October 2006 Complications of Age-related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial Sponsored by the National Eye Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Medical Retina and Macular Diseases
Advertisements

Fill in missing numbers or operations
Prepared by: ACTION Registry-GWTG Results: January – December, 2008.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
The Application of Propensity Score Analysis to Non-randomized Medical Device Clinical Studies: A Regulatory Perspective Lilly Yue, Ph.D.* CDRH, FDA,
OPTN Modifications to Heart Allocation Policy Implemented July 12, 2006 Changed the allocation order for medically urgent (Status 1A and 1B) patients Policy.
K A I S E R C O M M I S S I O N O N Medicaid and the Uninsured Figure 0 Medicaid: The Essentials Diane Rowland, Sc.D. Executive Vice President, Henry J.
K A I S E R C O M M I S S I O N O N Medicaid and the Uninsured Figure 0 Health Reform Primer: Who are the Uninsured? Diane Rowland, Sc.D. Executive Vice.
Figure 0 K A I S E R C O M M I S S I O N O N Medicaid and the Uninsured Medicaid: A Primer Robin Rudowitz Associate Director Kaiser Commission on Medicaid.
NTDB ® Annual Report 2009 © American College of Surgeons All Rights Reserved Worldwide Percent of Hospitals Submitting Data to NTDB by State and.
NFPA Urban Fire Safety Project Urban Fire Forum October 21, 2011 Sharon Gamache Program Director High-Risk Outreach Programs.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
2 |SharePoint Saturday New York City
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
PSA: Fact or Fiction The debate as it stands
Exploring Nuclear Energy. Nuclear Fusion and Fission  Nuclear Fusion Small nuclei into large Immense temperature and pressure Core of stars Iron is the.
PROCESS vs. WA State SCS Study A Comparison of Study Design, Patient Population, and Outcomes August 29,2007.
Cliccare sulla data per saperne di più e per trovare il link dove comprare i biglietti Servizio fornita da lady GaGa news.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Plan B ® Actual Use and Behavior Studies NDA NDAC & ACRHD Joint Meeting December 16, 2003 Jin Chen, MD, PhD Division of OTC Drug Products NDAC &
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network One-Year Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Intravitreal Ranibizumab or Saline for.
Laser Intervention in Early Age Related Macular Degeneration
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
Access to Care in The Medicaid Program Andrew B. Bindman, MD Professor of Medicine, Health Policy, Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California.
Taking a Swing at Weight Loss! Chronicles of a Shrinking Baseball Fan…
Vitrectomy Outcomes in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema, Visual Loss, and Vitreomacular Traction Sponsored by the National Eye Institute, National Institutes.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Macular Edema After Cataract Surgery Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network.
The Department of Labor (DOL) has released a compliance guide to help employers understand ERISA's requirements regarding qualified medical child support.
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
Desirable Surveillance Network National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center Locations Regularly Performing.
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network 5-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Evaluating Ranibizumab Plus Prompt versus Deferred Laser for.
Factors Associated with Changes in Visual Acuity and OCT Thickness at 1 Year after Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema Sponsored by the National Eye Institute,
1 Macular Morphology and Visual Acuity in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trial (CATT) Jaffe GJ, Martin DF, Toth CA, Daniel.
Geography of the United States the-united-states-of-america ?op=1.
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
TARIQ ALASBALI WHICH PATIENTS ARE AT RISK FOR THE PROGRESSION?
Laser-Ranibizumab-Triamcinolone for DME Study DRCR.net Protocol I
Gene Transfer for Neovascular Age- Related Macular Degeneration Peter A. Campochiaro The Wilmer Eye Institute The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Expanded 2-year Follow-up of Ranibizumab Plus Prompt or Deferred Laser or Triamcinolone Plus Prompt.
1 Baseline Predictors for One Year Visual Outcomes with Ranibizumab or Bevacizumab for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration Ying G-S, Maguire MG.
Comparison of Modified ETDRS and Mild Macular Grid Laser Photocoagulation Strategies for Diabetic Macular Edema Sponsored by the National Eye Institute,
A Randomized Trial of Peribulbar Triamcinolone Acetonide with and without Focal Photocoagulation for Mild Diabetic Macular Edema: A Pilot Study.
1 Slides Shown at FDA Advisory Committee Eyetech Pharmaceuticals Pfizer, Inc. Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting 27 August 2004.
Sponsored by the National Eye Institute,
The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group (OHTS)
Phase 2 Evaluation of Intravitreal Bevacizumab for DME Sponsored by the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health.
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network DRCR.net Prompt PRP vs Ranibizumab+Deferred PRP for PDR Study Jeffrey G. Gross, M.D. – Protocol Chair.
Date of download: 5/27/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Trial.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Age-Related Macular Degeneration Maguire MG,
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema with Prompt vs Deferred Laser Treatment: 3-year.
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
Protocol U Short-Term Evaluation of Combination Dexamethasone + Ranibizumab vs. Ranibizumab Alone for Persistent Central-Involved DME Following Anti-VEGF.
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
Randomized Clinical Trial Jeffrey G. Gross, M.D. for the DRCR Network
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Other Adults, January 2017
NJ WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NH NV
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
(map is coded by CAE-CD region)
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
A presentation to: Meeting name Date
Prompt PRP vs. Ranibizumab + Deferred PRP for PDR Study
DRCR Retina Network Treatment for Center-Involved DME in Eyes with Good Visual Acuity (Protocol V)
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
Presentation transcript:

October 2006 Complications of Age-related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial Sponsored by the National Eye Institute

October 2006 Study Question Can low-intensity macular laser treatment reduce the incidence of vision loss in eyes with large drusen ?

October 2006 Design Summary Major Eligibility Criteria – > 10 large drusen (>125  ) in each eye – Visual acuity >20/40 in each eye – Age > 50 years – No other ocular disease

October 2006 Design Summary Randomization Scheme CAPT Eligible Patient Randomization of eyes One Eye Treated One Eye Observed

5 Initial Treatment ( µ) Barely visible burns 60 burns 15 burns/quadrant 100 µ burns 0.1 second µ 2500 µ 1500 µ

6

October 2006 Design Summary Sample Size: 1052 peopleSample Size: 1052 people 2104 eyes 2104 eyes Length of Follow-Up: ≥5 years Length of Follow-Up: ≥5 years

October 2006 Design Summary Outcome Measures  Primary  Change in visual acuity  Secondary  Incidence of Advanced AMD (CNV, GA, SPED)  Contrast threshold  Reading (critical print size)  Side effects of treatment

October 2006 Description of Follow-up Overall missed visits:3%Overall missed visits:3% 87% of the 1052 patients completed the 5-year examination 87% of the 1052 patients completed the 5-year examination  9% patient deaths  4% missed the 5-year exam

October 2006 Percentage of Eyes with 50% Reduction of Baseline Drusen by Treatment Group Percentage of Eyes with 50% Reduction of Baseline Drusen by Treatment Group

October 2006 Percentage of Eyes with Visual Acuity Loss of Three Lines or More Percentage of Eyes with Visual Acuity Loss of Three Lines or More

October 2006 Incidence of Advanced Age-related Macular Degeneration 20%

October 2006 Incidence of Choroidal Neovascularization 13%

October 2006 Incidence of Geographic Atrophy P= %

October 2006 VA Loss – All Patients Mean VA scoreMean VA score  Baseline: 20/25 (+2)  5 years: 20/40 (+3)  Mean loss ~ 2 lines Eyes with 20/20 or betterEyes with 20/20 or better  Baseline: 50%  5 years: 31%

October 2006 VA Loss at 5 Years by Advanced AMD Status and Treatment Group Advanced AMD ≥ 3 Line Loss at 5 YearsTreated Observed at 5 YearsTreated Observed Present 60%54% Absent 10%11%

October 2006 Secondary Vision Outcomes 5-Year Results from CAPT

October 2006 Adverse Events No immediate complications of treatment at either initial or 12-month treatmentNo immediate complications of treatment at either initial or 12-month treatment (burns to foveal avascular zone, breaks in Bruch’s membrane, hemorrhage) (burns to foveal avascular zone, breaks in Bruch’s membrane, hemorrhage) Loss of ≥6 lines of VA not due to AMD or cataractLoss of ≥6 lines of VA not due to AMD or cataract  Treated eyes:0.6%  Observed eyes: 1.3%

October 2006 Summary Treated and observed eyes were very similar at 5 years after enrollment on:Treated and observed eyes were very similar at 5 years after enrollment on:  3-line loss in VA  Incidence of Advanced AMD (CNV & GA)  Change in contrast threshold  Change in critical print size  Adverse events Laser treatment as applied in CAPT had no clinically significant beneficial or harmful effectLaser treatment as applied in CAPT had no clinically significant beneficial or harmful effect

October Year Results from CAPT

October 2006 Principal Investigators of Clinical Centers Donald W. Park, MD Mesa, AZ Robert N. Johnson, MD San Francisco, CA Peter Reed Pavan, MD Tampa, FL Baker Hubbard III, MD Atlanta, GA Alice Lyon, MD Chicago, IL David Orth, MD Harvey, IL James C. Folk, MD Iowa City, IA Charles C. Barr, MD Louisville, KY Jeffrey Heier, MD Boston, MA Susan B. Bressler, MD Baltimore, MD

October 2006 Principal Investigators of Clinical Centers Michael Trese, MD Royal Oak, MI Colin A. McCannel, MD Rochester, MN Gilbert Grand, MD St. Louis, MO Andrew N. Antoszyk, MD Charlotte, NC Steven R. Leff, MD Edison, NJ Lawrence J. Singerman, MD Cleveland, OH Frederick H. Davidorf, MD Columbus, OH Richard F. Dreyer, MD Portland, OR Michael L. Klein, MD Portland, OR Juan E. Grunwald, MD Philadelphia, PA Gary Edd Fish, MD Dallas, TX Suresh R. Chandra, MD Madison, WI

October 2006 CAPT Resource Centers at the University of Pennsylvania Chairman’s Office Stuart L. Fine, MD Reading Center Judith Alexander Coordinating Center Maureen G. Maguire, PhD

October 2006 Appendix

Serous PED Without Apparent CNV Not commonNot common  2 treated eyes  5 untreated eyes Included as part of Advanced AMDIncluded as part of Advanced AMD

October 2006 Prophylactic Treatment of AMD (PTAMD) Multi-Centered Trial - Design Bilateral Study reported by Friberg at ARVO 2006Bilateral Study reported by Friberg at ARVO 2006 Eligibility criteriaEligibility criteria  ≥5 drusen ≥63 microns in each eye  VA ≥20/63 Randomized assignment of one eye to a single treatment of 48 subthreshold diode laser burns at initial visitRandomized assignment of one eye to a single treatment of 48 subthreshold diode laser burns at initial visit 639 patients (1278 eyes) enrolled639 patients (1278 eyes) enrolled

October 2006 PTAMD – Overall Results CNV incidenceCNV incidence  No difference between treated and observed eyes at 3 years Mean VA at 2 yearsMean VA at 2 years  Treated eyes 1.5 letters better than observed (p=0.04) Percentage with ≥2 line VA gain at 2 yearsPercentage with ≥2 line VA gain at 2 years  12% Treated vs 8% Observed

October 2006 PTAMD – Subgroup Results Eyes with initial VA 20/32 to 20/63 (n=?)Eyes with initial VA 20/32 to 20/63 (n=?) At 2 yrs TreatedObservedAt 2 yrs TreatedObserved  ≥2 line gain: 31% 19% p=0.02  ≥2 line loss: 13% 22% p=0.04 CAPT subgroup: initial VA 20/32-20/40 in 1 or both eyes (n= 385) at 2 yrsCAPT subgroup: initial VA 20/32-20/40 in 1 or both eyes (n= 385) at 2 yrs  ≥2 line gain: 7% 5%  ≥2 line loss: 11% 14% CAPT subgroup at 5 yrsCAPT subgroup at 5 yrs  ≥2 line loss: 33% 33%

29 Initial Visit 12 Months Observed Eye - <50% Drusen Reduction at 12 months

30 Initial Visit12 Months Observed Eye - <50% Drusen Reduction at 12 months

31 Observed Eye - <50% Drusen Reduction at 12 months Initial Visit12 Months

32 Observed Eye - <50% Drusen Reduction at 12 months Initial Visit12 Months

33 Observed Eye - >50% Drusen Reduction at 12 months Initial Visit12 Months

34 Observed Eye - >50% Drusen Reduction at 12 months Initial Visit12 Months

35 Initial Visit12 Months Treated Eye - <50% Drusen Reduction at 12 months

36 Initial Visit12 Months Treated Eye - <50% Drusen Reduction at 12 months

37 Initial Visit12 Months Treated Eye - <50% Drusen Reduction at 12 months

38 Treated Eye - >50% Drusen Reduction at 12 months Initial Visit12 Months

39 Treated Eye - >50% Drusen Reduction at 12 months Initial Visit12 Months

40 Treated Eye - >50% Drusen Reduction at 12 months Initial Visit12 Months

41 Treated Eye - >50% Drusen Reduction at 12 months Initial Visit12 Months

42 Treated Eye - >50% Drusen Reduction at 12 months Initial Visit12 Months