MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Education Assessment AAC&U GE and Assessment Conference March 1, 2007.
Advertisements

When Students Can’t Read…
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Outcomes Assessment- Full Implementation Meeting Fall 2009.
ACADEMIC DEGREE ASSESSMENT & GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay Arts & Sciences Faculty Meeting March 12,
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Administrative Council September 21, 2009.
So, What IS a Standards-based
1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Associate Professor Sarah Thomason & Karen Brunner, Asst. VP for Institutional Effectiveness & Research August 29,
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
PSU Anthropology Department Assessment Procedures Dr. Michele Gamburd
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
A Multi-method Approach: Assessment of Basic Communication Cheryl E Drout, Ph.D. SUNY-Fredonia.
On Scoring Guides everything you were afraid to ask PART TWO.
QEP Update CFCC Planning Retreat June 19, QEP Update Mid-Term Report Global Outcomes 1.Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills.
May 18, Two Goals 1. Become knowledgeable about the QEP. 2. Consider your role in making the QEP a success.
Cumberland County: May 28 Oak Ridge: June 2 Roane County: June 4 Scott: June 4 Campbell: June 9 Knox: June 10 Loudon: June 11.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
The draft NSW English K-10 syllabus Version 2 February, 2012.
Arunee Wiriyachitra, Chiang Mai University
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
SLOAC Committee Flex Day Working Session Date: Time: 12:45 – 2:15.
Assessing Tomorrow’s Leaders Today in an Integrated Reading and Writing Course NADE 2015 – Greenville, SC Kina Lara and Tina Willhoite San Jacinto College.
PEGGY MAKI, PH.D. EDUCATION CONSULTANT IN ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING PRESENTED AT CCRI SEPTEMBER 21, 2012 Assessment at Three Levels: Institution, Program,
Three Levels of Assessment: Portfolio Data, Curriculum Inventory, Standardized Assessment Results Dr. Kathleen DaBoll-Lavoie, PhD Department of Inclusive.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Improving the Teaching of Academic Genres in High-Enrollment Courses across Disciplines: A Three-Year Reiterative Study Chris Thaiss University of California,
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Inquiry and Investigation. What was the TOPIC? PROBLEM? CIVIC INQUIRY?
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Developing a Teaching Portfolio for the Job Search Graduate Student Center University of Pennsylvania April 19, 2007 Kathryn K. McMahon Department of Romance.
Writing Assignments that Work Lessons for the New Era of College Readiness Keystone Conference Tripp Presley, Heather Farmer, Mike Moran.
Welcome Richard Montgomery Parents! Richard Montgomery PTSA Information Session on the MYP.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Teaching Philosophy and Teaching Portfolio
Program Review A systematic method of analyzing components of an instructional program, including instructional practices, aligned and enacted curriculum,
The selection of appropriate assessment methods in a course is influenced by many factors: the intended learning outcomes, the discipline and related professional.
Subgrant Goals and Activities Frostburg State University.
Selecting Appropriate Assessment Measures for Student Learning Outcomes October 27, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of Assessment and.
Who We Are When Working in Assessment  Carl Brun works with Gen Ed and other programs  Aligning curriculum with standards  Collecting syllabi and posting.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
Using Research on Student Learning as a Framework for Curricular Redesign Joanne Baird Giordano University of Wisconsin Colleges.
Assessment Plans Council of Deans, March 22, 2007.
MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. COMMON.
Assessment Reboot January 31, 2014 GAC 38. Review of Assessment Cycle Documenting & Reporting.
Liberal Studies Update Deans and Department Chairs Meeting, April 4, 2016.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Quantitative Literacy Across the Curriculum. Members of the QLAC Committee Beimnet Teclezghi – co-chair Laura Pannaman – co-chair Marilyn Ettinger John.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Critical Information Literacy
Learning Assessment Techniques
Creating a Culture of Assessment
Assessment in student life
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Outcomes Assessment Committee
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
How Technologically Literate are EMCC Students?
Kennedy-King College’s Assessment Academy Project Report
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment
LEARNAPALOZZA: SERVICE-LEARNING AT CPCC
Applied Psychology Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Presentation transcript:

MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee Megan Stark Professor, Writing Committee Kelly Webster Director, Writing Center

General Education Writing Requirements at UM  Freshman Composition Course (WRIT 101)  Approved-Writing Course (usually 200-level)  Upper Division Writing Proficiency Assessment (UDWPA)  Writing in the Major Course (usually 400-level)

Learning Outcomes for Approved-Writing Courses  Compose written documents that are appropriate for a given audience or purpose  Formulate and express opinions and ideas in writing  Use writing to learn and synthesize new concepts  Revise written work based on constructive feedback  Find, evaluate, and use information effectively  Begin to use discipline-specific writing conventions (largely style conventions like APA or MLA)  Demonstrate appropriate English language usage

AIM: to improve the quality of student writing by improving the writing program Grounded in Gen Ed courses: analyzes student writing and course syllabi as primary reflections of our writing program Focused on studying the efficacy of learning outcomes : reflects General Education Approved-Writing Course Learning Outcomes Formative: focuses on studying aspects of the writing program to improve and modify those aspects Contextualized : can be scaled and shaped locally to address questions and issues faculty value University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment Implemented, Fall 2013

Goals of the UPWA to provide useful data about student writing proficiency in the context of a General Education Requirement; to analyze student writing as a reflection of our writing program; to uncover trends in students’ writing strengths and areas for improvement; to improve writing instruction and curriculum across disciplines; to provide professional development opportunities for faculty and staff.

The UPWA Holistic Rubric Grounded in the Approved-Writing Course Learning Outcomes Faculty generated Field tested Widely available and adaptable Discussed, interpreted, and debated each spring

UPWA Procedures for Paper Collection Approved-Writing Course faculty identify an assignment in which students are asked to demonstrate the Learning Outcomes. Students remove identifying information from and upload their papers to an online UPWA repository. Students take an online survey.

UPWA Annual Retreat Procedures All faculty, staff, and graduate students TAs are invited to participate. A random sample of papers is identified for scoring. Trained leaders teach participants how to apply accurately and efficiently the UPWA Holistic Rubric. Table leaders facilitate discussion on the rubric and scoring process as participants reach consensus on their scores. Participants complete a survey.

Using UPWA Data The University Writing Committee will: analyze the scoring data for trends in students’ writing strengths and areas for improvement; analyze student survey information; use the Writing Retreat results and feedback to plan a Fall Writing Symposium for faculty; share its findings and monitor/refine the UPWA.

Benefits of the UPWA empowers faculty to shape and engage in assessment that will impact teaching and learning; allows for authentic writing assessment; enacts and promotes shared responsibility for and commitment to writing instruction across disciplines; provides professional development and collaboration opportunities grounded in current research and best practices.

For Further Information UM Writing Committee Website