Comparison of full-repeat and sub-cycle solutions in gravity recovery simulations of a GRACE-like mission Siavash Iran Pour, Nico Sneeuw, Matthias Weigelt,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…

Advertisements

Istituto Nazionale Di AstrofisicaIstituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario V. Iafolla, E. Fiorenza, C. Lefevre, D.M. Lucchesi, A. Morbidini, S. Nozzoli,

CorrelationsComputational Geophysics and Data Analysis 1 Correlations Correlation of time series Similarity Time shitfs Applications Correlation of rotations/strains.

Proactive Traffic Merging Strategies for Sensor-Enabled Cars

1 Ground Based Meteorological Radars Presented By: David Franc NOAAs National Weather Service September 2005.

Stefan Hild, Andreas Freise University of Birmingham Roland Schilling, Jerome Degallaix AEI Hannover January 2008, Virgo week, Pisa Advanced Virgo: Wedges.

GUI familiarity level required: Higher

AOGS Singapore June 2005 Paper ID: 58-PS-A0321 BepiColombo – Mission to Mercury Mission Overview Rita Schulz Johannes.

RA-2 & MWR CCVT – ESA/ESRIN – 25 to 27 March, 2003 MWR Calibration & Validation status MWR Cal/Val team: Ngan Tran, Estelle Obligis, Laurence Eymard, Michel.

Time Variable Gravity Implementation issues for Jason L. Cerri, S. Houry, J.P. Berthias Ocean Topography Science Team Meeting - Hobart, Australia – March.

Geodetic monitoring of crustal deformation in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica Hannu Koivula, Jaakko Mäkinen, Joel Ahola and Markku Poutanen Finnish Geodetic.

Periodic motion Frequency Period. Periodic motion – Any motion that repeats itself.

Minimising the Propulsive Power Consumption of a Fleet of AUVs Pareecha Rattanasiri 1, Philip A. Wilson and Alexander B. Phillips Faculty of Engineering.

2006 AGU Fall Meeting. 14 Dec. 2006, San Francisco – Poster #G43A-0985 Jim Ray (NOAA/NGS), Tonie van Dam (U. Luxembourg), Zuheir Altamimi (IGN), Xavier.

ILRS Workshop, 2008, A 33 Year Time History of the J2 Changes from SLR Minkang Cheng and Byron D. Tapley Center for Space Research.

Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.

GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.

The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.

COMBINED MODELING OF THE EARTH’S GRAVITY FIELD FROM GOCE AND GRACE SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS Robert Tenzer 1, Pavel Ditmar 2, Xianglin Liu 2, Philip Moore.

Some Innovative Applications and Approaches Using Nudging Four Dimensional Data Assimilation: Lili Lei and David R. Stauffer Dept. of Meteorology, Penn.

CHAMP Satellite Gravity Field Determination Satellite geodesy Eva Howe January

Kostas Andreadis1, Dennis Lettenmaier1, and Doug Alsdorf2

Page 1 1 of 20, EGU General Assembly, Apr 21, 2009 Vijay Natraj (Caltech), Hartmut Bösch (University of Leicester), Rob Spurr (RT Solutions), Yuk Yung.

For the lack of ground data the verification of the TRMM performance could not be checked for the entire catchments, however it has been tested over Bangladesh.

Don P. Chambers Center for Space Research The University of Texas at Austin Understanding Sea-Level Rise and Variability 6-9 June, 2006 Paris, France The.

Resonances and GOCE orbit selection J. Kloko č ník (1), A. Bezd ě k (1), J. Kostelecký (2), R. Floberghagen (3), Ch. Gruber (1) (1)Astron. Inst. Czech.

Using GRACE to estimate changes in land water storage: present limitations and future potential John Wahr, Sean Swenson, Isabella Velicogna University.

Last Time: Introduction to Gravity Governed by LaPlace’s equation: with solution of the form: If we have a spherical body with mass M and constant (or.

Detailed Analysis of ECMWF Surface Pressure Data E. Fagiolini 1, T. Schmidt 1, G. Schwarz 2, L. Zenner 3 (1) GFZ Department 1, Potsdam, Germany (2) DLR.

Chapter 8: The future geodetic reference frames Thomas Herring, Hans-Peter Plag, Jim Ray, Zuheir Altamimi.

1 Approximate decorrelation and non-isotropic smoothing of time-variable GRACE gravity field models Jürgen Kusche, Roland Schmidt with input from Susanna.

Hydrological mass changes inferred from high-low satellite- to-satellite tracking data Tonie van Dam, Matthias Weigelt Mohammad J. Tourian Nico Sneeuw.

EGU General Assembly 2013, 7 – 12 April 2013, Vienna, Austria This study: is pioneer in modeling the upper atmosphere, using space geodetic techniques,

1 Average time-variable gravity from GPS orbits of recent geodetic satellites VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, Italy, 17–21 June 2013 Aleš Bezděk 1.

Water storage variations from time-variable gravity data Andreas Güntner Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section.

The effect of modelling assumptions on predictions of the space debris environment R. Blake and H.G. Lewis Astronautics Research Group, Faculty of Engineering.

Progress in identification of damping: Energy-based method with incomplete and noisy data Marco Prandina University of Liverpool.

OSTST Hobart 2007 – Performance assessment Jason-1 data M.Ablain, S.Philipps, J.Dorandeu, - CLS N.Picot - CNES Jason-1 GDR data Performance assessment.

Geocenter motion estimates from the IGS Analysis Center solutions P. Rebischung, X. Collilieux, Z. Altamimi IGN/LAREG & GRGS 1 EGU General Assembly, Vienna,

Gravity Summary For a point source or for a homogeneous sphere the solution is easy to compute and are given by the Newton’s law. Gravity Force for the.

GRACE Mascons and Hydrological Data for the Continents: GRACE ACCESS D. Rowlands (1), F. Lemoine (1), S. Luthcke (1), S. Klosko (2), D. Chinn (2), K. Akoumany.

   Alys Thomas 1, J.T. Reager 1,2, Jay Famiglietti 1,2,3, Matt Rodell 4 1 Dept. of Earth System Science, 2 UC Center for Hydrologic Modeling, 3 Dept.

TOWARDS THE TIME-VARIABLE GRAVITY FIELD FROM CHAMP M. Weigelt, A. Jäggi, L. Prange, W. Keller, N. Sneeuw TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint.

GRACE Science Team Meeting October 15-17, 2007 Potsdam Germany Alternative Gravity Field Representations: Solutions, Characteristics, and Issues Michael.

Regional Enhancement of the Mean Dynamic Topography using GOCE Gravity Gradients Matija Herceg 1 and Per Knudsen 1 1 DTU Space, National Space Institute,

Parameters : Temperature profile Bulk iron and olivine weight fraction Pressure gradient. Modeling of the Martian mantle Recently taken into account :

L. Zenner 1, E. Fagiolini 2, F. Flechtner 3, T. Gruber 1, G. Schwarz 2, T. Trautmann 2, J. Wickert 3 1 Institut für Astronomische u. Physikalische Geodäsie,

International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems GGHS 2012, Venice, Italy 1 GOCE data for local geoid enhancement Matija Herceg Per Knudsen.

Full Resolution Geoid from GOCE Gradients for Ocean Modeling Matija Herceg & Per Knudsen Department of Geodesy DTU Space living planet symposium 28 June.

C.C.Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. Improvement of Least-Squares Collocation error estimates using local GOCE Tzz signal standard.

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 18 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;

The Solar System Missions. planets not shown to scale >> MercuryVenusEarthMarsJupiterSaturnUranusNeptunePluto Mean Distance from the Sun (AU)

A proposal for a consistent model of air pressure loading as part of the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) Conventions Plag, H.-P. (1),

Vermelding onderdeel organisatie A 3-year series of Earth’s gravity field derived from GRACE range measurements Xianglin Liu, Pavel Ditmar, Qile Zhao,

ESA living planet symposium Bergen Combination of GRACE and GOCE in situ data for high resolution regional gravity field modeling M. Schmeer 1,

Ingo Sasgen 1, Henryk Dobslaw 1, Zdenek Martinec 2, and Maik Thomas 1 (1) GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Department 1: Geodesy and Remote Sensing Section.

OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 On the use of temporal gravity field models derived from GRACE for altimeter satellite orbit determination.

The Solar System Missions. Comparative Planetology * The study of the similarities and dissimilarities of the constituents of the solar system. * Provides.

Orbit Selection for the WATER HM Mission R. S. Nerem CCAR, CIRES, University of Colorado D. P. Chambers Center for Space Research, University of Texas.

4.Results (1)Potential coefficients comparisons Fig.3 FIR filtering(Passband:0.005~0.1HZ) Fig.4 Comparison with ESA’s models (filter passband:0.015~0.1HZ)

Astronomical Institute University of Bern Astronomical Institute, University of Bern Swarm Gravity Field Results with the CMA Adrian Jäggi, Daniel Arnold,

How Do we Estimate Gravity Field? Terrestrial data –Measurements of surface gravity –Fit spherical harmonic coefficients Satellite data –Integrate equations.

ESA Living Planet Symposium, 29 June 2010, Bergen (Norway) GOCE data analysis: the space-wise approach and the space-wise approach and the first space-wise.

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France ESA SC4MGV Search strategy for.

Dead zone analysis of ECAL barrel modules under static and dynamic loads for ILD Thomas PIERRE-EMILE, Marc ANDUZE– LLR.

Calibration, Validation and Status of OSI SAF ScatSat-1 products

X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.

Martin Pitoňák1, Michal Šprlák2 and Pavel Novák1

Session 5: Higher level products (Internal)

Presentation transcript:

Comparison of full-repeat and sub-cycle solutions in gravity recovery simulations of a GRACE-like mission Siavash Iran Pour, Nico Sneeuw, Matthias Weigelt, Tilo Reubelt EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April

2 Sampling the Earth from orbit Aliasing of high-frequency geophysical signals to lower frequencies (eventually seen in the recovered gravity ﬁeld) tornado.sfsu.eduwww.ni.com EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 2011

3 Strategies to mitigate the aliasing problem Satellite conﬁguration design Alternative recovery strategies (different solutions) How different solutions deal with the problem? Two different solutions strategies for the gravity ﬁeld recovery: - Repeat period of a repeat orbit scenario - Sub-cycle of the scenario Investigation of the aliasing behavior of different solution strategies The possibility of sub-cycle solution for further processing EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 2011

4 Orbit Design (Choosing the orbital parameters) Orbit Integration (Integrate the satellite parameters in the presence of the gravity field) Inversion (SH coefficients estimation) for different time periods Calculating positions and velocities of the satellites, as well as range, range rate and range acceleration EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 2011

5 Orbit design GRACE like configuration Repeat orbit of 125/8 Near circular, near polar orbit Differential orbital elements EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 2011

6 Orbit integration Static field egm96 Varying fields: 6 hourly time series of gravity potential spherical harmonic coefficient series - Atmosphere: ECMWF ERA-40 - Ocean: OMCT - Hydrology: PCR-GLOBWB driven with ECMWF meteorological data - Ice: ECMWF - Solid Earth: DEOS University of Luxembourg - Models reprocessed by Mass Transport Study – ESA Contract January 2005 Up to degree 60 (avoiding spatial aliasing by ) EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 2011

7 Repeat Period Check EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 2011

8 Inversion SH coefficients estimation up to degree 60 Comparison of different solutions through maps, coefficients and degree RMS 24 days Input fieldSolution EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 2011

9 8 days (cycle period) 3 days (sub-cycle) Input fieldSolution EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 2011

10 Differential SH coefficients – Triangle plots 24 days8 days (cycle period)3 days (sub-cycle) EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 2011

11 24 days8 days (cycle period) 3 days (sub-cycle) Degree RMS EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 2011

12 Spatial aliasing of the higher degrees? Remove the static field which may have the biggest contribution! 3 days ≈ 46 revolutions => l max ≈ 23 L in = 60, L out = 23L in = 23, L out = 23 EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 2011

13 Veryfing the hypothesis Observe the differential potential (V total – V static ) at the positions of one of the satellites Estimate the differential SH coefficients (∆K lm ) from the differential potential observation Could be meaningful! Further investigation: Spatial aliasing by the changing field? L in = 60, L out = 23 EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 2011

14 Summary Almost similar results for cycle period (8 days) and the longe time (24 days) solutions Sub-cycle soltion does not provid good results for the degrees up to half of the revolutions in the period when the orbit is integrated by higher degrees The static field may have the largest contribution for the spatial aliasing effect on the sub-cycle solution The remaining aliasing effect may come from the spatial aliasing of the changing field itself (the future work) Thank you EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 2011