Attribution Bias in South Korea, Japan, Germany, USA: Intercultural and Intracultural Differences Andrea Zo-Rong Wucherpfennig University of Hamburg Andrea.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Differences in Well Being: Beyond Individualism and Wealth Ulrich Schimmack University of Toronto.
Advertisements

Subjective wellbeing across cultures: why do differences exist? Daisung Jang and Do-Yeong Kim Department of Psychology, Macquarie University Sydney, Australia.
Multiple Regression and Model Building
Section B  Definitions, examples, thesis  Attributions- inferred causes of behavior ▪ Fundamental attribution error (Ross, 1977)-Behavior of others.
A. Timur Sevincer 1, Hyekyung Park 2, Shinobu Kitayama 2, & Henrik Singmann 1 1 University of Hamburg, 2 University of Michigan A. Timur Sevincer 1, Hyekyung.
Henrik Singmann 1, A. Timur Sevincer 1, Hyekyung Park 2, & Shinobu Kitayama 2 1 University of Hamburg, 2 University of Michigan Henrik Singmann 1, A. Timur.
Aronson Social Psychology, 5/e Copyright © 2005 by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 4 Social Perception: How We Come to Understand Other People.
Mental Contrasting Effects on Health Behavior Henrik Singmann 1, Andreas Kappes 1 & Gabriele Oettingen 1,2 1 University of Hamburg 2 New York University.
Culture, Communication Practices, and Cognition: Selective Attention to Content Versus Context Keiko Ishii Hokkaido University, Japan.
The fact that religious feelings were the best predictor of interdependence also allows us to speculate that this type of interdependence is more a feeling.
Courtesy of Constantine Sedikides. “... it is a mistake to consider the processes in social psychology as basic in the natural science sense. Rather,
Attribution Bias in Cultural Comparison: Dispositional versus Situational Attribution in South Korea and Germany Attribution Bias in Cultural Comparison:
CULTURE & SELF The Cultural Construction of Self and Positive Self-Regard.
Participants 241 residents of a Midwestern community, randomly selected from a phonebook matched by education/ gender / age Materials Structural variables.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Social Psychology. Chapter Outline I. What is Social Psychology?
Cognition and Perception Psych 448C 11/10/08. Objectives  Basic cognitive and perceptual processes may not be universal.  Holistic reasoning (middle-class,
Masters Thesis Defense Natasha Koustova Sept 12, 2011 The Roles of Cultural Competence and Cultural Motivation in Cultural Framing.
Attribution Theory and Arab Images of the Gulf War Daniel Heradstveit and G. Matthew Bonham.
Attribution Theory People are motivated to understand the causes of behavior. Attribution theory seeks to explain how and why people make these causal.
Research Question What has been the impact of the transition from Communism toward more open societies in Central Europe? Materials and Methods Study 1.
BACKGROUND Previous research suggests that the change from Communism to Democracy led to psychological changes in Central Europe. We suspect that political.
Evaluating cultural variations in attachment
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 20.
How WEIRD are they? Disentangling Psychological and Pragmatic Processes Thomas Holtgraves Dept. of Psychological Science Ball State University.
Sociocultural cognition
Results (continued) Effect of Expectations on Reality-Means Association (Mediator) A GLM with expectations and condition on the reality-means associations.
You’ve Got an Attitude! PICK UP THE HANDOUT FROM THE TABLE IN THE BACK!!!
Social Perception: How We Come to Understand Other People
Culture and Social Interactions, Gender, and Emotions Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos 1 June 2009.
Fanatic and energetic participation in sports Seppo Suominen, Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences Helsinki, Finland
Culture and Cognition LisaAllisonAronya HarperMenjivar Waller.
Culture and Cognition LisaAllisonAronya HarperMenjivar Waller.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 10.
INDIVIDUALISTIC /COLLECTIVISTIC CULTURES AND PARENTING.
Results Attentional Focus Presence of others restricted the attentional focus: Participants showed a smaller flanker compatibility effect for the error.
Self-serving Bias
Social Psychology. The branch of psychology that studies how people think, feel, and behave in social situations.
You’ve Got An Attitude!. Handout Time!  Fill out the questionnaire using Britney Spears as your inspiration.
UNIT 14.  Social Psychology – the study of how other people influence an individual’s thoughts, feelings, and actions.  Social Psychologists – study.
Session 3 Errors in Attribution. Principles of SCLOA?
Jenefer Husman Arizona State University Jenefer Husman Arizona State University When learning seems (un)important: Future Time Perspective and post-secondary.
Social Perception The ways in which people perceive on another
HRM-755 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 10.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 19.
The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion JENNIFER L. AAKER DURAIRAJ MAHESWARAN The Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 24, No. 3. (Dec., 1997),
Fundamental attribution error
Studies that Illustrate Errors in Attributions IB Psychology I (1A)
CULTURAL VARIATIONS IN ATTACHMENT. HOW MIGHT ATTACHMENT DIFFER ACROSS THESE CULTURES? WHY? Top of pg.33 in packs.
Implicit Cultural Orientations in the Arab World Alvaro San Martin 1, William W. Maddux 2, Marwan Sinaceur 3, Amer Madi 2, Steve Tompson 4, & Shinobu Kitayama.
& Results: Parenting & Line Judgments ► Parents’ autonomy scores are significantly.
THE CAUSES FOR BEHAVIOR Attribution Theories, Factors and Errors.
COE Postdoctoral Fellow
Mediation Effects of Self-Construal on Chinese-English Differences in Cognition, Emotion and Motivation Shengyu Yang & Vivian L Vignoles Method Introduction.
1 University of Hamburg 2 University of Applied Sciences Heidelberg
Exploring Consumer’s Reaction in the Bad Gift Situation Across Cultures Student Researchers: Gracia Clark and Yooik Jo | Department of Psychology, University.
Errors in Judging Others: The Fundamental Attribution Error
Andrea Zo-Rong Wucherpfennig University of Hamburg Henrik Singmann
South Korea and Germany
Processes of Mental Contrasting: Linking Future with Reality
Henrik Singmann1, Andreas Kappes1 & Gabriele Oettingen1,2
Mental Contrasting Effects on Health Behavior
Processes of Mental Contrasting: Linking Future with Reality
Discuss Two Errors in Attributions
Ch 3: Social Beliefs & Judgments
Cross-cultural ideas If Bowbly’s view that attachments have evolved is true then you would expect to see similar patterns of attachment cross-culturally.
Voluntary Settlement and the Spirit of Independence
Chapter 4: Perceiving Persons
Presentation transcript:

Attribution Bias in South Korea, Japan, Germany, USA: Intercultural and Intracultural Differences Andrea Zo-Rong Wucherpfennig University of Hamburg Andrea Zo-Rong Wucherpfennig University of Hamburg Shinobu Kitayama University of Michigan Shinobu Kitayama University of Michigan Mayumi Karasawa Tokyo Woman’s Christian University Mayumi Karasawa Tokyo Woman’s Christian University A. Timur Sevincer University of Hamburg A. Timur Sevincer University of Hamburg Henrik Singmann University of Hamburg Henrik Singmann University of Hamburg Poster presented at the Association For Psychological Science 21st Annual Convention, May , in San Francisco, CA Methodology Discussion Introduction Past research found that people from different cultures differ in the way they explain behavior (Nisbett, Peng, Choi, & Norenzayan, 2001): Whereas Asians tend to consider situational factors stronger (e.g., social norms) in their explanations, Westerners tend to focus stronger on dispositional factors (e.g., the personality). Hence, a dispositional attribution bias seems to be typical for individualistic, Western countries and a reduced dispositional attribution bias seems to be typical for collectivistic, Asian countries. However, in most of the studies the USA represented Western countries, and Japan represented Asian countries. This might lead to criticism that findings of single countries are over-generalized to a cultural dichotomy of East versus West. Therefore, we compared South Koreans’, Japanese’s, US-Americans’ and Germans’ attribution style. The Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE) Causal attribution is the individual’s explanation for observed or experienced behavior. It has either a dispositional (e.g., egoism) or a situational locus (e.g., peer pressure). The FAE is the general attribution tendency to overestimate dispositional influence and underestimate situational influence on observed behavior. Interdependence and Independence and the FAE Cultures differ in type of self-construal (Markus & Kitayama, 1991) Asians’ self-construal more interdependent, less independent: Focus on the connectedness of individuals Observer has attention on the situation and assumption of interconnectedness reduced FAE Westerners more independent, less interdependent: Focus on the expression of the individual’s dispositions Observer has attention on the actor and assumption of internal locus of control pronounced FAE This study adds evidence to the assumption of cultural factors as a source for psychological variation. The results suggest a continuous distribution of the dispositional bias, with the Western cluster on one end, Korea in the middle and Japan on the other end, rather than an Eastern versus a Western cluster. The different magnitude of FAE corresponds to the different percentages of Christian religion in each country. Therefore, we conclude that the predominant religion in a culture has an influence on the individuals self-construal. Sample characteristicUSAGermanySouth KoreaJapan Sample SizeN GenderFemale / Male / Unidentified %66 / 34/ -67 /31 / 249 /47 / 441 / 56 / 3 Age M age SD Sample Measure of FAE Task on dispositional bias in social judgment (Kitayama et al., 2006). Four vignettes: In half of the vignettes the protagonist engaged in a socially desirable behavior, in the other half in socially undesirable behavior. Rating of protagonists’ behavior on four scales: Factual and counterfactual dispositional attribution (α =.73), and factual and counterfactual situational attribution (α =.67), on 1-7 scales (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). Our study included a total N of 452 participants in secondary analysis (Kitayama at al., 2009). None of the collected demographical variables (gender, age, religion, time spend abroad, etc.) did correlate nor interact with the dependent variables and are therefore omitted from further discussion. Example vignette (socially desirable): Professional pitchers, like Tom Lyons, are very busy almost everyday during the regular season. The pitchers work hard practicing and playing in games. In the off-season, therefore, many professional pitchers take vacations. However, Tom Lyons holds several free baseball camps for kids living in poor neighborhoods instead of taking a vacation. All participants displayed the FAE; planned simple main-effect analyses on attribution style revealed that participants in all countries showed the FAE (ps <.001). Participants attributed the protagonists’ behavior more to dispositional than to situational causes. In planned interaction contrasts, Asians exhibited a smaller FAE than Westerners, F(1,448) = 27.16, p <.001. The USA and Germany did not differ significantly in amount of FAE (p =.49). Korean participants exhibited a more pronounced FAE than Japanese participants (p =.006). Religion Country Christian total % Protestant % Catholic % Buddhism/ Shinto % Others/ None % S. Korea Japan18415 Germany USA We hypothesize that Christianity is a major factor leading to indepen- dence, whereas Buddhism and Confucianism foster interdependence. Therefore, South Koreans should differ from Japanese in the magnitude of FAE. References Kitayama, S., Ishii, K., Imada, T., Takemura, K., & Ramaswamy, J. (2006). Voluntary settlement and the spirit of independence: Evidence from Japan's "Northern Frontier.". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 369‐384. Kitayama, S., Park, H., Sevincer, A. T., Karasawa, M., Uskul, A. K. (2009). A Cultural Task Analysis of Implicit Independence: Comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. Manuscript submitted for publication. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the Self ‐ Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224‐253. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291‐310. Thanks for the friendly financial support of German Academic Exchange Service and of the University of Hamburg Results