Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 of 17 Information Strategy The Features of an Information Strategy © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Strategy The.
Advertisements

Scaling up the global initiative on the implementation of the SNA and supporting statistics Meeting on Scaling up the coordination and resources for the.
HELPING THE NATION SPEND WISELY Performance audit and evaluation: common ground with Internal Audit ? The UK National Audit Office experience Jeremy Lonsdale.
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
ARMENIA: Quality Assurance (QA) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Tbilisi Regional Seminar on Quality Management in the Context of National.
Developing an Evaluation Strategy – experience in DFID Nick York Director – Country, Corporate and Global Evaluations, World Bank IEG Former Chief Professional.
Informing and engaging stakeholders Which stakeholder groups should be informed and engaged in preparing and using the policy brief? What contextual factors.
Campus Improvement Plans
Knowledge translation tool: A workbook for the contextualization of global health systems guidance at the national or subnational level _ CPHA, Toronto.
Putting Research Evidence to Work Research Seminar 14 th January 2009.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Knowing What Works in Health Care : A Roadmap for the Nation Alliance for Health Reform April 4, 2008 Wilhelmine Miller, MS, PhD GWU SPHHS.
Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?
Purpose of the Standards
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
TC176/IAF ISO 9001:2000 Auditing Practices Group.
From Evidence to EMS Practice: Building the National Model Eddy Lang, MD, CFPC (EM), CSPQ SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Montreal, Canada.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Capacity building for NGOs to support people to make healthy choices and take an active role in maintaining good health and wellbeing.
IWRM PLAN PREPARED AND APPROVED. CONTENT Writing an IWRM plan The content of a plan Ensuring political and public participation Timeframe Who writes the.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Regulatory expectations and current good practice Charles Cattell The Cattellyst Consultancy.
Sina Keshavaarz M.D Public Health &Preventive Medicine Measuring level of performance & sustaining improvement.
Developing a result-oriented Operational Plan Training
Participatory research to enhance climate change policy and institutions in the Caribbean: ARIA toolkit pilot 27 th meeting of the CANARI Partnership January.
Report on the Evaluation Function Evaluation Office.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Strategic Plan th October Management and Governance “GeSCI’s corporate structures and management arrangements were appropriate for.
NIPEC Organisational Guide to Practice & Quality Improvement Tanya McCance, Director of Nursing Research & Practice Development (UCHT) & Reader (UU) Brendan.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment 1.2 Discuss approaches to auditing the capabilities and capacity of an college in or der to evaluate its readiness.
Results The final report was presented to NICE and published by NICE and WHO. See
Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review What do we mean by confidence in a systematic review and in an estimate of effect? How should.
Governance and Commissioning Natalie White DCSF Consultant
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Using the AGREE¹ Instrument CAN-IMPLEMENT Toolkit Version 1.0 April 2010 Modified from:
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Introduction to policy briefs What is a policy brief? What should be included in a policy brief? How can policy briefs be used? Getting started.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Briefing Michael Mulvey PhD Director of Academic Affairs and Registrar
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Building Strong Library Associations | Sustaining Your Library Association BSLA Stakeholders Workshop Yaounde, Cameroon, April 2012 Managing Relationships.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster.
Partnership Health: Evaluation and possibilities for an adapted structure Agenda item 11 Madhavi Bajekal, ONS (UK) PH coordinator Directors of Social Statistics.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Responsibilities and functions of the regulatory body Objectives of regulatory functions Organizational.
TC176/IAF ISO 9001:2000 Auditing Practices Group.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
Internal Audit Quality Assessment Guide
Australian National Audit Office Better Practice Guide: Implementation of Programme and Policy Initiatives Presentation to the Canberra PMI Chapter 7 March.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Global and regional programmes in support of 2020 Round Population and Housing censuses United Nations Regional Workshop on the 2020 World Programme on.
LEARNING REPORT 2016 Disasters and Emergencies Preparedness Programme
school self-evaluation and improvement toolkit
Establish you aims from the outset
Taking the STANDARDS Seriously
Reviewing Governmental and Regulatory Responsibilities
Peru Draft R-PP: Initial comments by the TAP
Presentation transcript:

Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking

1. Do your organisational culture and values support the use of research evidence to inform decisions?

2. Does your organisation do a good job of setting priorities for obtaining research evidence to inform decisions?

3. Does your organisation do a good job of obtaining research evidence to inform decisions?

4. Does your organisation do a good job of assessing the quality and applicability of research evidence and interpreting the results to inform priority decisions?

5. Does your organisation do a good job of using research evidence to inform recommendations and decisions?

6. Does your organisation do a good job of monitoring and evaluating policies and programmes?

7. Does your organisation do a good job of supporting continuing professional development that addresses important topics and is evidence-based?

Lessons learned from the experience of organisations engaged in activities to support evidence-informed health policymaking Establish strong links between policymakers and researchers, and involve stakeholders in the work undertaken Be independent and manage conflicts of interest among those involved in the work Use appropriate methods and be transparent in the work Collaborate with other organisations Start small, have a clear audience and scope, and address important questions Build capacity among those working in the organisation Be attentive to implementation considerations even if implementation is not a remit

Strategies that can help to ensure collaboration between policymakers and researchers Locating those who support the use of research by policymakers within or close to those organisations responsible for policymaking Involving policymakers on an advisory board or steering committee in instances when organisations are located outside government or policymaking organisations Formal agreements linking academic organisations to policymaking organisations Using trusted individuals as ‘knowledge brokers’ to build relationships among researchers and policymakers Involving policymakers in research processes such as the preparation of policy briefs Involving researchers in policy-informing processes such as policy dialogues Skill development programmes for both policymakers and researchers

Options for managing conflicts of interest Specific, detailed, structured disclosure forms Explicit criteria to make decisions easier about whether a disclosed interest constitutes a conflict of interest Range of strategies to manage disclosed conflicts of interest –Public disclosure of conflicts associated with each meeting as a minimum prerequisite, through to –Recusal of conflicted individuals as the most extreme measure Standard policy requiring all financial ties to be made public Standing committee to review all financial disclosure statements and to help ensure that conflict of interest policies are enforced

Arrangements to ensure that independence is maintained Financial arrangements that minimise the risk of inappropriate influence on what evidence is summarised, or how it is summarised Management arrangements, including the involvement of independent stakeholders in advisory boards or steering groups Mechanisms for managing disputes such as independent arbitrators or appeal processes, particularly for governmental agencies that fund the work and for industry Ensuring that decision making is transparent in terms of how evidence is accessed, appraised, summarised and publicly reported

Use of systematic and transparent methods Methods should be described in easily accessible documents Although organisational arrangements are likely to vary widely, a great deal of commonality in the methods that are used is likely - no need to reinvent the wheel Systematic and transparent methods are time- consuming – it may sometimes be helpful to use more rapid methods that are “quick but clean enough”

Ensuring adequate capacity Collaborate with other organisations, both informally and formally, to learn from their experience in order to avoid the unnecessary duplication of efforts, to draw on their capacity, and to help build capacity Build capacity among those working in the organisation through training, making the best use of available staff (numbers are often limited), and actions aimed at retaining skilled staff Start small, have a clear scope, and address important questions in order to ensure that available resources are focused on areas where they are needed most Use more rapid methods that are rigorous but less resource-intensive

Questions or comments?