance  For-profit and nonprofit employees providing public services  Do bureaucrats differ from the general public?  Do new public servants differ from bureaucrats and other private employees?

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Literature Review  Paul Appleby (1945), Big Democracy  Frederick Mosher (1968), Democracy and the Public Service  Charles Goodsell (1983), The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic  Paul Light (1999), The New Public Service

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Charles Goodsell (1983)  Bureaucrats policy views are far more diverse than homogenous  Little evidence for “bureaucratic mentality”  Bureaucrats generally well adjusted, not alienated and powerless  Bureaucrats not as despised as the media stereotype

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Gregory Lewis (1990)  Views similar to average citizens on government spending  Secular humanists in terms of traditional values (e.g., sex, sex roles, race)  Rejects the “oppressed-bureaucrat thesis”  Bureaucrats are ordinary people

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Bureau Voting Model  Bureau information monopoly (Niskanen 1971) Self-interested budget maximizers  Bureau voting model (Garand et al. 1991) More supportive of government spending More likely to vote More supportive of candidates favoring spending

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Classification of Public Services  Using Standard Industrial Classification 1980 SIC ( )  Public services versus non-public services  Service providers Government (including USPS) For-profit Nonprofit: social/health/education

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Classification of Public Services PublicNon-public Government Public administration, USPSNA For-profit Railroad, Bus services, water transportation, air transportation, communications, utility and sanitary services, noncommercial educational and scientific research Agriculture, mining, construction, manufacturing, wholesale, retail, finance, business, taxicab, trucking service, theaters and motion pictures, bowling alleys, billiard, etc. Nonprofit Social services (welfare), health services, education services, museums, art galleries and zoos Membership, religious organizations

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Data and Methods  General Social Survey ( )  Dependent variables: government spending, confidence in institutions, voting for Republicans, morality and tolerance, reward preferences, social capital, sex/religion, world view  Covariates: education, political ideology, family income, prestige of jobs, age, gender, race  T-test, ordinary least squares, binary logit model to compare groups

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Result: Government Spending

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Result: Government Spending

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Result: Government Spending

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Result: Government Spending  Government bureaucrats more supportive of military/armaments/defense programs  Nonprofit employees more supportive of welfare spending, condition of blacks, social security; budget and spending maximizers?  No significant difference in environment, health, crime, city problem, drug, and foreign aid  Close similarity between bureaucrats and for-profit public services employees (new public servants)

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Confidence in Institutions  Similar to the general public (Federal government, Supreme Court, Congress, press, banks, scientific community, organized labor, TV, medicine)  Bureaucrats slightly higher in scientific community and lower in organized labor than private employees  Nonprofit public servants slightly higher confidence in education institutions and lower in major companies and military than ordinary people  Close similarity between government bureaucrats and for-profit public services employees

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Voting for Republicans  Government bureaucrats more likely than private employees to vote for Republicans; new public servants do not differ from ordinary people  Voting: government and education employees > other new public servants > ordinary people  Nonprofit employees more Democratic than government and for-profit employees  Nonprofit employees more supportive of needy Americans than government and for-profit employees: budget and spending maximizers?

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Morality and Tolerance  Similar in morality and tolerance as a whole  Nonprofit employees less supportive of death penalty and euthanasia than government and for-profit counterparts, and more supportive of making pornography illegal than ordinary people.  Government and for-profit employees higher tolerance (allowing racists and anti-democratic people to speak) than ordinary people, and more likely than nonprofit employees to allow homosexualists

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Reward Preferences  New public servants more satisfied with jobs than government employees and ordinary people  Government and nonprofit public services have higher job security than for-profit counterparts  Social/health services less financially satisfied but motivated by mission and intrinsic factors  For-profit public services employees put more value on high income and job security, but less on the feeling of accomplishment than nonprofit employees

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Social Capital  Slightly higher perceptions about helpfulness, fairness, and trust than ordinary people  Government bureaucrats more altruistic and affiliated with organizations than ordinary people  Nonprofit employees higher empathy than government and for-profit counterparts.  Similar in social evening with relatives, friends, etc.  Government and nonprofit employees less likely to go to a bar than for-profit counterparts.

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Sex, Religion, World View  Government and for-profit public services employees do no differ in perceptions about sex, religion, and world view from ordinary people  Education employees more tolerant of homosexuality than government employees and ordinary people, but less of premarital sex  Nonprofit employees more frequently attend religious services and tend to be strong believers than government employees and ordinary people

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Conclusion  Both bureaucrats and new public servants are ordinary people as a whole  For-profit public service employees are similar to government respondents, but more sensitive to monetary incentive and less intrinsically motivated. Effect of privatization?  Nonprofit public services employees are more sympathetic, ethical, religious; intrinsically motivated; female dominated

Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August Questions and Suggestions?