CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine The effect of anaesthetics on the developing neonatal brain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Study Quality and Publication Bias in Experimental Stroke

Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.

AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory

Evidence into Practice: how to read a paper Rob Sneyd (with help from...Andrew F. Smith, Lancaster, UK)

The Application of Propensity Score Analysis to Non-randomized Medical Device Clinical Studies: A Regulatory Perspective Lilly Yue, Ph.D.* CDRH, FDA,

OPTN Modifications to Heart Allocation Policy Implemented July 12, 2006 Changed the allocation order for medically urgent (Status 1A and 1B) patients Policy.

Chronic disease self management – a systematic review of proactive telephone applications Carly Muller Dean Schillinger Division of General Internal Medicine.

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Study Quality and Publication Bias in Experimental Studies of Neurological Diseases Emily S Sena,

Summarising what we already know – the pivotal role of systematic reviews Malcolm Macleod.

Summarising the evidence from animal models of neurological disease: Publication bias, poor internal validity, and (perhaps) some efficacy Malcolm Macleod.

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Stanford visit 8 Feb 2011.

Modelling Stroke in the Laboratory - Separating Fact from Artefact The impact of sources of bias in animal models of neurological disease, and what we.

Summarising the evidence from animal models of neurological disease: Are there any babies in the bathwater? Malcolm Macleod University of Edinburgh.

Improving the internal validity of experiments in focal ischaemia

Preventing introduction of bias at the bench: from randomizing to experimental results meta-analysis Malcolm Macleod Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences,

Summarising the evidence from animal models of neurological disease: Publication bias, poor internal validity, and (perhaps) some efficacy Malcolm Macleod.

Stem cells: (How) do they work? Malcolm Macleod, Jen Lees, Emily Sena, Hanna Vesterinen, Simon Koblar, David Howells.

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine The failure to translate the basic science into therapy is due primarily to inadequacies in the.

Critical appraisal of research Sarah Lawson

What is a review? An article which looks at a question or subject and seeks to summarise and bring together evidence on a health topic.

Break Time Remaining 10:00.

The basics for simulations

What Works in Undergraduate Science Education? 1 Heidi Iverson, Colorado State University OECD France Workshop Education for Innovation: the Role of Arts.

Localisation and speech perception UK National Paediatric Bilateral Audit. Helen Cullington 11 April 2013.

Randomized Controlled Trial

EXPERIMENTAL PAPERS IN THE BJS – LESSONS LEARNED AND ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT Editors Assistant Project Malin Sund 2011.

1 Cell-Free Hemoglobin-Based Blood Substitutes and Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Death Natason et al., JAMA, Prepublished online April 28, 2008 at.

Opportunities for Prevention & Intervention in Child Maltreatment Investigations Involving Infants in Ontario Barbara Fallon, PhD Assistant Professor Jennifer.

Artificial Intelligence

Introducing... Reproduced and modified from a presentation produced by Zoë Debenham from the original presentation created by Kate Light, Cochrane Trainer.

Clock will move after 1 minute

Secondary Data Analysis: Systematic Reviews & Associated Databases

Select a time to count down from the clock above

Gender effects in a randomized trial of individual tutoring with children in care Robyn Marquis & Robert J. Flynn School of Psychology & Centre for Research.

David Howells For the CAMARADES Collaboration STAIR A starting point for evidence-based translational medicine in stroke.

Systematic reviews of animal studies Malcolm Macleod.

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Optimizing the Predictive Value of Pre-Clinical Research Session 3: Reviewer Perspective Malcolm.

Rattan Juneja MD¹; Michael E. Stuart, MD 2,3 ; Sheri A. Strite 3 Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana¹ University of Washington,

15 de Abril de A Meta-Analysis is a review in which bias has been reduced by the systematic identification, appraisal, synthesis and statistical.

Campbell Collaboration Colloquium 2012 Copenhagen, Denmark The effectiveness of volunteer tutoring programmes Dr Sarah Miller Centre.

Gut-directed hypnotherapy for functional abdominal pain or irritable bowel syndrome in children: a systematic review Journal club presentation

Felix I. Zemel, MPH DrPH Student Tufts University School of Medicine.

E. McLaughlin, P. D. Chakravarty, D. Whittaker, E. Cowan, K. Xu, E. Byrne, D.M. Bruce, J. A. Ford University of Aberdeen.

Developing Research Proposal Systematic Review Mohammed TA, Omar Ph.D. PT Rehabilitation Health Science.

Background Information : Projected prevalence of arthritis is expected to increase from 2.9 million to 6.5 million Canadians, a rise of 124% (Badley.

DALLA CLINICA AL LABORATORIO: TRASLAZIONE INVERSA Milano 3 Febbraio 2009 SILVIO GARATTINI.

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Evidence based translational medicine Experimental Studies Systematic review and meta-analysis how.

Systematic Reviews.

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine What could be going wrong? Randomisation and blinding.

Division of Population Health Sciences Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn Diagnostic accuracy of the STRATIFY clinical.

Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.

Appraising Randomized Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews October 12, 2012 Mary H. Palmer, PhD, RN, C, FAAN, AGSF University of North Carolina at Chapel.

Critical Appraisal of the Scientific Literature

Wipanee Phupakdi, MD September 15, Overview  Define EBM  Learn steps in EBM process  Identify parts of a well-built clinical question  Discuss.

EBM Conference (Day 2). Funding Bias “He who pays, Calls the Tune” Some Facts (& Myths) Is industry research more likely to be published No Is industry.

Objectives  Identify the key elements of a good randomised controlled study  To clarify the process of meta analysis and developing a systematic review.

Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.

1 Lecture 10: Meta-analysis of intervention studies Introduction to meta-analysis Selection of studies Abstraction of information Quality scores Methods.

Protocol Launch Meeting and Research Skills Course September 16 th 2015, RCS England Searching the Literature.

1 Lecture 10: Meta-analysis of intervention studies Introduction to meta-analysis Selection of studies Abstraction of information Quality scores Methods.

Systematic review of Present clinical reality

25 – 26 March 2013 University of Oxford Intubation or CPAP ?

Reporting quality in preclinical studies Emily S Sena, PhD Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of

Abstract # Rates of Complications and Required Additional Surgical Interventions after Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment in Lumbar Spondylosis:

Evidence-Based Medicine

Chapter 7 The Hierarchy of Evidence

Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing

Google Scholar: 8,554 publications Systematic search:

Level of Evidence Lecture 4.

Presentation transcript:

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine The effect of anaesthetics on the developing neonatal brain: A systematic review and meta-analysis Robert Stewart (Neuroscience Honors Student) Christopher Ng, Gillian Currie, Marta Seretny, Emily Sena

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Clinical background Animal Data suggests GA’s are neurotoxic in neonates Both histological and behavioural evidence Unclear how this translates to humans FDA suggests avoiding ALL elective surgery in < 3 yo RCOA + APAGBI no ‘set rules’ Ongoing human studies (SMARTTOTS, PANDA)

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Why do we do meta-analysis of animal studies? Preclinical studies are performed to inform human health Used in preclinical research to: –assess the quality and range of evidence –identify gaps in the field –assess for publication bias –try to explain discrepancies between preclinical and clinical trial results –inform clinical trial design Used in clinical research to provide summary estimates to inform clinical practice

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Aim: To identify all In vivo studies reporting the impact of clinically used anaesthetics on the developing brain (behavioural and/or histological measures) Assess the internal validity of existing animal data To provide an unbiased summary of the animal data

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Methods Systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase and Web of Knowledge Screen the articles using a predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria (2 reviewers) The publications were then assessed for quality using a modified CAMARADES checklist (MacLeod et al. 2004) Data extracted and meta analysis performed

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Search Results

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Search Results

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Reported Study Quality Median score 3/7 (IQR 3-5) CRITERIA Number out of 66 (%) Blinding of outcome 26 (39%) Random Group allocation 39 (58%) Treatment Allocation Concealment 5 (7%) Sample Size Calculation 2 (3%) Report conflict of interest 19 (28%) Animal Welfare Report 65 (97%)

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Results Outcome Specific outcome measure Effect size (95% CI) InterpretationComparisonsTotal animals Histological (NMD) Apoptosis 36.1% (30.6, 41.5) (SMD) Neurodegeneration 0.16 SD (-0.014, 0.34) Behavioural (SMD) MWM - Memory 0.37 SD (0.21, 0.53) (SMD) MWM – Learning 0.06 (-0.07, 0.19) (SMD) Fear Conditioning0.92 (0.59, 1.27)9109

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Conclusions Quality of reporting low (impacts on effect size estimate) Larger effects in apoptosis than in behavioural measures (how clinically relevant is this?) Very few non human primates (worse apoptosis in this group?) Amount of apoptosis appears to decreases with increase in age

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Future Work Clear need for more human data Awaiting results of human trials Need for more robust approach to animal reporting Impact of surgery needs to be assessed More primate research

CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine References